Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • I see they're trying to round up asylum seekers and lock them up for about three months so they can be put on planes to Rwanda. I'm a bit surprised that this is legal.  
    • thought for the day "Prime ministers need a big strategy that tells you where you’re going, you need a bunch of tactics that get you there, and you need the ability to take everybody else with you."   Now I know you are all thinking 'why is the  UKs destination Rwanda ???
    • Asset Link filed for a default CCJ against me, in relation to an old Barclaycard debt which I apparently signed an agreement for back in 2000.   I did not own a Barclaycard in 2000 so I know this is not true.  The CCJ notice was sent to an old address so I did not receive it.  Years later when I found out about the CCJ when I applied for credit, I put an application in to have the CCJ set aside.   As part of the set aside case, I was asked by the judge to provide a draft defence, should the CCJ be set aside.   The defence I provided was that I did not admit to the debt as I had not been provided with any evidence of an original loan agreement.   I won the case and the CCJ was set aside.   Link then filed to court again to make me pay the debt.   We both filed directions questionnaires and the judge allocated the claim to the small claims track.   As part of the directions, additional directions given were as follows ' Additional Directions in a claim for an Assigned Debt - Because the claim is in respect of an assigned debt the Court makes the following directions for the management of claim.  The claim shall be automatically struck out at 4pm on 3 April 2024 unless, before that time, the Claimant delivers to the Court and to the Defendant the following documents'  It then listed various documents such as an original agreement, deed of assignment, notice of default, statement of account setting out how the alleged debt accrued under that agreement etc.     The Claimant failed to provide these documents within the deadline provided and instead I received a copy of a bundle of documents provided by them in preparation for the court date, this was received weeks after the deadline.    I have called the Court to ask if it has been automatically struck out and they advised that it is not automatic and that I should still send my witness statement by the deadline provided, which is Wednesday.  This does not give me much time to prepare my witness statement.   I have never done anything like this before and I am unclear what my witness statement should include.  My thoughts were that I should keep it simple and stick to the facts, like the fact thy have not provided evidence of the original agreement, or the deed of assignment of the debt.   They have provided a copy of a default notice from Baclaycard dated 2015, this states a figure of £550 but the debt they say I owe is £10k.   I am not sure what makes a valid default notice?   I have previously requested proof of the debt from Barclaycard directly and have evidence of emails between us where they have been unable to provide me with the agreement or any documents at all relating to the debt.   Should I include these as an appendix?  Are there any other documents I should include in my bundle?    I have also tried to mediate with the claimants, to save the court costs and time, on a without prejudice basis, but the claimants solicitors refused to mediate.   Should i state this in my witness statement too to show the judge that I have been reasonable and they haven't? Many thanks   Louise
    • Right that's exactly why so many drivers got caught, it had been that way for many years then suddenly changes with no warning
    • The hearing is 25th June, I have downloaded items to different organisations previously but they do it a simple way and I just cross out private things with a felt tip and sent to an email address.  I have looked at the instructions for CAG it seems extremely complicated especially this about having to use a system MSPAINT.EXE that removes your personal information. I am hoping one of my Grandchildren understands things to give me help, I have shown one of my daughters she said she does not understand the instructions. I have a PC and I mainly use a lap top, as previously advised I only understand the straightforward things, sending an email and using my scanner to send a document that I save in a file or send it to an email. I will try and find someone to help me, thanks for your help you have given me so far appreciate it        
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
        • Like
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
        • Like
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Marston HCEO Final Notice for son's unpaid fines - NOT MINE!


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 2453 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi all

 

I have today received a letter and discovered that my 20 year old son has debts totaling nearly £2000 which Marston say are for unpaid fines for not paying for several train fares after getting caught with no ticket. The letter says their client is "HMCTS Manchester".

 

I called Marston and they say they will attend my home tonight and unless I can prove with receipts items are not mine they will take them as my son's and I will have 28 days to prove they are mine to get them back.

 

My son lives at home and has nothing and all items such as TV etc are mine and not his. How can they taken them?! It doesn't seem right.

 

Is my car at risk as well? Should I move it and hide it? It's in my name only and has nothing to do with my son.

 

I know that the HCEO can't break into my house but can open via an open or unlocked door so I won't be answering when they call but I am still scared.

 

Please can you help?!

 

Thanks in advance.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hello and welcome to CAG.

