Jump to content

blind-as-a-bat

Registered Users

Change your profile picture
  • Content Count

    929
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by blind-as-a-bat

  1. Glad your amused Wintry, but not as amused as me,i shall leave it there;)
  2. With all due respect (and as we seem to have a mutual acquaintance, I do mean that) no you missed where I was coming from entirely. The only line in my post that was important was the last one. I can post anything I like, and it can not be verified, the same can be said of anyone posting on any forum. So whether your question is valid, or not, is academic, as the answer is irrelevant without any form of confirmation. I trust you see the logic in that statement? But that said, I do agree with you concerns to a point, but I have the luxury of seeing this from a desp
  3. Dam, I know I should leave this be, but can not break the (bad:p) habit of a lifetime. I won’t use the obvious puns. From your posts you seem very knowledgeable of matters regarding the intermediaries ‘handbook’, not conclusive, but could indicate you are in the debt advice sector. But I can not ignore the possibility you are an authorised intermediary, or connected too a company that is an authorised competent authoritie, this causes me a slight problem, as that sector has both free and profit making firms in it. There is also something else i can not ignore. As
  4. ............ but in some IVA agreemants if you cannot free up the equity expected, the IVA may last longer. Depends if the IP needs to make the 'if' 'or' offer to get the creditors agreemant. If you have no equity, after all secured debts, then the property in nearly all cases, or to be more accurate any future equity in the property, can be bought back from the official reciever for £1 plus legal fees (£250-460). So Bankruptcy may be an option, without loseing your home, but they may take into consideration the cost of the mortgage against cost of local rentals, so it is not ju
  5. and if they did, the debtors would be asking why they have, whats the catch? Fun this game;) Just a shame thats what it has ended up as, a sick game
  6. Ok, after swapping a few PM's with James, and as a sign of good faith, I will retract part of the above post. The app is not ready to do what it claims, I still maintain that fact, but I see the potential, and I can see this ‘idea’ filling a ‘void’, but to present it as it is now still makes it dangerous. I Suggest it is, for now, presented as a ‘work in progress’ which to be fair is what James has hinted at from the start, but it is not a solution yet, it still has a long way to go. I am sorry this post is a bit vague, but what has been discussed is not for me to disclos
  7. Have you included some measures to make sure the user does not exceed the CFS? if not, your wasting your time, it will never be recognised by creditors, but more to the point, you wasting the time, and creating more stress for those that use it. But also, have you built in some safeguards to protect the user from under estimating there realistic financial needs? I already know the answer, and you know I do James This app IS dangerous, and pointless, as it does not contain the safeguards needed to give it credibility nor protect the user. Bank fodder, if this is of no benef
  8. Oh, and yes, i know where this is going, after the ruling at the end of last year, already figured that one out ;-)
  9. Finaly got a reason to dust this of and update, and trust me, this is the iceing on the cake:rolleyes: Well, Brian must not have fancied it, but it looks like Moorcroft have lost the plot, after sending this in March last year I got another one of these yesterday. Just when you thought they could not make themselves look any dafter, they do
  10. Or in HTML on my site, a link has been posted on another thread on CAG somewhere;) Have sent you a PM, im up to my neck in it too, so was a bit rushed, hope it makes some sense
  11. first question - Why does it link to third parties, and who do you link too? To prepare an offer to creditors, you must first prepare a budget that allows for your reasonable domestic needs, then deivide whats left between your creditors fairly, the question is, as it is a fact people in debt lose focus on the true cost of living, how does your software make sure the user is being realistic? And what are those figures based on?
  12. The Common financial statement (CFS) trigger figures are a totally different set of figures, and are used for the preparation of offers of reduced payment or DMP’s by the likes of CAB, CCCS etc. The figures are agreed to be the amount required to live on by most major banks and creditors, and should be accepted without question when a SOA or I&E is prepared using them. The trigger figures are not available to the general public, and are somewhat of a guarded secret, three guesses why that is. In reality, they mean very little, and don’t get accepted, nor stop the harassment as mu
