Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • be very wary upon what you see being recently posted on here 😎 regarding KIH.... all is not what it seems...  
    • 1st - all my posts on CAG are made not only in reply to the specific issue the topic starter makes but also in a general matter to advise any future readers upon the related subject - here it is kings interhigh online school. KIH lets take this topic apart shall we so readers know the real situation and the real truth...and underline the correct way to deal with KIH. https://tinyurl.com/ycxb4fk7 Kings Interhigh Online School issues - Training and Apprenticeships - Consumer Action Group - but did not ever reply to the last post.  but the user then went around every existing topic here on CAG about KIH pointing to the above topic and the 'want' to make some form of group  promoting some  'class action' against KIH . then on the 2nd march this very topic this msg is in was created. all remarkably similar eh? all appear to be or state..they are in spain... ....as well as the earlier post flaunting their linkedin ID, (same profile picture) that might have slipped through via email before our admin killed it.., trying to give some kind of legitimacy to their 'credentials' of being 'an honest poster'....oh and some kind of 'zen' website using a .co.uk  address (when in spain- bit like the Chinese ebay sallers) they run ... and now we get the father of the bride ...no sorry...father of a child at the uk-based international school in question posting ...pretending to be not the 'other alf... do you really think people are that stupid..... ................... nope you never owed that in the 1st place... wake up you got had and grabbed the phone - oh no they are taking me to court under UK jurisdiction...and fell for every trick in the book that they would never ever put in writing that could be placed in front of a court operating under their stated uk jurisdiction wherever you live. T&C's are always challengeable under UK law this very site would not exist if it were not for the +£Bn's bank charges reclaiming from 2006> and latterly the +£Bn's of PPI reclaiming both directly stated in the banks' T&C's were they claimed they were legally enforceable ...not!! they lost big time... why? a waste of more money if you've not got a court claim....... why not use them for a good outcome...go reclaim that £1000 refundable deposit you got scammed out of . people please research very carefully ...you never know who any of these people are that are posting about kings interhigh and their 'stories' they could even be one of their online tutors or a shill . don't get taken in. dx      
    • @KingsParent thank you for sharing your experience.  I also tried contacting the CEO but didn’t get very far. Do you mind sharing his contact details?  kind regards   
    • Thank you Rocky for the clarifications though they did cause a problem at first since an original windsccreen ticket was  of a different breach some time before. The current windscreen ticket only states that you were parked there for 6 minutes which is just one minute over the minimum time allowed as the Consideration period. There is no further proof that you parked there for any longer than that is there? More photographs for example? Moving on to the Notice to Keeper-it does not comply with the Protection of Freedoms Act 2012 Schedule 4. First there is no parking period mentioned on it. there is the time 20.25 stated which coincides with the W/S ticket but a parking period must have a starting and finishing time-just one time is insufficient to qualify as a parking  period as required in Section 9 [2] [a] . Are there any different photos shown on the NTK comapared to the w/s PCN? Not that that would make a difference as far as PoFA goes since the times required by PoFA should be on the NTK but at the moment Met only appear to show that you stayed there for 6 minutes. Another failure to comply with PoFA is at S9([2][e] where their wording should be "the creditor will (if all the applicable conditions under this Schedule are met) have the right to recover from the keeper so much of that amount as remains unpaid; ". You can see on your NTK that they misssed off the words in brackets. Met cannot therefore transfer the charge from the driver to the keeper. Only the driver is now liable. Then their is the discrepancy with the post code on the NTK  HA4 0EY which differs from the post code on the contract and the Post Office Postcode Finder which both list it as HA4 0FY. As you were not parked in HA4 0EY the breach did not occur. In the same way as if you were caught speeding in the Mall in London, yet you were charged with speeding in Pall mall London [a street nearby] you would be found not guilty since though you were speeding you were not speeding in Pall Mall. I bow to Eric's brother on his reasoning on post 12 re the electric bay abuse  That wording is not listed on their signs nor is there any mention on the contract of any electric charging points at all let alone who can park there or use them. He is quite right too that the entrance sign is merely an invitaion to treat it cannot form a contrct with motorists. Also the contract looks extremely  short no doubt there will be more when we see the full Witness statement. As it stands there is no confirmation from Standard Life [or Lift !] on the contract that Savills are able to act on their behalf. Also most contracts are signed at the end of the contract to prevent either side adding extra points. So their percentage  chance of winning their case would be somewhere between 0.01 and 0.02.    
    • Owners of older vehicles tell the BBC of their anger that their cars' apps will stop working.View the full article
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 160 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

