Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Northmonk forget what I said about your Notice to Hirer being the best I have seen . Though it  still may be  it is not good enough to comply with PoFA. Before looking at the NTH, we can look at the original Notice to Keeper. That is not compliant. First the period of parking as sated on their PCN is not actually the period of parking but a misstatement  since it is only the arrival and departure times of your vehicle. The parking period  is exactly that -ie the time youwere actually parked in a parking spot.  If you have to drive around to find a place to park the act of driving means that you couldn't have been parked at the same time. Likewise when you left the parking place and drove to the exit that could not be describes as parking either. So the first fail is  failing to specify the parking period. Section9 [2][a] In S9[2][f] the Act states  (ii)the creditor does not know both the name of the driver and a current address for service for the driver, the creditor will (if all the applicable conditions under this Schedule are met) have the right to recover from the keeper so much of that amount as remains unpaid; Your PCN fails to mention the words in parentheses despite Section 9 [2]starting by saying "The notice must—..." As the Notice to Keeper fails to comply with the Act,  it follows that the Notice to Hirer cannot be pursued as they couldn't get the NTH compliant. Even if the the NTH was adjudged  as not  being affected by the non compliance of the NTK, the Notice to Hirer is itself not compliant with the Act. Once again the PCN fails to get the parking period correct. That alone is enough to have the claim dismissed as the PCN fails to comply with PoFA. Second S14 [5] states " (5)The notice to Hirer must— (a)inform the hirer that by virtue of this paragraph any unpaid parking charges (being parking charges specified in the notice to keeper) may be recovered from the hirer; ON their NTH , NPE claim "The driver of the above vehicle is liable ........" when the driver is not liable at all, only the hirer is liable. The driver and the hirer may be different people, but with a NTH, only the hirer is liable so to demand the driver pay the charge  fails to comply with PoFA and so the NPE claim must fail. I seem to remember that you have confirmed you received a copy of the original PCN sent to  the Hire company plus copies of the contract you have with the Hire company and the agreement that you are responsible for breaches of the Law etc. If not then you can add those fails too.
    • Weaknesses in some banks' security measures for online and mobile banking could leave customers more exposed to scammers, new data from Which? reveals.View the full article
    • I understand what you mean. But consider that part of the problem, and the frustration of those trying to help, is the way that questions are asked without context and without straight facts. A lot of effort was wasted discussing as a consumer issue before it was mentioned that the property was BTL. I don't think we have your history with this property. Were you the freehold owner prior to this split? Did you buy the leasehold of one half? From a family member? How was that funded (earlier loan?). How long ago was it split? Have either of the leasehold halves changed hands since? I'm wondering if the split and the leashold/freehold arrangements were set up in a way that was OK when everyone was everyone was connected. But a way that makes the leasehold virtually unsaleable to an unrelated party.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Caught using mother’s 60+ Oyster card - 50+ uses - SJPN Court

Going to court - TFL fare evasion

Recommended Posts

Hi!

I hope this reaches the right people.

I am a uni student and I got caught using my mother’s 60+ Oyster card by TFL when I attempted to travel from campus to home.

On 02/11/23 I was caught avoiding fares using my mother's 60+ oyster card.

The TFL officer took my details and I have received a few letters since.

In my response letter to TFL I stated that I was guilty of using the 60+ card to save money as we are not well off and money is tight. 
I received a letter stating I must attend a court hearing in April.
I did not receive a letter giving me the option to pay a fine. 

I emailed TFL about settling this matter out of court but they refused. 

I would like some advise on what to send to TFL and what to say in court as I am not confident in my abilities to successfully represent myself at the moment.

I want to settle this matter out of court if possible as a criminal conviction will impact my future once I graduate.

This case has been interrupting my focus and giving me restless nights because I am stressed over this, thus affecting my performance at university. 

I would like to know:
Which evidence to send in (SFE, my mother's bills as she pays for everything regarding living at this property)?
Some trips they are suspecting me of making with the 60+ oyster were made by my mother, how do I prove this (other than the hospital appointment letters from the hospital)?
Should my mother accompany me to court to testify for her travels?

Any advice will be greatly appreciated!

