Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • oh well i wonder what new fake documents they have made up then...for them to try this.... just to check nothing funky like Link have filed an n244 to lift the stay and strike out her defence....she hasnt moved since last court comms has she?   is this an n24? bit unusual for a 13mts stay to just be lifted... has she not received anything from link/kearns in the last fw weeks like a docs bundle? bit like this thread... https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/466576-lc-assetlinkkearns-claim-form-2-mbna-cc/?do=findComment&comment=5256397  
    • if the agreement was taken out jan 23, then she has not reached the 1/3rd mark so the car has not become protected goods under the consumer credit act.  this puts her in a very very vulnerable position regarding ever keeping the car....whereby once they have issued a default notice they can legally send a guy with a flatbed (though they are NOT BAILIFFS and have ZERO legal powers) to collect the car.  if the car is kept on the public highway then they can simply take it away and she will legally owe the whole stated amount on the agreement AND lose the car. if it's on private property i'e like a driveway, ok they shouldn't take it without her agreeing, but if they do, it's not really on but its better than a court case and an inevitable loss with the granting a return of goods order. are these 'health reasons' likely to resolve themselves in the very short term (like a couple of months?) and can she immediately begin working again ? i'e has she got a job or would have to find one?  answer the above and we'll try and help. but she looks to be between rock and a hard place . whatever happens she will still have to pay the loan off...car or no car....unless you can appeal to the finance company's better nature using health reasons to back off for xxx months.
    • no need to use it. it doubles the size of the thread and makes it very diff to find replies on small screens too. just like @username it - sends unnecessary alerts to people. everyone that's posted on your thread already inc you ...gets an automatic email alert when someone else posts.
    • Hello all,   I ordered a laptop online about 16 months ago. The laptop was faulty and I was supposed to send it back within guarantee but didn't for various reasons. I contacted the company a few months later and they said they will still fix it for me free of charge but I'd have to pay to send it to them and they will pay to send it back to me. The parcel arrived there fine. Company had fixed it and they sent it via dpd. I was working in the office so I asked my neighbours who would be in, as there's been a history of parcel thefts on our street. I had 2 neighbours who offered but when I went to update delivery instructions, their door number wasn't on the drop down despite sharing the same post code.  I then selected a neighbour who I thought would likely be in and also selected other in the safe place selection and put the number of the neighbour who I knew would definitely be in and they left my parcel outside and the parcel was stolen. DPD didn't want to deal with me and said I need to speak to the retailer. The retailer said DPD have special instructions from them not to leave a parcel outside unless specified by a customer. The retailer then said they could see my instructions said leave in a safe space but I have no porch. My front door just opens onto the road and the driver made no attempt to conceal it.  Anyway, I would like to know if I have rights here because the delivery wasn't for an item that I just bought. It was initially delivered but stopped working within the warranty period and they agreed to fix it for free.  Appreciate your help 🙏🏼   Thanks!
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
        • Thanks
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Smart Parking ANPR PCN - Havens Bank Exeter **CANCELLED BY SMART**


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 2248 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi

I'm hoping that you can help me...

 

A few days ago, I received a PCN from Smart Parking as the registered keeper of our vehicle, relating to an "unauthorised parking" of our vehicle on 24/01/2018. There are photos of the car entering the car park and leaving the car park.

 

It seems to be fairly standard to come on here and ask about not paying the fine etc.

but I have a slightly different enquiry

- we actually have the ticket from Havens Bank car park on that day which shows that my husband paid to park in the car park.

 

The ironic thing is that it's known to be notorious for this and I'd only said it to my husband the previous day, "keep that ticket just in case they send a funny letter!"

 

Do I just appeal it online, sending photographic evidence of the ticket and then it will be sorted?

Or is there a better way to sort this?

 

You've all given such helpful advice to others regarding their issues at this car park, I'm hoping that you can help me!

 

Thank you!

 

Sam

Link to post
Share on other sites

Oh, this could be good.

 

OK, firstly, it's not a fine. We know that's a term used in common parlance, but calling it a fine makes it sound a lot more legitimate than it is. Plus, you'll make dx100's teeth itch. You'll see :wink:

 

Secondly, what you have is not a pay and display ticket, it's a "Get out of jail free" card. And the rest of the advice is probably going to depend on how much fun you want to have at Daft Parking's expense :lol:

 

 

Could you have a look at this post https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/showthread.php?462118-Have-you-received-a-Parking-Ticket and then copy and paste the relevant bits to a reply in this thread along with your answers.

Please note that my posts are my opinion only and should not be taken as any kind of legal advice.
In fact, they're probably just waffling and can be quite safely and completely ignored as you wish.

Link to post
Share on other sites

They will be trying to invent some spurious transgression of hidden T & Cs keep that ticket safe. The team will help you sort this.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

The bailiff: A 12th Century solution re-branded as Enforcement Agents for the 21st Century to seize and sell debtors goods as before Oh so Dickensian!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi

Thank you so much for your really quick responses! Here are those details...