EON/Wedlake Bell LLP PAPLOC Now Claimform - old Dual Fuel Energy Util Bill for old property


Jase1982
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 193 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi All,

 

Hope this is the best place to post this.  I recently received court papers claiming £2500 for a debt at an old property.  I don't believe this figure can be accurate because I'd gone back to EDF to query the amount, and I believe this is due an erroneous meter reading and estimated usages.

 

The solicitors listed on the court papers haven't complied with the pre action protocol as far as I can tell because I've not received anything prior to these court papers from them and don't even know who they are.

 

I'm going to submit a defence on this and I would imagine part of my defence would be that they didn't comply with the pre action protocol.

 

I would just like to know if this is correct when dealing with energy companies?  Is there a template defence?  The only templates I can see are listed here, which I could adapt?  

 

Any further advice would be appreciated.

 

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Please start off by posting up the claim form in PDF format .

Redact it for your own identifiers.

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Topic moved to Financial legal Issues Forum in view of the court claim

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Have you acknowledged service of the claim? deadline was yesterday by 4.00pm.

You will have to respond quicker than this if you are to successfully defend this claim.

 

 

Please read the link below and provide any information regarding the debt and claim by copying the Qs and your responses back here.

 

 

 

https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/357877-you-have-received-a-court-claim-issued-in-england-wales-what-you-need-to-do/#comment-4355834

 

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

why are you not using MCOL?

 

pop up on the MCOL website detailed on the claimform.
[if mcol is not working return after the w/end or the next day if week time]
.
 register as an individual on the Gov't Gateway Site
Go to HMRC's login page.
Click the GREEN sign in button.
Click “Create sign in details”
Enter your email address where asked.
You will now be emailed a confirmation code. ...
You will now be issued with a User ID for your government gateway account.
 note down your details inc the long gateway number given, you might need it later.
 then log in to the MCOL Website
.
 select respond to a claim and select the start AOS box.
.
 then using the details required from the claimform
.
 defend all
 leave jurisdiction unticked
 you DO NOT file a defence at this time
[BUT you MUST file a defence regardless by day 33 ]
click thru to the end
confirm and exit MCOL.

.

get a CPR  31:14  request running to the solicitors [if one is not listed send to the claimant]
...
.[use our other CPR letter if the claim is for an OD or Telecom Debt]
.

https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/332546-legal-cpr-3114-request-request-for-information-when-a-claim-has-been-issued/

.

 type your name ONLY
Do Not sign anything
.do not ever use or give an email
.
you DO NOT await the return of ANY paperwork 
you MUST file a defence regardless by day 33 from the date on the claimform [1 in the count]

..............


 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

18 minutes ago, Jase1982 said:

Hi,

 

I submitted a response today.  I'm assuming they'll have to allow some leeway as due to the postal strikes I didn't receive it for several days afterwards..

Now refer back to my link and give us some history of the debt and complete the CPR 31.14 request 

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Defence due Tues 17th by 16.00pm.  

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Which Court have you received the claim from ? COUNTY COURT BUSINESS CENTRE, NORTHAMPTON 

 

Name of the Claimant ? E.ON NEXT ENERGY LIMITED

 

Date of issue – 16TH DEC 2022

 

Particulars of Claim

 

What is the claim for – the reason they have issued the claim? 

 

1.The claim is for the claimant's charges for supplies of electricity and/or gas to the defendant made under express contracts or contracts deemed by schedule 6 of the Electricity Act 1989 and/or Schedule 2B of the Gas Act 1986 with the Defendant as occupier, consumer and/or site owner by which payment was due within 14 days of invoice.  

