Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • I see that at the start of your thread you said they hadn't sent a Letter of Claim.  And in fact in all the uploaded material there is no LoC.  This is great news.  Even were you to lose - you won't - the judge would chop off a chunk of the money for their non-respect of PAPLOC. However, I'm a bit confused as you've named the file name as a SAR.  Are you sure about this?  Did you send any other letters apart from the one dx advised which was a CPR request (not a SAR) to DCBL (not Group Nexus).  I'm not being pernickety, this will be important for your Witness Statement further down the line.
    • I didn’t say it wouldn’t. That is not the issue here. To continue driving after the licence has expired (under s88), the driver must have submitted a “qualifying application”.  An application disclosing a relevant medical condition (of which sleep apnoea is one) is not a “qualifying application”, This means the driver cannot take advantage of s88 and must wait for the DVLA to make its decision before resuming driving. The driver’s belief is irrelevant. The fact that a licence was eventually granted may mitigate the offence, but  does it does not provide a defence. But this driver didn’t meet the conditions. I explained why in my earlier post. He only meets the conditions if his application does not declare a relevant medical condition. His did. As I explained, after his birthday he did not hold a licence that could be revoked. In my view it doesn’t matter what it says. The offence is committed because his application declared a medical condition. Meanwhile his licence expired and s88 is not available to him. The GP letter would form part of the material the DVLA would use to complete their investigations. But until those enquiries are completed he could not drive. The offence does not carry points or a disqualification (because a licence could have been held by your father). It only carries a fine and the guideline is half a week’s net income. If he pleads guilty that fine will be reduced by a third. He will also pay a surcharge of 40% of that fine. But the big difference is prosecution costs: a guilty plea will see costs of about £90 ordered whilst being convicted following a trial will see costs in the region of £600.
    • I'd recommend getting a new thread started about this. Let us help!
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

UC and ESA


odds
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 1646 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi,

Just after some guidance really as I'm lost with all this UC stuff and journals etc.

 

I recently helped someone with their first UC claim but they had a "fit note" from the doctor due to mental health and anxiety.

 

So they got a date for the assessment, which was on a Friday and they attended that and actually came out at about midday, after spending over 2 hours in there, and to be honest I had expected to be faced with an MR and then an appeal.

 

Then the following week on the Tuesday there was an entry in his journal saying he had basically been placed in the "Support Group" and doesn't need any more "fit notes" or take part in any Work Related Activity and maybe entitled to extra payments, how quick is that ?

 

This is what is confusing me, I read that you don't get the extra payments until 13 weeks have elapsed, despite him having been assessed and placed in the Support Group after just 6 weeks.  So are they depriving him of payments knowing his situation just to save money ?

 

The other thing that bothers me is that nothing has been received from DWP yet saying why he was placed in the Support Group and what rates he will be paid.

 

Any advice on how to get the why and how the Decision Makers verdict was based on, simply because it's always nice to know what they used to come to this decision.

 

Thanks for any guidance.

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

the extra is back dated to the start of the UC claim

samething happened like this to the neighbour i helped with recently

check under the payments tab should show what and when.

 

was he already on ESA and just transferred over UC?

 

or is this his 1st ever benefits claim?

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

It's a bit complicated DX,  as it is my grandson. 

He apparently made a claim in another town when he was with his father and actually got an advance payment. 

However, that claim was closed due to him not attending appointments.

 

He came back living with us to sort his life out and made a fresh claim for UC but had a "fit note" from the start.

 

They have now stopped £30 out of this months UC, though they didn't last month.

 

When I questioned him about it he said he was given two advance payments of £250 when he was at his fathers house. 

I personally find that hard to believe, because they wouldn't give an 18 year old with mental health issues a £500 loan surely ?

 

Just a couple of points, Will the DWP actually write and explain why he was put in the Support Group ?

 

The next one is that after he was put in the Support group he had a message off someone in his Journal saying to check his To Do List and if he didn't his claim would be closed.

 

So even if he has had the shackles taken off, does he need to keep checking his journal ?

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes, and it seems that is how they communicate with everyone now.

 

I just find it strange that the Job Center were informed after a couple of days and yet a couple of weeks later nothing has been received from the DWP with an explanation as to the decision.

Link to post
Share on other sites

lets put it this way they are very quick to not give or reduce payments so you'd think they were equally in the reverse.

 

these advances are very quick mind and they don't often question why too hard either. but hen they were castigated for as you say making people wait 6&13weeks before payments before . its all now changed.

 

 

 

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

The LCWRA rate will not be paid for 3 clear assessment period, following the date of the award.

 

The health journey starts from date of first fit note, which is normally when the  LCWRA is backdated to.  You then count 3 full assessment period as not receiving the extra LCWRA amount and the LCWRA amount will then be included in the 4th assessment period.

 

The 3 month relevant period where the extra amount is not paid, is applied to every claim, apart from those with LCWRA entitlement being transfered from an ESA claim and those people with less than 6 months to live, with a DS1500 form stating this.

 

In regard to advances, what some people have done, is make a claim, ask for an advance, then don't both to attend the Job Centre. They then wait for the claim to be closed, before making a reclaim, ask for another advance and they may then bother to attend the Job Centre, to ensure claim is up and running properly. 

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

9 hours ago, unclebulgaria67 said:

The LCWRA rate will not be paid for 3 clear assessment period, following the date of the award.

 

The health journey starts from date of first fit note, which is normally when the  LCWRA is backdated to.  You then count 3 full assessment period as not receiving the extra LCWRA amount and the LCWRA amount will then be included in the 4th assessment period.

 

That makes it a lot clearer, thank you.  Although it does seem strange that someone that has already been assessed then has to wait 2 months for any extra payments due.

9 hours ago, unclebulgaria67 said:

 

 

In regard to advances, what some people have done, is make a claim, ask for an advance, then don't both to attend the Job Centre. They then wait for the claim to be closed, before making a reclaim, ask for another advance and they may then bother to attend the Job Centre, to ensure claim is up and running properly. 

It seems strange that there is no detail on the advance payments that you can access, it just says we are taking £37.77 this month.

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

New claim advances are repayable over 12 months. 

 

I thought there was now an advance tab on home page, which had the information ?

 

With LCWRA/Support group, this was always subject to a period where it was not paid. What the reasons for this, other than Government budget, I am not sure of. 

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, unclebulgaria67 said:

New claim advances are repayable over 12 months. 

 

I thought there was now an advance tab on home page, which had the information ?

 

 

With LCWRA/Support group, this was always subject to a period where it was not paid. What the reasons for this, other than Government budget, I am not sure of. 

 

You're correct, there is an Advances Tab but all it says in there is:

"If you have an advance you'll have to pay it back a bit at a time from future Universal Credit payments.

If you stop getting Universal Credit, you will have to pay your advance back another way. For example, by deductions from your wages."

 

If you check the statements under the Payments Tab it gives the amount due and the amount they are taking back and then just gives a phone number to get more information about your Loans or Advance payments.

 

Another quick question, do the DWP still write to people on UC after having an assessment stating that they are entitled to ESA, at what rate and the reason they have come to their decision.

If not, how would you get that information.  At the moment he has nothing in writing that proves he is in receipt of benefits, which some places will ask to see.

 

Thanks.

Link to post
Share on other sites

If a claimant has a work capability assessment, they will have the decision advised to them via their UC online journal. UC is an online claim, so everything is digital, apart from the health assessessment company who post out the assessment forms.

 

So proof of UC benefits is the online statement that can be viewed and printed off. There is nothing posted out. 

  • Thanks 1

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...