Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • You will probably get a couple more reminders followed by further demands fro unregulated debt collectors with even increasing amounts to pay. They are all designed to scare you into paying.  Don't. It's a scam site and they do not know who was driving and they know the keeper is not liable to pay the PCN. Also the shop was closed so they have no legitimate interest in keeping the car park clear. So to charge £100 is a penalty as there is no legitimate interest which means that the case would be thrown out if it went to Court.  Keep your money in your wallet and be prepared to ignore all their letters and threats. Doubtful they would go to Court since a lot more people would not pay when they heard  MET lost in Court. However they may just send you a Letter of Claim to test your resolve.  If yoy get one of those, come back to us and we will advise a snotty letter to send them.  You probably already have, but take a look through some of our past Met PCNs to see how they are doing.
    • Hello, been a while since I posted on here, really hoping for the same support an advice I received last time :-) Long, long story for us, but basically through bad choices, bad luck and bad advice ended up in an IVA in 2016. The accounts involved all defaulted, to be expected. In 2018, I got contacted by an 'independent advisor' advising me that I shouldn't be in an IVA, that it wasn't the solution for our circumstances and that they would guide us through the process of leaving the IVA and finding a better solution. I feel very stupid for taking this persons advice, and feel they prey on vulnerable people for their own financial gain (it ended with us paying our IVA monthly contribution to them)-long and short of it our IVA failed in 2018. At the same time the IVA failed we also had our shared ownership property voluntarily repossessed (to say this was an incredibly stressful time would be an understatement!) When we moved to our new (rented) property in August 2018, I was aware that creditors would start contacting us from the IVA failure. I got advice from another help website and started sending off SARs and CCAs request letters. I was advised not to bury my head and update our address etc and tackle each company as they came along. Initially there was quite a lot of correspondence, and I still get a daily missed call from PRA group (and the occasional letter from them), but not much else. However, yesterday i had a letter through from Lowell (and one from Capital One) advising that they had bought my debt and would like to speak with me regarding the account. There will be several.of these through our door i suspect, as we did have several accounts with Capital One. Capital One have written to us with regular statements over the last 5 years, and my last communication with them was to advise of of our new address (June 2019), I also note that all of these accounts received a small payment in Jan2019 (i'm assuming the funds from the failed IVA pot). Really sorry for the long long post, but just thought id give (some of) the background for context.... I guess my question at the moment is.....how do I respond to Lowell...do I wait for the inevitable other letters to arrive then deal with them all together or individually...? Do I send them a CCA?  Many thanks
    • hi all just got the reminder letter, I have attached it and also the 2nd side of the original 1st pcn (i just saw the edit above) Look forward to your advice Thanks   PCN final reminder.pdf pcn original side 2.pdf
    • The airline said it was offering to pay $10,000 to those who sustained minor injuries.View the full article
    • The Senate Finance Committee wants answers from BMW over its use of banned Chinese components by 21 June.View the full article
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Tilly V mortgage express repo


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5724 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 1.5k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Hi Tilly

 

What a lot to think about you have to do the best for you and your familly,

My old mum had a saying knock on ever door possible and one will open

All I can say is is that I have been through some really tough times but knock on all the doors and one will open and you will get through

Take care

 

Bonaxxxx

Link to post
Share on other sites

Way to go Tills ! - what a difference a week can make eh? :) I admire your spirit girl

 

Ell x

Help us to keep on helping

Please consider making a donation, however small, if you have benefited from advice on the forums

 

 

This site is run solely on donations

 

My advice is based on my opinion and experience only. It is not to be taken as legal advice - if you are unsure you should seek professional help.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Your doing great there Tills, keep your chin up hun!23_32_7.gif

--------------------------------

If you approve of my Post, please tip my scales.

13/07/07 **WON** Halifax

Any advice or opinion I give, is what I have learnt from CAG, If in doubt, please consult a professional.

 

[sIGPIC][/sIGPIC]

Link to post
Share on other sites

The council's Benefits and Taxation Unit Manager Bev Wright explained: "This might seem like the perfect solution, freeing up equity and clearing debts, while still allowing people to remain living in their own homes.

