Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Hello I am a resident of a communal block of flats owned by a Housing Association and since Tuesday 14th May 2024 Matthews and Tannert had put up scaffolding for a job on the roof last week, which was up for the best part of nine days. They had removed the scaffolding on Thursday 23rd May 2024 but my Sky box is still not working because of the satellite dish outside, and I was wondering whether the scaffolders had touched the dish while it was there and as a result had probably knocked the dish and probably made the dish go out of signal or whatever. I needed someone to check this out as well as to see my Sky box to see what could be the problem, and hopefully sort this out. I have had my Sky Digibox for many years and I have got recordings saved on them that I have had a long time - it would break my heart if I had lost them forever.       I contacted Sky but I almost made the mistake of accepting an offer where I would have to pay £31.50 and wait a whole month without television in my front room for it. I am in debt at the moment and I don't want all this on top of everything else - thankfully I have since cancelled it two weeks later when I told the person on the phone that it is the dish which is at fault as well as the fact that I live in a communal Housing Association property, and so that is one of very few weights off my mind. I emailed the Housing Association's Repairs department and they said that they will contact an electrical company to come out and see to the dish outside. I received a telephone call on Friday 24th May from the man to say that he will arrive on Wednesday 29th May 2024 to do the job. He arrived at around 9.40 am on Wednesday as promised; he went into my flat and had a look at the Sky box and saw the blue screen on my front room TV set, indicating no signal. He also looked outside as to where the dish was.  The main problem was that the ladders that he had with him were not enough to reach the dish outside as the dish was towards the top of the building - obviously the Health and Safety aspect of the job didn't allow him to do this. He then mentioned that whether he could do the job as a result of getting onto the roof and doing it like that as the dish is closer to the top. He said that he needed the key to enter the loft part of the building in order to reach this, and he needed to contact the Housing Officer at the Housing Association who had key to this, but lo and behold, he came on the Wednesday to do the job, and guess what? Wednesday was the Housing Officer's day off and so therefore he was unable to contact him for the key so that he could do the job! I just couldn't believe it myself. I am personally annoyed because this has not been sorted, and the man who came to do this is also annoyed because he came all the way to Nottingham from Peterborough, and he said to me that he won't get paid if he cannot do the job, so you see, we are both angry about this for different reasons. We are both in the same boat with regards to frustration, and we both want to see a conclusion to this, once and for all. Sometimes I wish that I didn't live in a flat which is in a communal building and I am thinking of getting a transfer to a one bedroom flat that isn't in that sort of place. I pay around £85 a month in a Direct Debit to Sky to receive their TV services which I cannot use at the moment, and I don't have much money in my bank account as it is due to one thing and another. I also pay nearly £14 a month to TV Licensing so that I can legally watch TV in my front room. I pay for Sky hence the fact that I want the Sky service in my front room and not Freeview. Also, as the General Election is coming up in five weeks' time, I want the satellite TV to be working properly so that I can catch up with what is on the news channels, and I feel rather "cut off" from that at the moment, and I want it working in time for Thursday 4th July 2024 for ovbious reasons . I have Freeview in my bedroom, but that is not the point  - I don't want to be limited to my bedroom every time I want to watch TV. I have tried putting the Freeview in te front room but it doesn't seem compatable for the same uses that I usually have Sky for.  Sunday 9th June 2024 is Day 27 of the satellite TV not working in my flat, and I feel that something needs to be done about this. You can take this message as a complaint if you like, but nevertheless, I want this message to be acknowledged and also something to be done about what has happened. I have enough on my plate with regards to health problems and depression without things like this making things worse. I would appreciate it if something was done.  I don't like naming and shaming but it is Matthews and Tannert's fault that I am in this situation in the first place, and sometimes I wish that I could sue them. In a nutshell, I have had more than enough after being without TV in the my front room for nearly four weeks. Also, at a time like this, I am missing so much of interest on TV what with the General Election comning up in just a few weeks.
