Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Good afternoon,    I am writing in reference to the retail dispute number ****, between myself and Newton Autos concerning the sale of a Toyota Avensis which has been found to have serious mechanical faults.    As explained previously the car was found to be faulty just six days after purchase. The car had numerous fault codes that appeared on the dash board and went into limp mode. This required assistance from the AA and this evidence has already been provided. The car continues to exhibit these faults and has been diagnosed as having faults with the fuel injectors which will require major mechanical investigation and repairs.    Newton Autos did not make me aware of any faults upon purchase of the vehicle and sold it as being in good condition.    Newton Autos have also refused to honour their responsibilities under The Consumer Rights Act 2015 which requires them to refund the customer if the goods are found to be faulty and not fit for purpose within 30 days of purchase.    Newton Autos also refused to accept my rejection of the vehicle and refused to refund the car and accept the return of the vehicle.    It is clear to me that the car is not fit for purpose as these mechanical faults occurred so soon after purchase and have been shown to be present by both the AA and an independent mechanic.   Kind regards
    • Commercial Landlords are legally allowed to sue for early cancellation of the lease. You can only surrender your lease if your landlord agrees to your doing so. They are under no obligation even to consider your request and are entitled to refuse. You cannot use this as an excuse not to pay your rent. Your landlord is most likely to agree to your surrendering the lease if they want the property back in order to redevelop it, or if they wants to rent it to what they regards as a better tenant or at a higher rent. There are two types of surrender: Express surrender in writing. This is a written document which sets out the terms of the surrender. Implied surrender by conduct. (applies to your position) You can move out of the property you leased, simply hand your keys back and the lease will come to an end, but only if the landlord agrees to accept your surrender. Many tenants have thought they can simply post the keys through the landlord's letter box and the lease is ended. This is not true and without a document from the landlord, not only do you not know if the landlord has accepted the surrender, you also do not know on what basis they have accepted and could find they sue you for rent arrears, service charge arrears, damage to the property and compensation for your attempt to leave the property without the landlord's agreement. Unless you are absolutely certain that the landlord is agreeable to your departure, you should not attempt to imply a surrender by relying on your and the landlord's conduct.  
    • I had to deal with these last year worst DCA I have ever dealt with. Just wait for the constant threats of CCJ and how you'll lose in court and how they won't do mediation and they want the judge to question you with a load of "BIG" words to boot with the letter. My case was struck out in the end, stupidity on their part as I admitted to owing the debt in the end going through the court process was just a formality as they wouldn't let it drop despite me admitting the debt regardless. They didn't send the last part of the court paper work in so it ended up being struck out     .
    • Well, that's it then. Clear proof of the rubbish cameras. Clear proof of double dipping. G24 won't be getting a penny. Belt & braces, I would write to the address LFI has found, include the evidence of double dipping, and ask Fraser Group to call their dogs off.
    • LOL. after sending Perch capital a CCA request with a stapled £1 PO attached (x2) Their lapdog Legal team TM Legal have sent me two letters today saying "due to a recent payment on the account, your account is open to legal/enforcement action" so i guess they have tried to apply that payment to the account to run the statue bar along. dirty tactics lol.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 2389 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi,

 

I and my partner rented a property from april 2015 to may 2016 from a private landlord and moved out after a dispute with the landlord who would not carry out any repairs (a lot needed!) at the end of the tenancy.

 

I then moved into a rented property from a social housing provider in May 2016 (my partner and I went our separate ways). Last month I received a notification from the local council that I owed council tax for the previous property up until August 2016.

 

I rang the council and explained when i had moved out of the property and sent them my tenancy agreement for my current address dated May 2016, I was never provided with a tenancy agreement for the previous address.

 

A week down the line and i was then contacted again by the council who told me that the landlord had provided them with a tenancy agreement signed by both Myself and my ex for years 2015-2016 and 2016-2017, they also stated that the property was let fully furnished (it wasn't). I asked for these by freedom of information request and have received them this morning.

 

The documents provided are two identical tenancy agreements with both mine and my ex partners signatures very obviously forged onto them, they are not even good forgeries and the signatures are completely different even on each document.

 

I have spoken to the council who have put the case on hold until November 6th so i can try and get some advice but they are basically saying it is his word against mine and it is quite possible that i was living at both properties at the same time!

 

I have no idea where to even start with this, it makes no sense that they are chasing up council tax from may to august 2016 when he has forged the tenancy till may 2017, i can only assume that from me moving out till him carrying out repairs and getting a new tenant took till august so he has told them i was still there so he would get me to pay it.