 

"But what many people don't realise is that they are only eligible for housing benefit if they can show that they wouldn't have been able to carry on living in their home if they hadn't sold it. Otherwise they will have to wait five years before being able to claim benefit. Also, if selling their house leaves them with savings of more than £16,000, they will not be able to claim housing benefit

Link to post
Share on other sites

No Tills,

 

You need to show proof of income, proof of outgoings, and then proof that you dont have savings exceeding £16,000. You should check these figures with your local council though and apply for housing benefit straight away if possible. Put it on your list of questions for your meeting with the Council Thursday. Don't leave without answers as time is pushing on, and we need a definite solution as soon as possible (even to take the pressure off you). From what you've said you should qualify no problem.

 

Heed the warnings posted here very carefully, if you deal with the wrong company, they could have the house anyway in 6-12 months. Contact numerous and read the small print before you sign up to anything. The main thing is making sure you will be entitled to Housing Benefit and the company will accept this, and you can remain in the house indefinitely (providing you don't default).

 

Also getting the maximum price for your house. Check with the Land Registry online (free) for details of properties similar to yours which have been sold recently. Make sure you don't get ripped off on the sale.

 

I know it feels like a marathon, but more effort now will help you later (when you won't be in control).

 

Also, do what Caro says and go the quacks. Tell them you are under stress and ask for tablets (which you can or can't take). This could help with future employment issues.

 

IMHO...Small blue fish in a big pond...

Link to post
Share on other sites

The blonde strikes again lol

 

Thanks Tide i see what you mean now, i have taken heed of the advice everyone

has given me, made no decision on which way to go as yet,

 

Have already benn to doc back there again thursday, your right it does feel like

a marathon but i still got a way to go yet before i reach the finish line.

 

Ok questions added to council list.

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Another question for the Council list:

 

"Would a local housing association be interested in buying my house and renting it back to me?".

 

I will check this angle out today.

 

Keep going Tilly, we will all get you there!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Shelter seem to have quite a bit of advice that might prove useful to you Tilly.

 

Shelter: Emergency help and advice

 

Shelter: Evicted or asked to leave

 

I think this suggestion is very sound and would endorse it. They will act in your interests and on your behalf in your dealings with the Council and potential homelessness situation.

 

They are recognised experts,.............. more so than a lot of local authority homelessness staff.

 

Tilly, post on sell to rent is now ready for you to have a look at.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Another question for the Council list:

 

List been updated :D

 

"Would a local housing association be interested in buying my house and renting it back to me?".

 

I will check this angle out today.

 

Keep going Tilly, we will all get you there!!

 

 

Thankyou :)

Link to post
Share on other sites

phew that was some reading.

 

i think my mind is made up now im getting WARNING signs don't do it, some of the story i have just read, or should say horror stories of some s of those people, i do do not want to become one of them, if 6months down the line they dont pay the mortgage, it starts all over again and i do not want to relive this again ever. So now i stand up and fight, when the time comes in court,and hope and pray i sell, or they let me stay until that time.

 

Thankyou kenny for providing all the links,

Link to post
Share on other sites

I'll bet your glad that is over, Tilly!:o

 

I was just providing the information available and it was not a problem. It might also be useful for others at some point.

 

It is for you to decide if it is for you as an option. There will be good points remember, its just that that side does not get reported. If you knew the person who was buying then it would be completely different.

 

I have outlined some of the issues to consider in the rent- back post above, so won't repeat them here.

 

Catch up later, Kenny.:)

  • Haha 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

catcha later kenny :) time for a brew me thinks :rolleyes:

 

 

Well some good news for a change, my son just rang,his boss who owns a storage co

has said if need be we can have storage space for 3 months free of charge :D so maybe things are starting to look up :rolleyes:

Link to post
Share on other sites

the only way is up tilly chin up love and the sell to rent back no for me i wouldnt do it but it is up to u is the house up for sale yet ?xxkia

Link to post
Share on other sites

Tills, I went to the Magistrates Court with step;son this morning & I managed to pick up the booklet (No.6) Losing Your Home, & it's quite a good source of information. I found this bit on page 4;

If you are homeless or likely to become homeless with in 28 days, the local council may have to offer you somewhere else to stay or live,temporarily or longer term.The offer of somewhere to live may also apply to someone who normally lives with you as a member of the family, & will depend on your circumstances. The council must offer you somewhere if you are;

" # Homeless through no fault of your own,

# In Priority need, &

# Eligible for assistance.

The rules that describe priority need in England are different to those in Wales. However, you are in priority need if:

# You are responsible for children,

# You or someone you live with is pregnant,

# You are homeless because of an emergency such as a fire, flood or other

disaster, or;

# You or someone you live with is vulnerable because of their old age, Physical

Disability or Mental Illness or for another special reason.

