Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • I'm not sure on the best option here, I'm happy to go with Tomlin, however I can afford to pay this one in full if needed and wonder whether I should be trying to get a reduced amount, perhaps in the court hallway before going in? that would require submitting a WS of some sort. What I 'like' (strong word) about TO in this instance, is that it allows me to keep my savings to hand for further accounts needing attention in the near future and I would hope gives me some control over the pcm amount.. I've read a number of TO threads now (fell to sleep at the keyboard last night ) but have a few questions please: - Do I specify the payment arrangement in a TO or the claimant? I'm thinking 20% lump upfront plus 96 months of circa 60 squid. - Who decides repayment amounts if CCJ is granted? if the judge, then do I submit I&E at any point? Given the amount of total debt across all my claims, I need to ensure anything I commit to is future proofed. I wouldn't want all my disposable income sent to this one debt, only to have another one in a month or two.
    • I'm sure I've said before that it's fine and dandy bringing in rules that favour you or your party, but you have to consider how it would play out if your opponents get in and want to use the same rules...
    • Its Gaelic celebration and bonfires today - Beltane Quite fortuitous for tomorrow lets hope
    • look on the bright side - it would allow Biden to do what he likes ...
    • Few tweaks as the run order was completely messed up and the main point of your defence (reconstituted agreement) pushed to the bottom of the statement.   I, XXXXXX, being the Defendant in this case will state as follows; I make this Witness Statement in support of my defence in this claim and further to my set aside application dated 1 November 2022. 1.The claimants witness statement confirms that it mostly relies on hearsay evidence as confirmed by the drafts in person in the opening paragraph. It is my understanding they must serve notice to any hearsay evidence pursuant to CPR 33.2(1)(B) (notice of intention to rely on hearsay evidence) and Section 2 (1) (A) of the Civil Evidence Act. 2.  I understand that the claimant is an Assignee, a buyer of defunct or bad debts, which are bought on mass portfolios at a much reduced cost to the amount claimed and which the original creditors have already wrote off as a capital loss and claimed against taxable income as confirmed in the claimants witness statement exhibit by way of the Deed of Assignment. 3. As an assignee or creditor as defined in section 189 of the CCA this applies to this new requirement on assignment of rights.  This means that when an assignee purchases debts (or otherwise acquires rights under a credit agreement) it also acquires certain obligations to the borrower including the duty to comply with CCA requirements (such as the rules on statements and notices and other post-contractual information).  The assignee becomes the creditor under the agreement. This ensures that essential consumer protections under the CCA cannot be circumvented by assigning the debt to a third party. 4.  I became aware of original Judgement following a routine credit check on or around 14th September 2020. 5. The alleged letter of claim dated 7 January 2020 was served to a previous address which I moved out of in 2018, no effort was made to ascertain my correct address.  I have attached a copy of my tenancy agreement which is marked ‘Appendix 1’ and shows I was residing at a difference address as of 11 December 2018 and was therefore not at the service address at the time the proceedings were served.  I have also attached an email from my solicitors to the Claimants solicitors dated 14 July 2022 which was sent to them requesting that they disclose the trace of evidence they utilised prior to issuing the proceedings against me.  This is marked ‘Appendix 2’. The claimants solicitors did not provide me with these documents. 6. Under The Pre-Action Protocol for Debt Claims 2017 a Debt Buyer must undertake all reasonable enquiries to ensure the correct address of a debtor, this can be as simple as a credit file search. The Claimant failed to carry out such basic checks. Subsequently all letters prior to and including ,The Pre action Protocol letter of claim dated 7 January 2020 and the claim form dated 14th February 2020 were all served to a previous address which I moved out of in 2018. 7. Upon the discovery of the Judgement debt, I made immediate contact with the Court and the Claimant Solicitors, putting them on notice that I was making investigations in relation to the Judgement debt as it was not familiar to me.  I asked them to provide me with a copy of the original loan agreement but this was not provided to me.   The correspondence to the Claimant Solicitor's is attached and marked ‘Appendix 3’ 8. On (insert date) I successfully made application to set a side the judgment. The claim proceeded to allocation, 9. The claimant failed to comply with the additional directions ordered by District Judge Davis on the 2 February 2024 'The Claim shall be automatically struck out at 4pm on 3 April 2024 unless the Claimant delivers to the Court and to the Defendant the following documents.' None of these documents were received by the court nor the defendant by that date. (insert date you did receive the documents) I then sent a Data Subject Access Request to Barclays but no agreement was provided. Details the timeline of communication between myself and Barclays are attached and marked ‘Appendix 4’and the copies of correspondence between myself and Barclays are attached and marked ‘Appendix 5’. Remove irrelevant 10.The claimant relies upon and has exhibited a reconstituted version of the alleged agreement. It is again denied that I have ever entered into an agreement with Barclaycard on or around 2000.  It is admitted that I did hold other credit agreements with other creditors and as such should this be a debt that was assigned to Barclaycard from another brand therefore the reconstituted agreement disclosed is invalid being pre April 2007 and not legally enforceable pursuant to HHJ Judge Waksman in Carey v HSBC 2009 EWHC3417.  Details of this are attached and marked ‘Appendix 6’. The original credit agreement must be provided along with any reconstituted version on a modified credit agreement and must contain the names and address of debtor and creditor, agreement number and cancelation clause. 11. Therefore the claimant is put to strict proof to disclose a true executed legible agreement on which its claim relies upon and not mislead the court. 12. It is denied I have ever received a default Notice pursuant to sec 87(1) CCA1974.The claimant is put to strict proof to evidence from the original creditors internal document software the trigger of said notice.  13.   As per CPR 1.4(2)(a) the court encourages parties to cooperate with each other in the conduct of proceedings in order to try and save time and costs for the parties and to also save the time and resources of the court however, despite vast attempts at mediation the claimants have been most unreasonable and have remained unwilling to mediate. 14. Until such time the claimant can comply and disclose a true executed copy of the original assigned agreement they refer to within the particulars of this claim they are not entitled while the default continues, to enforce the agreement pursuant to section 78.6 (a) of the Credit Consumer Act 1974. I believe that the facts stated in this Witness Statement are true.  I understand that proceedings for contempt of court may be brought against anyone who makes, or causes to be made, a false statement in a document verified by a statement of truth without an honest belief in its truth. Signed                 ………………………………………………….. Name                  XXXX Date                     30 April 2024   Run 3 copies Court /Claimants Sol/File
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

