Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • I would only rely on your solicitor in this regard. The other two should not have a view.   And, you are responsible for how the court perceive you. They only have your words and deeds to go on. Expecting them to magically see things your way is not a great tactic.
    • Yes, I don't think there is any downside to doing this. If they decline then you can say that in your witness statement
    • Ok! Do you still want me to work on that letter you discussed above in post #26?
    • Thank you for posting up the required details and well done for apparently not revealing the identity of the driver. I am assuming you are the keeper? The depth of ignorance of the parking companies is absolutely amazing. The Protection of Freedoms Act 2012 Schedule 4 is the law relating to private parking and allows those rogues to be able to transfer the charge from the driver [whose name they do not know] to the keeper after 28 days . This is dependent on them complying with the Act. So many of the don't and Alliance is no different. It would help if we could see what you appeal was and to post the back of the PCN as it is lacking so much of the wording necessary to make it compliant so that in your case only the driver is liable to pay the charge. And of course just entering the ANPR arrival times means that they have failed to specify the parking time which is a requirement..  Because the car park was so busy you had to drive around for quite a while before finally finding a place to park which is when the parking period may  actually begin. The poor dears at Alliance have not grasped that particular part of the legislation as yet. To be fair the Act has only been in place for 12 years so one must make allowances for their stupidity . We shouldn't really mock them- but it is fun. You weren't to know but the chances of winning an appeal against Alliance and the IPC is around 5%-and that is high for them. If they allow you to cancel they lose the chance of making money and they would have had a field day when you were there with so many people being caught overstaying because of the chaos in trying to find a parking space then trying to pay.  Your snotty letter could go something like this- Dear Cretins, Yes I mean you Alliance. After 12 years one would have thought that even you could produce a compliant PCN. Did you really think I would pay you a penny extra considering the time I wasted trying  to pay with  long queues at the parking machine, then trying to get a signal to call Just Park. On top of that you then had the cheek to ask for an additional £70 for what dubious unspecified pleasure? You must have made a killing that day charging all those motorists for overstaying because the queues to pay were do long and even walking to pay from the over flow parking fields takes time. And yes I did take photos of the non existent signs in the fields so please don't give me the usual rubbish about your signs being clearly visible. Oh yes that £70. Please tell me and the Court whether that charge included VAT and if it did, why am I being charged to pay your vat? I am sure the Judge would look carefully at that as well as the Inland Revenue. The truth is you had no reasonable cause to ask the DVLA for my data given the chaos at your car park and I believe that you therefore breached my GDPR...................... I expect others will give their views as well.          
    • opps this is going to get messy then if they don't refund. you should never keep util accounts in credit.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

County Claim Advice - Holiday Compensation


toshyboy
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 2446 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi

 

I'm considering raising a claim against First Choice, as they have not responded to my compensation claim. All 4 of us (2 disabled kids) were ill during a stay in one of their resorts, which essentially wiped out the holiday.

 

Their legal team are uncontactable, and almost 8 months has passed without them responding to us. We raised a complaint with Abta, and they originally did not reply to them either. Abta referred it to their legal team, but FC responded advising they are not prepared to use the Abta mediation service, so Abta they have closed the close. We have never received any response to our claim.

 

I've never raised a court claim personally before, so was was just after some general advice about potential pitfalls etc. I can see the issue fee would be about £70, but would there be further costs if the case were defended?

 

My Mrs is concerned about us having a shedload of costs, should our claim fail, and mentioned a counterclaim, but unsure what this is??

 

This is the only option open to us however if we want to pursue it, as they are completely ignoring our claim.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi

 

I'm considering raising a claim against First Choice, as they have not responded to my compensation claim. All 4 of us (2 disabled kids) were ill during a stay in one of their resorts, which essentially wiped out the holiday.

 

Their legal team are uncontactable, and almost 8 months has passed without them responding to us. We raised a complaint with Abta, and they originally did not reply to them either. Abta referred it to their legal team, but FC responded advising they are not prepared to use the Abta mediation service, so Abta they have closed the close. We have never received any response to our claim.

 

I've never raised a court claim personally before, so was was just after some general advice about potential pitfalls etc. I can see the issue fee would be about £70, but would there be further costs if the case were defended?

 

My Mrs is concerned about us having a shedload of costs, should our claim fail, and mentioned a counterclaim, but unsure what this is??

 

This is the only option open to us however if we want to pursue it, as they are completely ignoring our claim.

 

 

Have you not considering claiming compensation for your illness too?

 

Was it an AI resort?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Have you not considering claiming compensation for your illness too?

 

Was it an AI resort?

 

Yeah it was inclusive - last time i ever do a holiday like that.

 

Not really thought of compensation to be honest, was just looking to get the cost of the holiday back, as it was complete write off. Would it be likely to be granted?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yeah it was inclusive - last time i ever do a holiday like that.

 

Not really thought of compensation to be honest, was just looking to get the cost of the holiday back, as it was complete write off. Would it be likely to be granted?

