Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • S13 (2)The creditor may not exercise the right under paragraph 4 to recover from the keeper any unpaid parking charges specified in the notice to keeper if, within the period of 28 days beginning with the day after that on which that notice was given, the creditor is given— (a)a statement signed by or on behalf of the vehicle-hire firm to the effect that at the material time the vehicle was hired to a named person under a hire agreement; (b)a copy of the hire agreement; and (c)a copy of a statement of liability signed by the hirer under that hire agreement. As  Arval has complied with the above they cannot be pursued by EC----- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- S14 [1]   the creditor may recover those charges (so far as they remain unpaid) from the hirer. (2)The conditions are that— (a)the creditor has within the relevant period given the hirer a notice in accordance with sub-paragraph (5) (a “notice to hirer”), together with a copy of the documents mentioned in paragraph 13(2) and the notice to keeper; (b)a period of 21 days beginning with the day on which the notice to hirer was given has elapsed;  As ECP did not send copies of the documents to your company and they have given 28 days instead of 21 days they have failed to comply with  the Act so you and your Company are absolved from paying. That is not to say that they won't continue asking to be paid as they do not have the faintest idea how PoFA works. 
    • Euro have got a lot wrong and have failed to comply with the Protection of Freedoms Act 2012 Schedule 4.  According to Section 13 after ECP have written to Arval they should then send a NTH to the Hirer  which they have done.This eliminates Arval from any further pursuit by ECP. When they wrote to your company they should have sent copies of everything that they asked Arval for. This is to prove that your company agree what happened on the day of the breach. If ECP then comply with the Act they are allowed to pursue the hirer. If they fail, to comply they cannot make the hirer pay. They can pursue until they are blue in the face but the Hirer is not lawfully required to pay them and if it went to Court ECP would lose. Your company could say who was driving but the only person that can be pursued is the Hirer, there does not appear to be an extension for a driver to be pursued. Even if there was, because ECP have failed miserably to comply with the Act  they still have no chance of winning in Court. Here are the relevant Hire sections from the Act below.
    • Thank-you FTMDave for your feedback. May I take this opportunity to say that after reading numerous threads to which you are a contributor, I have great admiration for you. You really do go above and beyond in your efforts to help other people. The time you put in to help, in particular with witness statements is incredible. I am also impressed by the way in which you will defer to others with more experience should there be a particular point that you are not 100% clear on and return with answers or advice that you have sought. I wish I had the ability to help others as you do. There is another forum expert that I must also thank for his time and patience answering my questions and allowing me to come to a “penny drops” moment on one particular issue. I believe he has helped me immensely to understand and to strengthen my own case. I shall not mention who it is here at the moment just in case he would rather I didn't but I greatly appreciate the time he took working through that issue with me. I spent 20+ years of working in an industry that rules and regulations had to be strictly adhered to, indeed, exams had to be taken in order that one had to become qualified in those rules and regulations in order to carry out the duties of the post. In a way, such things as PoFA 2012 are rules and regulations that are not completely alien to me. It has been very enjoyable for me to learn these regulations and the law surrounding them. I wish I had found this forum years ago. I admit that perhaps I had been too keen to express my opinions given that I am still in the learning process. After a suitable period in this industry I became Qualified to teach the rules and regulations and I always said to those I taught that there is no such thing as a stupid question. If opinions, theories and observations are put forward, discussion can take place and as long as the result is that the student is able to clearly see where they went wrong and got to that moment where the penny drops then that is a valuable learning experience. No matter how experienced one is, there is always something to learn and if I did not know the answer to a question, I would say, I don't know the answer to that question but I will go and find out what the answer is. In any posts I have made, I have stated, “unless I am wrong” or “as far as I can see” awaiting a response telling me what I got wrong, if it was wrong. If I am wrong I am only too happy to admit it and take it as a valuable learning experience. I take the point that perhaps I should not post on other peoples threads and I shall refrain from doing so going forward. 🤐 As alluded to, circumstances can change, FTMDave made the following point that it had been boasted that no Caggers, over two years, who had sent a PPC the wrong registration snotty letter, had even been taken to court, let alone lost a court hearing .... but now they have. I too used the word "seemed" because it is true, we haven't had all the details. After perusing this forum I believe certain advice changed here after the Beavis case, I could be wrong but that is what I seem to remember reading. Could it be that after winning the above case in question, a claimant could refer back to this case and claim that a defendant had not made use of the appeal process, therefore allowing the claimant to win? Again, in this instance only, I do not know what is to be gained by not making an appeal or concealing the identity of the driver, especially if it is later admitted that the defendant was the driver and was the one to input the incorrect VRN in error. So far no one has educated me as to the reason why. But, of course, when making an appeal, it should be worded carefully so that an error in the appeal process cannot be referred back to. I thought long and hard about whether or not to post here but I wanted to bring up this point for discussion. Yes, I admit I have limited knowledge, but does that mean I should have kept silent? After I posted that I moved away from this forum slightly to find other avenues to increase my knowledge. I bought a law book and am now following certain lawyers on Youtube in the hope of arming myself with enough ammunition to use in my own case. In one video titled “7 Reasons You Will LOSE Your Court Case (and how to avoid them)” by Black Belt Barrister I believe he makes my point by saying the following, and I quote: “If you ignore the complaint in the first instance and it does eventually end up in court then it's going to look bad that you didn't co-operate in the first place. The court is not going to look kindly on you simply ignoring the company and not, let's say, availing yourself of any kind of appeal opportunities, particularly if we are talking about parking charge notices and things like that.” This point makes me think that, it is not such a bizarre judgement in the end. Only in the case of having proof of payment and inputting an incorrect VRN .... could it be worthwhile making a carefully worded appeal in the first instance? .... If the appeal fails, depending on the reason, surely this could only help if it went to court? As always, any feedback gratefully received.
    • To which official body does one make a formal complaint about a LPA fixed charge receiver? Does one make a complaint first to the company employing the appointed individuals?    Or can one complain immediately to an official body, such as nara?    I've tried researching but there doesn't seem a very clear route on how to legally hold them to account for wrongful behaviour.  It seems frustratingly complicated because they are considered to be officers of the court and held in high esteem - and the borrower is deemed liable for their actions.  Yet what does the borrower do when disclosure shows clear evidence of wrong-doing? Does anyone have any pointers please?
    • Steam is still needed in many industries, but much of it is still made with fossil fuels.View the full article
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Cabot/mortimer claimform - OHs old EGG Loan debt - prob SBd