 

2.The defendant has failed to pay energy/invoices for Account No. XXXXXXXXXX dual at XXXXXXXXX rendered up to 24/09/2021 for £2,347.13.  

 

3.The claimant claims £2,347.13 and £229.94 INTEREST pursuant to S69 County Courts Act 1984 at 8% per annum from the due date to the date hereof and at £0.61 daily thereafter.

 

What is the total value of the claim? £2772.07
 

Have you received prior notice of a claim being issued pursuant to paragraph 3 of the PAPDC (Pre Action Protocol) ? No
 

Have you changed your address since the time at which the debt referred to in the claim was allegedly incurred? Yes, forwarding address provided and this form has been sent to my new address
 

Did you inform the claimant of your change of address? Yes

Is the claim for - a Bank Account (Overdraft) or credit card or loan or catalogue or mobile phone account? Energy
 

When did you enter into the original agreement before or after April 2007 ? After
 

Do you recall how you entered into the agreement...On line /In branch/By post ? I moved into a property
 

Is the debt showing on your credit reference files (Experian/Equifax /Etc...) ? No
 

Has the claim been issued by the original creditor or was the account assigned and it is the Debt purchaser who has issued the claim. No, it says Wedlake Bell LLP
 

Were you aware the account had been assigned – did you receive a Notice of Assignment? No
 

Did you receive a Default Notice from the original creditor? No
 

Have you been receiving statutory notices headed “Notice of Sums in Arrears”  or " Notice of Arrears "– at least once a year ? No, is that relevant for utilities?
 

Why did you cease payments? I moved properties and suffered significant drop in earnings through the pandemic
 

What was the date of your last payment? Some time in 2021
 

Was there a dispute with the original creditor that remains unresolved? The bill is too high?  They have billed me for a longer period than I was in the property for
 

Did you communicate any financial problems to the original creditor and make any attempt to enter into a debt management plan? Yes
 

Questionnaire completed. 

 

 

Thanks for any additional assistance 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • dx100uk changed the title to EDF/Wedlake Bell LLP PAPLOC Now Claimform - old Dual Fuel Energy Bill for old property

have you sent the cpr 31.14 to off yet?

 

tell use more about the bills 

do you have them?

do you have proof of date you moved in and moved out?

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi, I have sent the cpr 31.14 form off.

 

No I don't have any bills from them, I have nothing.  I suspect they might have sent them to my old address, possibly.

 

Yes I do have proof of the date I moved out.  I also suspect the letting agent may have given them an incorrect date to avoid paying any bills during the interim period. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • dx100uk changed the title to EDF/Wedlake Bell LLP PAPLOC Now Claimform - old Dual Fuel Energy Util Bill for old property

ok good.

plenty of util claimform threads here get reading up.

 

use our enhanced google searchbox

 

 

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...
On 07/01/2023 at 18:23, dx100uk said:

ok good.

plenty of util claimform threads here get reading up.

 

use our enhanced google searchbox

 

 

already told you how. use our enhanced google serachbox enter "util claimform"

all claimform threads are in the forum your thread is in or the successes forum off this one.

 

your defence is due by 4pm tomorrow

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I will search for you :becky:

 

 

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi guys, thanks.  Found them now.  I think the issue is that there is a search box at the top, which is what I was searching in, but there is another box that seems to search using google

 

1. I the Defendant contends that the particulars of claim are generic in nature. The Defendant accordingly sets out its case below and relies on CPR 16.5 (3) in relation to any particular allegation to which a specific response has not been made.

 

2. It is admitted that I have had a supply and service agreement with EON in the past. I resided at the property of supply from March 2019 up until August 2021.

 

3. There was and still remains an unresolved dispute with EON which was never resolved prior to the assignment of the alleged debt. Furthermore, the claimant has given no details as to the breakdown of their claim nor what specific period it relates to, so I am unable to defend accurately until the claimant can particularise and quantify its pleadings.

 

4. A request has been made that the claimant supply evidence in support of their claim by way of a CPR 31.14, but a response is yet to be received.

 

5. The claimant is claiming for a period of time where I was not resident, and therefore not liable for energy costs.

 

6. Pursuant to OFGEM code of back billing rules the alleged charges are now over 12 months old and relate to charges which have not been billed correctly by EON and are therefore prevented from charging.

