Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Northmonk forget what I said about your Notice to Hirer being the best I have seen . Though it  still may be  it is not good enough to comply with PoFA. Before looking at the NTH, we can look at the original Notice to Keeper. That is not compliant. First the period of parking as sated on their PCN is not actually the period of parking but a misstatement  since it is only the arrival and departure times of your vehicle. The parking period  is exactly that -ie the time youwere actually parked in a parking spot.  If you have to drive around to find a place to park the act of driving means that you couldn't have been parked at the same time. Likewise when you left the parking place and drove to the exit that could not be describes as parking either. So the first fail is  failing to specify the parking period. Section9 [2][a] In S9[2][f] the Act states  (ii)the creditor does not know both the name of the driver and a current address for service for the driver, the creditor will (if all the applicable conditions under this Schedule are met) have the right to recover from the keeper so much of that amount as remains unpaid; Your PCN fails to mention the words in parentheses despite Section 9 [2]starting by saying "The notice must—..." As the Notice to Keeper fails to comply with the Act,  it follows that the Notice to Hirer cannot be pursued as they couldn't get the NTH compliant. Even if the the NTH was adjudged  as not  being affected by the non compliance of the NTK, the Notice to Hirer is itself not compliant with the Act. Once again the PCN fails to get the parking period correct. That alone is enough to have the claim dismissed as the PCN fails to comply with PoFA. Second S14 [5] states " (5)The notice to Hirer must— (a)inform the hirer that by virtue of this paragraph any unpaid parking charges (being parking charges specified in the notice to keeper) may be recovered from the hirer; ON their NTH , NPE claim "The driver of the above vehicle is liable ........" when the driver is not liable at all, only the hirer is liable. The driver and the hirer may be different people, but with a NTH, only the hirer is liable so to demand the driver pay the charge  fails to comply with PoFA and so the NPE claim must fail. I seem to remember that you have confirmed you received a copy of the original PCN sent to  the Hire company plus copies of the contract you have with the Hire company and the agreement that you are responsible for breaches of the Law etc. If not then you can add those fails too.
    • Weaknesses in some banks' security measures for online and mobile banking could leave customers more exposed to scammers, new data from Which? reveals.View the full article
    • I understand what you mean. But consider that part of the problem, and the frustration of those trying to help, is the way that questions are asked without context and without straight facts. A lot of effort was wasted discussing as a consumer issue before it was mentioned that the property was BTL. I don't think we have your history with this property. Were you the freehold owner prior to this split? Did you buy the leasehold of one half? From a family member? How was that funded (earlier loan?). How long ago was it split? Have either of the leasehold halves changed hands since? I'm wondering if the split and the leashold/freehold arrangements were set up in a way that was OK when everyone was everyone was connected. But a way that makes the leasehold virtually unsaleable to an unrelated party.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

LA charging for house clearance after forced move


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 130 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

My dad died in March and my sister lived with him in our family home that we all grew up in. He had a tenancy, she didn’t. After his death she was told she can not succeed his tenancy as in my parents separation the transfer of the joint tenancy to a sole tenancy counted as a succession. They offered my sister to move her to a flat under her own discretionary tenancy as the house (a 3 bed) was too big for her needs. she has paid all bills, council tax and rent in this time whilst she has waited for rehoming. 


She moved 2 weeks ago and was told to drop his keys to the council office by 5 pm Monday. She dropped them in at 3pm only to be told she’d been advised wrong and it should have been 1pm so she was now liable for another weeks rent. 


Today they get in touch to tell her she needs to pay for the house to be cleared - my dad was a hoarder and had 35 years of car parts and ‘life’ stuff collected. Nobody has ever had a say over his things - she has lived there but couldn’t tell him what he can or can’t do in his home so there is a lot of stuff. 


originally she was told (by the same person who told her the wrong time for the keys) that she didn’t have to be responsible for all his things as it isn’t hers. Now they are back tracking again. 
can they do this?

She’s only a student so has no income except student loans and is finding this all very overwhelming- there’s a lot of stuff to clear and she has no money. 

they wouldn’t let her stay because the tenancy was not hers, so can they enforce that she clears a mess that is not hers? 

Link to post
Share on other sites

sadly they can. now if its legally enforceable is another matter.

i suspect this is what they are calling a 'summary charge'?

i argued this in 2011 and just ignored them after months of willy waving. never heard from the council again.

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I would ignore it myself but unfortunately they are her landlords in her new tenancy so she can’t.

it seems so unfair, none of it is her mess and if she was allowed to stay there she would have cleared it eventually but they made her move. 
 

