Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Thanks for that. I will give them till Tuesday. Thanks for your help, very much appreciated. 
    • Ok thanks for that, well spotted and all duly noted. Yes they did eventually submit those docs to me after a second letter advising them I was contacting the ICO to make a formal complaint for failing to comply with an earlier SAR that they brushed off as an "administrative error" or something. When I sent the letter telling them I was in contact with the information commissioner to lodge the complaint, the original PCN etc quickly followed along with their excuse!
    • its not about the migrants .. Barrister Helena Kennedy warns that the Conservatives will use their victory over Rwanda to dismantle the law that protects our human rights here in the UK.   Angela Rayner made fun of Rishi Sunak’s height in a fiery exchange at Prime Minister’s Questions, which prompted Joe Murphy to ask: just how low will Labour go? .. well .. not as low as sunak 
    • From #38 where you wrote the following, all in the 3rd person so we don't know which party is you. When you sy it was your family home, was that before or after? " A FH split to create 2 Leasehold adjoining houses (terrace) FH remains under original ownership and 1 Leasehold house sold on 100y+ lease. . Freeholder resides in the other Leasehold house. The property was originally resided in as one house by Freeholder"
    • The property was our family home.  A fixed low rate btl/ development loan was given (last century!). It was derelict. Did it up/ was rented out for a while.  Then moved in/out over the years (mostly around school)  It was a mix of rental and family home. The ad-hoc rents covered the loan amply.  Nowadays  banks don't allow such a mix.  (I have written this before.) Problems started when the lease was extended and needed to re-mortgage to cover the expense.  Wanted another btl.  Got a tenant in situ. Was located elsewhere (work). A broker found a btl lender, they reneged.  Broker didn't find another btl loan.  The tenant was paying enough to cover the proposed annual btl mortgage in 4 months. The broker gave up trying to find another.  I ended up on a bridge and this disastrous path.  (I have raised previous issues about the broker) Not sure what you mean by 'split'.  The property was always leasehold with a separate freeholder  The freeholder eventually sold the fh to another entity by private agreement (the trust) but it's always been separate.  That's quite normal.  One can't merge titles - unless lease runs out/ is forfeited and new one is not created/ granted. The bridge lender had a special condition in loan offer - their own lawyer had to check title first.  Check that lease wasn't onerous and there was nothing that would affect good saleability.  The lawyer (that got sacked for dishonesty) signed off the loan on the basis the lease and title was good and clean.  The same law firm then tried to complain the lease clauses were onerous and the lease too short, even though the loan was to cover a 90y lease extension!! 
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Misuse of partner's Student oyster card - +2mts use.


Recommended Posts

Good day, 

I got caught using my partner's student oyster card by a tfl officer. 

I have been using the card since January this year.

Got a  verification letter from tfl which I replied to (3 different mails were sent) accepting the offence and pleading not to proceed to court.

Will like to know what to expect after this.

Thanks 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you. So it's early days.

- Could you also post up what you said in the emails you sent to them please?

- And tell us how many times you think you used the card.

- Also, was the card confiscated or have you stopped using it?

HB

 

Illegitimi non carborundum

 

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Good evening, 

In response to the letter received with the , below are the information requested;

I do accept committing the said offence as I mistakenly picked up my partner's card when hurrying out of the house. I plead that you temper justice with mercy for the offence I committed on the said date.

I will be grateful if this is sorted out as soon as possible.

Thank you as I await your response.

Kind regards,

[edited - HB] 

 

Good day,

In response to the letter received with the case number; /LB, below are the information requested;

I do accept committing the said offence.. I plead that you temper justice with mercy for the offence I committed on the said date.

I will be grateful if this is sorted out as soon as possible.

Thank you as I await your response.

Kind regards,

[edited - HB]

 

Good evening, 

In response to the letter received with the case number; /LB, below are the information requested;

I do accept committing the said offence as i and my partner have been using our cards interchangeably not realising its an offence. 

I plead that you temper justice with mercy for the offence committed on the said date.

I will be grateful if this is sorted out as soon as possible and not proceed to court as it will have an adverse effect on us. 

Thank you as I await your response.

 

Kind regards,

[edited - HB]

 

These are the 3 mails i sent to them. 

