Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Sars request sent on 16th March and also sent a complaint separately to Studio. Have received no response. Both letters were received and signed for.  I was also told by the financial ombudsman that studio were investigating but I've also had no response to that either.  The only thing Studio have sent me is a default notice.  Any ideas of what I can do from here please 
    • Thanks Bank - I shall tweak my draft and repost. And here's today's ridiculous email from the P2G 'Claims Dept' Good Morning,  Thank you for you email. Unfortunately we would be unable to pay the amount advised in your previous email.  When you placed the order, you were asked for the value of your parcel, you stated that the value was £265.00. At this stage the booking advised that you were covered to £20.00 and to enhance this to £260.00 you could pay an extra £13.99 + VAT to fully cover your item for loss or damage during transit, you declined to fully cover your item.  Towards the end of your booking on the confirmation page, you were then offered to take cover again, to which you declined again.  Unfortunately, we would be unable to offer you an enhanced payment on this occasion.  If I can assist further, please do let me know.  Kindest Regards Claims Team and my response Good Afternoon  Do you not understand the court cases of PENCHEV v P2G (225MC852) and SMIRNOVS v P2G (27MC729)? In both cases it was held by the courts that there was no need for additional ‘cover’ or ‘protection’ (or whatever you wish to call it) on top of the standard delivery charge, and P2G were required to pay up in full for both cases, which by then also included court costs and interest. I shall be including copies of both those judgements in the bundle I submit to the court next Wednesday 1 May, unless you settle my claim (£274.10) in full before then. Tick tock…..    
    • IMG_2820-IMG_2820-merged.pdfmerged.pdf Case management was this morning. Here is the Sheriff’s order. Moved case forward to 24/05.   He said there was no signed agreement and after a bit of “erm, erm, yeah but, erm” when he asked them, he allowed time for sol to contact claimant.  what is the next step now? thank you UCM  
    • I've had a quick (well, quick for a thread of this length),  read of this thread and to be honest I'm struggling to make heads nor tails of the actual crux of the issue here. You seem awfully convinced that whatever is going on is worth the fight and the odds are in your favour but with how the thread has gone it seems that one trail goes cold so you simply move on to another in an attempt to delay the inevitable. All it does is end up digging holes and confusing others and yourself which means any advice given to you is completely pointless. I note that for the life of this thread there has not been any documentation or correspondence uploaded for people to have a look. Have you got any that you'd be willing to redact and upload for members to assist you? Right now, it seems people are shooting out advice while being in the dark because it's starting to become very difficult for people who weren't here at the start of this (including myself) to follow along. Right now, this whole thread is just hypothetical "He said, she said" and is going nowhere fast. Nothing more than basic advice can be given which, as you've sought out some legal advice, is likely not sufficient to actually come to any sort of conclusion. I, personally, am starting to agree with others that it may be best to consider bankruptcy and put the matter behind you.  
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

2015 PCN Edinburgh - Pollock Fairbridge Schiavone Solicitors threatening court action


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 2024 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

HI, apologies for randomly contacting you

https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/showthread.php?488162-VCS-final-demand-before-court-action

 

- I have received a similar letter from PCN today re a PCN in Edinburgh from May 2015-

can I ask what you did re your case?

 

It was def my car, but I was not driving it at the time of the PCN!!

 

Thanks

Edited by dx100uk
spacing
Link to post
Share on other sites

you are in Scotland...IGNORE!!

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

HI,

 

I have just received a letter from Pollock Fairbridge Schiavone Solicitors with a heading - "DO NOT IGNORE - DEMAND BEFORE COURT ACTION". Reply within 7 days of letter dated 3rd October, I received it on the 8th.

 

This apparently relates to a parking charge on 9th May 2015 in Edinburgh, and associated reminder letters. PCN was £100, and with a debt recovery fee of £60 , totalling £160 due.

 

Although the car was mine at the time, I did not leave it there for the alleged time and I cannot remember which of the 4 people on my car insurance at that time, who was driving it.