The way you become homeless will affect how long the council has to help you for. You may be entitled to only very short-term accommodation if the council decides that you are eligible for assistance & in priority need but 'intentionally homeless'. This may happen if:

# You choose to leave a home you could have stayed in,

# You didn't pay the rent when you could have afforded to,

# The council offered you a suitable place to live, but you didn't accept it,

# You made yourself homeless to take advantage of the system, or,

# You were evicted because of deliberate action or behaviour by you or someone else in the household.

However, the council should not claim that you were intentionally homeless if;

# Your home was unfit to live in,

# You lost your home for failing to to pay your rent or mortgage, for example because you lost your job or your benefit was not paid on time,

Even if the council says you are intentionally homeless, it still has to house you for a short time as long as you are eligible for assistance & in priority need. But this will only be long enough for you to find somewhere else to live (usually 28 days) .

 

  • Haha 1

--------------------------------

If you approve of my Post, please tip my scales.

13/07/07 **WON** Halifax

Any advice or opinion I give, is what I have learnt from CAG, If in doubt, please consult a professional.

 

[sIGPIC][/sIGPIC]

Link to post
Share on other sites

Tills, I went to the Magistrates Court with step;son this morning & I managed to pick up the booklet (No.6) Losing Your Home, & it's quite a good source of information. I found this bit on page 4;

If you are homeless or likely to become homeless with in 28 days, the local council may have to offer you somewhere else to stay or live,temporarily or longer term.The offer of somewhere to live may also apply to someone who normally lives with you as a member of the family, & will depend on your circumstances. The council must offer you somewhere if you are;

" # Homeless through no fault of your own,

# In Priority need, &

# Eligible for assistance.

The rules that describe priority need in England are different to those in Wales. However, you are in priority need if:

# You are responsible for children,

 

Have told them this fell on deaf ears

# You or someone you live with is pregnant,

 

:o

# You are homeless because of an emergency such as a fire, flood or other

disaster, or;

# You or someone you live with is vulnerable because of their old age, Physical

Disability or Mental Illness or for another special reason.

The way you become homeless will affect how long the council has to help you for. You may be entitled to only very short-term accommodation if the council decides that you are eligible for assistance & in priority need but 'intentionally homeless'. This may happen if:

# You choose to leave a home you could have stayed in,

N/A

# You didn't pay the rent when you could have afforded to,

N?A

# The council offered you a suitable place to live, but you didn't accept it,

# You made yourself homeless to take advantage of the system, or,

N/A

# You were evicted because of deliberate action or behaviour by you or someone else in the household.

However, the council should not claim that you were intentionally homeless if;

# Your home was unfit to live in,

# You lost your home for failing to to pay your rent or mortgage, for example because you lost your job or your benefit was not paid on time,

Even if the council says you are intentionally homeless, it still has to house you for a short time as long as you are eligible for assistance & in priority need. But this will only be long enough for you to find somewhere else to live (usually 28 days) .

 

 

 

 

Thanks jade i have another appointment with them on thursday, this time i am going to have all my paper work with me and my list of questions plus

my go sort it head on :)

 

Mr whats his face won't know what's hit him thursday:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

Glad to be of service Tills. All the bits in red are the ones that are applicable to your situation, so don't panic lol.

Good for you, don't let em fob you off, & tell you that your not a priority.

I haven't read this booklet all the way through yet, but if I come across anything, I'll let you know.

 

--------------------------------

If you approve of my Post, please tip my scales.

13/07/07 **WON** Halifax

Any advice or opinion I give, is what I have learnt from CAG, If in doubt, please consult a professional.

 

[sIGPIC][/sIGPIC]

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...