Parallel Parking Ltd ANPR PCN PAPLOC- Rear of property High Street

[FTMDave]

The deadline for them to reply to the SAR is 13 November.  The deadline to reply to the Letter Before Claim is ... 13 November.

 

They won't take you to court the very first day after the deadline.  You might as well hold on and see if there is a reply to the SAR.

 

Come back here when they reply to the SAR, or if they don't on 10 November, and we can draw up an appropriate snotty letter.

[TheCat08]

I have received a reply to the SAR this morning. 

Attached is the Unpaid Parking Notice & the PCN . 

 

They have included the Privacy Policy, why, what, how & which data they process. 

 

What will be the next step on this please? Unpaid Park Charge Parallel.pdfPCN Parallel.pdf

[honeybee13]

As Dave said above, you need to start working on a snotty letter.

 

HB

[brassnecked]

Such a letter has to be disparaging and mocking in tone use the advanced Google Search box to search on Snotty Letter

 

[TheCat08]

I have tried to search in the bar at top of page for 'Snotty Letter', but it just bring me back to my thread?  Can you help me please? 

 

Edited November 4, 2022 by TheCat08
Amend

[dx100uk]

use our enhanced google searchbox not the top red banner one .

 

dx

 

[FTMDave]

Parallel Parking seem to be a small company.  Yours is the only thread we have on them.

 

Good news!  This wasn't an ANPR capture.  Some  creep has spied on your car.  So they haven't respected the POFA timescales with their PCN.

 

Also, what the heil does "unauthorised parking" mean?  It could be anything.

 

Did you find a ticket affixed to the windscreen?

[TheCat08]

There was no windscreen ticket at all !!  I did wonder about the images, as there are about 5 of them taken from all angles & of the windscreen?? 

Edited November 4, 2022 by TheCat08
To add content

[Nicky Boy]

Is there by any chance a ticket present on the picture of the windscreen?

[TheCat08]

Nothing at all Nicky

My intended letter for Gladstones.  

My Name & Address

Gladstones Solicitors

Unit 8, First Floor

210 Cygnet Court

Centre Park

Warrington

WA1 1PP 4th Nov. 2022

 

Dear Gladstones

Ref: Your Client - Parallel Parking Ltd - Reg. No. *****

Clearly & most definitely you are not the best solicitors in Britain. However, as comedians go, you are pretty good.. Your letter certainly gave me & others a good laugh out loud,, which as we know is a positive for general health. .

Have you read the new Code of Practice?  The £70 you have added for "time and resources spent" [yeah right ] has been described in the Regulations as a "rip off".     Your avarice truly exceeds your legal knowledge by miles. 

May I suggest you consult with a competent solicitor, so you are able to understand the content of this letter. 

With Sympathy 

My intended letter to Parallel - I'm glad to have made this forum aware of this company, as I'm sure I am not the only one to have been contacted by them. 

Any tweaks / amendments will be very welcomed.  Thank you. 

My name & Address

Parallel Parking Ltd

P.O.Box 7401

Walsall

WS1 9TP

PCN*********

Firstly, my empathy on your instructing Gladstones Solicitors.  

Clearly & most definitely they are not the best solicitors in Britain. However, as comedians go, they are pretty good. Your letters & Gladstones  certainly gave me & others a good laugh out loud, which as we know is a positive for general health.

You nor Gladstones have evidently not read the new Code of Practice?   To your alleged “Unauthorised Parking Charge” of £100, they are trying to add a further £70 for "time and resources spent" [yeah right ], which has been described in the Regulations as a "rip off".     

Your’s & Gladstones avarice truly exceeds your legal knowledge by miles.

 May I suggest you consult with a competent solicitor, so you are able to understand the content of this letter. 

With Sympathy 

 

pixs.pdf

[FTMDave]

OK, how about this -

 

 

Dear Will & John,

 

cheers for your Letter Before Claim.  I rolled around on the floor in mirth at the idea you actually thought I'd take such tripe seriously and cough up!

 

Now you know and I know and now you know that I know the million reasons why your country bumpkin client's invoice is total pants.  It's no surprise that following simple legal instructions is a tad too difficult in the hamlets of Shropshire .

 

On top of that the greedy retards have invented £70 Unicorn Food Tax and you've been telling porkies about solicitors' fees again.  Letter to the SAR in the post!

 

Your client can either see sense or I will look forward to thrashing them in court, obtaining an unreasonable costs order under CPR 27.14(2)(g) and spending it on a nice foreign holiday while laughing at your client's expense. 

