Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Thanks dx for your kind words. I plan to renew my season ticket and write a new begging letter as following, can I ask for any suggestion about it?   Dear Investigator/Prosecutor,   Thank you for your reply. I deeply regret my actions and the inconvenience they have caused.   I’m extremely remorseful for my crime. and regret it everyday. I often ask myself ‘’how can I do that thing just because I felt it is interesting. There are a lot of crimes in the world, but feeling it’s interesting is certainly not a reason to crime. I should not crime with any reason.’’ I think about these things every day, and I understand that I can’t blame anyone but myself.   I thanks to the staff who stopped me, as this is a valuable lesson in my life. I told myself that I should never ever repeat such a thing again, and never ever do anything which is possible to be in breach of any law. As a result, I carefully tap my oyster card every time before I enter the station now. I remind myself that I did a wrong thing before, and I should never let it happen again.   Although my monthly travel expenses do not warrant a season ticket, but I just renew my season ticket (please see the attachment). I understand that a crime cannot be truly compensated for, but purchasing a season ticket offers me a small measure of comfort, knowing that my actions caused a loss to the public interest.   I received an email which ask me to negotiate being class teacher in this summer (please see the attachment). I hope that I could teach the lovely students again, which may not be allowed with a criminal record. I would please ask that you would please provide me a single opportunity to settle all outstanding sums owed outside of court without the need for legal proceedings which would have a determinantal impact on my teaching career.   I sincerely apologise again for my crime. If you need anything further from me to help you please let me know.    Yours sincerely,
    • You did what??? You asked them to send you the documents that without them you had  a 100% ironclad win in Court. Why on earth would you do that? As it happens in this case, there is still enough mistakes in their PCNs and the NTH to have your case cancelled. Amd it may be that not sending those documents in the first place along with the ICO complaint and the letters from Alliance themselves which would confirm by the dates on the letters may be enough to cancel it anyway. I hope you have kept their letters as evidence? The chances are that Alliance will not actually take you to Court because of their errors but you never know.  You have made so much extra work for yourself in your WS if they decide to push their luck.though. Can you please post up their letter where they give the reason why I wasn't sent with the NTH.
    • I'm not sure that I fully agree with my site team colleague above.  My understanding is that there is nothing to stop you recording but it is strictly for your own personal use.   
    • I live in a student house, with 5 tenants, unihomes is our utilities provider, who we each have a direct debit set up with and have paid each bill every month. Two letters were sent in my name by BWLegal saying I had two outstanding payments due adding up to over £3500, I have tried to contact british gas (as that is apparently our houses provider) as well as Unihomes. Nothing has helped and BWlegal are pursuing legal action if these debts are not resolved by the 1st May. What do I do? I've called Bwlegal when i bring up that the debt isnt for me and for unihomes they hang up on me. so I am stressed and do not know what to do
    • cant do either if its not in a public place or on your land. dx  
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
        • Thanks
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

UKPC/DCB(Legal) 11+PCNs for privately owned van used for my Ltd Co. - PAPLOC for 5, gained Default Judgement!! - Parkhorse Shopping Centre, Church St, Hudds, HD1 2RT **SET ASIDE+CLAIM DISMISSED**


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 351 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi, I set up in business 5 months ago, in a shopping centre which is privately owned. They have underground loading bay and parking, the parking spaces are only for those who have it in their lease. I do not.

 

I unload stock every morning, and after a while started to just leave my van there, no problems as it was out the way, and I found the security guards were just handing out the tickets to anyone who did not have a business in there, no one used it really..

 

This changed in March when they brought in UKPC, I have since amassed 10+ tickets as I ave been leaving my van there, I have spoken to the centre managers but they said it is not possible that I leave my van there.

 

I have read that UKPC can not hand out fines, and what they instead hand out are actually invoices for using a service?? There seems to be a lot of warm air around this matter..

 

I might have to start parking my van elsewhere now, it's just that business is slow and I can not afford to be paying for town centre parking...

 

I have actually threw the tickets away...

 

Can someone please advise what UKPC are liable to do?

Link to post
Share on other sites

well if you don't do 'something' and respond in someway they might well think you are an easy touch and go for a CCJ, and that could be very expensive and as the total will be over £600 they might well get HCEO involved and they could raid your business.

 

is your van registered under the business or your name, are you sole trader or ltd?

 

have you been getting NTK's for each of these tickets too?

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi what 'something'

do you you suggest,

try to get them to understand that I have a business here?

And that I plan to abide and park elsewhere now?

 

I am LTD company and the van is not in the compnay name, just my own.

 

By NTK do ytou mean the yellow tabs on the window?

 

Couln't I just put a sign on my van say

'any company found littering my car will be fined £100',

surely that's as absurd as what is happening here.

Link to post
Share on other sites

So they have the correct address

It not a business van

So they can't raid your business

 

Unless you get a letter of/before claim is wait?

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi, so you mean just wait it out?

I am now going to park my van elsewhere form tomorrow.

 

.... Unregulated madness.. Is it likely they will attempt to take me to court...

Link to post
Share on other sites

Right, UKPC have been banned from accessing the DVLA database so cant do anything about contacting the keeper as from last week.

 

Tell us when you got the tickets slapped on your vehicle and what other correspondence you have and particularly have you made any contact with them?