 

7. The claimant has thus far been unable to produce any evidence that the alleged debt has been legally assigned to them.

 

8. Thus far I am unaware that the claimant has completed the pre action protocol as stipulated by the courts, as I have had no prior communication with the claimant to the date of the court summons.  Details of the pre action protocol undertaken by the claimant have also been requested by way of a CPR 31.14.  To date, no response has been received.


9. Pursuant to the civil procedure rules Practice Direction 16 (7.3) Where a claim is based upon a written agreement.

   1) a copy of the contract or documents constituting the agreement should be available at the hearing.


   With the court’s permission the Claimant is put to strict proof to: -


        a) show and disclose how the Defendant has entered into an agreement.
        b) show and disclose how the Claimant has reached the amount claimed.
        c) show how the Claimant has the legal right, either under statute or equity to issue a claim.

 

10. As per Civil Procedure Rule 16.5 (4) it is expected that the Claimant prove the allegation that the money is owed.

 

11. It is therefore denied that the defendant is indebted to the claimant as alleged or at all.

 

This is the best I can come up with and puts the ball firmly in their court...  I'll post it up on MCOL shortly

Link to post
Share on other sites

no that needs work.

not due till 4pm tomorrow as you get one extra day for xmas

 

dx

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Ok, where would you specifically say I need to tweak it.  Basics are that I have no information from them and they're charging for a period where I wasn't at the property. I've had no communication with them either, so I just want to make them work

Link to post
Share on other sites

put this as a new para 2, remove your para about pre action protocol totally

 

The Claimant has not complied with paragraph 3 of the PAPDC (Pre Action Protocol) Failed to serve a letter of claim pre claim pursuant to PAPDC changes of the 1st October 2017.It is respectfully requested that the court take this into consideration pursuant to 7.1 PAPDC.

 

On 17/01/2023 at 14:28, Jase1982 said:

7. The claimant has thus far been unable to produce any evidence that the alleged debt has been legally assigned to them.

remove

the debt has not been assigned (sold) they are the original supplier

 

On 17/01/2023 at 14:28, Jase1982 said:

2. It is admitted that I have had a supply and service agreement with EON in the past. I resided at the property of supply from March 2019 up until August 2021.

 

i also would not nail yourself to the cross here by stating the above, its admittance you owe something to them.

 

in their paragraph one they dont even know what you are just guess you must be...

On 07/01/2023 at 16:00, Jase1982 said:

with the Defendant as occupier, consumer and/or site owner


i would be just as vague....

 

paragraph 1 is noted, i have in the past had utility dealings with EON but do not remember the specific account number the claimant states, nor ever leaving any debt owed by myself to them. the claimant has to date failed to supply any bills or better details despite numerous previous requests and a cpr 31:14 sent to their solicitors by (method date) which remains unanswered to date.

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Is this ok?   I agree, no need to hang myself I guess.

 

 

1. I the Defendant contends that the particulars of claim are generic in nature. The Defendant accordingly sets out its case below and relies on CPR 16.5 (3) in relation to any particular allegation to which a specific response has not been made.

 

2. paragraph 1 is noted, i have in the past had utility dealings with E.ON but do not remember the specific account number the claimant states, nor ever leaving any debt owed by myself to them. the claimant has to date failed to supply any bills or better details despite numerous previous requests and a cpr 31:14 sent to their solicitors by (method date) which remains unanswered to date.

 

3. There was and still remains an unresolved dispute with EON which was never resolved prior to the assignment of the alleged debt. Furthermore, the claimant has given no details as to the breakdown of their claim nor what specific period it relates to, so I am unable to defend accurately until the claimant can particularise and quantify its pleadings.

 

4. A request has been made that the claimant supply evidence in support of their claim by way of a CPR 31.14, but a response is yet to be received.

 

5. The claimant is claiming for a period of time where I was not resident, and therefore not liable for energy costs.

 

6. Pursuant to OFGEM code of back billing rules the alleged charges are now over 12 months old and relate to charges which have not been billed correctly by EON and are therefore prevented from charging.