  13. Must admit the thought crossed my mind more than once babybear while converting that spread sheet to html, but you can not realy look at it like that. The trouble with those figures are they are just a national average of what people spend for a given household unit, and include the use of credit, so are not that good a guide. Every OR's office will adjust them, up or down, for regional variations, but most importantly, what your allowed is not set in stone. Just a shame some OR examiners and potential BR's don’t realise that and treat that chart as the Holy Grail. The bott
  14. Strangly, the point my judge realised that, or should i say i pointd it out, is the point he decided to throw the case out, but then there where other factors, like them not showing up for the hearing, so he was already a bit miffed at them:p
  15. Have you taken any steps to verify the claims of HC that a new or resurrection of the old order has been filed at court, and checked with the court that it has? By the way, is there any profit (equity) in the sale for you and the ex, in other words, is there any profit for HC to try a second time for a CO now. You have to ask is the timing fate, or have they been watching for your property going up for sale? May seem a bit of a stretch, but i do wonder in this modern age of information technology just what they can subscribe too to raise a flag, if you see what i mean Edit-
  16. You say the application was discharged, yet it appears that HC now seem to be claiming otherwise, yet you have no clarification from any source. Does that not classify as odd? Sorry if my posts came across the wrong way, maybe i should have been more specific, I do not doubt you, more the claims of HC, but there is nothing concrete…..yet
  17. While i do not wish to imply they are doing so in this case, as i have no basis to say they are, i do have personal experience of HC fabricating documents, and basically lying to suite there goals, in the form of a fabricated witness statement, a point noticed by the judge in my case, and was the deciding factor to him throwing the case out. While i am not sure if that may be the case here, your posts on events do seem odd. All i would say, until you or your ex get notification from the land registry a CO of any form has been lodged, or official paperwork from the court implying it
  18. Trust me, it is better i keep my thoughts to myself, if i am wrong i would be doing you a disservice, and if so you have my apologies, but if i am right you will already know my thoughts. A charging order can not be past too the new owners, if the sale goes thru without objection, even if a charging order was in place, that is the fault of the holder of the charge
  19. Sorry to jump in at the end f the thread, but see my case here re forged DN, http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/legal-issues/152198-can-anyone-tell-me.html Not sure if yous was from CL or GE, but they are definatly forgeing docs under the name of GE, they can not even get the postcode of GE's registered office correct. Not only that they supplied a totaly differant set of T&C's, claiming they where a 'reconstruction' of the origanals, shame the paragraph numbers did not match the allledged front page;)
  20. That is a strange, very carefully worded post, from a new poster, i would be intrested to hear the legal argumant to how a CO could be filed against the new owners of the property, while i am the first to admit, property is not my strong point, i know enough people that would argue that point;) If the CO is not final, and the sale goes thrue, CL/HC have yet again screwed up, i dont see how that is possible to hold the new owners liable:???: I will keep further comments to myself, for now:cool:
  21. michris from MSE i presume? have i got the right thread? In short they are taking a gamble you have equity in the property and you are entitled to a beneficial interest of said equity. That basically means if your house is worth 200k, and the outstanding mortgage and any debt secured on the property is less, you can be seen to have money in the property, for arguments sake, lets say after the mortgage and any secured debt is settled, that amount is 50k, you will be perceived to have a beneficial interest of 25k, unless the situation donates otherwise and it can be argued your ‘share’
  22. So pleased for you Skegleg, one less thing to worry about. Strange though, my OH got the same 'not in dispute as far as we a concerned' letter from cabot. Cabot a lowells are not connected are they, they seem to be useing the same wording and timing? I have bigger fish to play with, so not that bothered, but so glad your sorted
  23. OK now we may have something to fight back with i think, need some confirmation here, i am a bit rusty at this, but you can not recieve a DN on an account that has already been terminated if i remember rightly, and a creditor can not demand the full sum unless a valid DN has been issued, and doing so is deemed as termination of the contract Bingo, GE demanded the full sum, which they can only do ,lawfully, after issueing a DN, if they did not issue a DN, by demanding the full ammount they terminated there own agreemant. Whichever it is, what exactly has CL issued a D
×
×
  • Create New...