TORT Notice applied to my car. Housing Association car park **RESOLVED**


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 1959 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi

 

Yes you can send the Formal Complaint by email just ensure in the Subject ling to put Formal Complaint and in the email itself and if you can ask for a read receipt.

 

The reason I say to send a SAR asking for all data held is you may be surprised at what they have discussed about you.

How to Upload Documents/Images on CAG - **INSTRUCTIONS CLICK HERE**

FORUM RULES - Please ensure to read these before posting **FORUM RULES CLICK HERE**

I cannot give any advice by PM - If you provide a link to your Thread then I will be happy to offer advice there.

I advise to the best of my ability, but I am not a qualified professional, benefits lawyer nor Welfare Rights Adviser.

Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 84
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Find out that they're not the land owners, then send a final communication stating that if the interfere with the car you'll be reporting them to the authorities and seek substantial compensation.

Then just hope they carry on with their threats.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Because advice depends on who owns it. If the HA doesnt own it, they cant do a thing. We've already said that. If they do, then they can issue a notice advising you to remove it within a certain timeframe, or they will.

 

Right now, you or us, do not know 100% who owns the land, so nobody can give you concrete advice. Look at it from the HA side. For all they know, it could have been dumped.

 

One thing in your favour, as already said, is that NOTHING that they have said is in your TA.

 

From Monday, I only have 4 days before the HA say they will remove my car and destroy it.

