Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Unpaid wages should be pretty straightforward if you did the work. Don't be intimidated. You need only show you were due money, and did not get money.   The risk is that they have no money to pay you (and legal fees) - frankly a solicitor maybe be costing them more than your claim is for and I might have expected them to make a commercial decision to settle before this point regardless of the merits of the case.
    • Thanks so much FTMDave.  This is so much better   I'm still tempted to leave the blue section in is as if I lose it will at least save me a little bit of money.  But I get your point that it's pretty superfluous.   Thinking I'll get this in the post on Monday unless you think it's worth delaying?   
    • Hi All I have now received a Final Reminder, which I have attached. Can you confirm that I should still ignore this letter and take no further action. It does not appear to say "Letter of Claim" anywhere on the document but I just wanted to check with you all. Many thanks FightUnfairParkingTickets Parking Charge Final Reminder issued 29th May 2024.pdf
    • Hello I am a resident of a communal block of flats owned by a Housing Association and since Tuesday 14th May 2024 Matthews and Tannert had put up scaffolding for a job on the roof last week, which was up for the best part of nine days. They had removed the scaffolding on Thursday 23rd May 2024 but my Sky box is still not working because of the satellite dish outside, and I was wondering whether the scaffolders had touched the dish while it was there and as a result had probably knocked the dish and probably made the dish go out of signal or whatever. I needed someone to check this out as well as to see my Sky box to see what could be the problem, and hopefully sort this out. I have had my Sky Digibox for many years and I have got recordings saved on them that I have had a long time - it would break my heart if I had lost them forever.       I contacted Sky but I almost made the mistake of accepting an offer where I would have to pay £31.50 and wait a whole month without television in my front room for it. I am in debt at the moment and I don't want all this on top of everything else - thankfully I have since cancelled it two weeks later when I told the person on the phone that it is the dish which is at fault as well as the fact that I live in a communal Housing Association property, and so that is one of very few weights off my mind. I emailed the Housing Association's Repairs department and they said that they will contact an electrical company to come out and see to the dish outside. I received a telephone call on Friday 24th May from the man to say that he will arrive on Wednesday 29th May 2024 to do the job. He arrived at around 9.40 am on Wednesday as promised; he went into my flat and had a look at the Sky box and saw the blue screen on my front room TV set, indicating no signal. He also looked outside as to where the dish was.  The main problem was that the ladders that he had with him were not enough to reach the dish outside as the dish was towards the top of the building - obviously the Health and Safety aspect of the job didn't allow him to do this. He then mentioned that whether he could do the job as a result of getting onto the roof and doing it like that as the dish is closer to the top. He said that he needed the key to enter the loft part of the building in order to reach this, and he needed to contact the Housing Officer at the Housing Association who had key to this, but lo and behold, he came on the Wednesday to do the job, and guess what? Wednesday was the Housing Officer's day off and so therefore he was unable to contact him for the key so that he could do the job! I just couldn't believe it myself. I am personally annoyed because this has not been sorted, and the man who came to do this is also annoyed because he came all the way to Nottingham from Peterborough, and he said to me that he won't get paid if he cannot do the job, so you see, we are both angry about this for different reasons. We are both in the same boat with regards to frustration, and we both want to see a conclusion to this, once and for all. Sometimes I wish that I didn't live in a flat which is in a communal building and I am thinking of getting a transfer to a one bedroom flat that isn't in that sort of place. I pay around £85 a month in a Direct Debit to Sky to receive their TV services which I cannot use at the moment, and I don't have much money in my bank account as it is due to one thing and another. I also pay nearly £14 a month to TV Licensing so that I can legally watch TV in my front room. I pay for Sky hence the fact that I want the Sky service in my front room and not Freeview. Also, as the General Election is coming up in five weeks' time, I want the satellite TV to be working properly so that I can catch up with what is on the news channels, and I feel rather "cut off" from that at the moment, and I want it working in time for Thursday 4th July 2024 for ovbious reasons . I have Freeview in my bedroom, but that is not the point  - I don't want to be limited to my bedroom every time I want to watch TV. I have tried putting the Freeview in te front room but it doesn't seem compatable for the same uses that I usually have Sky for.  Sunday 9th June 2024 is Day 27 of the satellite TV not working in my flat, and I feel that something needs to be done about this. You can take this message as a complaint if you like, but nevertheless, I want this message to be acknowledged and also something to be done about what has happened. I have enough on my plate with regards to health problems and depression without things like this making things worse. I would appreciate it if something was done.  I don't like naming and shaming but it is Matthews and Tannert's fault that I am in this situation in the first place, and sometimes I wish that I could sue them. In a nutshell, I have had more than enough after being without TV in the my front room for nearly four weeks. Also, at a time like this, I am missing so much of interest on TV what with the General Election comning up in just a few weeks.
    • There's no facility for a settlement "out of court" as such. But matters that are started under the "Single Justice" (SJ) Procedure can often be concluded without the defendant appearing. The SJ procedure, as the name suggests, involves a single magistrate, sitting in an office with a legal advisor, dealing with matters "on papers" only. Nobody else can attend. The SJ deals with straightforward guilty pleas. Anything where the SJ believes the defendant should appear, or which should be dealt with by the "ordinary" court are adjourned o a hearing in the normal magistrates'  court .As well as this, all defendants have the right to a hearing in the normal court if they wish. Nobody is forced to have their case heard under he SJP.  In particular, as far as traffic matters go, a SJ will not disqualify a driver and if a ban is to be considered, the case will be passed over to the normal court. Because, following your SD, you will be pleading Not Guilty (and offering the "deal"), your case would usually be heard in the normal court, meaning a personal appearance. To be honest, performing your SD at the court is a more straightforward way of doing things. It avoids any possible hitches involved in serving he SD on the court. But of course, as I said, most courts have backlogs which mean an SD may not be quickly accommodated. If you do end up doing your SD before a solicitor, check with them the protocol for serving it on the court. Do let us know what the solicitor says about Wednesday.    
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

