Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Thanks for that. I will give them till Tuesday. Thanks for your help, very much appreciated. 
    • Ok thanks for that, well spotted and all duly noted. Yes they did eventually submit those docs to me after a second letter advising them I was contacting the ICO to make a formal complaint for failing to comply with an earlier SAR that they brushed off as an "administrative error" or something. When I sent the letter telling them I was in contact with the information commissioner to lodge the complaint, the original PCN etc quickly followed along with their excuse!
    • its not about the migrants .. Barrister Helena Kennedy warns that the Conservatives will use their victory over Rwanda to dismantle the law that protects our human rights here in the UK.   Angela Rayner made fun of Rishi Sunak’s height in a fiery exchange at Prime Minister’s Questions, which prompted Joe Murphy to ask: just how low will Labour go? .. well .. not as low as sunak 
    • From #38 where you wrote the following, all in the 3rd person so we don't know which party is you. When you sy it was your family home, was that before or after? " A FH split to create 2 Leasehold adjoining houses (terrace) FH remains under original ownership and 1 Leasehold house sold on 100y+ lease. . Freeholder resides in the other Leasehold house. The property was originally resided in as one house by Freeholder"
    • The property was our family home.  A fixed low rate btl/ development loan was given (last century!). It was derelict. Did it up/ was rented out for a while.  Then moved in/out over the years (mostly around school)  It was a mix of rental and family home. The ad-hoc rents covered the loan amply.  Nowadays  banks don't allow such a mix.  (I have written this before.) Problems started when the lease was extended and needed to re-mortgage to cover the expense.  Wanted another btl.  Got a tenant in situ. Was located elsewhere (work). A broker found a btl lender, they reneged.  Broker didn't find another btl loan.  The tenant was paying enough to cover the proposed annual btl mortgage in 4 months. The broker gave up trying to find another.  I ended up on a bridge and this disastrous path.  (I have raised previous issues about the broker) Not sure what you mean by 'split'.  The property was always leasehold with a separate freeholder  The freeholder eventually sold the fh to another entity by private agreement (the trust) but it's always been separate.  That's quite normal.  One can't merge titles - unless lease runs out/ is forfeited and new one is not created/ granted. The bridge lender had a special condition in loan offer - their own lawyer had to check title first.  Check that lease wasn't onerous and there was nothing that would affect good saleability.  The lawyer (that got sacked for dishonesty) signed off the loan on the basis the lease and title was good and clean.  The same law firm then tried to complain the lease clauses were onerous and the lease too short, even though the loan was to cover a 90y lease extension!! 
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 2831 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Ok, some more questions for clarification on this.

 

From what I understand, a bailiff cannot clamp your car on private land. Would this include a bed & breakfast car park that you were staying at? Because sometimes I have to work away and just wondered the legality of the situation. The only reason I ask is because I know they use ANPR, so theoretically if they're looking for my car they could get lucky, although this is unlikely I just want to be sure.

 

Secondly, they can't take your car if it's worth under £1350 and is used for work? So, how do they value the car? And how do you prove that it's essential for work? What happens if they clamp it anyway?

 

The car I use is a cat d write off. I was paid out £3250 a few years back, and bought the car back off the insurance for £325. So does that mean it's worth £325? Or will it be the book price for a cat d, or just any price they decided?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Why do you think your car is going to be clamped is p'haps more the issue?

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

A bailiff cannot clamp on private land, so the off road parking on a B and B should be fine.

 

There is an issue regarding the definition of the vehicle as exempt. The tools of the trade exemption relates to goods that if the debtor was deprived of would stop the debtor from being able to carry out his trade or profession.

 

Usually vehicles which transport the debtor to the place of his profession are not exempt, if there are other means of providing them.

DO NOT PAY UPFRONT FEES TO COLD CALLERS PROMISING TO WRITE OFF YOUR DEBTS

DO NOT PAY UPFRONT FEES FOR COSTLY TELEPHONE CONSULTATIONS WITH SO CALLED "EXPERTS" THEY INVARIABLY ARE NOTHING OF THE SORT

BEWARE OF QUICK FIX DEBT SOLUTIONS, IF IT LOOKS LIKE IT IS TO GOOD TO BE TRUE IT INVARIABLY IS

Link to post
Share on other sites

Ok, some more questions for clarification on this.