Link to post
Share on other sites

same with me they just gave up.

their only eventual course of action is to raise a county court claim and try for a CCJ for the sum it cost to clear the property as its a CIVIL matter, hence i asked you if this was a 'summary charge' invoice by the council?. if so the above is all they can do and then you'll get to tell the story and the judge will decide.

i know mine was 10yrs+ ago but they could find no 'law' that they could force me to pay it.

same type of thing.

i was not a tenant of that council at the time, but had lived there with whom was for +15yrs before

the tenant moved out, i didn't till forced too,  by the council, they gave me a flat, thus i was then their tenant.

i kept up the pretence that the contents were not mine and never were as i was not their tenant. but inherited it.

there's far more to this story before hand, but thats all irrelevant .

  • Like 1

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

This sounds very similar scenario

- my sister has never been their tenants until she was moved last week.

Thank you for sharing your experience 

Edited by dx100uk
unnecessary previous post quote removed
Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi

As this is Council Housing they are a Registered Social Landlord (RSL) and as the exact same as Housing Associations/Trusts etc so never ever be afraid to challenge them just because they are the Council does not make them anything special as they still have to follow the exact same Legislation/Regulations as all RSLs must.

Nice to see a Council when someone parent has passed using the heavy handed tactic with absolutely no compassion.

Sadly the Council Housing can charge to empty out the property as it is the Tenants responsibility  to clear out the Property before handing it back i.e. handing in the Properties Keys and if they have to end up removing items to clear the property they can then charge for this service especially if 35yrs worth of stuff has been left.

I can see what dx100uk is saying but your situation is slightly different as this was the family home and you were all related and have now moved to another property with the same council. So what the Council will probably do with these charges from liable for one weeks rent to charge for clearing property if not paid is they will add this to your rent account for your new property as a Charge until fully paid.

Depending on how much they decide to charge if unable to pay it in full the Council must give you the option or ask for the option of setting up a payment plan but you don't let them dictate the weekly/monthly payment you tell them what you can afford and remember if you default they can then take other action.

Which Council Housing is this?

What you need to do here is challenge their action by following the Council Housings Complaints Procedure and write to them ensuring to title the letter Formal Complaint. (Get Free Proof of Posting from the Post Office and keep a Good Paper Trail)

 

Dear Sir/Madam

Formal Complaint

As you are aware my Father passed away on XX/XX/XXXX and the Tenancy Agreement was in his Sole Name and you were arranging for me to down size to another property due to Bedroom Tax/Under Occupation which was done by yourselves.

During this and getting my new property not once was it explained to myself by the Council Housing that I had to full clear out the property
as the Tenancy Agreement was in my late fathers name and I would have expected to be informed of something so crucial.

I was also informed by (name) from the Council that I had to drop off the Keys to the Property to the Council Office by 5pm on Monday (month, year) but I actually dropped the key earlier at 3pm on that day. I have now been informed that I had been advised wrongly and the keys should have been dropped off by 1pm and due to this I am late and am now liable for another weeks rent.

I fully refute that I am now liable for another weeks rents as this error was due to the incorrect information given to me by (name) Councill Officer
so this maladministration lies directly with your staff giving incorrect information.

Also bear in mind your Tenancy Agreement for that Property was with my Late Father and not myself so I would have been unaware of your 
Policy and Procedures for Ending the Tenancy as it was actually the Council that did this due to Bedroom Tax/Under Occupation and made me down size to another property.

Therefore the Council are in Breach of their own Policies and Procedures for Ending a Tenancy as nothing was mentioned to myself as to the proper way to follow your Policies and Procedures for ending that Tenancy that was in my Late Fathers Name as I should have been informed properly by your staff which I was not as I was never informed about ensuring to fully clear the property before handover to Council to the incorrect information about handing the key back.

This is disgraceful action by your staff and maladministration which I am being forced to pay for and fully refute due to your the Council Housings Actions

I look forward to your reply.

 

NOTE: please amend the above to suit your needs again never ever be scared to challenge Council Housing just because they are the Council they are no different to any other Social Housing Landlord and you use their own Policies and Procedures against them

 

 

How to Upload Documents/Images on CAG - **INSTRUCTIONS CLICK HERE**

FORUM RULES - Please ensure to read these before posting **FORUM RULES CLICK HERE**

I cannot give any advice by PM - If you provide a link to your Thread then I will be happy to offer advice there.

I advise to the best of my ability, but I am not a qualified professional, benefits lawyer nor Welfare Rights Adviser.

Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...