Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • You will probably get a couple more reminders followed by further demands fro unregulated debt collectors with even increasing amounts to pay. They are all designed to scare you into paying.  Don't. It's a scam site and they do not know who was driving and they know the keeper is not liable to pay the PCN. Also the shop was closed so they have no legitimate interest in keeping the car park clear. So to charge £100 is a penalty as there is no legitimate interest which means that the case would be thrown out if it went to Court.  Keep your money in your wallet and be prepared to ignore all their letters and threats. Doubtful they would go to Court since a lot more people would not pay when they heard  MET lost in Court. However they may just send you a Letter of Claim to test your resolve.  If yoy get one of those, come back to us and we will advise a snotty letter to send them.  You probably already have, but take a look through some of our past Met PCNs to see how they are doing.
    • Hello, been a while since I posted on here, really hoping for the same support an advice I received last time :-) Long, long story for us, but basically through bad choices, bad luck and bad advice ended up in an IVA in 2016. The accounts involved all defaulted, to be expected. In 2018, I got contacted by an 'independent advisor' advising me that I shouldn't be in an IVA, that it wasn't the solution for our circumstances and that they would guide us through the process of leaving the IVA and finding a better solution. I feel very stupid for taking this persons advice, and feel they prey on vulnerable people for their own financial gain (it ended with us paying our IVA monthly contribution to them)-long and short of it our IVA failed in 2018. At the same time the IVA failed we also had our shared ownership property voluntarily repossessed (to say this was an incredibly stressful time would be an understatement!) When we moved to our new (rented) property in August 2018, I was aware that creditors would start contacting us from the IVA failure. I got advice from another help website and started sending off SARs and CCAs request letters. I was advised not to bury my head and update our address etc and tackle each company as they came along. Initially there was quite a lot of correspondence, and I still get a daily missed call from PRA group (and the occasional letter from them), but not much else. However, yesterday i had a letter through from Lowell (and one from Capital One) advising that they had bought my debt and would like to speak with me regarding the account. There will be several.of these through our door i suspect, as we did have several accounts with Capital One. Capital One have written to us with regular statements over the last 5 years, and my last communication with them was to advise of of our new address (June 2019), I also note that all of these accounts received a small payment in Jan2019 (i'm assuming the funds from the failed IVA pot). Really sorry for the long long post, but just thought id give (some of) the background for context.... I guess my question at the moment is.....how do I respond to Lowell...do I wait for the inevitable other letters to arrive then deal with them all together or individually...? Do I send them a CCA?  Many thanks
    • hi all just got the reminder letter, I have attached it and also the 2nd side of the original 1st pcn (i just saw the edit above) Look forward to your advice Thanks   PCN final reminder.pdf pcn original side 2.pdf
    • The airline said it was offering to pay $10,000 to those who sustained minor injuries.View the full article
    • The Senate Finance Committee wants answers from BMW over its use of banned Chinese components by 21 June.View the full article
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Welcome Finance - This company needs to be banned.


tightbum
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4599 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

The best news right now is that the right people have taken control of this division, but we must look at the overall picture, is welcome cleaning up their act! are they treating customers fairly? are local section managers listening to the new CEO? the answer is 'No', they are not. Before I left cattles/Welcome Finance, the entire company was focused on cash collection, and it seems to be working, but the methods used to do this needs a lot of explanation, it's all good to save the company, generate cash from outstanding debts but the problem still present are the senior section managers, area managers, who have turned a blind eye to their local branches using dirty tactic's to collect this cash, just to save their own skin, as long as they hit that monthly target. CEO is begging the staff to Treat Customers Fairly, but everyone is busy digging up another big hole which can lead to a lot of unhappy customers & breech of FSA guidlines! what the ExCo need to do is remove these old school regional managers, area managers and branch managers who dont believe in a better welcome, better training for staff & forcing staff to lie to customers to take illegal payments without consent, issue legal threats to customers in genuine financial difficulties, charge customers accounts with telephone/letter charges without even talking to customers, no thank you! couldnt do this anymore.....these internal issue still plague welcome's recovery...hence alot more fixing is still needed

 

 

THOUGHT I WOULD POST THIS FROM THE CATTLES SHARE TRADING FORUM

 

SAYS IT ALL REALY

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 9.6k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