It's just not feasible to fix and MoT my car by then.

 

I appreciate your advice but my TA must count for something or the HA wouldn't of quoted terms of the TA that don't exist in my TA.

 

 

I don't have a term which says I can place a fridge or setteee in the car park and a car park is not where a fridge or settee would normally be kept.

 

If I had a garden bench in the communal grounds and there is nothing in my TA which says I can not have a garden bench but the HA say I must get rid of it, the bench is still my property and the HA must give me an opportunity to removed it myself.

 

This is what the Tort notice is for, but normally applied to abandoned property, to give fair warning, give the HA a defence and prevent the HA committing a tort when they remove, sell or destroy my bench.

 

But I have a TA which says, as a resident I can park my car in the residents car park, there is no term which says my car must be roadworthy, taxed, mot'd and insured, this must trump that of the HA and landowner or what's the point of my TA ?

 

I would guess that its the insurance that's troubling them.

 

if it caught fire etc etc and it damaged other peoples 'whatever' they'd have to cough up.

 

not that 'they' could force you too get insurance mind.

 

If that was the case why are HA tenants not made to take out home insurance, more chance of a fire in the home than a car bursting into flames.

 

And if this was the real reason why has the HA not said this, rather than say my car is abandoned because its untaxed and quoting terms of the TA which are not stated in my TA.

 

I would of thought HA's have to have their own insurance for this very reason, just on the off chance a uninsured car does burst into flames and burns down the estate, as I cant see how the car owner can be liable for something thats out of their control.

 

Hi

 

Yes you can send the Formal Complaint by email just ensure in the Subject ling to put Formal Complaint and in the email itself and if you can ask for a read receipt.

 

The reason I say to send a SAR asking for all data held is you may be surprised at what they have discussed about you.

 

Yeah, will do this and send it first thing in the morning and asking for acknowledgement of email, I'll follow this up with a phone call to ensure email received at correct dept on Monday.

 

I've made a few formal Complaints to HA over the years, so I have a good idea.

 

Find out that they're not the land owners, then send a final communication stating that if the interfere with the car you'll be reporting them to the authorities and seek substantial compensation.

Then just hope they carry on with their threats.

 

To an extent, I've already done this on Wednesday morning, saying the HA don't have lawful authority to remove my car, my car is not abandoned and there are no terms in my TA which says my car must be taxed, mot'd and insured and I've followed legislation and declared my car as SORN.

 

I've also said I will hold the HA liable for any loss or additional cost incurred and any damage caused.

 

Not received a reply yet.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi

 

I know it may be a pain but everything you have already asked and the added information put it all in that email Formal Complaint and don't just ask put them to proof

 

Yes your Tenancy Agreement with the Housing Association is a Legal Document and then stating it's in your TA as above ask then for full clarification of this.

 

Ask for clarification as to whether the Housing Association is either the Landowner or just Managing the Car park.

 

You use your Tenancy Agreement and there Policies and Procedures (when you get copies of them againts them, have they followed them)

 

Who is the Housing Association

How to Upload Documents/Images on CAG - **INSTRUCTIONS CLICK HERE**

FORUM RULES - Please ensure to read these before posting **FORUM RULES CLICK HERE**

I cannot give any advice by PM - If you provide a link to your Thread then I will be happy to offer advice there.

I advise to the best of my ability, but I am not a qualified professional, benefits lawyer nor Welfare Rights Adviser.

Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

Link to post
Share on other sites

Don't know if this is of use but Flintshire council took away a BMW on SORN from outside a tenant's flat as an abandoned vehicle and had to pay compensation and had a tolchocking from the Ombudsman for maladministration.

 

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-wales-45879154

 

https://www.leaderlive.co.uk/news/16988154.flintshire-council-mistakenly-scraps-mans-prized-bmw-while-he-was-in-hospital/

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

The bailiff: A 12th Century solution re-branded as Enforcement Agents for the 21st Century to seize and sell debtors goods as before Oh so Dickensian!