 

As you say, these aren't your debts so I'm sure a solution can be found. I expect the forum regulars will be along later with advice for you.

 

Best, HB

 

Not an expert.

 

Best way forward is your Son contacting Marstons to come to a payment arrangement. If needed, he should send them wage slips/benefit information together with living expenses details, so the amount he can afford can be assessed.

 

Your Son should have had letters from the court and a notice of enforcement from Marstons. If he has not had documents from the court, he can attend the court to make a statutory declaration and come to an arrangement with the court.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi all

 

I have today received a letter and discovered that my 20 year old son has debts totaling nearly £2000 which Marston say are for unpaid fines for not paying for several train fares after getting caught with no ticket. The letter says their client is "HMCTS Manchester".

 

I called Marston and they say they will attend my home tonight and unless I can prove with receipts items are not mine they will take them as my son's and I will have 28 days to prove they are mine to get them back.

 

My son lives at home and has nothing and all items such as TV etc are mine and not his. How can they taken them?! It doesn't seem right.

 

Is my car at risk as well? Should I move it and hide it? It's in my name only and has nothing to do with my son.

 

I know that the HCEO can't break into my house but can open via an open or unlocked door so I won't be answering when they call but I am still scared.

 

Thanks in advance.

 

Given that the debt relates to Magistrate Court fines, the enforcement agent is permitted to use force to gain entry. This is an exceptional step but unfortunately, but nonetheless, it is a step that is used.

 

You have started your post by stating that you have received a letter. I assume that it is your son who has received the letter?

 

For the avoidance of doubt, an enforcement agent is only permitted to take control of goods belonging to the debtor (who is your son). Given that he is just 20 years of age, then common sense alone will tell you that your son is most unlikely to own any of the goods in the property.

Link to post
Share on other sites

 

I have today received a letter and discovered that my 20 year old son has debts totaling nearly £2000 which Marston say are for unpaid fines for not paying for several train fares after getting caught with no ticket. The letter says their client is "HMCTS Manchester".

 

My son lives at home and has nothing and all items such as TV etc are mine.

 

Your son is only 20 years of age and appears to have more than one conviction for travelling on a train without paying.

 

Given that he lives at home, he should have received the following documents:

 

A summons

 

Notice of Fine & Collection outlining the amount that he had been fined.

 

Failure to address the matter at that stage would have led to him being sent another letter entitled: Further Steps Notice. That notice would have warned him that a warrant would be issued with bailiff fees of up to £310 being added to the debt!!

 

He should also of received a Notice of Enforcement from Marston Holdings for each debt.

 

Did your son receive any of these letters?

 

Do you know whether he contacted the court at any time?

 

Is your son working?

 

PS: Please be assured that you are not responsible for paying these debts. These are your son's debts and only his goods can be taken. Given the size of the debts, I would suspect (and hope) that the enforcement agent would realise that your son cannot pay and will return the warrants back to Marston Holdings and they in turn will return the case back to to HMCTS Manchester. This will at least allow your son to make an application to the court for a 'Means Hearing'.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Might be a good idea to get a statutory declaration done - you can get this done at a local solicitor - they should be able to do it almost straight away (can't remember the fee but it's probably £10 -15). You would show this to the bailiff (make sure you keep copies) I have affixed a draft SD for you to amend - get it done asap. If you are married then you need to put both names where there are XXXs in the letter.

Help us to keep on helping

Please consider making a donation, however small, if you have benefited from advice on the forums

 

 

This site is run solely on donations

 

My advice is based on my opinion and experience only. It is not to be taken as legal advice - if you are unsure you should seek professional help.

Link to post
Share on other sites

The link doesn't appear to be working for me?

 

Hi, can you open the affixed? if you can't edit the PDF you will need to type it out and take to Solicitor/Notary[ATTACH=CONFIG]68657[/ATTACH]

Statutory Declaration.pdf

Help us to keep on helping

Please consider making a donation, however small, if you have benefited from advice on the forums

 

 

This site is run solely on donations

 

My advice is based on my opinion and experience only. It is not to be taken as legal advice - if you are unsure you should seek professional help.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks all, sorry about the delay in getting back to you all!

 

The HCEO agreed to not come round until tonight as he could tell I was upset yesterday.

 

I will get my son to sort out his own mess, but I need to know if the HCEO can can my possessions or car? Nothing in my home belong to my son.

 

The HCEO said he could take anything in the house and I need to prove within 28 days that it is mine and not my son's. is this correct as it seems backwards to me!

