Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • The move marks the first time the country's central bank has raised interest rates for 17 years.View the full article
    • The move marks the first time the country's central bank has raised interest rates for 17 years.View the full article
    • The firm has benefited from the AI boom, making it the third-most valuable company in the US.View the full article
    • Former billionaire Hui Ka Yan has been fined and banned from the financial market for life.View the full article
    • In terms of "why didn't I make a claim" - well, that has to be understood in the context of the long-standing legal battle and all its permuations with the shark. In essence there was a repo and probable fire sale of the leasehold property - which would have led to me initiating the complaint/ claim v SPF in summer 19. But there was no quick sale. And battle commenced and it ain't done yet 5y later. A potential sale morphed into trying to do a debt deal and then into a full blown battle heading to trial - based on the shark deliberately racking up costs just so the ceo can keep the property for himself.  Along the way they have launched claims in 4 different counties -v- me - trying to get a backdoor B. (Haven't yet succeeded) Simultaneously I got dragged into a contentious forfeiture claim and then into a lease extension debacle - both of which lasted 3y. (I have an association with the freeholders and handled all that legal stuff too) I had some (friend paid for) legal support to begin with.  But mostly I have handled every thing alone.  The sheer weight of all the different cases has been pretty overwhelming. And tedious.  I'm battling an aggressive financial shark that has investors giving them 00s of millions. They've employed teams of expensive lawyers and barristers. And also got juniors doing the boring menial tasks. And, of course, in text book style they've delayed issues on purpose and then sent 000's of docs to read at the 11th hour. Which I not only boringly did read,  but also simultaneously filed for ease of reference later - which has come in very handy in speeding up collating legal bundles and being able to find evidence quickly.  It's also how I found out the damning stuff I could use -v- them.  Bottom line - I haven't really had a moment to breath for 5y. I've had to write a statement recently. And asked a clinic for advice. One of the volunteers asked how I got into this situation.  Which prompted me to say it all started when I got bad advice from a broker. Which kick-started me in to thinking I really should look into making some kind of formal complaint -v- the broker.  Which is where I am now.  Extenuating circumstances as to why I'm complaining so late.  But hopefully still in time ??  
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 160 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

PCN code 62 while parking on my own Drive, Parked with one or more wheels on or over footpath


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 2407 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hello

 

I live in a cul-de-sac and my house is the last house on the road and I have my own drive at end.

 

Today, I received a PCN code 62 while parked on my own Drive.

It states 'Parked with one or more wheels on or over a footpath or any part of a road other than a carriageway'.

 

My car was parked with the back wheels just on the edge of the footpath,

something I have been doing since 1988

but for some reason I have received a parking ticket today.

 

 

The footpath ends at my house, although a neighbour whose garden backs onto my drive has put a small gate in his fence so he can leave his house from the back.

 

What can I do in this instance as I will have problems parking on my drive in future?

With the back wheels close to footpath, the back of the car stands over the footpath by a foot or more depending on the car that is parked.

 

I would appreciate any help or suggestions

Link to post
Share on other sites

CEO photo's + GSV link please.

 

 

Court won't know anything about it, but Council Parking Enforcement should.

 

 

I suggest rear wheels were parked on part of Public Highway, prob nothing to do with the pavement.

Link to post
Share on other sites

well pavement is the public highway

..

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

CEO photo's + GSV link please.

 

 

Court won't know anything about it, but Council Parking Enforcement should.

 

 

I suggest rear wheels were parked on part of Public Highway, prob nothing to do with the pavement.

 

So sorry, new to this post site so not sure what you mean by CEO photo and GSV link?

Link to post
Share on other sites

you can't park with your vehicle fouling the pavement.

 

The question is, why did they enforce now and never before?

 

One possible answer is your neighbour, who you mention

- I don't know what the issue is with his gate and your car, but might he have complained?

Link to post
Share on other sites

So sorry, new to this post site so not sure what you mean by CEO photo and GSV link?

 

CEO Photos - [edited]

 

 

The neighbour has put a gate exactly where the footpath meets the fence..

 

Any thoughts would be appreciated..

Edited by Mr.P
Registration numbers showing
Link to post
Share on other sites

Hello

 

I live in a cul-de-sac and my house is the last house on the road and I have my own drive at end.

 

Today, I received a PCN code 62 while parked on my own Drive.

It states 'Parked with one or more wheels on or over a footpath or any part of a road other than a carriageway'.

 

My car was parked with the back wheels just on the edge of the footpath,

something I have been doing since 1988

but for some reason I have received a parking ticket today.

 

 

The footpath ends at my house, although a neighbour whose garden backs onto my drive has put a small gate in his fence so he can leave his house from the back.

 

What can I do in this instance as I will have problems parking on my drive in future?

With the back wheels close to footpath, the back of the car stands over the footpath by a foot or more depending on the car that is parked.

 

I would appreciate any help or suggestions

 

You are clearly on the footway, as for the future, park in your double garage, get a smaller car or park sideways

Link to post
Share on other sites

CEO Photos - [edited]

 

 

The neighbour has put a gate exactly where the footpath meets the fence..

 

Any thoughts would be appreciated..

 

Removed the link as your registration number is visible. It is a measure to protect your anonymity.

 

Having looked at the photos, you are clearly blocking a substantial part of the pavement which would attract a PCN in most areas.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 

No... you can't eat my brain just yet. I need it a little while longer.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...