Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • The property was our family home.  A fixed low rate btl/ development loan was given (last century!). It was derelict. Did it up/ was rented out for a while.  Then moved in/out over the years (mostly around school)  It was a mix of rental and family home. The ad-hoc rents covered the loan amply.  Nowadays  banks don't allow such a mix.  (I have written this before.) Problems started when the lease was extended and needed to re-mortgage to cover the expense.  Wanted another btl.  Got a tenant in situ. Was located elsewhere (work). A broker found a btl lender, they reneged.  Broker didn't find another btl loan.  The tenant was paying enough to cover the proposed annual btl mortgage in 4 months. The broker gave up trying to find another.  I ended up on a bridge and this disastrous path.  (I have raised previous issues about the broker) Not sure what you mean by 'split'.  The property was always leasehold with a separate freeholder  The freeholder eventually sold the fh to another entity by private agreement (the trust) but it's always been separate.  That's quite normal.  One can't merge titles - unless lease runs out/ is forfeited and new one is not created/ granted.
    • Northmonk forget what I said about your Notice to Hirer being the best I have seen . Though it  still may be  it is not good enough to comply with PoFA. Before looking at the NTH, we can look at the original Notice to Keeper. That is not compliant. First the period of parking as sated on their PCN is not actually the period of parking but a misstatement  since it is only the arrival and departure times of your vehicle. The parking period  is exactly that -ie the time youwere actually parked in a parking spot.  If you have to drive around to find a place to park the act of driving means that you couldn't have been parked at the same time. Likewise when you left the parking place and drove to the exit that could not be describes as parking either. So the first fail is  failing to specify the parking period. Section9 [2][a] In S9[2][f] the Act states  (ii)the creditor does not know both the name of the driver and a current address for service for the driver, the creditor will (if all the applicable conditions under this Schedule are met) have the right to recover from the keeper so much of that amount as remains unpaid; Your PCN fails to mention the words in parentheses despite Section 9 [2]starting by saying "The notice must—..." As the Notice to Keeper fails to comply with the Act,  it follows that the Notice to Hirer cannot be pursued as they couldn't get the NTH compliant. Even if the the NTH was adjudged  as not  being affected by the non compliance of the NTK, the Notice to Hirer is itself not compliant with the Act. Once again the PCN fails to get the parking period correct. That alone is enough to have the claim dismissed as the PCN fails to comply with PoFA. Second S14 [5] states " (5)The notice to Hirer must— (a)inform the hirer that by virtue of this paragraph any unpaid parking charges (being parking charges specified in the notice to keeper) may be recovered from the hirer; ON their NTH , NPE claim "The driver of the above vehicle is liable ........" when the driver is not liable at all, only the hirer is liable. The driver and the hirer may be different people, but with a NTH, only the hirer is liable so to demand the driver pay the charge  fails to comply with PoFA and so the NPE claim must fail. I seem to remember that you have confirmed you received a copy of the original PCN sent to  the Hire company plus copies of the contract you have with the Hire company and the agreement that you are responsible for breaches of the Law etc. If not then you can add those fails too.
    • Weaknesses in some banks' security measures for online and mobile banking could leave customers more exposed to scammers, new data from Which? reveals.View the full article
    • I understand what you mean. But consider that part of the problem, and the frustration of those trying to help, is the way that questions are asked without context and without straight facts. A lot of effort was wasted discussing as a consumer issue before it was mentioned that the property was BTL. I don't think we have your history with this property. Were you the freehold owner prior to this split? Did you buy the leasehold of one half? From a family member? How was that funded (earlier loan?). How long ago was it split? Have either of the leasehold halves changed hands since? I'm wondering if the split and the leashold/freehold arrangements were set up in a way that was OK when everyone was everyone was connected. But a way that makes the leasehold virtually unsaleable to an unrelated party.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Debt collection hell, need advice & someone to talk to...