 

I will not be letting the HCEO into my house but need clarification please about what he can/can't take for this debt that isn't mine.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Make sure your son is at home when the Bailiffs call.

You may have to provide sales receipts for anything you claim is yours.

 

After this all happened he no longer lives with me. His room is now empty apart from my furniture.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Your son is only 20 years of age and appears to have more than one conviction for travelling on a train without paying.

 

Given that he lives at home, he should have received the following documents:

 

A summons

 

Notice of Fine & Collection outlining the amount that he had been fined.

 

Failure to address the matter at that stage would have led to him being sent another letter entitled: Further Steps Notice. That notice would have warned him that a warrant would be issued with bailiff fees of up to £310 being added to the debt!!

 

He should also of received a Notice of Enforcement from Marston Holdings for each debt.

 

Did your son receive any of these letters?

 

Do you know whether he contacted the court at any time?

 

Is your son working?

 

PS: Please be assured that you are not responsible for paying these debts. These are your son's debts and only his goods can be taken. Given the size of the debts, I would suspect (and hope) that the enforcement agent would realise that your son cannot pay and will return the warrants back to Marston Holdings and they in turn will return the case back to to HMCTS Manchester. This will at least allow your son to make an application to the court for a 'Means Hearing'.

 

Thanks.

 

Yes he had all of that and hid it from me and ignored it.

 

He will have to deal with the consequences of this himself, but thank you for the help!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks.

 

Yes he had all of that and hid it from me and ignored it.

 

He will have to deal with the consequences of this himself, but thank you for the help!

 

Trouble is that if your Son does not deal with this, Marstons may force entry into your house, if you did not let them in peacefully. These are Magistrates fines, so forced entry is allowed.

 

Once inside the Marstons agent may try to bully you into dealing with your Sons fines. They may try to get you to make a payment, under the threat of taking goods in your house that you don't have paperwork proving you own them. Most people don't have receipts.

 

Yes this is a bit naughty, as the fines are not yours and the household goods are obviously yours. But if you do your research, Enforcement Agents try to bully payments out of relatives on a regular basis. No point phoning the Police, as they will not intervene.

 

You really must get hold of your Son and tell him that unless he deals with this, court Enforcement Agents will force entry to his Mums house to remove goods that belong to her.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Have you done anything about the Statutory Declaration ?

Help us to keep on helping

Please consider making a donation, however small, if you have benefited from advice on the forums

 

 

This site is run solely on donations

 

My advice is based on my opinion and experience only. It is not to be taken as legal advice - if you are unsure you should seek professional help.

Link to post
Share on other sites

 

The HCEO said he could take anything in the house and I need to prove within 28 days that it is mine and not my son's. is this correct as it seems backwards to me!

The above comment is a very popular one for bailiffs to quote and even more so, to parents when seeking to enforce a debt for their young son's or daughters. Fortunately, the comment has many flaws:

 

If a bailiff comes into my home, can he take goods belonging to anyone?

 

No, the enforce agent may only take control of goods belonging to the debtor (which in this case, is your son.

 

Can the bailiff assume that all the goods in my house belong to my son or daughter?

 

It's not as simple as that. The bailiff, in order to protect himself from a complaint to his employer or more seriously; to the Court, will need to have good reason to believe that the goods that he is seeking to take control of, belong to the young son or daughter and on this point, common sense alone would tell the enforcement agent that the household items within the property would almost certainly not belong to a young 20 year old !!

 

If the bailiff were to seize goods from my house, what could he actually take?

 

Note a lot really. Under the Taking Control of Goods Regulations 2013, many household items are exempt from being seized by a bailiff.

 

Which household items are exempt?

 

The following is a list of the exempt household items as outlined under Regulation 4 of the above legislation.

 

items or equipment (for example, tools, books, telephones, computer equipment and vehicles) which are necessary for use personally by the debtor in the debtor’s employment, business, trade, profession, study or education, except that in any case the aggregate value of the items or equipment to which this exemption is applied shall not exceed £1,350;

 

(b)such clothing, bedding, furniture, household equipment, items and provisions as are reasonably required to satisfy the basic domestic needs of the debtor and every member of the debtor’s household, including (but not restricted to)—

 

(i)a cooker or microwave;

 

(ii)a refrigerator;

 

(iii)a washing machine;

 

(iv)a dining table large enough, and sufficient dining chairs, to seat the debtor and every member of the debtor’s household;

 

(v)beds and bedding sufficient for the debtor and every member of the debtor’s household;

 

(vi)one landline telephone, or if there is no landline telephone at the premises, a mobile or internet telephone which may be used by the debtor or a member of the debtor’s household;

 

http://www.legislation.gov.uk/uksi/2013/1894/regulation/4/made?view=plain

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you.

