Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Well barristers would say that in the hope that motorists would go to them for advice -obviously paid advice.  The problem with appealing is at least twofold. 1] there is a real danger that some part of the appeal will point out that the person appealing [the keeper ] is also the driver.  And in a lot of cases the last thing the keeper wants when they are also the driver is that the parking company knows that. It makes it so much easier for them as the majority  of Judges do not accept that the keeper and the driver are the same person for obvious reasons. Often they are not the same person especially when it is a family car where the husband, wife and children are all insured to drive the same car. On top of that  just about every person who has a valid insurance policy is able to drive another person's vehicle. So there are many possibilities and it should be up to the parking company to prove it to some extent.  Most parking company's do not accept appeals under virtually any circumstances. But insist that you carry on and appeal to their so called impartial jury who are often anything but impartial. By turning down that second appeal, many motorists pay up because they don't know enough about PoFA to argue with those decisions which brings us to the second problem. 2] the major parking companies are mostly unscrupulous, lying cheating scrotes. So when you appeal and your reasons look as if they would have merit in Court, they then go about  concocting a Witness Statement to debunk that challenge. We feel that by leaving what we think are the strongest arguments to our Member's Witness Statements, it leaves insufficient time to be thwarted with their lies etc. And when the motorists defence is good enough to win, it should win regardless of when it is first produced.   
    • S13 (2)The creditor may not exercise the right under paragraph 4 to recover from the keeper any unpaid parking charges specified in the notice to keeper if, within the period of 28 days beginning with the day after that on which that notice was given, the creditor is given— (a)a statement signed by or on behalf of the vehicle-hire firm to the effect that at the material time the vehicle was hired to a named person under a hire agreement; (b)a copy of the hire agreement; and (c)a copy of a statement of liability signed by the hirer under that hire agreement. As  Arval has complied with the above they cannot be pursued by EC----- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- S14 [1]   the creditor may recover those charges (so far as they remain unpaid) from the hirer. (2)The conditions are that— (a)the creditor has within the relevant period given the hirer a notice in accordance with sub-paragraph (5) (a “notice to hirer”), together with a copy of the documents mentioned in paragraph 13(2) and the notice to keeper; (b)a period of 21 days beginning with the day on which the notice to hirer was given has elapsed;  As ECP did not send copies of the documents to your company and they have given 28 days instead of 21 days they have failed to comply with  the Act so you and your Company are absolved from paying. That is not to say that they won't continue asking to be paid as they do not have the faintest idea how PoFA works. 
    • Euro have got a lot wrong and have failed to comply with the Protection of Freedoms Act 2012 Schedule 4.  According to Section 13 after ECP have written to Arval they should then send a NTH to the Hirer  which they have done.This eliminates Arval from any further pursuit by ECP. When they wrote to your company they should have sent copies of everything that they asked Arval for. This is to prove that your company agree what happened on the day of the breach. If ECP then comply with the Act they are allowed to pursue the hirer. If they fail, to comply they cannot make the hirer pay. They can pursue until they are blue in the face but the Hirer is not lawfully required to pay them and if it went to Court ECP would lose. Your company could say who was driving but the only person that can be pursued is the Hirer, there does not appear to be an extension for a driver to be pursued. Even if there was, because ECP have failed miserably to comply with the Act  they still have no chance of winning in Court. Here are the relevant Hire sections from the Act below.
    • Thank-you FTMDave for your feedback. May I take this opportunity to say that after reading numerous threads to which you are a contributor, I have great admiration for you. You really do go above and beyond in your efforts to help other people. The time you put in to help, in particular with witness statements is incredible. I am also impressed by the way in which you will defer to others with more experience should there be a particular point that you are not 100% clear on and return with answers or advice that you have sought. I wish I had the ability to help others as you do. There is another forum expert that I must also thank for his time and patience answering my questions and allowing me to come to a “penny drops” moment on one particular issue. I believe he