 

From what I understand, a bailiff cannot clamp your car on private land. Would this include a bed & breakfast car park that you were staying at? Because sometimes I have to work away and just wondered the legality of the situation. The only reason I ask is because I know they use ANPR, so theoretically if they're looking for my car they could get lucky, although this is unlikely I just want to be sure.

 

 

The car I use is a cat d write off. I was paid out £3250 a few years back, and bought the car back off the insurance for £325. So does that mean it's worth £325? Or will it be the book price for a cat d, or just any price they decided?

 

The 'private land' exemption can prove difficult to define. However, you should not worry yourself too much about this. Bailiffs do indeed use ANPR and presently there are some very worrying new 'models' that are in use. The main point to consider though is that ANPR is really only of use to enforcement agents enforcing road traffic debts. If you have another type of debt, ANPR will not be of assistance to the EA.

 

With regards to your second question, it is difficult for me to answer. It is possible that you have repaired the car and accordingly, it may have a much higher value.

Link to post
Share on other sites

The 'private land' exemption can prove difficult to define. However, you should not worry yourself too much about this. Bailiffs do indeed use ANPR and presently there are some very worrying new 'models' that are in use. The main point to consider though is that ANPR is really only of use to enforcement agents enforcing road traffic debts. If you have another type of debt, ANPR will not be of assistance to the EA.

 

With regards to your second question, it is difficult for me to answer. It is possible that you have repaired the car and accordingly, it may have a much higher value.

How is private land difficult to define? Surely if it's parked on private property such as a friend's driveway, it should be ok? But as for a B&B, I wondered about the legality as it could be deemed a place of residence?

 

With regard to the car, the value on Parkers.co.uk was £1040 in poor condition - which it is. So I'd hope they'd go by that value, but have no way to tell what criteria it'd need to meet. And there doesn't seem to be any information on the subject anywhere. Would it be the auction value of the car? If so, I can't see it fetching much.

Link to post
Share on other sites

The car would have to be on a public highway to be clamped, or at a place where the debtor usually resides or hie place of work to be taken under control.

DO NOT PAY UPFRONT FEES TO COLD CALLERS PROMISING TO WRITE OFF YOUR DEBTS

DO NOT PAY UPFRONT FEES FOR COSTLY TELEPHONE CONSULTATIONS WITH SO CALLED "EXPERTS" THEY INVARIABLY ARE NOTHING OF THE SORT

BEWARE OF QUICK FIX DEBT SOLUTIONS, IF IT LOOKS LIKE IT IS TO GOOD TO BE TRUE IT INVARIABLY IS

Link to post
Share on other sites

The exception to this is where the bailiff has got a court warrant allowing them to take your belongings in a specific location, which can include private land. However, an EA is only likely to be able to get a court warrant if they've watched the premises and discovered you're parking your car there regularly.

 

I suspect this exception explains why it is not straightforward, as BA stated.

Link to post
Share on other sites

If you are residing at the b and b, then yes, it can be clamped.

 

If its used for work purposes, then you would need to prove it.

If its just for travel, then no, you cant claim tool of the trade.

If you are not the SOLE user, then tott can't be claimed.

If its worth over 1350, then it can't be claimed tott.

The bailiff will call an auction to get the value. Hpi now have access to mot/mileage so an accurate value can be given.

 

As others have asked, do you want to give some info about what this is about as often, there are other easier ways to settle these matters.

Link to post
Share on other sites

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

If you are residing at the b and b, then yes, it can be clamped.

 

If its used for work purposes, then you would need to prove it.

If its just for travel, then no, you cant claim tool of the trade.

If you are not the SOLE user, then tott can't be claimed.

If its worth over 1350, then it can't be claimed tott.

The bailiff will call an auction to get the value. Hpi now have access to mot/mileage so an accurate value can be given.