 

That is very useful and a big relief. I panicked that the HCEO could take the lot!

 

I've managed to fend the HCEO off for a few more days and am going to try and get my son to deal with this and sign a stat dec etc but it won't be easy.

Link to post
Share on other sites

YOU need to sign the Stat Dec, not your son! it's your property you're trying to protect - you need the Stat Dec notarised by a solicitor then take copies so you can hand one to the bailiff (through the window - don't open the door!)

Help us to keep on helping

Please consider making a donation, however small, if you have benefited from advice on the forums

 

 

This site is run solely on donations

 

My advice is based on my opinion and experience only. It is not to be taken as legal advice - if you are unsure you should seek professional help.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I note that you have stated that your son no longer lives with you at that address - you need to contact the council and get him removed from the Council Tax (if there is no one else with you then this may qualify you for a single resident discount as well).

 

You then need to write to Marston and tell them that your son does not live at your address and they are therefore to cease all attempts to contact him there.

Link to post
Share on other sites

YOU need to sign the Stat Dec, not your son! it's your property you're trying to protect - you need the Stat Dec notarised by a solicitor then take copies so you can hand one to the bailiff (through the window - don't open the door!)

 

Thank you for your help.

 

I've fended them off for now and am working on the Stat Dec for myself.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I note that you have stated that your son no longer lives with you at that address - you need to contact the council and get him removed from the Council Tax (if there is no one else with you then this may qualify you for a single resident discount as well).

 

Good idea, thanks.

 

 

You then need to write to Marston and tell them that your son does not live at your address and they are therefore to cease all attempts to contact him there.

 

I have tried this already and Marston originally said they don't care and that they can still get a locksmith to force entry into my house but they've gone quiet over the last few days.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Good idea, thanks.

 

 

 

 

I have tried this already and Marston originally said they don't care and that they can still get a locksmith to force entry into my house but they've gone quiet over the last few days.

 

Think you need to remind your Son that failure to pay Magistrates court fines can lead him being sent to Prison. He might not realise the consequences of not attempting to pay the fines.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Good idea, thanks.

 

 

 

 

I have tried this already and Marston originally said they don't care and that they can still get a locksmith to force entry into my house but they've gone quiet over the last few days.

 

If Marston could do that then they would just get on with it and do it. You have notified them them that your son no longer lives there and that should be enough for them to stop harassing you as it is not your debt and you can never be made liable for it.

 

As a belt and braces backup I would write to Marston one more time using recorded and signed for delivery stating that you have already informed them that your son no longer lives at your address and you cannot enter any further dialogue with them as the debt is not yours.

 

Make sure you keep copies of your letters and if they turn up ring the Police and explain to them you have notified Marston he is not at your address and you are not obliged to grant them access to check. You could allow the Police only to come in and check and they could report back to Marston (who should wait outside) on their findings.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you for your help.

 

I've fended them off for now and am working on the Stat Dec for myself.

 

It's certainly a good idea to get that done as soon as possible. Don't forget to take copies ( you keep the original and give |Marston's a copy).

Help us to keep on helping

Please consider making a donation, however small, if you have benefited from advice on the forums

 

 

This site is run solely on donations

 

My advice is based on my opinion and experience only. It is not to be taken as legal advice - if you are unsure you should seek professional help.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I know that this is a couple of days old but. How would a council tax bill addressed to the owner, prove if the debtor was living there?

 

Also if this is a fine,

Why does the OP keep referring to the HCEO ?

DO NOT PAY UPFRONT FEES TO COLD CALLERS PROMISING TO WRITE OFF YOUR DEBTS

DO NOT PAY UPFRONT FEES FOR COSTLY TELEPHONE CONSULTATIONS WITH SO CALLED "EXPERTS" THEY INVARIABLY ARE NOTHING OF THE SORT

BEWARE OF QUICK FIX DEBT SOLUTIONS, IF IT LOOKS LIKE IT IS TO GOOD TO BE TRUE IT INVARIABLY IS

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...