Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • An update to this case as I’ve not been on in a while.    I am still awaiting a charging decision in the case. The two police officers involved have said their personal belief is a section 47 ABH charge is the most likely outcome but this isn’t a sure thing of course.    The EA certificate from the issuing court has now lapsed. The court have refused to recertify him until they’ve had a hearing in to the case, and the district judge has issued orders to surrender all evidence, footage, photos etc.    I have done so promptly.    the EA, not so much . Equita have claimed they cannot provide his bodycam footage as the camera he was wearing is the EA personal one not one of theirs.   the EA has claimed he has asked Equita and the police for the footage as he claims he doesn’t have it.    the police have confirmed they didn’t seize his camera and they don’t have it.    so they are basically pointing the finger at each other all the while failing to comply with the district judges order to provide all evidence they intend to rely on at the rescheduled hearing.    The district judge has stated the hearing for his certification will NOT be the hearing for my complaint as there is no charge as of yet, and just as to whether he should be recertified or not.    I’m not 100% on why that can’t be done at the time, but I’m not about to question a judge…..      
    • Thanks FTMDave, I like the cut of your jib - I'll go with that and obtain proof of postage. Encouraging that NPE have never followed through and seem to blowing hot air, let's see where they go after this   Regards
    • Please see my comments in orange within your post.
    • no i meant the email from parcel2go which email address did they send it from and who signed it off (whos name is at the bottom)
    • I understand confusion with this thread.  I tried to keep threads separate because there have been so many angles.    But a team member merged them all.  This is why it's hard to keep track. This forum exists to help little people fight injustice - however big or small.  Im here to try get a decent resolution. Not to give in to the ' big boys'. My "matter' became complicated 'matters' simply because a lender refused to sell a property. What can I say?  I'll try in a nutshell to give an overview: There's a long lease property. I originally bought it short lease with a s.146 on it from original freeholder.  I had no concerns. So lender should have been able to sell a well-maintained lovely long lease property.  The property was great. The issue is not the property.  Economy, sdlt increases, elections, brexit, covid, interest hikes etc didn't help.  The issue is simple - the lender wanted to keep it.   House or Flat? Before repo I offered to clear my loan.  I was a bit short and lender refused.  They said (recorded) they thought the property was worth much more and they were happy to keep accruing interest (in their benefit) until it reached a point where they felt they could repo and still easily quickly sell to get their £s back.  This was a mistake.  The market was (and is) tough.   2y later the lender ceo bid the same sum to buy the property for himself. He'd rejected higher offers in the intervening period whilst accruing interest. Lenders have a legal obligation to sell the property for the best price they can get. If they feel the offer is low they won't sell it, because it's likely the borrower will say the same. I had the property under offer to a fantastic niche buyer but lender rushed to repo and buyer got spooked and walked.  It had taken a long time to find such a lucrative buyer.  A sale which would have resulted in £s and another asset for me. Post repo lender had 1 offer immediately.  But dragged out the process for >1y - allegedly trying to get other offers. But disclosure shows there was only one valid buyer. Again, points as above. Lender appointed receiver (after 4 months) - simply to try acquire the freehold.  He used his powers as receiver to use me, as leaseholder, to serve notice on freeholders.  Legally that failed. Meanwhile lender failed to secure property - and squatters got in (3 times).  And they failed to maintain it.  So freeholders served a dilapidations notice (external) - on me as leaseholder (cc-ed to lender).   (That's how it works legally) Why serve a delapidations notice? If it's in the terms of the lease to maintain the property to a good standard, then serve an S146 notice instead as it's a clear breach of the lease. I don't own the freehold.  But I am a trustee and have to do right by the freeholders.  This is where matters got/ get complicated.  And probably lose most caggers.   Lawyers got involved for the freeholders to firstly void the receiver enfranchisement notice. Secondly, to serve the dilapidations notice.  The lack of maintenance was in breach of lease and had to be served to protect fh asset. Enfranchisement isn't something that can be "voided", it's in the Leasehold Reform Act 1967 that leaseholders have the right to buy the freehold of the property. It's normal, whether it is a "normal" leaseholder or a repossession with a leasehold house, to claim this right of enfranchisement and sell the property with said rights attached and the purchase price of the freehold included in the final completion price. That's likely what the mortgage provider wished to do. The lender did no repairs. They said a buyer would undertake them. Which was probably correct. If they had sold. After 1y lender finally agreed to sell to the 1st offeror and contracts went with lawyers.  