    • There's no facility for a settlement "out of court" as such. But matters that are started under the "Single Justice" (SJ) Procedure can often be concluded without the defendant appearing. The SJ procedure, as the name suggests, involves a single magistrate, sitting in an office with a legal advisor, dealing with matters "on papers" only. Nobody else can attend. The SJ deals with straightforward guilty pleas. Anything where the SJ believes the defendant should appear, or which should be dealt with by the "ordinary" court are adjourned o a hearing in the normal magistrates'  court .As well as this, all defendants have the right to a hearing in the normal court if they wish. Nobody is forced to have their case heard under he SJP.  In particular, as far as traffic matters go, a SJ will not disqualify a driver and if a ban is to be considered, the case will be passed over to the normal court. Because, following your SD, you will be pleading Not Guilty (and offering the "deal"), your case would usually be heard in the normal court, meaning a personal appearance. To be honest, performing your SD at the court is a more straightforward way of doing things. It avoids any possible hitches involved in serving he SD on the court. But of course, as I said, most courts have backlogs which mean an SD may not be quickly accommodated. If you do end up doing your SD before a solicitor, check with them the protocol for serving it on the court. Do let us know what the solicitor says about Wednesday.    
    • Welcome to posting on CAG cabot, people will be along soon to help you try to sort this out. Please complete this:  
    • Quotes of the day penny mordaunt came out swinging with her broadsword, and promptly decapitated sunak while Nigel Farage, representing Reform UK, made contentious claims about immigration policies, which were swiftly fact-checked during the debate.   Good question though raised at labour about the 2 child benefit cap, which I broadly agree with, but the tory 'trap' assumes tory thinking - rather than child centric thinking. There should be no incentives to have kids as a financial way of life paid for by everyone else ... ... BUT the kids should not be made to suffer for the decisions of their parents Free school meals would feed the kids, improve their ability to learn, and incentivise them to go to school. As an added benefit ... it would invest in our nations future.   How far this should go is a matter for costing, social intent and future path of the nation, but not feeding our nations kids is an abomination. There should be at least one free school meal per day for every child who attends school. Full Stop. Its the cheapest and most effective investment in our future we could make.
    • Hey people, I've been browsing this amazing forum for the past year and recieved a letter today which has made me require some help. Received a claim form from Cabot in the Civil National Business Centre in regards to an Aqua Credit Card taken out in 2018. I failed to make payments due to financial hardship and have not taken out any credit or uses any forms of credit since. Received a lot of letters from Cabot and their solicitors Mortimer Clarke which I've ignored    By an agreement between New Day Ltd RE Aqua& the Defendant on or around 26/03/2018 ('ths Agreement) New Day Ltd RE Aqua agreed to issue Defendant with a credit card. The Defendant failed to make the minimum payments due. The Agreement was terminated following the service of a default notice. The Agreement was assigned to the named Claimant. Cabot Credit Management Group Limited, acting as servicing agent of the named Claimant through its Appointed Representative (Cabot Financial (Europe) Limited), has arranged for these proceedings to be issued in the name of the Claimant. The named Claimant may be entitled to claim interest under the Agreement but does not seek such interest and instead claims interest under Section 69(1) of the County Courts Act 1984 at 8% p.a.from03/03/2023 until date of issue only, or alternatively such interest as the Court thinks fit THE NAMED CLAIMANT THEREFORE CLAIMS 1. 3800.82 2. INTEREST OF 379.84 3. Costs How would I go about this and what could happen? I don't remember much details about the card either.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Scottish Power Switch Objection - Beyond Frutration