I started using the card since January and I was paying for it with my bank card. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you for the information. I'm not sure why you sent three emails that all look the same?

The only question you haven't answered is how many times you used the Student card. Or if you're still using it.

HB

Illegitimi non carborundum

 

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

It's OK to tell us how many times you used the card, you're anonymous here.

TfL will be looking at the history of the card going back around two months, to look for a pattern of how many times it was used for the same journey. I expect they will write to you when they're ready but if there's a lot of work involved it could take time. They have six months.

Is there a reason why you sent them the same email three times?

I would say that you need to get a new letter ready for when they reply. Yours was short and succinct but it didn't say the things that we normally suggest. They want to see that you understand why you shouldn't have used the card, how that affects TfL and other users, that you've learned lessons from this and most importantly, that you won't do it again. We can help you with that.

HB

Illegitimi non carborundum

 

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I am a Domiciliary Care worker and my job entails me moving from house to house.

Please that is the reason I said I don't know the number of times but I started using it from January as I had some financial issues to sort out

Thanks for your response. 

I will really appreciate any help I can get and I am ready to do what is necessary to ensure it does not get to court. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

So did you use the card every day when you were working? I'm just trying to get an idea of how many times TfL will be looking at. You need to understand that they can see all of the journeys made on the card.

HB

Illegitimi non carborundum

 

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just now, jenexx said:

Thanks for your response.  I will really appreciate any help I can get and I am ready to do what is necessary to ensure it does not get to court. 

You can help us to work out how many times you used the card because TfL will be looking at the amount you cost them by not paying the full far.

Then you need to start working on a letter to send them when they reply to you. We can help you to refine it but we can't write it for you, we don't know the whole story the way you do.

HB

Illegitimi non carborundum

 

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • honeybee13 changed the title to Misuse of partner's Student oyster card

Right. What I'm trying to explain to you is that TfL will be going through all of the journeys they think were made by you, one by one, and working out how much they think you avoided paying in fares. That's what they will base their case on, whether it goes to court or not, as I understand it.

They may write to you again asking you to confirm which journeys were made by you. Are you going to be able to do this?

TfL don't like people abusing cards with discounts and you will need to persuade them not to take this to court.To me, that means being honest about what's happened.

If they don't like your answers to their questions, they will be looking to take it to court. If they do that, they will be looking to claim all of the fares you evaded, plus TfL's costs for looking into this, plus court costs, etc.

We need to get a good letter ready to send when TfL come back to you.

HB

Illegitimi non carborundum

 

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

All the journey on that card was made by me. Will really appreciate any help I can get. Thanks for your prompt response 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • dx100uk changed the title to Misuse of partner's Student oyster card - +2mts use.

I would do that. However this turns out you need to work out how much the unpaid fares could come to. If you manage to reach a settlement with them they will want the whole amount straight away. 

HB

Illegitimi non carborundum

 

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, jenexx said:

I do accept committing the said offence as I mistakenly picked up my partner's card when hurrying out of the house. I plead that you temper justice with mercy for the offence I committed on the said date.

you cant have picked it up by mistake multiple times. over a 2 mts period.

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Ok. Thanks. Will do that but have to figure out how much for  daily fare and work out for 2 months.  

My worry is i hope they don't go ahead to take the case to court as I can't afford that and the effect will be bad for me, generally.  

@dx100uk that was the reason I sent the other mails. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

We can't say if they will go to court, sadly, but they don't normally do that straight away. 

You need to co-operate with them, do a more detailed letter if they don't offer you a settlement when they write back. We can help you with that.

Be aware that it can take two or three letters back and forth to reach a settlement,  if they agree to one.

HB

 

Illegitimi non carborundum

 

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted (edited)

What did you say when you were stopped (were you questioned?).

Have you told them both
a) that you and your partner "use them interchangeably" but also
b) that on the day you picked up the wrong pass by mistake   ?

That might look to TfL that you aren't being honest with them.

You don't have to answer questions they haven't  asked you, but equally,if you are hoping for leniency, you don't want to get caught in a lie, either.

Edited by BazzaS
Link to post
Share on other sites

Ok. Thank you so much. What should be the content of the detailed letter I will be sending to them? 

Thanks once again for your prompt response 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...