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Nicky Boy changed the title to URGENT Caught using mother’s 60+ Oyster card - need advice
  • TiredDodo changed the title to URGENT Caught using mother’s 60+ Oyster card and being taken to court - need advice

Hello, welcome to CAG. 

So we can advise you please could you post up a mass pdf with the correspondence you've had from TfL and what you've sent them? Obscure your name and address and their reference number. 

Our upload guide will help if you need it.

HB

Illegitimi non carborundum

 

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • dx100uk changed the title to Caught using mother’s 60+ Oyster card

thread title updated

moved to Public Transport Forum.

For how long have you been using the card?

how many uses/journey's are on their TIC list for you to sign off on?

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I wish you'd found us sooner.

This all happened four months ago; if you'd come to us then, it could have been resolved by now (although I wouldn't like to say which way).

You've received 'a few' letters since; it's usually over the course of those letters that, on our advice, you persuade TfL not to take forward their prosecution.

The problem here is that, with the amount of time that's passed, you can't tell them anything radically different to what you've already said. Bearing in mind that you've been placed under PACE caution at least twice by now, and according to your original post, you told them you did it to save money. I'm afraid mens rea is all they need to win a case, and that's it right there. 

Feel free to post up the info the others have asked for. Two other things, perhaps more importantly considering the stage of the game we're at now:

  • Have you got a court date yet?
  • Have they indicated what figure they're seeking yet? 

Re. your final questions, I think I'd probably want to keep my 60+ mother out of court, to be honest, but of course, that's between you. Unless the vast majority of journeys were made by her—were they?—it won't make much difference.

  • Like 3
Link to post
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, TiredDodo said:

I received a letter stating I must attend a court hearing in April.

 

14 minutes ago, Grotesque said:

Unless the vast majority of journeys were made by her—were they?—it won't make much difference.

agree

dx

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted (edited)

I am so grateful for all your responses!

I didn’t realise I had to do anything, then I got the letter from TFL about taking me to court and it freaked me out 

I tried to find places I could go for advice.

Now I’m with you lovely people :) if only I had found it sooner🥲

HB thank you for the upload guide!

I will attach the correspondence thus far. This includes the 3 letters I received from TFL as well as an email I sent them about going to court. 

The files are large so I will upload them in separate posts. This one is the first letter I received from TFL as well as the response after I send them my letter.

I used it quite a lot during that period of time because I was short on money.

Looking forward to reading your responses!

 

Edited by dx100uk
PDF removed Not properly redacted
Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you for the documents.

Could you also show us an anonymised copy of what you sent to them please?

Their wording is deliberately vague about offence/s and I expect they will be checking the card's history. Could you tell us how many times you used it please?

HB

Illegitimi non carborundum

 

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Here are emails I exchanged with TFL.

This is the important letter about court. 

Of these trips about 10 of them were made by my mother. 

Also I have a 16-25 Railcard linked to my Oyster card  I get discounted travel, this would significantly cut the amount that I am due. 

Please let me know if there is anything else you need 🙏appreciating the support.

 

 

 

docs1 .pdf

Link to post
Share on other sites

I've hidden your post with the court document because you've left your full name showing at the top of page 3. Please cover that up and repost.

So TfL are quoting a total of about 65 journeys and you think about 55 of them were you?

Also, when is the court date and when do you need to reply by? EDIT: I see the court date is 22nd April.

HB

Illegitimi non carborundum

 

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

pdf's merged and sorted.

 

  • Thanks 1

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Sorry DX,

We had the same idea.

If you want to put yours up again... OK.

But I noticed the redaction wasn't done properly originally. (OP please note!)

  • Like 1

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group The National Consumer Service

Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted (edited)

Hi sorry for the confusion with the files, should've just put them all together in the first place.

I have re uploaded the files. Thank you for pointing out that I missed out one part with my name. The system seemed to have moved my censors. Is there a way I can delete the other file in my last post?

Hopefully it's clear enough now. 

What should I be doing now regarding this case? Is there anything I can do to change my fate?

Please let me know. Thanks!

 

Edited by dx100uk
pdf has pers info still
Link to post
Share on other sites

pdf still has details showing.

no matter we've done the last one above a few posts

the 10 or so not your journey's.... you dont sign against but they wont have any affect upon the charge.

just p'haps a smaller sum to pay.

you will do well to get away with an OOC settlement here .