Within 1 month lender reneged.  Lender tried to suggest buyer walked. Evidence shows he/ his lawyers continued trying to exchange (cash) for 4 months.  Evidence shows lender and receiver strategy had been to renege and for ceo to take control.   I still think that's their plan. Redact and scan said evidence up for others to look at? Lender then stupidly chose to pretty much bulldoze the property.  Other stuff was going on in the background. After repo I was in touch by phone and email and lender knew post got to me.   Despite this, after about 10 months (before and then during covid), they deliberately sent SDs and eventually a B petition to an incorrect address and an obscure small court.  They never served me properly.  (In hindsight I understand they hoped to get a backdoor B - so they could keep the property that way.)  Eventually the random court told them to email me by way of service.  At this point their ruse to make me B failed.  I got a lawyer (friend paid). The B petition was struck out. They’d failed to include the property as an asset. They were in breach of insolvency rules. So this is dealt with then. Simultaneously the receiver again appointed lawyers to act on my behalf as leaseholder. This time to serve notice on the freeholders for a lease extension.  He had hoped to try and vary the strict lease. Evidence shows the already long length of lease wasn't an issue.  The lender obviously hoped to get round their lack of permission to do works (which they were already doing) by hoping to remove the strict clauses that prevent leaseholder doing alterations.  You wouldn't vary a lease through a lease extension. You'd need a Deed of Variation for that. This may be done at the same time but the lease has already been extended once and that's all they have a right to. The extension created a new legal angle for me to deal with.  I had to act as trustee for freeholders against me as leaseholder/ the receiver.  Inconsistencies and incompetence by receiver lawyers dragged this out 3y.  It still isn't properly resolved. The lease has already been extended once so they have no right to another extension. It seems pretty easy to just get the lawyer to say no and stick by those terms as the law is on your side there. Meanwhile - going back to the the works the lender undertook. The works were consciously in breach of lease.  The lender hadn't remedied the breaches listed in the dilapidations notice.  They destroyed the property.  The trustees compiled all evidence.  The freeholders lawyers then served a forfeiture notice. This notice started a different legal battle. I was acting for the freeholders against what the lender had done on my behalf as leaseholder.  This legal battle took 3y to resolve. Again, order them to revert it as they didn't have permission to do the works, or else serve an S146 notice for breach of the lease. The simple exit would have been for lender to sell. A simple agreement to remedy the breaches and recompense the freeholders in compensation - and there's have been clean title to sell.  That option was proposed to them.   This happened by way of mediation for all parties 2y ago.  A resolution option was put forward and in principle agreed.  But immediately after the lender lawyers failed to engage.  A hard lesson to learn - mediation cannot be referred to in court. It's considered w/o prejudice. The steps they took have made no difference to their ability to sell the property.  Almost 3y since they finished works they still haven't sold. ** ** I followed up some leads myself.  A qualified cash buyer offered me a substantial sum.  The lender and receiver both refused it.   I found another offer in disclosure.  6 months later someone had apparently offered a substantial sum via an agent.  The receiver again rejected it.  The problem of course was that the agent had inflated the market price to get the business. But no-one was or is ever going to offer their list price.  Yet the receiver wanted/wants to hold out for the list price.  Which means 1y later not only has it not sold - disclosure shows few viewings and zero interest.  It's transparently over-priced.  And tarnished. For those asking why I don't give up - I couldn't/ can't.  Firstly I have fiduciary duties as a trustee. Secondly, legal advice indicates I (as leaseholder) could succeed with a large compensation claim v the lender.  Also - I started a claim v my old lawyer and the firm immediately reimbursed some £s. That was encouraging.  And a sign to continue.  So I'm going for compensation.  I had finance in place (via friend) to do a deal and take the property back off the lender - and that lawyer messed up bad.   He should have done a deal.  Instead further years have been wasted.   Maybe I only get back my lost savings - but that will be a result.   If I can add some kind of complaint/ claim v the receiver's conscious impropriety I will do so.   I have been left with nothing - so fighting for something is worth it. The lender wants to talk re a form of settlement.  Similar to my proposal 2y ago.  I have a pretty clear idea of what that means to me.  This is exactly why I do not give up.  And why I continue to ask for snippets of advice/ pointers on cag.  
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Family debt...now court claim received.