Peepo
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5527 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 127
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

That 's the spirit to adopt with these DCA morons, they don't understand that even with the best will in the world there are times when hardship strikes and you can't take in the slack or whatever any more without causing yourself real problems (ie not enough money for food or heating or transport to work...)

 

If the letter really is intimidating you should take it to Trading Standards and complain about it to them.

Link to post
Share on other sites

can you post up the letter, minus the personal info?

post office WON 12/11/06

 

abbey.LBA sent 30/10/06.MCOL claim submitted 8/11/06.allocation questionnaire sent 16/12/06.schedule of charges sent 16/12/06.WON

 

2nd abbey claim SAR sent 3/1/07.WON.complaint letter sent 18/1/08

 

alliance and Leicester.WON

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Peepo:)

 

I’m reading your thread with interest. I too suffered a nervous breakdown about four or five years ago and know exactly what you must be going through;)

 

Just to add to the advice already given – NEVER speak to any DCAs on the ‘phone - EVER – I have learnt that to my cost. If they do ring, do not answer any security questions and do not be drawn into a conversation with them at all no matter how nice they appear to be - tell them that you will correspond IN WRITING ONLY. I ended up getting caller ID which I didn’t realise was a free service, from BT.

 

If they are constantly ringing you, send them the Telephone Harassment letter Here – that should shut them up:p If they continue to ring, make sure you keep a log of all dates and times of 'phone calls.

 

 

Go get 'em Tiger:D

  • Haha 2
Link to post
Share on other sites

Just subscribing Peebo, letting you know that my situation was very similar to the circumstances you describe but now everything is in writing, I have had fantastic advice from this forum.

It looks like everyone has already pointed you in the right direction, keep posting let us know how you are getting along.

Best wishes

DS

  • Haha 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Thankyou for replies, I feel alittle better, still unable to muster a smile.

 

The letter said 'We allowed you to pay this account by instalments. In spite of this you have failed to pay your installments on time.

If you want the priviledge of paying by instalments you must pay every payment on time'

 

It was the privilege part that irked me the most. And incidentally the payment that I missed which they are referring to was the one for last Friday.

I read somewhere how debt collectors hassled a man till he commited suicide. I have been having these thoughts myself. A human being can only take so much ontop of everything Ive been through these last few years :-x

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Peepo.

 

Focus on the fact that you are now in control. As you read more and more on the site you will become familiar with the legal rights you have. Funnily enough creditors and DCAs aren't very good at volunteering such information. I can assure you the knowledge will give you strength.

 

Since joining this site i have realised that being in debt does not mean people are entitled to threaten or belittle me. Like you, i wanted to pay my debts, but using the CCA route bought me valuable time to start getting myself sorted.

 

Keep all paperwork, recorded delivery receipts and records of payments.

 

Keep posting and the support will continue.

 

Best wishes ;)

I'm midway through the tunnel, but getting closer to the light.

 

 

 

Please be aware that i am not an expert in anything!

I may offer an opinion, but the final decision is yours.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi, Peepo,

 

Hope I can help to raise your spirits a little.

 

I don't think anyone's yet mentioned to you about what might happen if the worst comes to the worst and the DCAs do take action against you -sounds scary, doesn't it? WELL MAYBE IT'S NOT AS BAD AS YOU THINK!!!!!!

 

Just relax and think about the worst , the very WORST scenario . . . . .

 

Say if you fall way behind on payments on an account, it is true that they may ask the courts for a County Court Judgement against you. This is a legal declaration that says, 'Miss X must pay Company Y the amount of £xxx per month.

 

Now, the important bit is this - the court will ask you to send in a declaration of income/expenditure etc to see how much you can afford. So you tell them. And they WILL only set a reasonable amount for you to pay off each month. Once this is in place the company CANNOT do any more about the debt UNLESS you start missing these payments.

 

Of course, you will have a CCJ listed against your credit record but at least the courts have given you a set amount, probably much lower than the DCAs would like, to pay off.