 

As others have asked, do you want to give some info about what this is about as often, there are other easier ways to settle these matters.

Hey, thanks for the reply. No I don't reside at a b&b, but do stay at some for a few nights when working away. Just wanted to know if they could take it, although it's very unlikely they'd ever find me when I'm in another county.

 

I use the car for work, but how would I go about proving it? I'm a salesman and drive all over the place, the car is essential. There's absolutely no way I could do my job without it. But how would I be able to prove this? Trying to explain this to a bailiff would probably be met with a brick wall response - "pay us".

I am the sole user.

I don't know if it's worth over £1350, it's a grey area. Some of this type go for way more, but mine is a cat d write off and is tatty now.

 

There's no need for any further details, I'm just looking for advice on whether they can take the car or not. As soon as I receive an enforcement notice at this address I'm going to park my car on a friend's driveway anyhow, but I'm hoping that it won't come to that.

Link to post
Share on other sites

An order allowing entry to the friends drive to remove the car can be granted very quickly. Dont believe the codswallop that the car is safe there.

 

Hi Grumpy.

I agree with th rest of your points, but I am given to understand that for a court to grant a section 15 warrant the EA would have to show that goods were being stored on third party premises, not just parked for a few hours.

DO NOT PAY UPFRONT FEES TO COLD CALLERS PROMISING TO WRITE OFF YOUR DEBTS

DO NOT PAY UPFRONT FEES FOR COSTLY TELEPHONE CONSULTATIONS WITH SO CALLED "EXPERTS" THEY INVARIABLY ARE NOTHING OF THE SORT

BEWARE OF QUICK FIX DEBT SOLUTIONS, IF IT LOOKS LIKE IT IS TO GOOD TO BE TRUE IT INVARIABLY IS

Link to post
Share on other sites

A similar incident was shown on can't pay, They located the car at a pub they didn't clamp it there. They in this case an HCEO waited for the debtor to return to their home with it before going for it...

If I have been of any help, please click on my star and leave a note to let me know, thank you.

Link to post
Share on other sites

An order allowing entry to the friends drive to remove the car can be granted very quickly. Dont believe the codswallop that the car is safe there.

 

Grumps.....you can be really horrible some times !!!

 

Starbugs.....Grumps works in the enforcement industry and we very much welcome contributions from him on the forum. We may not like them....but at least he does provide us with the enforcement industries views and that it very important.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Grumps.....you can be really horrible some times !!!

 

Starbugs.....Grumps works in the enforcement industry and we very much welcome contributions from him on the forum. We may not like them....but at least he does provide us with the enforcement industries views and that it very important.

Yeah I can see how it's useful to hear it from an industry professional. It's good to hear both sides.

 

I have a couple more questions - firstly, am I right in thinking that they cannot clamp your car after 9pm and before 6am?

 

Also, given my situation in that they don't have my current address - if they find it out, can they clamp my car or do they need to issue a "notice of enforcement" first? Giving me a few days notice. Or can they just clamp it based on the notice from the previous address?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yeah I can see how it's useful to hear it from an industry professional. It's good to hear both sides.

 

I have a couple more questions - firstly, am I right in thinking that they cannot clamp your car after 9pm and before 6am?

 

Also, given my situation in that they don't have my current address - if they find it out, can they clamp my car or do they need to issue a "notice of enforcement" first? Giving me a few days notice. Or can they just clamp it based on the notice from the previous address?

 

An enforcement agent cannot visit between 9pm and 6am.

 

As I said on another thread, you really are worrying far too much about the vehicle. Unless the debt is one for a road traffic debt, then the enforcement company cannot record the number plate on the ANPR equipment.

Link to post
Share on other sites

As always, I'm happy to be proved wrong, but this was my understanding.

 

Vehicles can be clamped though, and are often a prime target. They can usually only take control of a vehicle at your home, your place of trade or business, or on the highway.

 

There are some exceptions to vehicles which may or may not be clamped, but I would not rely on a bailiff adhering to any regualtions. They tend to clamp in order to 'coerce' payment from debtors.