 

7. The Claimant has not complied with paragraph 3 of the PAPDC (Pre Action Protocol) Failed to serve a letter of claim pre claim pursuant to PAPDC changes of the 1st October 2017.It is respectfully requested that the court take this into consideration pursuant to 7.1 PAPDC.


8. Pursuant to the civil procedure rules Practice Direction 16 (7.3) Where a claim is based upon a written agreement.

   1) a copy of the contract or documents constituting the agreement should be available at the hearing.


   With the court’s permission the Claimant is put to strict proof to: -


        a) show and disclose how the Defendant has entered into an agreement.
        b) show and disclose how the Claimant has reached the amount claimed.
        c) show how the Claimant has the legal right, either under statute or equity to issue a claim.

 

9. As per Civil Procedure Rule 16.5 (4) it is expected that the Claimant prove the allegation that the money is owed.

 

10. It is therefore denied that the defendant is indebted to the claimant as alleged or at all.

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

7 should be moved to 2.

 

erm and you also need to fill in (date method) for the CPR ....not leave it like that!!

 

let @andyorch check it too please no rush.... by 4pm tomorrow

 

 

 

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Amended...  I also deleted paragraph 5 as that was already covered in point 3.

 

Particulars of claim

 

1.The claim is for the claimant's charges for supplies of electricity and/or gas to the defendant made under express contracts or contracts deemed by schedule 6 of the Electricity Act 1989 and/or Schedule 2B of the Gas Act 1986 with the Defendant as occupier, consumer and/or site owner by which payment was due within 14 days of invoice.

 

2.The defendant has failed to pay energy/invoices for Account No. XXXXXXXXXX dual at XXXXXXXXX rendered up to 24/09/2021 for £2,347.13.  

 

3.The claimant claims £2,347.13 and £229.94 INTEREST pursuant to S69 County Courts Act 1984 at 8% per annum from the due date to the date hereof and at £0.61 daily thereafter.

 

What is the total value of the claim? £2772.

 

 

 

1. I the Defendant contends that the particulars of claim are vague and generic in nature. The Defendant accordingly sets out its case below and relies on CPR 16.5 (3) in relation to any particular allegation to which a specific response has not been made.

 

2. The Claimant has not complied with paragraph 3 of the PAPDC (Pre Action Protocol) Failed to serve a letter of claim pre claim pursuant to PAPDC changes of the 1st October 2017.It is respectfully requested that the court take this into consideration pursuant to 7.1 PAPDC.

 

3. Paragraph 1 is noted, i have in the past held a financial contract with E.ON but do not recall the specific account number the claimant states, nor ever leaving any debt owed by myself to them. The claimant has to date failed to supply any bills or better details despite numerous previous requests and a CPR 31:14 sent to their solicitors on the 7th January 2023, the claimant has failed to respond to date.

 

4. There was and still remains an unresolved dispute with EON which was never resolved in respect of the alleged debt. Furthermore, the claimant has given no details as to the breakdown of their claim nor what specific period it relates to, so I am unable to defend accurately until the claimant can particularise and quantify its pleadings.

 

5. The claimant is claiming for a period of time when I didn't reside at said property, and therefore not liable for energy costs.

 

6. Pursuant to OFGEM code of back billing rules the alleged charges are now over 12 months old and relate to charges which have not been billed correctly by EON and are therefore prevented from charging.

 

7. Pursuant to the civil procedure rules Practice Direction 16 (7.3) Where a claim is based upon a written agreement.

 

   1) a copy of the contract or documents constituting the agreement should be available at the hearing.


   With the court’s permission the Claimant is put to strict proof to: -


        a) show and disclose how the Defendant has entered into an agreement.
        b) show and disclose how the Claimant has reached the amount claimed.

 

8. As per Civil Procedure Rule 16.5 (4) it is expected that the Claimant prove the allegation that the money is owed.

 

9. It is therefore denied that the defendant is indebted to the claimant as alleged or at all.

Link to post
Share on other sites

By 7th January??

 

On 7th Jan by (method.... what type of postage did you use . geddit yet????)

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...