The best news right now is that the right people have taken control of this division, but we must look at the overall picture, is welcome cleaning up their act! are they treating customers fairly? are local section managers listening to the new CEO? the answer is 'No', they are not. Before I left cattles/Welcome Finance, the entire company was focused on cash collection, and it seems to be working, but the methods used to do this needs a lot of explanation, it's all good to save the company, generate cash from outstanding debts but the problem still present are the senior section managers, area managers, who have turned a blind eye to their local branches using dirty tactic's to collect this cash, just to save their own skin, as long as they hit that monthly target. CEO is begging the staff to Treat Customers Fairly, but everyone is busy digging up another big hole which can lead to a lot of unhappy customers & breech of FSA guidlines! what the ExCo need to do is remove these old school regional managers, area managers and branch managers who dont believe in a better welcome, better training for staff & forcing staff to lie to customers to take illegal payments without consent, issue legal threats to customers in genuine financial difficulties, charge customers accounts with telephone/letter charges without even talking to customers, no thank you! couldnt do this anymore.....these internal issue still plague welcome's recovery...hence alot more fixing is still needed

 

 

THOUGHT I WOULD POST THIS FROM THE CATTLES SHARE TRADING FORUM

 

SAYS IT ALL REALY[/qu

Link to post
Share on other sites

What David Postings wants to do if he is in anyway serious bout making this company better is send spies round to work in the offices for a few weeks and see for himself what is going on, and that we are not exagerating or lying.

 

Shame they couldn't have got a few 'mystery shoppers' in while they were still lending...and am at a loss why Trading Standards never did anything like that considering the number of complaints logged about them.

 

The company needs cash, lots of it at fast, and needs to be able to show it can get this....they aint gonna play fair doing that now when they never have.

 

Mr Postings, stop hiding in the big leather chair, admit to whats been going on and deal with it. You have a once in a lifetime chance to make the right changes, do whats right and build a company folk may even trust again.

 

Or people will keep fighting you and looking for ways to stop Welcome, as they cannot be trusted.

 

Now who would they be lol :D

Dipply75

 

I am in no way a legal advisor and only speak from my own experiences and the helpful advice of those in the same boat! :p

Link to post
Share on other sites

What David Postings wants to do if he is in anyway serious bout making this company better is send spies round to work in the offices for a few weeks and see for himself what is going on, and that we are not exagerating or lying.

Good idea, but i dont think there will be any offices left to visit very soon ....hee hee

Shame they couldn't have got a few 'mystery shoppers' in while they were still lending...and am at a loss why Trading Standards never did anything like that considering the number of complaints logged about them.

The trouble with mystery shoppers is that when it happens...word always gets back to the office of when it is going to happen so they clean up there acts on a temporary basis

 

The company needs cash, lots of it at fast, and needs to be able to show it can get this....they aint gonna play fair doing that now when they never have.

Well untill i gat a copy of my agreement they aint getting another penny out of me

 

Mr Postings, stop hiding in the big leather chair, admit to whats been going on and deal with it. You have a once in a lifetime chance to make the right changes, do whats right and build a company folk may even trust again.

Personally think its too late for these cowboys no matter what steps they take.

 

Or people will keep fighting you and looking for ways to stop Welcome, as they cannot be trusted.

 

Now who would they be lol :D

 

 

Caggers

Link to post
Share on other sites

now that there are a few director jobs going at welcome, think ill send in my cv

 

500,000 a year

 

even cattles reading this forum, they still cant get it right

 

there realy is no hope for this company when they even ignore there own ceo

Link to post
Share on other sites

now that there are a few director jobs going at welcome, think ill send in my cv

 

500,000 a year

 

even cattles reading this forum, they still cant get it right

 

there realy is no hope for this company when they even ignore there own ceo

 

 

Post...you would be well worth the 500K and your right...there is no hope as the people employed by welcome are the lowest form of muppet with no intelligence , just a love of greed..................on another note...I mentioned last week that santander spread the acceptance fee across the term of there agreements but seem to think it is ok as it mentions it in the agrement.....i mentioned this to the rep from our other financial supplier and he said the very first payment of there agreement is the acceptance fee, nothing else just the acceptance fee.... the agreement then kicks in a month later, the reason they do that is ....in his own words....ilegal to charge interest on acceptance fees....so there is obviously a lot a substance to this argument..