 

I look forward to your defeating silence.

 

COPIED TO PARALLEL PARKING LTD

 

 

If none of the other regulars have comments, invest in two 2nd class stamps tomorrow and get two free Certificates of posting from the post office.

 

EDIT: our letters "crossed in the post"!!!

Edited November 4, 2022 by FTMDave
Typo

[KKilla]

  This far surpasses what I've put together.   I will certainly be making that stamp investment & will keep Parallel thread updated, even if it's silence !!!  

[Gick]

Dave, I think you mean SRA in para  4, 

The Cat08 Change SAR to SRA in Para 4.  (Solicitors Regulation Authority. not Subject Access Request. 

[FTMDave]

@GickGick is spot on!  Sorry about the typo.  SRA is right.

 

@TheCat08I was going to post to compliment you on the level of your snottiness!  However, send either your letter or mine or a mixture.  The important thing is that the fleecers know you would be big trouble for them in court, and are therefore more likely to leave you in peace and instead go after some mug who will be scared and who will just cough up.  No need to write two versions for Gladdys and PP, just address it to Gladdys (which is why I wrote "Dear Will and John", these being the two spivs who run the company) and send a copy to PP.  

 

The bit about the SRA is because Gladstones regularly lie about solicitors' costs.  For a £170 claim they are allowed to include £50, but have put £80 to try to scare you.  If you have time on your hands then really do complain to the SRA.  They're an old boys' network and will do nothing, but it will annoy Will & John and will reinforce their picture of you as a complete pain in the backside who is best left alone. 

[brassnecked]

Yes they know they will get spanked for the £80 so is good tolet them know you know its a no no, yes a mixture of Yours and FTMDaves will do nicely.

 

[TheCat08]

How does this look:-

 

Dear Will & John,

 

I would like to thank you  for your Letter Before Claim.  I rolled around on the floor in mirth at the idea you actually thought I'd take such tripe seriously and cough up!  

Clearly & most definitely you are not the best solicitors in Britain. However, as comedians go, you are pretty good. Your letter certainly gave me & others a good laugh out loud, which as we know is a positive for general health. .

 

Your avarice truly exceeds your legal knowledge by miles.  Now you know & I know the million reasons why your country bumpkin client's invoice is total pants.   It's no surprise that following simple legal instructions is a tad too difficult in the hamlets of Shropshire .  Clearly you have not bothered to read or are unable to comprehend the new Code of Practice?   The £70 you have added for "time and resources spent" [just a short a nano second of a nano second] has been described in the Regulations as a "rip off".   The invention of this Unicorn Food Tax just shows you’re not adverse to telling real porkies in attempts to scaremonger.  

 

 

Letter to the SRA in the post!

 

Your client can either see sense or I will look forward to thrashing them in court, obtaining an unreasonable costs order under CPR 27.14(2)(g) and spending it on a nice foreign holiday while laughing at your client's expense.  

 

I look forward to your defeating silence.

 

COPY SENT TO PARALLEL PARKING LTD

[honeybee13]

Very artistic. Did you send that by post or email?

 

HB

[TheCat08]

I will be sending this via post HB.  I've read through & seen it repeated several times never to let the charlatans get your email address.  Thank you for the approval  TheCat 

[honeybee13]

Well done.   Just checking because the graphics looked more like an email than a paper letter. I wouldn't waste coloured ink on them, lol.

 

HB

[FTMDave]

That is superb - well done.

 

Just one change.  Add a bit to the sentence

 

The invention of this Unicorn Food Tax just shows you’re not adverse to telling real porkies in attempts to scaremonger. 

 

instead

 

The invention of this Unicorn Food Tax plus inflating solicitors' costs just shows you’re not adverse to telling real porkies in attempts to scaremonger

 

That's because Parallel Parking added the £70 Unicorn Food Tax and then it is Gladdys lying about solicitors' costs.

 

Also at the end it should be "deafening silence" - my typo above.

[Nicky Boy]

Actually I think "defeating silence" is quite apt

[FTMDave]

Serendipity!

[brassnecked]

Yes with FTMDave's changes thats brilliant, copied by snail mail to fleecers as well  excellent.

[lookinforinfo]

On the contrary honeybee13 the introduction of coloured graphics will probably mean the letter is the first time they have understood a snotty letter.

[honeybee13]

Very good, LFI.

 

HB