 

Have a read here:

 

http://www.legislation.gov.uk/uksi/2013/1894/part/2/crossheading/ways-of-securing-goods/made

Link to post
Share on other sites

but I would not rely on a bailiff adhering to any regualtions. They tend to clamp in order to 'coerce' payment from debtors.

Yeah, that's exactly why I'm trying to find out where I stand and what can be done if they go rogue. Supposing the worst came to the worst and they clamped a car unlawfully, how would I go about getting the vehicle back? Am I allowed to saw the clamp off if they clamped it on a private driveway? Or if they clamped a family member's car? Surely if they broke the rules and clamped illegally, then I should be able to do what's necessary to get the vehicle back?

 

And seeing as how the value is a grey area, and I use the vehicle for work, if they clamped it they would be depriving me of a vital tool, and costing me my job. What could I do if this were to happen?

 

I don't think it will tbh, but I do like to be prepared.

Link to post
Share on other sites

An enforcement agent cannot visit between 9pm and 6am.

 

As I said on another thread, you really are worrying far too much about the vehicle. Unless the debt is one for a road traffic debt, then the enforcement company cannot record the number plate on the ANPR equipment.

 

Yeah I probably am worrying a bit too much. They don't even have my current address yet, and would still need to send a notice of enforcement here if they wanted to take a vehicle?

Link to post
Share on other sites

The first step would be to tell the EA and be prepared to prove what you are saying. For goods belong to a third party, there's a good, simple explanation here:

 

https://www.citizensadvice.org.uk/debt-and-money/action-your-creditor-can-take/bailiffs/your-belongings-and-bailiffs/what-goods-can-a-bailiff-take/belongings-owned-by-other-people-bailiffs/

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...
Yeah I probably am worrying a bit too much. They don't even have my current address yet, and would still need to send a notice of enforcement here if they wanted to take a vehicle?

 

The chances are, you are worrying too much. Apologies if my comments come across as harsh, I'm just giving the advice based on what WE do.

 

At a B&B, I wouldn't worry unless they use anpr vans which is unlikely.

At home, yes a new NOE would be needed UNLESS you have made contact on the back of a previous NOE to a different address.

You assume they don't have a current address. If you have lived somewhere for more than 4 weeks, there is a good chance you will show up during a trace.

Link to post
Share on other sites

The chances are, you are worrying too much. Apologies if my comments come across as harsh, I'm just giving the advice based on what WE do.

 

At a B&B, I wouldn't worry unless they use anpr vans which is unlikely.

At home, yes a new NOE would be needed UNLESS you have made contact on the back of a previous NOE to a different address.

You assume they don't have a current address. If you have lived somewhere for more than 4 weeks, there is a good chance you will show up during a trace.

Hey, thanks for the reply. No you don't come across as harsh at all, I appreciate the help.

 

How could I show up on a trace? I'm not on the electoral roll, don't have any credit accounts here, bank and phone is still at previous address as I haven't updated it yet. I've checked my credit file and this address isn't listed, and there's nothing about me on social media.

 

How could I be traced here?

 

Also you mentioned making contact on the back of a previous NOE... so is it best to avoid contact? I'm awaiting a debt relief order and wondered if it's wise to call the HCEOs and let them know. But if it gives them more power then I might just wait it out. I've moved the car to a private driveway anyhow, but that's a pain in the ass.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Starbug,

 

You are worrying FAR TOO MUCH....

I'm just trying to find out exactly where I stand. I won't stop worrying until I have the DRO in my hand. Then I can put all this behind me.

 

Oh and the guy above(Grumpy) said that I can be traced here. So surely it's better to be prepared?

Link to post
Share on other sites

You can't be traced, if there is nothing on any database. It would have to be a mobile anpr trace which would be very lucky of them. They might not even know about the car, as the debt is not for anything related to a car and DVLA records might not have been checked.

 

As said on the other thread, you should speak to the DRO company about this. You might be responsible for some of the HCEO fees and can include them in DRO. I am not sure all of the HCEO fees would be automatically cancelled, if they stopped enforcement, because they could not get you to pay. Hence why DRO company should be aware of situation.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...