has helped me immensely to understand and to strengthen my own case. I shall not mention who it is here at the moment just in case he would rather I didn't but I greatly appreciate the time he took working through that issue with me. I spent 20+ years of working in an industry that rules and regulations had to be strictly adhered to, indeed, exams had to be taken in order that one had to become qualified in those rules and regulations in order to carry out the duties of the post. In a way, such things as PoFA 2012 are rules and regulations that are not completely alien to me. It has been very enjoyable for me to learn these regulations and the law surrounding them. I wish I had found this forum years ago. I admit that perhaps I had been too keen to express my opinions given that I am still in the learning process. After a suitable period in this industry I became Qualified to teach the rules and regulations and I always said to those I taught that there is no such thing as a stupid question. If opinions, theories and observations are put forward, discussion can take place and as long as the result is that the student is able to clearly see where they went wrong and got to that moment where the penny drops then that is a valuable learning experience. No matter how experienced one is, there is always something to learn and if I did not know the answer to a question, I would say, I don't know the answer to that question but I will go and find out what the answer is. In any posts I have made, I have stated, “unless I am wrong” or “as far as I can see” awaiting a response telling me what I got wrong, if it was wrong. If I am wrong I am only too happy to admit it and take it as a valuable learning experience. I take the point that perhaps I should not post on other peoples threads and I shall refrain from doing so going forward. 🤐 As alluded to, circumstances can change, FTMDave made the following point that it had been boasted that no Caggers, over two years, who had sent a PPC the wrong registration snotty letter, had even been taken to court, let alone lost a court hearing .... but now they have. I too used the word "seemed" because it is true, we haven't had all the details. After perusing this forum I believe certain advice changed here after the Beavis case, I could be wrong but that is what I seem to remember reading. Could it be that after winning the above case in question, a claimant could refer back to this case and claim that a defendant had not made use of the appeal process, therefore allowing the claimant to win? Again, in this instance only, I do not know what is to be gained by not making an appeal or concealing the identity of the driver, especially if it is later admitted that the defendant was the driver and was the one to input the incorrect VRN in error. So far no one has educated me as to the reason why. But, of course, when making an appeal, it should be worded carefully so that an error in the appeal process cannot be referred back to. I thought long and hard about whether or not to post here but I wanted to bring up this point for discussion. Yes, I admit I have limited knowledge, but does that mean I should have kept silent? After I posted that I moved away from this forum slightly to find other avenues to increase my knowledge. I bought a law book and am now following certain lawyers on Youtube in the hope of arming myself with enough ammunition to use in my own case. In one video titled “7 Reasons You Will LOSE Your Court Case (and how to avoid them)” by Black Belt Barrister I believe he makes my point by saying the following, and I quote: “If you ignore the complaint in the first instance and it does eventually end up in court then it's going to look bad that you didn't co-operate in the first place. The court is not going to look kindly on you simply ignoring the company and not, let's say, availing yourself of any kind of appeal opportunities, particularly if we are talking about parking charge notices and things like that.” This point makes me think that, it is not such a bizarre judgement in the end. Only in the case of having proof of payment and inputting an incorrect VRN .... could it be worthwhile making a carefully worded appeal in the first instance? .... If the appeal fails, depending on the reason, surely this could only help if it went to court? As always, any feedback gratefully received.
    • To which official body does one make a formal complaint about a LPA fixed charge receiver? Does one make a complaint first to the company employing the appointed individuals?    Or can one complain immediately to an official body, such as nara?    I've tried researching but there doesn't seem a very clear route on how to legally hold them to account for wrongful behaviour.  It seems frustratingly complicated because they are considered to be officers of the court and held in high esteem - and the borrower is deemed liable for their actions.  Yet what does the borrower do when disclosure shows clear evidence of wrong-doing? Does anyone have any pointers please?
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Scotland - Council Tax - Bankruptcy