 

Can anyone offer any advice? its not difficult to prove the signatures are forgeries as they are shockingly bad but the council are not interested in that for some reason.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Show the council your lease for the period the council are saying you were resident at the property.

Being social housing ask for a statement from them on your rent payments, make sure your current address is on it.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Who from the LA (which is??) have you spoken to so far?

 

It is always best to put your complaint with them in writing, there are strict time scales in which they have to comply with.

 

Have you contacted your local councillors or MP regarding the council's lack of interest?

Was/is this landlord under the same LA?

Who ever heard of someone getting a job at the Jobcentre? The unemployed are sent there as penance for their sins, not to help them find work!

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi

 

thanks for the response, I never had a lease or tenancy in writing for the other property, as for the property i live in now, i have sent the tenancy and proof of payments showing that i have been living here since may 2016 but the council have said that this evidence is not enough as i could have been living at both properties at the same time, they have taken the forged tenancy agreements provided by my old landlord as proof that i was resident in his property even though i had moved and they are saying that it is up to me to take advice on what to do next, as far as they are concerned, the forged agreements are gospel

Link to post
Share on other sites

Who from the LA (which is??) Sefton MBC have you spoken to so far? A revenue officer from their office

 

It is always best to put your complaint with them in writing, there are strict time scales in which they have to comply with.

 

Have you contacted your local councillors or MP regarding the council's lack of interest? Not yet

Was/is this landlord under the same LA?

No idea-apart from meeting him when we originally went to view the house have never had any correspondence with him-only text messages when the reapirs to the property needed doing-never got done though and have no idea where he lives
Link to post
Share on other sites

No idea-apart from meeting him when we originally went to view the house have never had any correspondence with him-only text messages when the reapirs to the property needed doing-never got done though and have no idea where he lives

 

Sounds very dodgy to me.

 

Tell the LA you want to go in for a meeting with a housing manager to see the evidence they have and show them it is fraudulent.

 

Was the rental property in the the same county as the LA?

 

the forged agreements are gospel
Ask them that, and ask them how they are certain that the tenancy documents are legit.

Who ever heard of someone getting a job at the Jobcentre? The unemployed are sent there as penance for their sins, not to help them find work!

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

the rental property was in the same county-yes, I have already asked about the tenancy agreements, there stance is that they assume that they are legit until i can prove otherwise, the lady herself described the signatures to me as 'some kind of scribble' I actually laughed when i saw them this morning, they look like they have been done by a three year old. I have already given them my signature on the FOIR and have offered to send my exs off his driving license or passport but the impression they are giving is that this will be insufficient

Link to post
Share on other sites

The signatures he has used are different on both forms and are not even remotely similar to ours, my signature is my 3 initials first middle and last name, exs is his first name initial and his full surname, the ones he has provided are both our full first and last names that look like they have been signed during an earthquake

Link to post
Share on other sites

It would be nice to know if he is an approved LL, or simply a stand alone LL. Does he have any more properties he rents?

 

As for the LA and their attitude, they need to be reminded who it is they serve in the community, lodge a formal complaint, TODAY, set up a meeting with the manager of the housing department and air all of your findings too them.

 

The rogue LL can be dealt with later.

http://www.actionfraud.police.uk/evict-rogue-landlords-sep10

 

http://england.shelter.org.uk/campaigns_/fixing_private_renting/evict_rogue_landlords/rogue_landlord_watch

Who ever heard of someone getting a job at the Jobcentre? The unemployed are sent there as penance for their sins, not to help them find work!

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

does the ll get charged more council tax when the property is empty then when its let . just a thought .

 

Depends on whether it is furnished or unfurnished.

However, if the property is empty for two years or more then an extra 50% will be added to the CT.

 

Just because it is empty does not ordinarily mean the LL pays more CT.

Who ever heard of someone getting a job at the Jobcentre? The unemployed are sent there as penance for their sins, not to help them find work!

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

how did you pay your rent when you live there? If it shows up well on your bank statements then the change in your tregular outgoings on that front will be a strong indication you are telling the truth. the bad news is councils are aloowed to make assumptions in any way they see fit and the law protects them from action so the burden of proof is reversed.

I once tried to claim council tax relief as my pension is low enough to enable me to do so but they made the assumption that I had other income of £99,000 per yesr and was paid in cash! how do you show it isnt true?