 

Letter from the Solicitors has a very threatening tone, and to be honest I am not sure whether I am being scammed or whether these monies are actually due to them.

 

The original ticket - and any letters that were received relating to it - I do not have.

 

Help please. Before I head to a solicitors and incur even more costs.

 

Thank you.

Link to post
Share on other sites

https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/showthread.php?488162-VCS-final-demand-before-court-action

 

Thread moved to the appropriate forum...please continue to post here to your thread.

 

Andy

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

please complete this:

 

https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/showthread.php?462118-Have-you-received-a-Parking-Ticket-(1-Viewing)-nbsp

 

and scan up this silly letter to PDF please

read upload

 

thread title updated

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Ok short response.

 

" I was not the driver at the time, tell your client, Simple Simon, to go and bother the person who was."

 

 

as for you playing grandmothers footsteps by saying it could have been w,x,y or z as they are insured, I am insured to drive your car and people without insurance such as police officers and soldiers under orders can do so as well. You dont need to say anything, there is no keeper liability so it is for them to show who was driving at the time, not for you to give them clues.

 

 

 

And for their imaginary costs, they arent going to win a court claim so no costs apply

Link to post
Share on other sites

your circumstances are vastly different as the law in Scotland is very different.

So far all you have got is hot air delivered by RM but tell us all about the event and we can tailor a suitable response should one be needed

 

 

Thank you for your help here.

I am really worried about this.

I did receive a PCN and a further request for payment but was advised that this was not actionable in Scotland

- ie I didn't have to pay, and I did not leave my car there.

It was definitely there apparently but not by me.

 

I have no idea where the original paperwork is as I probably binned it after a year.

I suppose, being an avid TV watcher, that I am concerned I will get a bad credit score (after 5 decades of having a good one) and that the case will be taken to court and judged without my knowledge. M

Link to post
Share on other sites

unless they get a decree, which they cant, nothing can show on your credit file.

and you will never need a solicitor no matter what happens

 

IMHO you've ignored to date.

you are in Scotland POFA etc does NOT apply so they cant just take you to court assuming you were the driver even if they could.

 

and

as there is no such thing as trespass in Scotland so again that's the only other reason they could do court...so it aint going nowhere.

if you could possibly scan up this letter you got to PDF please so we can see it [read upload] we can better advise.

 

as long as they have your correct address, i'e you've not moved since the event and you car is registered to your present address and not an old one then their is nothing they can do without you knowing about it.

 

so...absolutely nothing to be worried about....you continue to ignore

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I am sorry I have tried to upload the letter with no success - obviously not to pc literate. I have taken a photo with my phone but am happy to type the whole thing in this text box thingie if that would work? And thank you SO much for your help so far. M

Link to post
Share on other sites

have you redacted the photo so all pers info is blocked out

if so use officelense program rad the guide

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

so what? there is no POFA in Scotland so they cant win that argument.

Send what I have written and stop fretting about stuff you see on the telly that has no bearing on your case.

 

The more strident you are the less likey they are to want to start a fight they cnat win. They use the threat fo court to coerce you into paying money you dont and cant owe but that abuse of process wont stop because it works 85% of the time. Be part of the righteous minority.

BTW Simon Renshaw-Smith is the owner of VCS, Excel, Mr Clampit and other companies. He has in the past told judges they dont knwo their job and then wonders why he loses his speciosu claims. Using a soliciotr to write a threatogram is designed to make you think there must be some gravitas to this. Nope, soliciotrs just rub their hands and count the money without giving a s*** about the morality ior rights of the claim.

 

 

Thank you for your help here.

I am really worried about this.

I did receive a PCN and a further request for payment but was advised that this was not actionable in Scotland

- ie I didn't have to pay, and I did not leave my car there.

It was definitely there apparently but not by me.

 

I have no idea where the original paperwork is as I probably binned it after a year.

I suppose, being an avid TV watcher, that I am concerned I will get a bad credit score (after 5 decades of having a good one) and that the case will be taken to court and judged without my knowledge. M

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...