6 hours ago, TiredDodo said:

Also I have a 16-25 Railcard linked to my Oyster card  I get discounted travel, this would significantly cut the amount that I am due. 

nope..wont make any odds, the journey's they are charging you with under the TIC scheme are on your mothers card .

worthy of  read

https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/457981-60-oyster-card-months-of-misuse-settled-by-formal-warning-and-pay-a-fine/

thread title updated

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • dx100uk changed the title to Caught using mother’s 60+ Oyster card - 50+ uses - SJPN Court
Posted (edited)

Thanks dx.

Are you able to answer any of my questions in my initial post now that you're up to speed?

I want to avoid getting a criminal record and settle this matter out of court.

Edited by TiredDodo
Link to post
Share on other sites

you can only keep begging to TfL via the email address on the 1st letter.

those journeys by your mum are somewhat immaterial, so you dont need her there nor evidence of such.

theres also no worth in proving poverty by inc bills etc.

have you read that thread i pointed too...

and 

Caught using someone else freedom pass, more than one use...facing prosecution- please help **SETTLED OOC** - Page 2 - Public transport (Trains, tubes and buses) - Consumer Action Group

dx

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

9 hours ago, TiredDodo said:

Hi sorry for the confusion with the files, should've just put them all together in the first place.

I have re uploaded the files. Thank you for pointing out that I missed out one part with my name. The system seemed to have moved my censors. Is there a way I can delete the other file in my last post?

Hopefully it's clear enough now. 

What should I be doing now regarding this case? Is there anything I can do to change my fate?

Please let me know. Thanks!

 

You can keep writing to TfL about settling OOC, but please run the letters past us first. If you convince them, they can withdraw the court case.

You can also speak to the prosecutor on the day and ask about a settlement. This would need to be paid in one go, normally all the missed fares plus an extra amount for their admin costs. I don't know if they take cards nowadays or if it's still cash only. You need to work out all the fares you evaded and the cost of that and start saving up. EDIT: The court form says £326.60 in fares although that might reduce a bit, plus £375 for their investigation costs.

Have you replied to the court form? If the case is 22nd April there must be a deadline soon.

HB

Illegitimi non carborundum

 

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi!

Over the weekend I managed to make a draft of the letter for TFL, pleading them not to take me to court.

Could you please let me know what I should add or remove from this letter before I send it to TFL?

Much appreciated!!

Dear Sir/Madam,

I write to you today regarding the aforementioned case, and I respectfully request your attention to the following circumstances:

Firstly, I wish to underscore the potential ramifications a criminal charge could have on my future career prospects post-graduation. The implications of such an outcome are profound and deeply concerning to me

. The thought that my actions could jeopardise my future career prospects fills me with profound regret and sorrow.

In light of this, I implore you to consider the extenuating circumstances surrounding my situation and explore the possibility of settling this matter out of court.

The factors contributing to my actions are multifaceted. My family has been grappling with significant financial strain, exacerbated by the escalating cost of living. As a result of financial constraints, there are three of us living in a single-bedroom residence.

During the time I used my mother’s 60+ Oyster card, we received the distressing news of my mother's cancer diagnosis. Witnessing her battle with this illness has taken an emotional toll on me, leaving me in a constant state of worry and distress.

In an attempt to alleviate some of the financial burden on her and allow her to focus on her recovery, I made the regrettable decision to utilise her oyster card.

Though my intentions were born out of love and a desire to shield her from further worry, I have come to realise the gravity of my actions.

While I acknowledge that my actions were unjustifiable, I want to express my sincere remorse and assure you that I have learned a profound lesson from this experience.

The stress and anxiety resulting from this ordeal have significantly impacted my ability to concentrate on my university studies, leading to sleepless nights and a pervasive sense of unease.

I can assure you that I have been deeply affected by the repercussions of my actions and am committed to never repeating such behaviour. The magnitude of this offence is something that will stay with me for the rest of my life.

Considering these circumstances, I respectfully ask for your deliberation in resolving this matter extrajudicially. I plead with you to find it in your heart to show compassion and understanding.