 

 

You'd have to seek formal advice from a solicitor.

 

If you didn't eat outside of your hotel, reported your illness to your resort rep and saw a doctor then there's a very good chance you'll get a settlement.

Link to post
Share on other sites

You'd have to seek formal advice from a solicitor.

 

If you didn't eat outside of your hotel, reported your illness to your resort rep and saw a doctor then there's a very good chance you'll get a settlement.

 

can tick all the boxes there, although we disdnt all see the doctor. At 90 euro a pop we just got the little one looked at

Link to post
Share on other sites

So only evidence to claim for your little one. Because you did not all get checked, that would be a problem. First Choice are likely to defend any claim, so make sure you only claim for what you can evidence.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

can you possibly get any evidence of any other families on same holiday/ resort falling ill? might help getting some background in before filing a claim.

what letters have you sent to FC in regards to claiming?

Link to post
Share on other sites

So only evidence to claim for your little one. Because you did not all get checked, that would be a problem. First Choice are likely to defend any claim, so make sure you only claim for what you can evidence.

 

Should still all be able to make a claim for all family members, but formal legal advice from a personal injury/holiday sickness specialist lawyer is required.

Link to post
Share on other sites

In terms of additional costs, there would be a 'hearing fee' to pay if the case proceeded to a hearing. Search for court form EX50 which explains what this is. There shouldn't be much else.

 

You would not usually be liable to pay First Choice's legal costs in the small claims track. However you could be ordered to pay their costs if the judge finds that you 'behaved unreasonably'. This is rare but would apply if - for example - you ignore court deadlines, ignore court correspondence or part of your claim is found to be dishonest/fraudulent.

 

The main difficulty with a case like this would be proving it I suppose. You would need to prove on a balance of probabilities that (1) everyone in the family was actually ill, (2) the illness was caused by a problem at the resort. These things are quite difficult to prove so you need to have a think about what evidence you might be able to come up with or request from First Choice in due course - e.g. doctor's reports, was a report made, were other guests in the resort ill too, etc. etc.

 

In terms of procedure, you should serve a formal 'letter before action' explaining exactly what you intend to sue for and stating that a claim will be issued if a satisfactory response is not received within 14 days. You then wait 14 days for them to respond before issuing your claim. The Civil Procedure Rules require that you do this. You should be able to find reasonable templates for this online.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

The main difficulty with a case like this would be proving it I suppose. You would need to prove on a balance of probabilities that (1) everyone in the family was actually ill, (2) the illness was caused by a problem at the resort.

 

I disagree. Why? Because:

1) Not everyone in the holiday party has to become ill.

What if I am vegetarian, and my holiday party all become ill except me, due to a meat dish that I didn't consume ......

 

Re-reading : do you instead mean "proving everyone we claim was ill was actually ill"? rather than "everyone in the party has to fall ill"??

 

2) "The illness was caused by a problem at the resort" is too broad.

There could be a problem at the resort that didn't represent a breach of duty of care by the resort.

The yardstick is "problem at the resort that represents a breach of the resort's established duty of care".

Link to post
Share on other sites

I disagree. Why? Because:

1) Not everyone in the holiday party has to become ill.

What if I am vegetarian, and my holiday party all become ill except me, due to a meat dish that I didn't consume ......

 

Re-reading : do you instead mean "proving everyone we claim was ill was actually ill"? rather than "everyone in the party has to fall ill"??

I meant to say the latter (although I see why you read it the other way as it was not clear in my original post!)

 

The point I am trying to make is that the Op is trying to claim for his entire party and it might be difficult to prove that everyone in the party was ill, as opposed to just one or two people. Not impossible, just potentially difficult.

 

2) "The illness was caused by a problem at the resort" is too broad.

There could be a problem at the resort that didn't represent a breach of duty of care by the resort.

The yardstick is "problem at the resort that represents a breach of the resort's established duty of care".

I agree

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Should still all be able to make a claim for all family members, but formal legal advice from a personal injury/holiday sickness specialist lawyer is required.

 

My reply was based on reading about such cases. There have been loads of these cases in the media recently and one of the problems was people not getting Doctors reports fully diagnosing the exact issue, obtaining stool samples. Also whether the hotel and tour operator were informed, so they could take necessary actions

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

thanks for all the responses guys. We submitted a formal complaint to FC, and received acknowledgement, along with a timeframe of 6 months for it to be investiagted. 8 months on, we've heard nothing more, and despite daily attempts at contact for weeks on on end, there has been no reply to e mails, letters or phone calls. We have made numerous attempts via facebook chat which are all documentated, however they simply advise we need to speak to legal team, who we have been trying to contact in the first place.

 

We advised the rep (verbally) of all our illnesses, but only the 2 kids were "officially recorded", and only 1 was medically examined and has a doctors report.

 

We were weighing up either one of these sick holiday type claim firms, or doing a claim form ourselves.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...