anney63
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 1703 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

My brother in law asked me to pay back a loan of a few thousand pounds after my wife was killed in an accident .

At the time I was grieving and vunerable and also embarrassed as I didn’t know about it

 

I started paying him back

to date I have paid over half and have decided to stop paying as I had no idea what it was for and didn’t see the money .

 

I’m now being threatened with county court

if this happens should I counter claim for the money I’ve paid as there is no proof and I just have no idea what it was for ???:evil:

Edited by dx100uk
spacing
Link to post
Share on other sites

Who is threatening you with county court ?

Any advice I give is honest and in good faith.:)

If in doubt, you should seek the opinion of a Qualified Professional.

If you can, please donate to this site.

Help keep it up and active, helping people like you.

If you no longer require help, please do what you can to help others

RIP: Rooster-UK - MARTIN3030 - cerberusalert

Link to post
Share on other sites

The brother in law because I stopped pay and told him I had no idea what the debt was and he arranged it and paid to my wife without my knowledge can’t even tell me what it was for

Link to post
Share on other sites

If he can't/won't show proof of this alleged debt, let him sue you so he will be forced to disclose proof.

As he will have to follow the pre action protocol he will need to produce evidence of this debt.

One problem I see for you is that you have paid him some money, so he could say that you have known about this all along and only now you have decided to stop paying.

I would personally ask for proof and look through wife's accounts to see if there's anything there.

Finding nothing I would let him sue and risk a little further loss as you might find a good judge that throws the case out.

Also he could avoid court as it's a 50/50 and he could also risk a counterclaim from you.

My personal opinion, then you'll have to do what you think best.

Anyhow, ask for proof.

Link to post
Share on other sites

So sorry to hear about your wife's death. In the awful circumstances of your wife being killed I can see how researching the law on this was not your first priority.

 

But it might be helpful to note that even if this debt does exist you personally are not legally liable for repaying it and cannot be sued in the county court. Nobody is responsible for or obliged to pay their spouse's debts. (Unless you had formally guaranteed the debt, which is not the case here.)

 

As for the payments you have already paid, if your b-i-l claimed this showed you accepted liability for the debt you'd have a strong defence. You would say, correctly, that you made the payments in error because you thought you were legally liable, and stopped paying when you discovered that you weren't. And I believe you could then recover payments made in error, but that needs researching a bit more.

 

The legal liability to repay this (if it is a loan that is legally repayable - that's yet to be established) falls on your late wife's Estate. Did she leave a Will? If so it's the responsibility of the Executors to satisfy themselves that the debt is actually due, and if it is to pay it.

Who are the Executors? That may be you too, but suing you as Executor isn't so straightforward. Is there sufficient money in your late wife's Estate to pay this debt if it is actually repayable?

 

It's not at all clear that this is a loan that could be recovered in court anyway. The court would have to decide whether it was a loan or a gift between brother and sister. Your b-i-l would have to prove to the court that the alleged loan was made. The court will not automatically accept it exists merely because he says so.

  • Confused 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

another point to consider is the terms of the loan. If it is written down then the terms will be clear but if it was somehting vague like "here is some money to tide you over pay it back when you can" then there isnt a start or finish date to the agreement so it cannot be enforced.

You may well have reasonable cause to sue him for the retun of what you have already paid as it was never your debt even if it existed. Some people are so unscrupulous they might just invent a story to get some money. My daughter's ex did that to try and get money from my wife.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 5 weeks later...

Well Hes done it Ive got a claim on line.

Im going to strongly defend it.

 

I also have copies of messages from my wife to him discussing the loan.

All very secretive and paid into her account .

 

I have since sold the house and given her 2 sons aged 21 and 18 her share .

This has all come about as I have met someone.

 

If I counter claim it will cost me funds I cant really afford .

I just want him to leave me alone.

There is nothing to show that I had any money off him.

Link to post
Share on other sites

He is stating that I knew about the loan which i didnt until after her death.

He has stated on his claim form that there are witnesses.

 

The worry I have is that I started paying him 250 per month but stopped when advised i am not liable.

I have bank statements showing the money going into my wifes account and coming out to other accounts but I have no idea where to .

He has also included in his claim £10 from a family meal and a bill for a solicitor.

 

I have no copy of the bill im not disputing it but I have requested a copy in response to his letter before action.

This has not been received.

 

There actually is no proof of debt at all .

I just dont relish going to court and seeing all my deceased partners relatives standing making false statements , I just want to move on now but this isnt going to go away.

 

My defense will have to be in by 4th March which Im ok with doing.

 

What happens next.?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thread moved to General Legal Issues Forum in view of the court claim received and thread title updated.

 

Regards

 

Andy

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

anney63, please can give more information about your late wife's Will.

Did she leave one? If so who are the executors? 

They are responsible for paying any debts of your late wife.

 

Also can you post up on here a copy of the claim form you have received (with all identifying information, claim numbers, bar codes etc removed).

 

I've been away and only just logged back into CAG to read the thread.

I see you has until yesterday to respond.

 

What defence did you send (identifying details removed again)?

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 5 months later...

Well I lost my case and to make it worse the judge put the debt back to £5000 even though I had already paid 1900.

 

I didnt take my bank statements showing payments.

 

I now have a judgement of £6000+ .

I cant pay so will have to wait for paperwork and see what next move is

 

. He had a load of witness statements which were in effect character assassinations nothing to do with the debt.

 

Took 27 of my dead wife's family and friends with him.

Whole thing very traumatic

. Cant believe the judge put the debt up more.

 

Said I created another contract with my wording in my statement I said that I would honour the debt when He pressured me a week after the accident when I had lost my wife and at an all time low.

