Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Northmonk forget what I said about your Notice to Hirer being the best I have seen . Though it  still may be  it is not good enough to comply with PoFA. Before looking at the NTH, we can look at the original Notice to Keeper. That is not compliant. First the period of parking as sated on their PCN is not actually the period of parking but a misstatement  since it is only the arrival and departure times of your vehicle. The parking period  is exactly that -ie the time youwere actually parked in a parking spot.  If you have to drive around to find a place to park the act of driving means that you couldn't have been parked at the same time. Likewise when you left the parking place and drove to the exit that could not be describes as parking either. So the first fail is  failing to specify the parking period. Section9 [2][a] In S9[2][f] the Act states  (ii)the creditor does not know both the name of the driver and a current address for service for the driver, the creditor will (if all the applicable conditions under this Schedule are met) have the right to recover from the keeper so much of that amount as remains unpaid; Your PCN fails to mention the words in parentheses despite Section 9 [2]starting by saying "The notice must—..." As the Notice to Keeper fails to comply with the Act,  it follows that the Notice to Hirer cannot be pursued as they couldn't get the NTH compliant. Even if the the NTH was adjudged  as not  being affected by the non compliance of the NTK, the Notice to Hirer is itself not compliant with the Act. Once again the PCN fails to get the parking period correct. That alone is enough to have the claim dismissed as the PCN fails to comply with PoFA. Second S14 [5] states " (5)The notice to Hirer must— (a)inform the hirer that by virtue of this paragraph any unpaid parking charges (being parking charges specified in the notice to keeper) may be recovered from the hirer; ON their NTH , NPE claim "The driver of the above vehicle is liable ........" when the driver is not liable at all, only the hirer is liable. The driver and the hirer may be different people, but with a NTH, only the hirer is liable so to demand the driver pay the charge  fails to comply with PoFA and so the NPE claim must fail. I seem to remember that you have confirmed you received a copy of the original PCN sent to  the Hire company plus copies of the contract you have with the Hire company and the agreement that you are responsible for breaches of the Law etc. If not then you can add those fails too.
    • Weaknesses in some banks' security measures for online and mobile banking could leave customers more exposed to scammers, new data from Which? reveals.View the full article
    • I understand what you mean. But consider that part of the problem, and the frustration of those trying to help, is the way that questions are asked without context and without straight facts. A lot of effort was wasted discussing as a consumer issue before it was mentioned that the property was BTL. I don't think we have your history with this property. Were you the freehold owner prior to this split? Did you buy the leasehold of one half? From a family member? How was that funded (earlier loan?). How long ago was it split? Have either of the leasehold halves changed hands since? I'm wondering if the split and the leashold/freehold arrangements were set up in a way that was OK when everyone was everyone was connected. But a way that makes the leasehold virtually unsaleable to an unrelated party.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Party Wall Notice - Changed planning


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 2469 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi,

An elderly family member has received a party wall notice and we would like some advice before contacting a surveyor see if we just being rediculous.

 

The bits we would like help with are as follows:

 

1: adressed to the owner not him personally even though his name is known and shown further in notice.

 

Should it be addressed to him personally?

 

 

2: they give less than a months notice NOT minimum 2 months.

 

As it is a Party structure notice we understand it should give a minimum of 2 months notice.

 

3: the notice says to build a bedroom above the garage.

 

Original plans were for a gym above the garage not a bedroom, can these be changed without notice?

 

4: they say no special foundations needed.

 

The garage is joined to his by single skin breeze block wall and they have not as far as we are aware checked the foundations. They do say they will strengthen the wall but we have doubts about foundations as the neighbour the other side had to have foundations dug.

 

5: They want to erect the scaffolding over his garage.

 

If they do then he wont be able to use it for a minimum of 4 weeks, bearing in mind he does park his car in it can he claim compensation as in effect his insurance could be invalid as car wont be garaged as declared instead it will be at the end of his driveway.

 

We look forward to any responses.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hello there.

 

I'll move your thread to the local authority forum, hopefully people there will have information for you.

 

HB

Thats great thank you.

Link to post
Share on other sites

The notice is not addressed to a person, because the ownership of neighbouring house might br changing.