Link to post
Share on other sites

I would go back to the police station, ask advice and note the officer's collar number.

Then send another email to the HA with these details.

Maybe , knowing the police opinion would deter them to delay their action, giving you more time to sort it out.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Front desk on most stations are civilians now. To speak to an actual officer you have to ask for a sergeant.

Any advice i give is my own and is based solely on personal experience. If in any doubt about a situation , please contact a certified legal representative or debt counsellor..

 

 

If my advice helps you, click the star icon at the bottom of my post and feel free to say thanks

:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

Don't know if this is of use but Flintshire council took away a BMW on SORN from outside a tenant's flat as an abandoned vehicle and had to pay compensation and had a tolchocking from the Ombudsman for maladministration.

 

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-wales-45879154

 

https://www.leaderlive.co.uk/news/16988154.flintshire-council-mistakenly-scraps-mans-prized-bmw-while-he-was-in-hospital/

 

Thanks for link, I'll make reference to this in my next email to HA.

 

I would go back to the police station, ask advice and note the officer's collar number.

Then send another email to the HA with these details.

Maybe , knowing the police opinion would deter them to delay their action, giving you more time to sort it out.

 

When I called the Police, I was put through to Divisional HQ of the Roads Policing Unit I to spoke an Inspectior, I have his name, but cant remember if I got his number, but he said my details and details of my call have been noted.

 

I've already told the HA what the Police have said, which dept and who said it.

 

Hi

 

I know it may be a pain but everything you have already asked and the added information put it all in that email Formal Complaint and don't just ask put them to proof

 

Yes your Tenancy Agreement with the Housing Association is a Legal Document and then stating it's in your TA as above ask then for full clarification of this.

 

Ask for clarification as to whether the Housing Association is either the Landowner or just Managing the Car park.

 

You use your Tenancy Agreement and there Policies and Procedures (when you get copies of them againts them, have they followed them)

 

Who is the Housing Association

 

I rather not say who the HA is, I don't want my location pinpointed.

 

I've searched my HA website for the TA and terms which they say are in it but I can't find anything.

 

There are no terms in my TA which says cars in the car park must be roadworthy, taxed mot'd and insured.

 

 

It's not a pain, so easy to just copy and paste into a new email.

 

At the moment I don't think it's important to know who the landowner is, as it's my landlord the HA who is making the demands, using terms of the TA which don't exist and I'd rather dispute that.

Edited by dx100uk
merge
Link to post
Share on other sites

Ranks of Inspector and above do not have a collar number.

My time as a Police Officer and subsequently time working within the Motor Trade gives me certain insights into the problems that consumers may encounter.

I have no legal qualifications.

If you have found my post helpful, please enhance my reputation by clicking on the Heart. Thank you

Link to post
Share on other sites

Forget about the number, you have his name.

Remind the HA of what this inspector told you and his advice was in an official capacity and logged, just in case they think it's your mate and said this after a few pints down your local boozer.

As I said, once you tell them, you just have to hope they interfere with your car, then you'll be quids in.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Not necessarily.

It all depends on who owns that land.

Then it comes down to the contract which doesnt have the terms, although the HA's current does.

Its not black and white, just yet.

Edited by dx100uk
quote

Any advice i give is my own and is based solely on personal experience. If in any doubt about a situation , please contact a certified legal representative or debt counsellor..

 

 

If my advice helps you, click the star icon at the bottom of my post and feel free to say thanks

:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

So let's say the HA don't own the land, are you saying my TA is worthless and the terms or the lack of them, are meaningless ?

 

Also, if this is an issue with the landowners permission, why has the HA not said this rather than use terms of the TA as the reason ?

Link to post
Share on other sites

If the HA is not the Landowner then they would need the Landowners consent to carry out any enforcement action as you have already with the TORT notice within the time limit informing them that it is not Abandoned and is legally declared SORN.