Also you may need to look at other things so was your deposit protected at the time? If not then that will help you persuade someone that your LL was not to be trusted in other areas so there is a strong possibility the tenancy agreements may have been forged. The lack of a deposit for the year 2016 onwards may help as well.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi,

 

I and my partner rented a property from april 2015 to may 2016 from a private landlord and moved out after a dispute with the landlord who would not carry out any repairs (a lot needed!) at the end of the tenancy.

 

I then moved into a rented property from a social housing provider in May 2016 (my partner and I went our separate ways). Last month I received a notification from the local council that I owed council tax for the previous property up until August 2016.

 

I rang the council and explained when i had moved out of the property and sent them my tenancy agreement for my current address dated May 2016, I was never provided with a tenancy agreement for the previous address.

 

A week down the line and i was then contacted again by the council who told me that the landlord had provided them with a tenancy agreement signed by both Myself and my ex for years 2015-2016 and 2016-2017, they also stated that the property was let fully furnished (it wasn't). I asked for these by freedom of information request and have received them this morning.

 

The documents provided are two identical tenancy agreements with both mine and my ex partners signatures very obviously forged onto them, they are not even good forgeries and the signatures are completely different even on each document.

 

I have spoken to the council who have put the case on hold until November 6th so i can try and get some advice but they are basically saying it is his word against mine and it is quite possible that i was living at both properties at the same time!

 

I have no idea where to even start with this, it makes no sense that they are chasing up council tax from may to august 2016 when he has forged the tenancy till may 2017, i can only assume that from me moving out till him carrying out repairs and getting a new tenant took till august so he has told them i was still there so he would get me to pay it.

 

Can anyone offer any advice? its not difficult to prove the signatures are forgeries as they are shockingly bad but the council are not interested in that for some reason.

 

Assuming you're in England or Wales.

 

A tenant doesn't have to be resident in a property to remain liable for the council tax charge after vacating it so, although an indicator of possible vacation, lack of rent payments etc aren't conclusive to the council. Whether liability continues after residency ends or not depends on the tenancy agreement - if the council are provided with a tenancy agreement that appears to be valid then the determination made, based on that, may be correct.

 

Whether the tenancy agreement is correct or not is another question but ultimately the decision on liability is that of the local authority and, if they won't move on it, something which a valuation tribunal would need to make a decision on. The appeal process is free but there are agencies out there who can assist with it, if required.

Link to post
Share on other sites

If you were paying Council Tax during your time in the property that you moved from you would have needed to inform the Council Tax office of your move and leave date (as this would be classed as a change in circumstances) for the council tax office to forward a final council tax bill as to whether you still need to pay or they owe you a refund.

 

Did you inform the council of your move and receive a final bill?

 

As you do not have a copy of the original tenancy agreement and the council does there is nothing to stop you writing to the council and asking for a copy of that agreement.

How to Upload Documents/Images on CAG - **INSTRUCTIONS CLICK HERE**

FORUM RULES - Please ensure to read these before posting **FORUM RULES CLICK HERE**

I cannot give any advice by PM - If you provide a link to your Thread then I will be happy to offer advice there.

I advise to the best of my ability, but I am not a qualified professional, benefits lawyer nor Welfare Rights Adviser.

Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

Link to post
Share on other sites

If you were paying Council Tax during your time in the property that you moved from you would have needed to inform the Council Tax office of your move and leave date (as this would be classed as a change in circumstances) for the council tax office to forward a final council tax bill as to whether you still need to pay or they owe you a refund.

 

Did you inform the council of your move and receive a final bill?

 

As you do not have a copy of the original tenancy agreement and the council does there is nothing to stop you writing to the council and asking for a copy of that agreement.

 

Technically there's no requirement to tell them unless you receive a discount or exemption (or received CTB/CTR) - it's unfortunate that a lot of people don't always tell the council and it's invariably in cases like this where that has happened.

Link to post
Share on other sites

If you were paying Council Tax during your time in the property that you moved from you would have needed to inform the Council Tax office of your move and leave date (as this would be classed as a change in circumstances) for the council tax office to forward a final council tax bill as to whether you still need to pay or they owe you a refund.

 

Did you inform the council of your move and receive a final bill?

 

As you do not have a copy of the original tenancy agreement and the council does there is nothing to stop you writing to the council and asking for a copy of that agreement.

 

There is no original agreement, i never signed one, the LL has produced two fraudulent ones with forged signatures and i did write to the council requesting them as per OP

Link to post
Share on other sites

So he needs to be reported as a rogue LL, and the LA informed that any tenancy agreement they have off him with your signature on is fraudulent.

Who ever heard of someone getting a job at the Jobcentre? The unemployed are sent there as penance for their sins, not to help them find work!

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...