 

It is only if you disobeyed the court's payment plan that the company can apply for a Warrant where bailiffs become involved . . . and this is a long way off from your present position.

 

Anyway, it's geting late now and I have to say goodnight - but try to keep this in perspective, Peepo, and not let it take over your life - you've done the right thing by asking for help and you will get over this!!! I will post more tomorrow . . .!

 

Cheers, BAE

Link to post
Share on other sites

Peepo I have two lever arch files full of letters threatening all sorts of horrendous things. Eventually it reaches the stage where you just file them away with all the others, including the postcards telling you there is a parcel to collect (not) and so on. You do become immune to them eventually;)

  • Haha 1

BANK CHARGES

Nat West Bus Acct £1750 reclaim - WON

 

LTSB Bus Acct £1650 charges w/o against o/s balance - WON

 

Halifax Pers Acct £1650 charges taken from benefits - WON

 

Others

 

GE Money sec loan - £1900 in charges - settlement agreed

GE Money sec loan - ERC of £2.5K valid for 15 years - on standby

FirstPlus - missold PPI of £20K for friends - WON

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hiya Peepo :)

 

I too was in a very similar position and got the horredous treatment you're getting.

 

Contact either of these charities (free and excellent service from both):

National Debtline England & Wales | Contact National Debtline

CCCS - Contact Us

 

I'd also advise you to contact trading Standards ASAP regarding that horrible letter. Here's a link for them:

Trading Standards Central - Trading Standards and Consumer Protection information for the UK

 

Good luck and best wishes and please try and put all this in perspective. They want you to be terrified so you'll pay, but you have rights and now you're getting the help you deserve :)

Link to post
Share on other sites

I sent off the letters last week & recieved my first reply today.

 

This one is from Red Debt Collection... 'We are in receipt of your request for a copy of your credit agreement in accordance with section 78(1) of the Consumer Credit Act 1974.

We are also in receipt of the prescribed fee from you.

 

We are requesting a copy of the agreement from the original lender with whom you originally entered into the agreement.

 

While we endeavour to reply to you with the required information within the prescribed 12 day period under the Consumer Credit Act, you will appreciate this is dependent upon receipt of the information from the original credtor.'

 

I await the rst of the replies...

Link to post
Share on other sites

hmm. intersting that they chase you for a debt that they have no credit agreement for - therefore no right to collect!!!

 

idiotis morinnis!!!!

post office WON 12/11/06

 

abbey.LBA sent 30/10/06.MCOL claim submitted 8/11/06.allocation questionnaire sent 16/12/06.schedule of charges sent 16/12/06.WON

 

2nd abbey claim SAR sent 3/1/07.WON.complaint letter sent 18/1/08

 

alliance and Leicester.WON

Link to post
Share on other sites

I sent off the letters last week & recieved my first reply today.

 

This one is from Red Debt Collection... 'We are in receipt of your request for a copy of your credit agreement in accordance with section 78(1) of the Consumer Credit Act 1974.

We are also in receipt of the prescribed fee from you.

 

We are requesting a copy of the agreement from the original lender with whom you originally entered into the agreement.

 

While we endeavour to reply to you with the required information within the prescribed 12 day period under the Consumer Credit Act, you will appreciate this is dependent upon receipt of the information from the original credtor.'

 

I await the rst of the replies...

 

Hi Peepo.

 

Hope you are feeling ok. This is the first bit of breathing space then. Keep us posted, we'll all be here if you get stuck or just need to share ;-)

I'm midway through the tunnel, but getting closer to the light.

 

 

 

Please be aware that i am not an expert in anything!

I may offer an opinion, but the final decision is yours.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi, I am feeling low again after coming home & opening these letters.