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 2238 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hello.

 

I apparently have £12k Council Tax arrears.

I recently got a Sheriff Officer hand delivered letter demanding payment within 14 days.

The arrears start from 2002 until 2018.

 

I have 4 questions.

 

1)If I was not living in the property, (housing association) during the time of the invoices, but still on the voters roll (and tenancy agreement), do I still owe these arrears? (I can prove I was living at another address for several years, under a separate Council Authority).

 

2) If I made myself bankrupt, can I include all of this 'debt' under it?

 

3) How can I stop any further action, pending a dispute/starting bankruptcy?

 

4) How do I quickly start bankruptcy (I have no other debts, not concerned regarding my credit rating, don't own anything, I currently work - earning around £1200 per month).

 

Any other positive advice would be useful.

 

Thanks in advance :-)::!:

Link to post
Share on other sites

1.tenancy makes you jointly liable if someone else on the agreement was still living there, regardless to if you were living elsewhere, so why aren't they paying?

 

2. yes you can inc Scottish CTAX in BK, but you need money to do so, The council can also petition for your bankruptcy [rfee to you!] if your council tax arrears are £3,000 or more. They would normally only do this if they cannot recover the money in any other way. [bankruptcy is a serious step and your home, assets and employment could be at risk}

 

3. you only have 14 days else they'll freeze banks account and seize your wages

 

4. approach the council.

 

expand on 1 so for 16yrs who has been there and why have they not paid?

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Responses to above-

 

1 - They are chasing me for the debt, further inforrmation irrelevant

 

2 - Please explain who I approach, what I do etc. etc. to commence these proceedings and include this, should I wish to do so.

 

3. I asked for information relating to disputing the amount AND postponing further action legally - there must be some way of ensuring a legal stop to further action - please provide this.

 

4. I have. They advise to contact the Sherriff Officers. Basically, they do not care, they send an amount and these people chase it. Without remorse, information or any evidence that the amount is owed. Therefore, I wish to ensure that I deal with this situation immediately.

 

5. "expand on 1 so for 16yrs who has been there and why have they not paid?" Irrelevant. They are chasing me for the 16 years debt. I was not living in the property, (although on the tenancy), I was at a different Council, in a private lodging, where business rates were paid. However, I do not wish to go down the route of the legalicy of their claim, although justified to do so in my belief, I just wish to deal with this, and have the ability to contest if I chose to do so.

 

Thanks in advance.

Link to post
Share on other sites

further info irrelevant..........then further help irrelevant.

 

unsubbing....

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I only asked for specific information pertaining to what I wanted to do, you were asking for information which was irrelevant. I'm not looking for a saviour, only exact advice to my relevant questions.

 

Why does the information you seek matter? If you read my questions, I was VERY clear on the advice I needed, surplus information makes is muddy.

 

I'm guessing you are not impartial, nor here to provide correct advice ;-).

 

I am confident there will be someone on here with credible advice, and 100% impartial and knows common law and other relevant human rights!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi

 

Without the Irrelevant Information then you will not get the advice you need

How to Upload Documents/Images on CAG - **INSTRUCTIONS CLICK HERE**

FORUM RULES - Please ensure to read these before posting **FORUM RULES CLICK HERE**

I cannot give any advice by PM - If you provide a link to your Thread then I will be happy to offer advice there.

I advise to the best of my ability, but I am not a qualified professional, benefits lawyer nor Welfare Rights Adviser.

Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

Link to post
Share on other sites

Ok, lets see if providing the information provides further legitimate advise.

 

1. so why aren't they paying? I can't answer for them. The Council are chasing me for (what it seems) the FULL amount per year. My brother was also on the tenancy agreement. The bills were in his name for 10 years, then reverted to mine. Either way, I was not in the house. You said I would be liable because I am on the tenancy agreement - where in LAW does this make me liable??

 

2. I have nothing of value.

 

3. If they wish, they can do so, however, to do so will only involve me to take them to court to provide evidence I owe this money. As mentioned, I didn't live there, I was on the tenancy agreement. I do not know of any law which states, if you are on a tenancy agreement,( this is for council tax), that I would be liable, - please can you elaborate on your knowledge of why I would be liable?

 

4. I have. They passed me back to the Sherriff Officers. They only want the money and take the action allowed by Law. However, there must be some common law which over rides the guidence> perhaps not common law, but surely evidence must be in existence to enforce their privillidges of taking action? (Excuse my writing, my spell checker is broken.

 

I have now provided all the information requested. It doesn't change my question. .... How does one go ahead and go bankrupt and include council tax debt into the bk?

Edited by davidscreditfile
Truth
Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi

 

1. Was it just you and your brother on the HA tenancy Agreement and who was the main tenant named on that agreement? (when you moved from the property did you inform the council and tell them your new address and recieve a Final Bill?)

 

Housing Associations share information with councils even my own HA shares information with the council under an Information Sharing Agreement/Policy which makes it legal.

 

You urgently need to respond to the Sheriff Officers hand delivered letter within 14 days as there is no way you are going to be made Bankrupt within that period if applying for it yourself.