 

You are also correct to harp on about the Tenancy Agreement as if your present Tenancy Agreement has no mentionof this then you need to challenge this by asking them to clarify exactly which clause in your Tenancy Agreement states this as you need then to confirm it in black and white not just say it's in your TA.

 

Also ask them for clarification on which Housing Legislation gives them the authority to ask you to provide your vehicles Mot, Insurance etc if this is not a Residents Only Permit Area.

 

If they say X is black, Y is white, Z is orange and they are correct how do you know they are coreect without any information to back up there claim. Challenge they to provide you with the exact clause, policy, procedure, legislation as without this you don't know if they have followed there own Policies & Procedures.

 

If you don't want to name them on the Forum you can PM a Site Team member

How to Upload Documents/Images on CAG - **INSTRUCTIONS CLICK HERE**

FORUM RULES - Please ensure to read these before posting **FORUM RULES CLICK HERE**

I cannot give any advice by PM - If you provide a link to your Thread then I will be happy to offer advice there.

I advise to the best of my ability, but I am not a qualified professional, benefits lawyer nor Welfare Rights Adviser.

Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

Link to post
Share on other sites

I wouldnt say I'm harping on about my TA, it's the focus of my post and justification for parking my SORN car, with no Mot and insurance in the residents car park, it's all I've got.

 

 

I dont wish to say which HA it is, even to a Site Team member.

 

 

Other than two phones calls to HA, all questions I've asked are by email, I've also asked HA to reply by email only.

 

I've asked the HA to provide proof of the terms of TA they refer to which says cars in car park must be roadworthy, taxed, mot'd and insured.

 

I asked what legislation gives the HA the authority to demand I tax my car?

 

I've asked what legislation gives the HA the authority to threaten to and or remove, sell or destroy my car (quoting Reg No) when I've already informed the HA by email on many occasions that my car is not abandoned.

 

 

Since the Tort notice was affixed to my car, I've sent the HA 3 email type statements declaring I'm the Owner and keeper of my car, quoting it's Reg No every time I refer to my car.

Each statement says I'm a resident and my TA says I can park my car in the car park and my car (Reg No) must not be removed, sold or destroyed without my permission.

 

I also said, legislation does not require Vehicle Excise Duty be displayed.

 

I've said the HA has no legally authority to remove my my car(Reg No) without my permission and if my car is removed by

anyone instructed by and or acting on behalf of the HA, I I will hold the HA liable for any loss, additional cost incurred and or any damaged caused.

 

None of these emails got any reply but 13 days after the TORT notice was affixed to my car, I did finally got a reply.

The person dealing with it was supposedly on annual leave and not passed the case onto anyone else, so 13 days wasted.

 

Also, when the HA does reply, it's always on a Friday afternoon.

 

The HA reply ignored all my statements and points made in earlier emails and asked for documents to prove my car is taxed mot'd and insured, saying if documents not received, my car will be remove and destroyed on the 28th.

 

So on Weds 21st, I've sent a more robust email demanding Tort notice be cancelled as my car is not abandoned and to confirm cancellation of Tort notice in writing by email.

 

I made similar demands requesting proof of the terms which HA are quoting and proof of the legislation which give the HA authority to remove and destroy my car when my TA says I can park my car in the car park.

 

This email also included details of all council depts, with names of who I spoke to and contact details, which confirm the car park is not an adopted highway but private property.

 

I also included the information I got from the Police and the Inspectors name and contact details, quoting what he said about theft should my car be removed without my permission.

 

I again quoted, legislation does not require Vehicle Excise Duty be displayed.

 

I finish by saying, I do not authorised the removal of my car(Reg No) and anyone instructed by and or acting on behalf of the HA, I will hold the HA liable for any loss, additional cost incurred and or, any damaged caused.

 

I'm yet to receive a reply

 

I've since rewritten my last email as an Official Complaint, which I will send on Monday morning.

 

 

All I can do is await a reply.