 

Thank you for your attention to this matter. I eagerly await your response.

Link to post
Share on other sites

its never a good idea to go straight in with how this will impact you etc.

move the green bit to the very top, ditch the red.

then lets see how that reads.

i would also be including 'something' that proves to them you now have attained and have been using, you own card etc.

p'haps after the green bit before the rest.

dx

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

this 'letter' should be sent to TfL using the email address on their 1st letter.

dx

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi thanks for the feedback, I have made some adjustments.

The letter is roughly the size of an A4.

Please let me know whether this is okay to send off to the initial email address. 

Thanks so much!

Dear Sir/Madam,

I write to you today regarding the aforementioned case, and I respectfully request your attention to the following circumstances:

Firstly, I acknowledge that my actions were unjustifiable, I want to express my sincere remorse and assure you that I have learned a profound lesson from this experience. The stress and anxiety resulting from this ordeal have significantly impacted my ability to concentrate on my university studies, leading to sleepless nights and a pervasive sense of unease.

I can assure you that I have been deeply affected by the repercussions of my actions and am committed to never repeating such behaviour. The magnitude of this offence is something that will stay with me for the rest of my life.

Considering these circumstances, I respectfully ask for your deliberation in resolving this matter extrajudicially. I plead with you to find it in your heart to show compassion and understanding.

Since the incident, I have been diligently utilising my personal Oyster card, with card number xxxx, and have adopted a more conscientious and ethical perspective.

Additionally, I wish to underscore the potential ramifications a criminal charge could have on my future career prospects post-graduation. The implications of such an outcome are profound and deeply concerning to me. The thought that my actions could jeopardise my future career prospects fills me with profound regret and sorrow.

In light of this, I implore you to consider the extenuating circumstances surrounding my situation and explore the possibility of settling this matter out of court.

The factors contributing to my actions are multifaceted. My family has been grappling with significant financial strain, exacerbated by the escalating cost of living. As a result of financial constraints, there are three of us living in a single-bedroom residence.

During the time I used my mother’s 60+ Oyster card, we received the distressing news of my mother's cancer diagnosis. Witnessing her battle with this illness has taken an emotional toll on me, leaving me in a constant state of worry and distress. In an attempt to alleviate some of the financial burden on her and allow her to focus on her recovery, I made the regrettable decision to utilise her oyster card. Though my intentions were born out of love and a desire to shield her from further worry, I have come to realise the gravity of my actions.

Thank you for your attention to this matter. I eagerly await your response.

Yours sincerely,

Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted (edited)

not a legal opinion, but there are a couple of bits that sound overly verbose, making your letter come accross as contrived. 
Sounds more like someone trying very hard to use complicated words, rather than the real you. Am I wrong?

Apologizing deeply and repeatedly is fine (and I'm sure some ppl working at TFL get a kick from it), but I think it can be done in simpler words to come across as more genuine. 2 examples:

 

Quote

Since the incident, I have been diligently utilising my personal Oyster card, with card number xxxx, and have adopted a more conscientious and ethical perspective.

 

A pespective on what?!? On the use of Oyster cards? Does this need to be viewed via "more or less ethical" lens?  Best to delete bit in red entirely.

 

Quote

Though my intentions were born out of love and a desire to shield her from further worry, I have come to realise the gravity of my actions.

 

Bringing love into the tribunal may sound a bit cringy. How about something like this?  "My intentions were to shield her from further financial worries, but I have now come to realize how wrong that was"

 

 

Edited by Kyosanto
  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

14 hours ago, TiredDodo said:

During the time I used my mother’s 60+ Oyster card, we received the distressing news of my mother's cancer diagnosis. Witnessing her battle with this illness has taken an emotional toll on me, leaving me in a constant state of worry and distress. In an attempt to alleviate some of the financial burden on her and allow her to focus on her recovery, I made the regrettable decision to utilise her oyster card. Though my intentions were born out of love and a desire to shield her from further worry, I have come to realise the gravity of my actions.

This reads like you were already using the card when Mum's cancer was discovered.

Maybe rewrite it, so the cancer diagnosis was more of a stress trigger prior to using the card?

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group The National Consumer Service

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...