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 2388 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Name of the Claimant ? Cabot Financial UK Ltd

 

Date of issue – 1 Jun 2017

 

What is the claim for –

1.By an agreement between IDEM Re Egg Banking Plc & the Defendant

on or around 16/8/2005 ('the agreement') IDEM Re Egg Banking Plc agreed to loan the Defendant monies.

2. The Defendant did not pay the installments as they fell due & the Agreement was terminated. The Agreement was assigned to the Claimant.

THE CLAIMANT THEREFORE CLAIMS 1397.53

 

What is the value of the claim?

1547.53 (inc fees of 150)

 

Is the claim for - personal loan

 

When did you enter into the original agreement before or after 2007? before - around 2003-4

 

Has the claim been issued by the original creditor

or was the account assigned and it is the Debt purchaser who has issued the claim. Cabot

 

Were you aware the account had been assigned – did you receive a Notice of Assignment? NO

 

Did you receive a Default Notice from the original creditor? No

 

Have you been receiving statutory notices headed “Notice of Default sums” – at least once a year ?No

 

Why did you cease payments? Payments were being taken by direct debit, unaware payments had stopped, no notices received for lack of payment at any time

 

What was the date of your last payment? Exact date unknown at present, sometime prior to 2010

 

Was there a dispute with the original creditor that remains unresolved? No

 

Did you communicate any financial problems to the original creditor and make any attempt to enter into a debt management planicon?

No financial problems, no need to contact creditor, no need for debt management. They stopped taking payments and did not inform us we were behind

 

 

 

 

Hello

 

I received a county court claim form in the post today from Cabot.