Link to post
Share on other sites

Post...you would be well worth the 500K and your right...there is no hope as the people employed by welcome are the lowest form of muppet with no intelligence , just a love of greed..................on another note...I mentioned last week that santander spread the acceptance fee across the term of there agreements but seem to think it is ok as it mentions it in the agrement.....i mentioned this to the rep from our other financial supplier and he said the very first payment of there agreement is the acceptance fee, nothing else just the acceptance fee.... the agreement then kicks in a month later, the reason they do that is ....in his own words....ilegal to charge interest on acceptance fees....so there is obviously a lot a substance to this argument..

 

There is something to this, the more I dig, the more I see every other legit agreement has a larger first payment - this pays the initial acceptance fee.

 

They have been just adding it to the total amount of credit and making that bit extra per agreement. Not much until you multiply that by their consumerbase - mega ££ of pure profit - illegally.

 

Have seen how Santander treat folk also, so doesn't surprise me they're at it too

Dipply75

 

I am in no way a legal advisor and only speak from my own experiences and the helpful advice of those in the same boat! :p

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Dipply have you had any joy finding out about the IPT things for me?

 

Sorry The Wife! meant to get back to you sooner.

 

The 5% thing you know about but the reason you'll notice the amount they quote as IPT ISN'T 5% of your premium is a cracker.

 

welcome are trying the angle that in your PPI premium there is an 'element' for life cover - which is exempt from IPT. Now, Life Insurance IS exempt - but thats not what is in your PPI - it is life cover, which only covers your payments if you die...

 

Very grey area, but one that HMRC will have to decide - they have been asked ;)

 

I am also of the opinion they should be paying IPT on the interest charged on the PPI also - HMRC to clarify that also ;)

 

The government are obviously a bit strapped nowadays and clawing in every tax they can think of - wonder what they'll decide :D

Dipply75

 

I am in no way a legal advisor and only speak from my own experiences and the helpful advice of those in the same boat! :p

Link to post
Share on other sites

Have a court case going through with Welcome as we speak. Barrister agreed to take on the case on a CFA (conditional Fee Agreement) basis. A slow process, and even though he is only questioning the PPI side, I know there is a much bigger picture. The trouble is either getting him to question the whole loan, or sort the PPI issue then challenge the loan after.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just To Keep It In The Spot Light

 

Cattles Has Only Five Days Left To Pay Its 500 Mill Loan

 

Been Very Quiet From Cattles

 

Not Looking To Good For Them Is It

 

WHEN WAS THE LAST TIME A FTSE COMPANY WENT INTO BANKRUPCY

 

I THINK IT WAS LONDON SCOTISH OR MARCONI

 

BRING IT ON:D:D:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

Have a court case going through with Welcome as we speak. Barrister agreed to take on the case on a CFA (conditional Fee Agreement) basis. A slow process, and even though he is only questioning the PPI side, I know there is a much bigger picture. The trouble is either getting him to question the whole loan, or sort the PPI issue then challenge the loan after.

 

 

Disputing the PPI is easy as most of it was missold .................challenging the enforceablity of the agreement is harder ...................but not much;)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi All, got ppi refund from our friends(not) Welcome via fos, took a while but got there in the end. Got 1 agreement with deposit added back on and no repayment dates and interest added on for acceptance fee. Agreement 2 (car finance) got origonal agreement with all sorts of insurances added on. told them i wasent paying them and wanted agreement without insurances. Eventually they agreed and i went into the office and signed a new one. never recieved a copy, neither agreement has an agreement number, and personal loan has wrong address on it.Also the deposit has been added back on. I have a breakdown and it states £3.16x 36 months but the fee is £75, maybe im dumb but that works out to more than £75, interest springs to mind. I have sent 2 cca requests as per rules but dont hold out much hope as i couldnt supply agreement numbers as i have never been supplied with them or ever had a statment for any of my loans. Oh and by the way they havent contacted me for payment for 2 weeks now, I havent witheld any payment. the last time i spoke to them was three weeks ago asking them to explain charges on my account that she told me i haaaad levied against me, she tried to put me through to my so called account manager and the line was constantly engaged and would leave a note on my file and he would call me when he got the e mail. I am still waiting. soz for being so long winded.(I pay them weekly by card).

Edited by hari1888
some mistakes
Link to post
Share on other sites

Had a phone call tothe house will I was at work apparently left message to phone. Then they phoned my mobile from their mobile phone. They ask if I realised I had cancelled the direct debit and asked why. I directed them to their compliance team stating I was waiting on a number of outstanding requests including completion of my SAR which I have been waiting on for more than 4 months. I am willing to pay the loan but I felt I had no other answer to get things that I am legally entitled to.