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 2528 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

This situation now is so ridiculous it is beyond frustration.

 

I initiated the switch process to leave Scottish Power back in February.

This was objected to.

Contacted them to find out why and was advised that incorrect MPAN had been applied for.

Supplied with MPAN.

 

Contacted new supplier with MPAN.

Was the same one they had applied for.

Switch re-initiated.

Objected to again.

 

Phoned Scottish Power to discover reason for this second objection.

Again informed it was because of incorrect MPAN.

Was now advised that supply had a dual MPAN and that first number advised was in fact the secondary number and that a different primary number had to be applied for.

 

Back to new supplier with this info.

After some discussion, questioning and investigation, new supplier advised they were unable to take over the supply unless the second MPAN was de-energised and unregistered and / or the meter changed.

 

Back to SP with this information and a request for them to perform said actions.

After some long discussion which centered mostly around trying to convince them that I do not have electric heating an appointment was made to have the meter changed.

Told a letter would be sent out to confirm.

 

No letter was received so called SP the day before scheduled appointment to confirm.

Rep was unable to access this information nor able to confirm or deny appointment.

Next day no one arrive to perform meter change.

 

Called SP again to complain and ask why.

Rep was unable to answer this question or access the relevant information.

Was put on hold several time while he made enquires with other people and departments.

The last time I was put on hold I was left there for approx 1 1/2 hours before being disconnected.

 

Both emailed and called to voice my complaint and displeasure at the situation.

Receive irrelevant email replies addressed to someone else.

The account is registered in my name only and no one is registered on it, had made contact on my behalf or should be affiliated in anyway with it.

Also received and email addressed to both myself and this other person asking that we ignore the previous message and requesting we provide a letter of authority to allow details to be disclosed to this other name person.

Each of these messages bearing this name were questioned and explanation sought as to who this person was and why they were being linked to my account.

No answer received, only replies that bore no resemblance to the questions asked or the points raised.

 

Various other emails sent and calls made trying to find a resolve, each time in vain and usually with Scottish Power referring to the electric heating in the property. The electric heating I do not have.

 

There seems to be some sort of inability or unwillingness for them to accept the fact I do have electric powered heating as most of their correspondence includes some sort of reference to it and the cycle begins again when I explain that this is not the case.

 

Having received yet another email stating that there is a dual MPAN because of the fact the property had electric heating I sent an email reply and telephoned them.

After spending a good few minutes explaining the situation and making it abundantly clear that I do have electric heating the rep put me on hold.

On picking up the call again the rep began to explain that the meter could be changed but that I would be making a mistake as the cost of my electricity would increase, especially that of my heating.

Not believing I was hearing I stopped him and asked him to explain his statement given that I had not ten minutes previously finished telling him that my heating was not electric powered.

"Oh, I missed that" came the response.

 

At this point I was put on hold again as he went to seek advice.

Returned to the call and advised that someone else would look into this and call me later.

After agreeing a suitable time the call back was confirmed by the agent.

No call received.

 

Sent yet another email complaining of the situation.

Surprised to receive a call from a complain resolution rep.

Short lived was this surprise as, Deja vu, she started to comment on the supply and the electric heating.

Again I had to state and explain this was not the case.

This was met with great resistment and I was even asked whether I was sure as I had to have electric heating.

 

She at this point advised that more investigation would have to be done but the she was finished at three o'clock and would not be returning until the following week.

Told me she would send me an email from her direct address and asked that I send photographs of my electric meter to aid resolve the situation.

Never received her mail.

 

Have sent yet another email of complaint

 

You can see why it is now beyond frustrating.

 

Have passed some of this onto OFGEM.

 

All I want them to do is change the meter to allow me switch supplier.

 

Any suggestion how I can get them to do this ?

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

After sending yet more emails and making more calls I am no further forward.

 

Nonsensical and irrelevant replies received to emails sent.

One phone call received to apologies for delay and ensure "everything possible was being done" and promising a call back 2 days later with an update.

 

Surprisingly enough this call never came and still hasn't despite requesting an update.

 

Cant even check the online complaint tracker as my complaint seem to be linked to an account number not registered to or with my account.

 

Any suggestions what I can try next ?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi

There are loads of directors for Scottish Power however, this chap is the head of Retail and Generation so I am assuming he would be the one to escalate to.

 

[email protected]

 

IF he is the correct person, you may get some action. If he isn't, get him to pass on to the correct person. Be aware that most emails are grabbed by the exec staff before he sees them but sometimes the staff will see it as important and pass it on to him.

If you are asked to deal with any matter via private message, PLEASE report it.