 

Account in Bankruptcy link: https://www.aib.gov.uk/

 

You also need to check you credit file

How to Upload Documents/Images on CAG - **INSTRUCTIONS CLICK HERE**

FORUM RULES - Please ensure to read these before posting **FORUM RULES CLICK HERE**

I cannot give any advice by PM - If you provide a link to your Thread then I will be happy to offer advice there.

I advise to the best of my ability, but I am not a qualified professional, benefits lawyer nor Welfare Rights Adviser.

Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

Link to post
Share on other sites

thank you for the info.

the law used is called joint and several liability because you left yourself on the tenancy agreement

 

regardless to if you are resident at any other property and can prove that

you are a joint tenant so both of you liable for the full amount until paid.

 

you can go argue the toss about legalities and if there is any there there later.

 

pers i'd try going for a time order

http://www.govanlc.com/counciltax_downloadform.htm

 

but you must speak with the sheriff officers soonest.

they don't have to tell you they are going to arrest your bank accounts nor your wages

they just do it on day 14.

 

I notice you've posted on this thread

https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/showthread.php?483001-Walker-Love-Huge-CTAX-Debt&p=5104829#post5104829

yo need to go read it and follow what london1971 says get LETTER writing.

 

what date is on the warrant please

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Take 5 minutes, to write an email, make a phone call to the elected local councillor, and elected head of council. (for the area where the property is). All the relevant contact details should be available on Google. Leave a voicemail and send an email. Please do this today, as they have the authority to cancel this immediately. I know this because I was in deep debt to the council, and they rescued me. At the very worst they might be able to make it so you can make affordable payments.

 

Along the lines,

 

' The council, is demanding that I pay £12,000 in back council tax from 2002, for a property that I was a joint tenant (with my brother) but never lived in. I earn £1200 per month and have no savings, and have been told I need to pay £12,000 within 14 days. I've tried to explain the situation to the council and the Sheriff but it has fallen on deaf ears.

 

This has come out of the blue, and is shocking to me, I don't have the money and have been told that my wages can be seized if I don't pay, I could potentially be unable to pay my rent and end up homeless because of something that I have no knowledge of.

 

I understand that councils are under great financial pressure, and that to the letter of the law I may be liable for this sum of money but please can you intervene on my behalf to cancel this, as it has placed me in an impossible situation.

 

Kind Regards

 

xyz

  • Haha 1

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

You signed the tenancy, your responsible for the ct. So is someone else but they can chase either or.

Your living somewhere else.... Irrelevant.

 

Bankruptcy, you need a lump sum of money to get the ball rolling and expect for the next few years to have problems even signing a new tenancy, never mind renewing a phone contract or getting credit from anyone.

Link to post
Share on other sites

That £12,000 may also be wrong if you can prove you weren't living there. If your brother was living alone he would have been eligible for the single person 25% percent discount. There could be a back claim and reduction there.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

"How does one go ahead and go bankrupt and include council tax debt into the bk? "

 

https://www.nationaldebtline.org/S/factsheets/Pages/council-tax-recovery-scotland/council-tax-debt.aspx

 

Regards

 

Andy

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Have a look at this Citizens Advice link: https://www.citizensadvice.org.uk/debt-and-money/debt-solutions/bankruptcy-2/after-you-go-bankrupt/creditors-still-chasing-you-after-you-go-bankrupt/

 

Go down to 'When creditors can still chase you' and have a wee read.

How to Upload Documents/Images on CAG - **INSTRUCTIONS CLICK HERE**

FORUM RULES - Please ensure to read these before posting **FORUM RULES CLICK HERE**

I cannot give any advice by PM - If you provide a link to your Thread then I will be happy to offer advice there.

I advise to the best of my ability, but I am not a qualified professional, benefits lawyer nor Welfare Rights Adviser.

Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

Link to post
Share on other sites

this is Scotland gentlemen....

 

https://www.advicescotland.com/home/council-tax-debt/

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

How to Upload Documents/Images on CAG - **INSTRUCTIONS CLICK HERE**

FORUM RULES - Please ensure to read these before posting **FORUM RULES CLICK HERE**

I cannot give any advice by PM - If you provide a link to your Thread then I will be happy to offer advice there.

I advise to the best of my ability, but I am not a qualified professional, benefits lawyer nor Welfare Rights Adviser.

Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...