 

In regard to notice period, where does the 2 months notice come from for this type of work ?

 

If your relative is not happy, why have they not registered a formal dispute with the local authority ? I don't think your relative has to give consent to scaffolding over their garage. If they don't want to assist the neighbour, then i am not sure they have to. It is not essential works to repair a property.

 

There should have been planning details posted on the local authorities website ? What is showing about the changed usage, what restrictions if any applied ?

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Not an expert on planning but

If plans state a gym and they are creating a bedroom then their is a difference between a habitable room and non habited room.

 

They must seek consent to place scaffolding on your property.

No consent, no build.

Link to post
Share on other sites

You do, however, have recourse to the Access to Neighbouring Land Act 1992. The Act allows the court to grant an applicant a temporary right of access in order to carry out basic preservation works - works necessary to repair or maintain the applicant’s property.

 

However, The Act draws an important distinction between preservation works and works which are simply about improving the property: the court will not grant a right of access for the latter.

 

Be aware too that the court will not grant right of access if that access can be gained via an alternative route – even if that route is less convenient or more expensive for you to take.

 

The court is not obliged to grant a right of access if it would cause unreasonable disturbance or interference to your neighbour and, if a right of access is granted, the court can award compensation based on a measure of the inconvenience and damage to the neighbouring property.

 

Easy find on google.

No consent, its not preserving a property, its improvement

 

No consent=no build

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you Sgt Bush your post is quite informative.

 

 

In regard to notice period, where does the 2 months notice come from for this type of work ?

 

If your relative is not happy, why have they not registered a formal dispute with the local authority ?

 

I don't think your relative has to give consent to scaffolding over their garage.

 

There should have been planning details posted on the local authorities website ?

 

In regard to the 2 month notice this is laid down in legislation??????

 

They did register an objection at the initial planning stage.

 

As far as we are aware they do need approval for scaffolding over the garage.

 

There were planning details posted, the plans were for a porch ext, garage converted to bedroom for carers? New Extension above garage to be a gym, single story rear ext.

Link to post
Share on other sites

How to Upload Documents/Images on CAG - **INSTRUCTIONS CLICK HERE**

FORUM RULES - Please ensure to read these before posting **FORUM RULES CLICK HERE**

I cannot give any advice by PM - If you provide a link to your Thread then I will be happy to offer advice there.

I advise to the best of my ability, but I am not a qualified professional, benefits lawyer nor Welfare Rights Adviser.

Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hello.

Just so you know - if a neighbour serves a Party Wall Award on you - for work they intend to do to their property - you have the legal right to appoint a surveyor to represent you - at the neighbour's expense.

The neighbour's surveyors details will be on the Award they gave you.

Google a local to you surveyor who specialises in Party Wall Awards. Call them and give them the details of the neighbour's surveyors.

The new surveyor - looking after you and the condition of your property - will then attend your property and make notes/ take photos of yours to ensure when the neighbour's work is in process/done that there is no structural damage to yours. They will pass their bill on to your neighbour.

It is quite a simple process.

 

In terms of them changing intended use of their own property - that is a planning issue and the council could be contacted. However - does it really affect you how they use that room? You need to bear in mind if you may ever wish to do something similar to increase the value of your own property. Having the neighbour's change of use could be a good precedent. I always like to bear 'karma' in mind when I feel like complaining!!! After that thought, sometimes I back down on my initial angry thoughts.....

Link to post
Share on other sites

We know he has to unstruct a surveyor of his own, what we were not sure about is what are his rights about the notice being wrong, I read somewhere that he can go back to them in writing and tell them until they serve a valid notice nothing can be done.

 

After reading and re reading the planning approval it states that plans are approved as listed and shall be carried out in accordance with drawings etc. Now they wish to build in the same space etc but change the use from gym to bedroom.

 

It is highly unlikely he or anyone else would want to do the same extension as it would devalue both the properties at the moment they are linked by the garages if the relative copied and extended then they would become semi detatched and in that area worth about £5000 less than the current valuation.

 

We have a surveyor we now coming today to give us her opinion then he is going to do whatever is neccessary after.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...