 

1 Date of the infringement: 24/01/2018

 

2 Date on the NTK [this must have been received within 14 days from the 'offence' date]: 30/01/2018

 

3 Date received: 31/01/2018

 

4 Does the NTK mention schedule 4 of The Protections of Freedoms Act 2012? [y/n?]: No

 

5 Is there any photographic evidence of the event? Photographs of vehicle entering and exiting car park.

 

6 Have you appealed? {y/n?] post up your appeal]: No (not yet!)

Have you had a response? [Y/N?] post it up: N/A

 

7 Who is the parking company?: Smart Parking

 

8. Where exactly [carpark name and town]: Havens Bank Retail Park, Water Lane, Exeter, EX2 8BY.

 

For either option, does it say which appeals body they operate under.: IAS

 

There are two official bodies, the BPA and the IAS. If you are unsure,

please check HERE

 

If you have received any other correspondence, please mention it here: None

 

Thank you all so much,

 

Sam

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just to clarify the above.. Daft Parking operate under the BPA and use POPLA, not IAS. Although I notice that more and more of them are now referring to POPLA as the IAS, just to confuse matters.

Please note that my posts are my opinion only and should not be taken as any kind of legal advice.
In fact, they're probably just waffling and can be quite safely and completely ignored as you wish.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi,

 

You can say 'fine' if you want. I like to see Dx have the vapours :-)

 

As this is an ANPR ticket, I would appeal, not naming the driver, just say 'The Driver' and enclose a photocopy of the P&D ticket and demand they cancel the charge forthwith. They won't of course but that gives you the route to POPLA as (not so) Smart Parking must give you one.

 

I have this feeling in my guts that SP will say to POPLA that they don't want to continue, giving you an automatic win. They have done this before on other sites so I see no reason why they should be any different on this site.

 

There are a couple of other threads this week about the same site and they are slightly ahead of you but it can do no harm to watch their process.

If you are asked to deal with any matter via private message, PLEASE report it.

Everything I say is opinion only. If you are unsure on any comment made, you should see a qualified solicitor

Please help CAG. Order this ebook. Now available on Amazon. Please click HERE

Link to post
Share on other sites

there are other threads on this exact issue elsewhere on this forum so ahve a look and you will see that this patently menas they have BIG problems with their equipment.

 

Whay I would do is look up a couiple of the other threads and glean what you can from them and then write to Smart parking as the keeper of the vehicle making sure that you do not mention or allude to who was driving at the time.

 

Tell them that you are aware from reading various motoring advice forum s that they have trouble with their equipment and as the driver purchased a ticket at the time the error is entirely theirs and no breach of contract has ever occurred.

 

Tell them that you have read what was said specifically about them in parliament last week and on this occasion, "as a gesture of goodwill" you wont be suing them for breach of the DPA and nor will you be making a complaint for attempting to obtain a pecuniary advantage by deception as long as they stop being so stupid and greedy and cancel the ticket forthwith. If they do fancy their chances in court then you will of course use the said payment receipt issued by their rubbish machinery along as evidence of their laziness and dishonesty.

 

send this to them pronto and copy to your MP and make sure thet smarts know that it has gone to your MP so they have somehting to add to the debate. Do not be nice, nice is a sign of weakness and they then think you may actually pay up if they try a little harder

Edited by honeybee13
Paras
Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you all so much.

 

I've appealed the Parking Charge Notice tonight and am fully expecting it to be rejected!

That being said, I did mention the lack of breach of contract and the fact that payment had occurred making the contract complete - I also attached the photo of the evidence etc., so you never know!

 

I'll let you know when I hear from Smart (or Not-So-Smart) Parking!

 

Sam

Link to post
Share on other sites

You could have authority to park signed by God and it wouldn't be enough for some of these clowns. :lol:

 

They *might* realise that they're on to a loser as you've enclosed a copy of the evidence, but most of these muppets need detailed instructions (with pictures) on how to walk without dragging their knuckles, so I wouldn't be holding my breath just yet :wink:

Please note that my posts are my opinion only and should not be taken as any kind of legal advice.
In fact, they're probably just waffling and can be quite safely and completely ignored as you wish.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 4 weeks later...

So I heard back from Smart Parking today and, rather unbelievably, they've agreed to cancel the charge!!!!!!

 

Thank you so, so much for all of your help and this fab forum!

 

Sam

Link to post
Share on other sites

blimey well done

 

please make a small donation if you can to keep us here to help others like we helped you.

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

A well done from me too. This should never have happened and SP knew it which is why they cancelled it. If they continued to pursue it, even if they didn't go to court, you would have had a claim against them anyway so they have cut their losses.

If you are asked to deal with any matter via private message, PLEASE report it.

Everything I say is opinion only. If you are unsure on any comment made, you should see a qualified solicitor

Please help CAG. Order this ebook. Now available on Amazon. Please click HERE

Link to post
Share on other sites

Smart got Smart! :| It's almost unheard of.

 

Next thing we know ParkingLie will start telling the truth :lol:

 

 

Another well done from me. :thumb:

Please note that my posts are my opinion only and should not be taken as any kind of legal advice.
In fact, they're probably just waffling and can be quite safely and completely ignored as you wish.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...