Link to post
Share on other sites

ok you don't want to name the Housing Association so I will ask you this question instead is your Housing Association a Charity?

 

If they are they come under Charity Regulations as well as Housing Legislation

How to Upload Documents/Images on CAG - **INSTRUCTIONS CLICK HERE**

FORUM RULES - Please ensure to read these before posting **FORUM RULES CLICK HERE**

I cannot give any advice by PM - If you provide a link to your Thread then I will be happy to offer advice there.

I advise to the best of my ability, but I am not a qualified professional, benefits lawyer nor Welfare Rights Adviser.

Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

Link to post
Share on other sites

Possibly. But its like a PPC. Theyll say its their land or it belongs to them, when infact it doesnt. Do you have anywhere thatyou can move the vehicle to while you sort all this out?

Any advice i give is my own and is based solely on personal experience. If in any doubt about a situation , please contact a certified legal representative or debt counsellor..

 

 

If my advice helps you, click the star icon at the bottom of my post and feel free to say thanks

:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

No, no where to park car in meantime, also it's an issue moving it, its got no tax, Mot or insurance.

Catch 22 really, probably cost £45 to move on car transporter and if I did manage to find somewhere off road to park it, for say a month, that'll be another £50, plus the cost of returning it to my car park if & when its all been sorted.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Don't know if it works, but long time ago I read that if you put a rainproof cover on your car, nobody can see the number plate and the car is clearly not abandoned.

Might work out cheaper than other options.

Just move it to another part of the car park and remove the plates before covering.

Others will advise on feasibility of such thing, just throwing it in there.

Link to post
Share on other sites

What a stupid suggestion!

 

All it will do is confirm to the Housing Association that you believe the vehicle should not be parked there. If the number plates are removed it will increase the claim that it has been abandoned.

 

You need to do what others have previously suggested and obtain definitive clarification from Land Registry as to whom is the Landowner of the car park area.

My time as a Police Officer and subsequently time working within the Motor Trade gives me certain insights into the problems that consumers may encounter.

I have no legal qualifications.

If you have found my post helpful, please enhance my reputation by clicking on the Heart. Thank you

Link to post
Share on other sites

I was convinced I held all the cards as the clause HA say is in my TA isn't, but still no reply. even after formal complaint today.

 

If it was for any other reason, why issue the Tort notice saying abandoned / untaxed car and only quoting a term which HA says is in my TA ?

 

Only reason I haven't contact Land Registry is not because of my awkwardness but due to time constraint, HA didn't reply to my calls and emails for 19 days (not 13) and because Tort notice says abandoned/untaxed, I thought it was just a matter of saying to HA, don't worry, it's not abandoned and its SORN, job done.

 

I certainly didn't expect such a heavy handed approach, especially as I've lived here for 16 years without issues.

I can't understand why HA didn't write to me first to discuss it rather than just slap a Tort notice on it.

 

By time I posted on here and told to find out who the landowner is, and after speaking to the Land Registry, I only have 4 or 5 days before the Tort notice expires and the first application to Land Registry for type of search I need, has to be sent in by post and I assumed returned to me by post.

 

I didn't know of the importance or difference it will make knowing who owns the land but it seems that if HA dont own land I'm in a worse position ?

 

My car is not some old wreck with flat tires, it's old but a future classic and other than the repair for its MOT, which cant be seen unless on a ramp and you know what you're looking at, it looks no different to any other car.

 

One of my neighbour has a old wreck, not as old as my car but it's a absolute mess, looks like a wing, rear light and exhaust are hanging off, either tied on or stuck on with tape, it supposedly called a rat look car but engine, brakes, suspension are all top notch, well looked after and no expense spared and his car not classed as abandoned.

Link to post
Share on other sites

If HA don't own the land you'd be in a better position because only the landlord can act (or someone with authorisation from landlord)

My suggestion to cover the car was open to further advice, as stated, it's something I read a long time ago and don't know if true or if it would work.

Apparently not.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...