VCS ANPR 2015 PCN claimform - Berkeley Centre Sheffield S11 8PN ***Claim Discontinued***


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 1480 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

well in all truth 10am - 4pm is the full 'time window' the case could be heard during.

 

there is no known start time typically for wall notice schedule for the days' cases for the morning session to begin.

 

The main issue being as the local court never knows what other urgent items might come up from the night before etc, those cases HAVE to be dealt with first.

once the schedule begins, their wall notice will tell you the order ...so you should be able to gauge when yours will be.

 

if you have a word with the clerks of the court, most now are quite happy to know (and encourage you to tell them) of any issues on the day and will help with them by having a word with the judge of the day (get you in first or say 1st after the set lunch period).  i've known some to say go away to a local cafe etc if you dont live local and will send you a text just before you are due there.

though it does depend upon the clerks and the courts.

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

the courts knowthis is a rubbish claim hearing so wont allocate any tiem for it as they expect to slot it in at some point but if another case drags on then you may not get a hearing that day.

If that is the case you need to have a letter drafted to show your expenses for the day out and ask that the claimant be forced to pay then regardless. Nowthis may well be added to any order for a new hearing and VCS will by them be a good few quid down before they say a word. If that is agreed it shows that the judge has read the papers and your chances of success can be measured accordingly.

 

No letter though and you will get nothing.

commonly both sides will be told to swallow their costs as long as they are not too great but personally I would go for double or quits as a postponement that results in a loss for VCS will see them over £100 out of pocket on top of their costs for bringing the claim.

make them blink first

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for all that.

We won't be requesting an adjournment and I'm now focussing on the main points for shooting down their statement.

VCS assert that they are only there to manage & enforce, and aren't responsible for the policy.

 

Their attachment Schedule 1 is actually the Parking Policy (a generic one) - it's signed by the leasing agents & includes the statement that wheel clamping may be used!

 

I assumed the policy and terms and conditions would be laid down by VCS - not that it makes any difference really, since VCS is responsible for the signs that advertise the terms and conditions.  So their position is they are simply implementing the landowner's terms and conditions and entering into a contract on behalf of the landowner, without any clear chain of authority, but they get to keep the proceeds. It's a confused picture.