 

 I was honest in my witness statement a lot of good that's done me.

 

I also had to take a load of verbal abuse outside court. All this because I have found someone else. 

 

Can I do anything about claiming my £1900 back.?

Still not received my judgement paperwork back .

 

This is now going to affect my remortgaging in 2 years time I presume.

 

I just feel numb and have lost faith in our legal system I would have been better off not turning up at all.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Sounds weird.

You were there, so you should know. 

Is it a case of the claimant giving a lot of figures to confuse the judge and being successful?

Showing up with an entourage of 27 angry relatives...

I suppose the judge didn't see them, otherwise things could've  gone the other way.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Still waiting for the judgment paperwork . The claim was for 4100 which included interest . The original amount my dead wife borrowed was £5000 so the judge said as I hadn’t proved I had paid some off he was putting it back to the original amount even though brother in law admitted I had paid . I have now got a debt of 6200. Let’s see what paperwork says and how much they expect me to pay each month . Who knows . ?? No faith in the system at all !!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

No paid by bank transfer but as I hadn’t included my bank statements proving payment . I did question the judge and stated that they weren’t required as the claimant admitted I had paid it but he just acted as if he couldn’t be bothered as there was a lot of huffing and puffing in court from my dead wife’s relatives . He just wanted it out the way when I said I couldn’t pay that he just said that he couldn’t deal with that and that was it . I’m gathering the money together with help from my new partners family and paying him off  I don’t want it on my record . Can I take him to court for what I’ve already paid after that ?. Still not received judgement paperwork . 

Link to post
Share on other sites

anney63 I am sorry to hear what has happened. It all sounds rather odd from  legal point of view. As advised earlier you are not responsible for your late wife's debts unless you have personally guaranteed them. It sounds as if the court decided that you had guaranteed the debt yourself and created some form of contract between yourself and your BiL to repay the debt.

 

It would help us understand what has happened if you can post up on here the original claim (with all personal identifying information removed).

 

I also don't understand why the debt wasn't paid from your late wife's Estate. I asked about this in post 10 above. Can you give the information asked for in that post please. (Again don't identify names)

Link to post
Share on other sites

There was no will I was paying this debt monthly as it was bought to my attention a month after she died and like a fool I agreed to pay it thinking I was liable I wa also laid up myself after the crash and vulnerable  I paid off her credit card debt etc as I thought  i was liable . The family were fine until I found someone else. It has been hell but I’m paying the judgement to get rid of them but I feel there should be some way I can get the payments I’ve made back . The judge didn’t want to listen even my ex brother in law admitted I had paid it maybe he’ll repay it when he gets the money let’s see  I just want rid of them my wife would be horrified at their treatment . 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I realise how difficult this is for you but without more details and seeing the actual claim it's almost impossible to advise what you might be able to do next. 

 

Your wife left no Will so who administered her Estate? Who was granted Letters of Administration by the Probate Office? Was there enough money in the Estate to pay the alleged loan from her brother? Why wasn't it paid rom the Estate?

 

If you post the claim made by your BiL on here (identifying details removed) it will help us understand the legal argument your BiL was making.

Edited by Ethel Street
Link to post
Share on other sites

It's OK in that it doesn't matter who pays it, if the debt the court ordered you to pay is paid by someone then it is settled and that is the end of the matter. There's no further appeals you can make and no way (AFAIK) of re-opening it if your partner has paid it on your behalf.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Well he’s now written to the court stating that the debt has been paid but it looks suspicious as paid by someone he doesn’t know but quotes the judgement number .

If that isn’t vindictive nothing is .

 

What I would like to know is other than an ex343 firm which I have completed .

How can I claim the overpayment back .

 

This guy knows he’s received money he wasn’t entitled to .

The judge just was in a rush and hadn’t even looked at anything other than my witness statement .

We both stated the amount had been paid but he brushed both of us aside .

 

2 hours was quoted as the estimate for this case which took a few minutes and all because my wording in my statement said I agreed to honour the debt as I was being pressured 1 week after the accident when my wife was killed and I was at home recouperating . I wasn’t aware that I was responsible .apparently that created a new contract !!!

 

There was no will only her personal credit card debts which I paid as again I thought I was responsible . The house became mine under survivorship . Sorry to go on but a bit angry now . 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Money come and goes.

Whenever someone dies there are vultures around trying all sort of things to extract some money from the next of kin.

It happened to us when our dad gave up the ghost.

Upsetting at the time, but then it's cursed money and it will bring only trouble to the fraudsters.

Move on.

Link to post
Share on other sites

If the judge made such a glaring error (or errors) as you claim, why didn't you appeal against his decision?  I'm by no means certain but I would have thought that now your partner has paid it, you've essentially accepted the judgment and that's that?  I'm not sure you can now reopen it.

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...