I will fill out the details I know you need in the next post.

 

I'm doing this for my wife, who is in bits now because of this form.

I'm trying to calm her down but he is scared witless.

 

She did take out a loan over 10 years ago with Egg, but that was sold to another company when Egg got out of the personal loan business and I think we only had one more letter from them after that. This is the only one we've received since.

 

 

Bank accounts and direct debits have not changed in over 20 years and she always pays her debts on time. I don't think she has ever missed a payment for anything.

 

I work at home and as such, very rarely ever leave the house.

No-one has come knocking at the door about this

- or any other - debt in the 10 years I've lived here.

 

Can someone lease assist me, I have no idea what I'm doing and we cannot afford solicitors.

 

Thank you in advance

 

Ian

Link to post
Share on other sites

You have plenty of avenues for defence, including if they hold paperwork sufficient to enforce any agreement through the courts.

 

However, these may be superfluous, as from the greater than 6 years between when you last made a payment (or rather when a payment was missed, and their 'cause of action' arose) and when they've started the claim, if the date of last payment is correct, you have an ABSOLUTE defence in that the claim is 'Statute Barred'.

 

So, reassure your wife, and tell her to calm down.

 

You'll need to do some procedural things, and make sure you don't slip up and let them get a default judgment, but provided you pay attention to the timescales for submitting responses to the court, this should be straightforward to 'bat away'.

 

More to follow shortly, but show this to your wife, reassure her, and lets get her a bit calmer!.

 

Procedural stuff :

 

You'll need to make an 'acknowledgement of service' (AoS) of the claim. You could submit a defence with your AoS (especially if the defence is 'statute barred'), but submitting the AoS in time then buys you more time to submit a defence.

 

Some may disagree (saying using anything other than 'statute barred' makes claiming its 'statute barred' look less reliable), but IMO there is nothing wrong with being prepared for discovering a later payment was made, and having "in the alternate' defences up your sleeve, and you want to get as much info as you can to prepare the most robust defence, that may even get them to withdraw.

 

Cabot are supposed to comply with a 'pre-action protocol' before issuing a claim. They should have written to you setting out what they think they are owed and why. When you write (to their solicitors) asking for sight of the documents relating to their claim (under CPR 31.14), make sure you demand a copy of this too.

They may well claim they don't have to comply with CPR31.14 as it is likely going to be a small claims track case, and that would be true if the case had been 'allocated' to the small claims track. Just because it is LIKELY to be a small claims case doesn't mean CPR 31.14 doesn't apply, unless and until it actually has been allocated (and hopefully they'll withdraw before that stage when they see you aren't going to be a push-over / or allow them a default win).

 

The CPR 31.14 goes to their solicitor, and a CCA request (for the paperwork for the loan under the Consumer Credit Act) goes to the claimant, Cabot. (For good measure you can also SAR the original lender, Egg, in case it shows anything that further weakens the claimant's case).

 

CAG doesn't encourage debt avoidance, and part of you may be thinking "if I owe as a result of defaulting on a loan, I should pay".

 

Firstly, find out if you did owe anything. Then consider that the original creditor will have written off any such debt, if it ever existed, by selling it on. Then consider how much Cabot will have paid (pennies in the pound?), then consider if Cabot have a good claim and how they've behaved (including the effect on your wife of today's claim form out of the blue).

If at the end of that you still feel "I owe someone, something", let CAG help you bat away Cabot, then consider:

a) a donation to CAG if you feel you have something on your conscience to salve?, and / or

b) helping others who face the same, by posting on CAG!.

Link to post
Share on other sites

This should be easily defeated - your wife can rest assured, although Cabot are unlikely to roll over without a bit of argy-bargy in the meantime

 

First things first you need to go onto the MCOL website and acknowledge the claim. Tick that you intend to defend the claim in full. Leave the jurisdiction box unticked and save.