Everything I say is opinion only. If you are unsure on any comment made, you should see a qualified solicitor

Please help CAG. Order this ebook. Now available on Amazon. Please click HERE

Link to post
Share on other sites

Guest Mrs Hobbit

I would send him a recorded delivery letter to make sure the matter is brought to his attention. Emails seems to be lost in cyber space between people, but a recorded delivery letter will hold someone in the chain responsible.

 

I would include all copies of emails in this letter of complaint.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Guest Mrs Hobbit

Definitely...this way the letter will go down the chain with a trail, so there wont be any ducking and dodging. I have found this method works best for me and I get a satisfactory resolution smartly, as whoever ends up with it, has to report back up the chain..

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Finally, some progress.

 

Scottish Power now seem to have accepted what I have been telling them for months, that I don not have electric powered heating, and agreed that meter change is what is required to facilitate a non objection switch to a new supplier.

 

Ah good I hear you cry.

If only so.

 

Having been offered the earliest available appointment of 19th May it was unable to be booked due to a system technical fault.

Their next offering was an appointment for 2nd June.

This offer was accepted by myself and arrangements made for time of work etc.

 

Not surprisingly, I then received communication stating they would now like to move this appointment to the 5th of June.

 

The saga continues.

Link to post
Share on other sites

At least there is some movement on their part. Let's hope they keep the appointment however, I suspect they will turn up on the 2nd.

If you are asked to deal with any matter via private message, PLEASE report it.

Everything I say is opinion only. If you are unsure on any comment made, you should see a qualified solicitor

Please help CAG. Order this ebook. Now available on Amazon. Please click HERE

Link to post
Share on other sites

Lets hope so.

I have responded to their appointment change request in the negative advising that this is not suitable and that I wish to stick with the offered and accepted date of the 2nd.

 

Still to hear from them either way.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

Success !!!

Despite twice seeking to cancel the appointment due to a lack of engineers in the area and then on the day itself the engineer having been given incorrect details threatening to lead to the job being cancelled, the meter has finally been changed.

 

Pressure, persistence and patience prevailed.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Well done. Is that the end of it or is a complaint still ongoing?

If you are asked to deal with any matter via private message, PLEASE report it.

Everything I say is opinion only. If you are unsure on any comment made, you should see a qualified solicitor

Please help CAG. Order this ebook. Now available on Amazon. Please click HERE

Link to post
Share on other sites

Will now have to restart the switch process to new supplier and see how it goes.

 

Hopefully this time it will go through without objection.

 

Only then will it be truly over and complete.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Cool! Well done. Let's hope the switch truly moves properly.

 

I really hate the term 'Goodwill Gesture'. What they really mean is that 'We screwed up so have some money to go away'

 

Once the switch has finally happened, we can mark the thread resolved. Please keep us updated.

If you are asked to deal with any matter via private message, PLEASE report it.

Everything I say is opinion only. If you are unsure on any comment made, you should see a qualified solicitor

Please help CAG. Order this ebook. Now available on Amazon. Please click HERE

Link to post
Share on other sites

Wow, does no one at Scottish Power talk to each other or pass information.

 

Since the meter change I have received several letters that contradict each other.

 

Today, I received two ;

 

  1. One confirming the work completion and what the next stages are re. administering the second MPAN.

  • A second apologizing for the lack of action and progress there has been on my complaint and how they will prioritise the actions needed to solve it.

 

Despite this, the switch so far seems to be progressing.

New supplier has been in touch to say they have began the process and will progress the switch at the end of the cooling off period.

 

Here's hoping.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Geez. Is there no-one at SP who can think for themselves!!! Just because the computer says no doesn't mean that is the case.

 

I have to ask again as it's not that clear. Have you sent a written Formal Complaint? Has any verbal complaint been treated as such? How long has elapsed since the first complaint?

 

After 8 weeks with no resolution, you are entitled to go straight to the Ombudsman. While this process will take more time to sort the switching issue out, I can't see SP having a leg to stand on.

 

Do SP give any reason why the switch has been blocked?

If you are asked to deal with any matter via private message, PLEASE report it.

Everything I say is opinion only. If you are unsure on any comment made, you should see a qualified solicitor

Please help CAG. Order this ebook. Now available on Amazon. Please click HERE

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...