It would appear that the 2 letters sent to DCA's with P.O BOX numbers have not been signed for as Royal Mail sais they havent been delivered & I am still recieving letters from them & having charges added to my account. Ive paid off £4 this month & they have added £13 charge!! What right do they have to do this??!!!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Peepo, it may take some time but if they can't produce a valid CCA then they can charge you £1300 a month but they ain't gonna get it. That's how I looked at ridiculous charges when I was in your situation. Remember that and you will feel much better.

  • Haha 2

BANK CHARGES

Nat West Bus Acct £1750 reclaim - WON

 

LTSB Bus Acct £1650 charges w/o against o/s balance - WON

 

Halifax Pers Acct £1650 charges taken from benefits - WON

 

Others

 

GE Money sec loan - £1900 in charges - settlement agreed

GE Money sec loan - ERC of £2.5K valid for 15 years - on standby

FirstPlus - missold PPI of £20K for friends - WON

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Peepo. Don't worry about not being able to track the letters. As long as you have the receipts to prove the letters went off.

 

Many companies do keep pestering for money because there will always be someone that will cave in and give them what they want. Until that agreement is produced they cannot do anyhting else other than make meaningless threats. Just file all the letters in case you decide to make a formal complaint at a later date.

 

Is it a credit card account that charges are being added to? If it is, don't forget these can be reclaimed.

 

Try not to worry.

  • Haha 1

I'm midway through the tunnel, but getting closer to the light.

 

 

 

Please be aware that i am not an expert in anything!

I may offer an opinion, but the final decision is yours.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Mm, it would appear my debts have been sold to DCA's, what right do these people have to sell my debt on to a company that will add their own charges? I agreed to account with original lender, not these people my debt has been sold to, how on earth do they get away with it? Was it in the small print I wonder?

Link to post
Share on other sites

They will do whatever they can as long as they can get away with it. You are now getting the hang of fighting back.

 

There are millions of people in debt in this country, those debts will be sold onto DCAs with far less scruples than the ones you're having to deal with. These people live in a commission based bubble, all they see is a way to get the new car, or holiday or whatever. You and I and millions like us, will pay for all of their jollies.

 

As Goldlady says, they can add whatever charges they want, it doesn't mean you're going to pay them.

 

Lets say that the DCA buys a debt of £100, they only pay a couple of pence for it. They aren't allowed to add their own collection charges because even if they find your CCA, those charges are contestable.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Okie, Red Debt collection havent been in touch since their last letter. But it has become apparent that the other 3 DCA's have ignored my letters because they are still sending me letters saying I owe them money & have not once mentioned my letter :confused:

 

 

That is expected behaviour Peepo. They keep putting on the pressure in the hope that the person they're harrassing crumbles.

 

Sit tight and see out the deadlines ;)

I'm midway through the tunnel, but getting closer to the light.

 

 

 

Please be aware that i am not an expert in anything!

I may offer an opinion, but the final decision is yours.

Link to post
Share on other sites

In that case, Peepo they have just exceeded the 12 + 2 days. Now you are entitled to withhold payment if you wish. After a further 30 days they will be in summary criminal default and could be reported to TS if they continue to demand payments.

 

You can either ignore the letters they're sending you or if you're not comfortable with that, send a non-compliance letter.

 

Try to read other threads in this forum, you will find many others who have been through this process.

 

:)

  • Haha 1

I'm midway through the tunnel, but getting closer to the light.

 

 

 

Please be aware that i am not an expert in anything!

I may offer an opinion, but the final decision is yours.

Link to post
Share on other sites

As Hopeful1 says deffinately complain to your local Trading Standards if they've passed the 12 + 2 and are continuining to demand payment. Here's the link:

Trading Standards Central - Trading Standards and Consumer Protection information for the UK

 

 

Hi BB - how you doing? :)

 

The complaint needs to be made after the 12+2 working days and the 30 days has passed, doesn't it?

 

Are they still looking into things for you?

I'm midway through the tunnel, but getting closer to the light.

 

 

 

Please be aware that i am not an expert in anything!

I may offer an opinion, but the final decision is yours.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...