Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 162 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

PRA / Brodies - SPC 1 Barclaycard


Recommended Posts

name the issuing court: Ayr

Who Is The Claimant: PRA Group

Who Are the Solicitors: Brodies

What type of action? (Simple/Ordinary): Simple

What is the claim for –

[type out ALL the text [minus pers details] [E1 BOX SPR FORM]

On or around ## June 2015, Barclays Bank Plc entered into a credit agreement (hereinafter referred to as 'the Arrangement')

On or around ## June 2015, Barclays Bank PIc entered into a credit agreement (hereinafter referred to as 'the Agreement') with the Respondent. A copy of the Agreement will be produced.

The Respondent failed to maintain payment of the instalments due in terms of the Agreement.

On or around ## November 2022, a Default Notice was served on the Respondent. The Respondent failed to make payment in satisfaction of the Default Notice. The agreement was terminated.

The balance outstanding in terms of the Agreement is £3,333.00 which is the sum sued for.

On or around ## December 2022, Barclays Bank Plc's rights in terms of the Agreement|were assigned to the Claimant. Notice of the assignation was intimated to the Respondent.

The Respondent(s) has (have) been called upon to make payment of the sum sued for but has (have) refused or at least delayed to do so. This claim is accordingly necessary.
 

type out ALL the text [minus pers details] [E4 BOX SPR FORM] or [Condescendence from Writ]

NOTE THE EXACT WORDING IS EXTREMELY IMPORTANT TO YOUR CASE SO GET IT RIGHT.

Date of Agreement: ## Jun 2015

Claimant Agreement Reference: BBK####### (3 letters, 7 numbers)

Guarantor: N/A

Unpaid balance: £3,333.00

Balance is due under a credit account agreement which commenced with a nil balance.

 

date of raised claim [or court stamp date from writ or date from ] :- 27th November 2023

Last Date Of Service [look on form 07]:- 6th December 2023

Last Date For Response [look on form 07]:- 27th December 2023

What Documents are listed in Box E2:[or in your form requesting the same?] 

Is the claim for ......an Overdraft, credit card, loan account, HP Agreement, Catalogue or mobile phone debt? :- Credit card

 

….

from your knowledge: answer the following:

When did you enter into the original agreement before or after 2007? 2015 (online signup)

Has the claim been issued by the original creditor or was the account assigned and it is the Debt purchaser who has issued the claim.:- Debt purchaser

Were you aware the account had been assigned – did you receive a Notice of Assignment? Aware that PRA were involved, but unsure whether i received a NoA.

Did you receive a Default Notice from the original creditor? Unsure. 

Have you been receiving statutory notices headed “Notice of Default sums” – at least once a year ? Unsure

When was you last payment:- mid-2022

Why did you cease payments:- Numerous credit cards with crippling minimum payments. Had family issues to contend with which i prioritised.

Was there a dispute with the original creditor that remains unresolved? No

Did you communicate any financial problems to the original creditor and make any attempt to enter into a debt management plan? No contact with them whatsoever.

Other: I received a letter before action from PRA / Brodies in early October. I sent a CCA request (template content from here) immediately. PRA responded confirming they "...have requested the information. Your account has been placed on hold until this has been received." I haven't anything since this response in early October - yet have now received a SPC.

What do i do now?

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

well done. 

you know the routine.

hold on filing till say 20th ish? get it in before xmas/new year closedown / postage issues.

you'll see the sticky upon how to respond to an SPC and you'll need to make ref to the previous failed CCA request. that wont go down well with the sheriff, AYR guys know nolans very well and their tricks. had previous dealing with 2 of the sheriffs there won both. 

ps have a look in financial legal issues and you'll see numerous barclaycard claimform threads.

BC never give out the cca even for 2015 online signup, 9/10 its fake stuff and claimants try to rely upon recon rules.

  • Thanks 1

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 4 months later...

how'd this go?

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...