 

Anyway the agent's' policy makes it clear that a minimum grace period of 10 minutes must apply, and the agreement (contract) signed with the agent, stipulates that VCS has to abide by the BPA Code of Practice. Both useful points.

Link to post
Share on other sites

never assume anything, use this to show that there isnt actually a contract that is lawful in place to allow them to perform to that contract.

 

Likewise they arent members of the BPA and havent been for years so again tht should negate any contract with the public as they cant use the POPLA or Ombudsman Services Ltd as an ADR if you had decided to go down that route.

 

Yes, the chain of authority is a thing to plug at the beginning but you have stronger arguments about the actual contract offered to you, so dont be dismayed if the judge just decides without any evidence to support it that a contract and chain does exist.

 

Dot forget Excel ISNT VCS

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes thanks for that Eric's brother.

 

In Para 9 of their statement, VCS say

" The Claimant submits that they have the authority to implement a parking scheme since 1 December 2010.

There has been no notice of termination (actually the agreement is only for 36 months!!) and the Claimant remains contracted to enforce parking to date."

 

This is rubbish as all the current signs are in the name of Excel, who have installed a pay and display machine and changed the rules. I will try to find out when they took over. 

 

Don't know if I mentioned, but I have now established that they have paid the court fee, so looks Simon is keen to continue. 

 

They do go on about their 2 tier appeals procedure, even though they're not members of the BPA.

The first layer is an 'Adjudicator' within their appeals department.

Second tier is the IAS: Independent Appeals Service, which they describe at length. 

 

I've just come across John's case with VCS in the same place from 2018 re an overstay in 2017.

The claimant's statement is word for word the same as mine, including the cases cited, and the photographs attached!!

 

It would be nice to question whether these signs were in place 3 years previously, but I don't have the proof.

It was a sad and an unfair outcome for John in Wrexham.

I hope our judge is more receptive!

Link to post
Share on other sites

You are missing the point, their contract with LL says they use the BPA appeals system when they CANT because they arent members. read up on performance of contracts.

 

Now the obvious assumption is that the contract was never renewed and they are relying on inertia from the LL but this isnt good enough if you read about such things in other cases where the claim was chucked out ( parking prankster again) they cant offer you a deal which they cant perform and part of that is offering you a chance to follow the BPA code of Practice and appeals procedure.

 

The fact they are members of the IPC and they have their own appeals system is irrelevant,  you jave to be offered the BPA one according to their deal with the landlord

Link to post
Share on other sites

Does anyone have any clue as yet as to what the  courts will do in the current Corona crisis?

It looks as though I'm to be incarcerated at home from this weekend and there's every chance nurseries and daycare centres will soon close. This means neither I nor my daughter will be able to attend the hearing on April 6th.

 

I'm thinking I should now write to the court and offer a hearing by video link.

It was indicated to me last time I tried to make contact with the courts, that I should write to them as soon as possible if I needed to request an adjournment.

 

It's not possible to speak to the local court direct, so I would be grateful for any guidance from those who may have some inside info. I'm reluctant to take a wait and see approach, since the government's position is that I'm not supposed to have any avoidable contact for the next 12 weeks.

 

don't think that's going to change before the hearing date. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

No idea, it depends on the government, but ...

 

Here in Italy the court system carried on for a short while, until lawyers and court staff were up in arms asking what was the difference between a crowded shopping centre and a crowded court building.  So all court cases have been stopped.

 

I expect things will change in the UK by the day now.  6 April is still a while off.

 

Probably best to prepare for the absolute worst (as you have been brilliantly doing!), that your daughter has to go on her own and get someone to look after her kids - but it's also possible that courts could be shut down by then.  As I say, things will probably be very, very different by 6 April.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Might be a very lean time for the PPC's if less people are parking, and they won't get much joy if army vehicles are being used and are getting double dipped by Simple Simon.  Just waiting for him to invoice a police car like UKPS did to Devon & Cornwall Police on a shout.

 

I can't seer how the County Courts can operate apart from undefended defaults going through Northampton. but as FTMDave says be prepared.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

The bailiff: A 12th Century solution re-branded as Enforcement Agents for the 21st Century to seize and sell debtors goods as before Oh so Dickensian!