 

Get a CCA request off to Cabot and a CPR 31.14 request off to the solicitor named on the Claim form. Probably also worth phoning Egg to establish the exact date of the last payment to the account

 

If as you believe there have been no payments since 2010 or before then the above may well be superfluous anyway as the Claim would be barred by the Limitation Act, but no harm in getting as much information as you can

 

Very unlikely that you will receive any paperwork before having to file a defence, and in that case you would submit a SB defence backed up by the lack of any paperwork

Any advice given is done so on the assumption that recipients will also take professional advice where appropriate.

 

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

DONATE HERE

 

If I have been helpful in any way - please feel free to click on the STAR to the left!

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks, Sidewinder .... we've cross-posted a bit....

I hope dx doesn't mind me quoting their useful (standard) summary post, noting the same

 

std procedure then..

 

pop up on the MCOL website detailed on the claimform.

.

register as an individual

note the long gateway number given

then log in

.

select respond to a claim and select the AOS box.

.

then using the details required from the claimform

.

defend all

leave jurisdiction unticked.

click thru to the end

confirm and exit MCOL.

 

dx

 

Also, OP : check your credit file (experian / clearscore etc.).

I'm not expecting you to find anything on there,

but if it is clear it is further confirmation there isn't anything showing for the last 6 years .......

Link to post
Share on other sites

I wouldn't bother with CCA/CPR

just do the AOS on MCOL.

 

its statute barred

IND debts always are

 

just go CHECK [poss ring Canadian square operations numbers on here somewhere]

and ask last payment date.

DO NOT RING THE CLAIMANT NOR THE SOLS [who are the solicitor - restons?]

 

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you all for your help. I am printing the letters off now and will get them sent off in the next 30 mins. Luckily there is a post office here still open in the afternoons so I can get the postal order and recorded delivery sorted today.

 

I will also get a copy of my wifes credit report to check the details on there too.

 

I will keep this thread updated with my status.

 

I really appreciate the help given already

 

Wife is much happier now :)

 

Ian

 

dx100uk said:
I wouldn't bother with CCA/CPR

just do the AOS on MCOL.

 

its statute barred

IND debts always are

 

just go CHECK [poss ring Canadian square operations numbers on here somewhere]

and ask last payment date.

DO NOT RING THE CLAIMANT NOR THE SOLS [who are the solicitor - restons?]

 

 

dx

 

Sorry for my ignorance, what's an IND debt?

Link to post
Share on other sites

sorry should read IDEM.

 

 

forget the CCA/CPR no point if the debts statute barred.

as sending those weakens your claim of SB.

 

 

I believe CITI bought all the old EGG loans

then sold them to wither IND DCA or IDEM DCA.

 

 

theres a CITI and an EGG phone number on here somewhere

Canadian square operations

just search for that in the red top SEARCH CAG box of the red toolbar.

 

 

either EGG or CITI will hae the details

of the last payment made

you'll need the original loan number mind.

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

 

forget the CCA/CPR no point if the debts statute barred.

as sending those weakens your claim of SB.

 

Weakens them with who?

The claimant?

The claimant's solicitor?

A judge?.

 

The latter 2 will be used to seeing "in the alternate," defences, without regarding them as a sign of weakness.

(If it got that far!) if a judge agreed it was statute barred on the facts, the alternate defence wouldn't get considered.

A judge wouldn't use the existence of an alternate defence to alter their opinion on if a matter was statute barred - the dates are the dates.

 

I did note that opinions vary regarding "just use SB defence in its own" or "leave the door open for alternate defences".....

Link to post
Share on other sites

requesting paperwork is saying

well I don't really know if its sb'd.

 

 

whatever the claimant wants to rely upon must be produced at disclosure stage

its for them to prove NOT SB

rather than for the defendant to prove it is

 

 

anyway

I bet this is CABOT/RESTONS

99% of the SB debts they drop like a hot stone.

 

 

they hoped as they always do for a non contested default rubberstamped judge without human intervention

shame the OP found cag.

 

 

dx

 

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

The solicitor is named as Mortimer Clarke Solicitors Ltd in Worthing.

 

I'm a bit confused now.

I've gone through my wifes bank statement looking for the date of last payment and it looks to me like the debt was transferred to Britannia Moorgate (the amount of £142 paid to egg stops and they take over the exact same amount the following and subsequent months).