 

As they will have had to wait 28 days before being able to ask the DVLA for keeper details most of these will be impossible to find out who you are anyway and if they were in time to ask about one or two they arent allowed to assume that you hadnt sold the van the day afterwards so cant just guess that you might still be the keeper.

 

They are such a shower they wont have got the paperwork right to claim keeper liability anyway so that gives you at least 2 reasons to complain to the DVLA and ICO if they do write to you.

 

So, will they take you to court?

I see their business folding before they get that far, the nlt director has taken half a million out of the business in loans that arent going to be repaid so I guess he is going to do a runner and start again and hope that no-one notices that.

 

keep any paperwork you get and start learning about how these things work rather than getting the hump about it, knowing what the signage says and actually means as far as an offer of a contract goes will help you make decisions on whether to park or not in the future.

 

If you can show us the pictures of the signage there that would help us help you.

Edited by dx100uk
Spacing
  • Confused 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

well, no unauthorised parking isnt an offer of a contract to park. No contract means you cant break it and therefore dont owe any money

Also UKPC are banned from obtaining your keepr detaisl so if you get a letter through the post tell us when it arrives and we will advise of what to say to the DVLA as a complaint.

Link to post
Share on other sites

UKPC can't actually take me to court then?

Certainly did not sign any contract, other than my business lease, but even that does not strictly say anything about NOT parking, at least I don't think so, should I check this?

 

I only have 1 out of the 12 or so NTK from UKPC... Am I right to just bin this now?

 

Also, without sounding like a cheeky sod, should I refrain from parking in this place or would I be ok, and only the landlord land owner can enforce action such as getting the police or other?

Link to post
Share on other sites

its private parking nothing to do with the police at all

 

don't bin stuff ever

scan to PDF and keep the scan

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

What I meant was, UKPC can not enforce anything.... only the land owners can enforce say police, for illegal parking, or something else?

 

So I have absolutely nothing to worry about here then?

Link to post
Share on other sites

its private parking/land nothing to do with the police at all

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

got some weird ideas mrk,

if a dca is sold the debt ofcourse you have an agreement with them you signed with the oc and it got transfered st sale.

but as they are not bailffs they are powerless

 

UKPC are going down soon by the looks of it anyway

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

The bailiff: A 12th Century solution re-branded as Enforcement Agents for the 21st Century to seize and sell debtors goods as before Oh so Dickensian!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Well I would be careful about continuing to park there.

You are trespassing and the freeholder would have a claim against you even if UKPC don't.

 

Though the damage to their car park would not probably amount to much most Judges would take a dim view of your practice of parking there free whilst running up costs from UKPC sending out their invoices so you could find it to be an expensive mistake.

 

Against UKPC as it stands the likelihood if it went to Court and you defended well there may be no charge. Against the freeholder you have no defence so are at the mercy of the Judge and how good their QC is.

Link to post
Share on other sites

No landowner is going to go to the expense of hiring a QC to fight a county court small claim, they cant recover the costs and a QC will be a thousand an hour minimum.

 

However, finding somewhere lese to park is good advice, the landlord could go after you in different ways that pass on the cost of his lawyers

 

but there is one thing for certain, this has nothing to do with UKPC and anything they say or do is totally separate, they cant claim agency or they wouldnt be able to send out demands in their own name either.

 

Understanding a little about how all of this works makes it easier to see that the parking co's normally dont have a leg to stand on but rely on lies, ignorance, bullying and bluff to get money when none is due.

 

There are places where they have a proper contract with the landowner, have proper signage and planning permission for their equipment but these are few and far between.

 

They are mostly done on the fly because the people who run the parking co's are ex-clampers and used to make money by threats and intimidation ( see how many got done for carrying an offensive weapon before the POFA and you will see the sort of person you are dealing with).

 

even Parking Eye, the biggest co by far, doesnt bother with planning permission unless they are brought to task by a council and would rather lie to a court than actually go down the proper route.

Edited by honeybee13
Paras
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

Seen this article..

 

http://ulsterherald.com/2015/01/23/private-parking-operator-hasnt-taken-anyone-to-court-in-five-years/

 

Any truth in it?

 

We could say I have racked up some tickets, but majority of them issued duting their ban, march to may...

 

I have a lease on a shop unit, and park car in the car park underneath the shopping centre which is for business use only, usually deliveries, it's an old shopping centre and only 20fters come in through the day, tons of room..

 

Should I be remotely worried, my plan was to use the fact I was a paying tenant and was not just someone parking on private land.

 

I do understand though that I would have to be in some kind of contract with UKPC to be taken to court?

Link to post
Share on other sites

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Sometimes, but thats because people who dont know what they're doing, let them.

UKPC always and without question slip up on something that kills their claim.

Any advice i give is my own and is based solely on personal experience. If in any doubt about a situation , please contact a certified legal representative or debt counsellor..

 

 

If my advice helps you, click the star icon at the bottom of my post and feel free to say thanks

:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

That article was written back in 2015

-I think you would have heard something from them by now.

 

And when they say they win most cases that go to Court they mean the ones where the motorist fails to turn up.

 

Up against a strong defence they rarely win.

Most of these parking companies only take a small percentage of non payers to Court.

 

This is to encourage many people to pay early to avoid Court.

 

As Renegadeimp said" they usually slip up on something when taking people to Court", which is true.

 

However they make most of their money from those who would rather pay up than go to Court.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...