Link to post
Share on other sites

This is only a call for something, not a decision, and concerns criminal instead of civil courts - but I can't imagine things will stay as they are till 6 April

 

https://www.bbc.com/news/uk-51935320

 

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

No I hadn't seen that EmmaTPockets - thanks. It's suggesting we should contact the court then - I was afraid that they would say tough if your lay rep can't come, the Defendant still has to, but this is saying if those coming with you have to self isolate, you should contact the court, so I guess we'd better follow the advice. 

 

That's a very good article FTMDave - thanks for that. I can see that criminal cases must continue, so as to preserve law and order, but I agree there should be some re-thinking of civil cases, especially ones concerning a 7 minute parking overstay!!! Why put people at risk for such an absurd claim! 

Link to post
Share on other sites

That is a good point RichieBoy56, look for the duration in any contract they claim to have, it might just be the clincher if they cant prove it is still in force.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

The bailiff: A 12th Century solution re-branded as Enforcement Agents for the 21st Century to seize and sell debtors goods as before Oh so Dickensian!

Link to post
Share on other sites

RB56 have you never started a thread?

this would be a good one to write up to help others?

?

 

dx

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes that figures prominently in our comments re Contract and I remember someone on the forum saying the contract had been the clincher so it might have been you Richie Boy.

 

We also have a lot of points on contract but that fixed term one is a no brainer

- I expect they'll present some laughable creation from the agents trying to say there's been a renewal

- let's pray we get a judge like yours Richie Boy! 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you so much for that FTMDave. That is extremely helpful.

 

I've consulted my daughter and we will now ask for an adjournment as I'm socially isolated and she has no childcare, nor does she have the technology to take part in a remote hearing.

 

I was hoping the court would take the initiative so we wouldn't have to hassle them at this time,

but nothing has been forthcoming,

so we'll have to submit a request.

 

I would have liked to just get it over with, but these are crazy times.

If they agree to an adjournment, the challenge will then be to stay on top of it until matters settle down. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Late Monday afternoon we mailed the attached letter to the court and my daughter also emailed it, as we were concerned that the hearing day was getting close.. On Tuesday, she received an acknowledgement and was told she'd get a response from the court within 5 days.

 

Today, Wednesday,  she received in the mail, a letter dated 23rd (so no connection with our letter) from VCS enclosing a Notice of Discontinuance!! My guess is that Simon realised that with thousands of people dying round the world in a global pandemic, it was unlikely that the courts would be sympathetic to a piddling claim for a 7 minute overstay.

 

It could be that the poor Paralegal took fright at our voluminous Defence statement and was scared of our final comment about claiming expenses! Maybe her deal means it gets deducted from salary! We'll never know unfortunately.

 

I would have relished the opportunity to let fly at them in a hearing and had lots of extra points I was working on, like the inability to perform to contract, but heyho, my daughter is delighted it has gone away, and I can now remove all the many files from my kitchen table.

 

It has been a great learning experience and I thank everyone on this site for coaching me and leading me to excellent reference material - I wouldn't have known where to start without your help. I'm very happy to support your site and encourage every other victim to fight the good fight. 

 

Keep safe everyone.

 

 

Letter re adjournment redacted (3).pdf

Link to post
Share on other sites

simon running 

now that is RARE!!

 

 

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • dx100uk changed the title to VCS ANPR 2015 PCN claimform - Berkeley Centre Sheffield S11 8PN **Discontinued**

And we've received a very kind donation from you – and I responded with an email. You may need to check your spam folder because Hotmail addresses often give us problems.  🙂

Link to post
Share on other sites

Absolutely delighted for you @anniebattlemum. On a different group someone else posted a notice of discontinuance they had received. I genuinely think that the looming threat of a court case can not be good for anyone's mental health and stress levels in the best of times (no matter how well prepared you may be) and something as trivial as a 7 minute overstay totally pales into insignificance in the current pandemic crisis. I wish you and all your family well and please keep safe. Sending virtual hugs and high fives!!

 

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...