Link to post
Share on other sites

She seemed reluctant to speak to the compliance team and said the account would be passed for legal action. I haven't heard anything since.

Edited by EBOY
.
Link to post
Share on other sites

just recieved our info, however no ts and cs with the agreement, no underwriting sheet or statement of price, however we did get somebody elses stuff including court request for info, bank statements and everything else...how bad is that...i cant belive they can be so reckless...morons

Link to post
Share on other sites

hi mojo

 

welcome playing silly prats again

 

contact the person who you have detail for

report to information comm as well

 

ill post a template to send back to welcome

 

include the things that are missing

 

they are on the back foot at the moment hoping it will all go away

 

fat chance with me on the case

Link to post
Share on other sites

LETTER BEFORE ACTION

Section 7 – Data Protection Act 1998

 

Dear Sir/Madam

 

Account: xxxxxxxx

 

I am in receipt of the documents that you have supplied in response to my Data Protection Act information request dated (Insert Date). The disclosure of personal data is incomplete in that at least the following documents are missing.

 

(Adapt this next section to your situation)

 

1) You have failed to provide a complete list of transactions and charges.(Add details of missing period - or a transaction that you know about which is not included)

2) You have provided no notes, or documents relating to any legal action between you and myself.

3) You have provided no notes, or documents relating to instances of manual intervention.

 

This is not an exhaustive list by any means, it is just an example of some of the information I am missing.

 

Accordingly, I have to tell you that you have not yet complied with your obligations under the Data Protection Act 1998.

 

The time for compliance with my request has now expired. If you do not comply fully with my Subject Access Request within 7 days, I shall apply to the County Court for an order to enforce compliance, together with damages at the discretion of the court.

 

Yours faithfully,

 

 

 

[name]

 

 

there you go mojo

 

send recorded

 

cattles announce agm in july

 

same every year, just going through the motions

 

if this loan is not paid by wed

 

the fat lady starts singing

Link to post
Share on other sites

LETTER BEFORE ACTION

 

Section 7 – Data Protection Act 1998

 

Dear Sir/Madam

 

Account: xxxxxxxx

 

I am in receipt of the documents that you have supplied in response to my Data Protection Act information request dated (Insert Date). The disclosure of personal data is incomplete in that at least the following documents are missing.

 

(Adapt this next section to your situation)

 

1) You have failed to provide a complete list of transactions and charges.(Add details of missing period - or a transaction that you know about which is not included)

2) You have provided no notes, or documents relating to any legal action between you and myself.

3) You have provided no notes, or documents relating to instances of manual intervention.

 

This is not an exhaustive list by any means, it is just an example of some of the information I am missing.

 

Accordingly, I have to tell you that you have not yet complied with your obligations under the Data Protection Act 1998.

 

The time for compliance with my request has now expired. If you do not comply fully with my Subject Access Request within 7 days, I shall apply to the County Court for an order to enforce compliance, together with damages at the discretion of the court.

 

Yours faithfully,

 

 

 

[name]

 

 

there you go mojo

 

send recorded

 

cattles announce agm in july

 

same every year, just going through the motions

 

if this loan is not paid by wed

 

 

the fat lady starts singing

 

Thanks post, ill get that sent straight away. Just a quick question...if i have actually requested the statement of price or underwriting sheet in my SAR do thay have to supply or can they choose no too...

Link to post
Share on other sites

the underwriting sheet will only be produced through a disclosure order in court.

 

it will cos welcome millions

they may slip up and enclose it

 

statement of price, yes they do need to include it

 

 

though i would let slip

 

i have in my possesion underwriting sheets showin commission payments that welcome say they dont do

 

the crap is going to hit the fan soon, i mean national

 

to all welcome fighters

 

hang on, not long now

Link to post
Share on other sites

the underwriting sheet will only be produced through a disclosure order in court.

 

it will cos welcome millions

they may slip up and enclose it

 

statement of price, yes they do need to include it

 

 

though i would let slip

 

i have in my possesion underwriting sheets showin commission payments that welcome say they dont do

 

the crap is going to hit the fan soon, i mean national

 

to all welcome fighters

 

hang on, not long now

 

 

post...your a genius

Link to post
Share on other sites

style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4599 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...