 

On 6th February 2012 a payment of £100 was taken by Moorgate Loans.

Nothing after that.

We didnt know this was taken until we checked just now.

 

if I understand this right, this means its not statute barred?

And if so, the CCA and CPR letters are useless?

Sorry, I really dont understand... I've not sent them yet, just in case.

 

I've just checked my wifes Noddle report and Cabot updated a default on 30-04-2017.

The date given on the default is 19-03-2012.

They've also spelled her middle name wrong which is annoying!

 

Ironically,

my wife works in the building next to Cabots

and I drive past it when I occasionally drop her off.

Now I know what they do there!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Ok baz. Not on me server so pop that instruction text up again and that'll get them sort ed

 

Dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Ok baz. Not on me server so pop that instruction text up again and that'll get them sort ed

 

Dx

 

I can still see my quote of your instructions higher up the thread (post #5?, the one timed 12:59 anyhow)

Link to post
Share on other sites

A CCA request (section 77/78/79 must always be made on receipt of a court claim irrespective of whether its statute barred or not.

 

Also there is a vital error in the claimants particulars.....

 

 

1.By an agreement between IDEM Re Egg Banking Plc & the Defendant on or around 16/8/2005 ('the agreement') IDEM Re Egg Banking Plc agreed to loan the Defendant monies.

 

The debt was assigned to IDEM...so there is no agreement between.

 

 

Regards

 

Andy

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

OK, I will send off the CCA and CPR letters on monday now as the post office has closed.

 

Is there anything else I can get prepared for Monday too?

 

Ian

Link to post
Share on other sites

Read andy's post. It's important :)

Any advice i give is my own and is based solely on personal experience. If in any doubt about a situation , please contact a certified legal representative or debt counsellor..

 

 

If my advice helps you, click the star icon at the bottom of my post and feel free to say thanks

:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

A CCA request (section 77/78/79 must always be made on receipt of a court claim irrespective of whether its statute barred or not.

 

 

I though when we had one of our serial disrupters on most legal threads some many months ago and this came up...

it was put down as pointless advice, as it matters not if they hold the agreement, ?

 

the fact that its statute barred negates the question of if/if not they hold such paperwork?

makes no odds at all?

 

or was that for CPR?

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

thanks

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just a quick update to say I posted the letters yesterday morning recorded first class. I also submitted my AoS at the same time. I will make a further update as soon as I get a reply from either of them. Thanks for all your help so far, I really appreciate it.

Link to post
Share on other sites

do NOT miss your defence filing date NO MATTER WHAT HAPPENS

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 4 weeks later...

Quick update -

 

I received a letter from their solicitors a few days after I posted on to them, stating that my wife does owe the money, but offering no proof. They also said they would request the documents we needed and put a hold on the court action until it was received.

 

They did not put a hold on the court action.

 

This morning I contacted the court again to check and they confirmed the defence has to be received by today or a default judgement would be entered.

 

I know I left it late, but I'm doing the moneyclaim defence online right now.

 

Still no reply from Cabot at all. Nothing. I believe the solicitors lied so I would fail to file by today and they would automatically get a default judgement.

 

If Cabot can prove there is money owed, and it has legally been assigned to them, I will happily pay it. We don't shirk our debts in this house. But being heavy handed like this, going straight to court before contacting us and lying in order to get a default is wholly unacceptable in my eyes.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Claimants cant put a court claim on hold..you was warned in post#23 above...pity you didn't post this letter to your thread on receipt..rather than today.

 

Better get a holding defence drafted PDQ and post here to be checked.

 

Andy

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

and the letter does not say they are putting the court case on hold

read it properly.

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 4 weeks later...

Hi - Just a quick email with a final update (I hate it when people start threads and dont follow through!).

 

I filed the claim defence on time and a few days later got a letter from the solicitors saying they were looking into the claims I made in defence and would get back to me shortly. About a week later I received a letter from them stating they were unable to produce any documents as required and as such, were cancelling any action and removing my wifes details and closing the case with no further action.

 

We won! :)

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...