Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Absolutely for the agreement they are referring to.... puts them on notice that this is going to be a uphill fight.   Andy 
    • Particular's of claim for reference only 1. the claim is for the sum of £6163.61due by the defendant under an agreement regulated by the consumer credit act 1974 for hsbc uk bank plc. Account (16 digits) 2. The defendant failed to maintain contractual payments required by the agreement and a default notice was served under s 87(1)  of the consumer credit act 1974 which as not been compiled with. 3. The debt was legally assigned to the Claimant on 23/08/23, notice on which as been given to the defendant.  4. The claim includes statutory interest under S.69 of the county courts act 1984 at a rate of 8% per annum from the date of assignment to the date of issue of these proceedings in the sum of £117.53 the Claimant claims the sum of £6281.14. Suggested defence 1. The Defendant contends the particulars of the claim are generic in nature. The Defendant accordingly sets out its case below and relies on CPR r 16.3 (3) in relation to any particular allegation to which a specific response has not been made. 2. The claimant has not complied with paragraph 3 of the PAPDC (Pre action protocol) failed to serve a letter of claim pre claim pursuant to PAPDC changes of the 1st of October 2017. It is respectfully requested that the court take this into consideration pursuant 7.1 PAPDC. 3. Paragraph 1 is noted. I have in the past had financial dealings but do not recognise this specific account number or recollect any outstanding debt and have therefore requested clarification. 4. Paragraph 2 is denied. I have not been served with a default notice pursuant to the consumer credit act 1974. 5. Paragraph 3 is denied. i am unaware of any legal assignment or notice of assignment. A copy of assignment was sent by Overdales solicitors when acknowledgement of receipt of CPR request was received, but this was not the original.   6. Paragraph 4 is denied. Neither the original creditor or the assignee have served notice pursuant to sec86c of the Credit Consumer Act 1974 Notice of Sums in Arrears and therefore prevented from charging interest on debt regulated by the CCA1974. 7. The defendant submitted a request for a copy of the alleged agreement pursuant to s78 CCA 1974. The claimant has acknowledged receipt of request but has failed to comply. The claimant has failed to provide any evidence of balance or Default Notice requested by CPR 31.14 8. It is therefore denied with regards to defendant owing any monies to the claimant. therefore the claimant is put to strict proof to:  a.  Show how the defendant has entered into an agreement with HSBC. b.  Show and evidence the nature of breach and service of a Default notice pursuant to section 87 (1) CCA 1974. c.  Show and quantify how the defendant has reached the amount claimed for. d.  Show how the claimant has the legal right, either under statute or equity  to issue a claim. 8.  As per civil procedure rule 16.5 (4) it is expected claimant prove the allegation that the money is owed. 9.  Until such time the claimant can comply to a section 78 request he is not entitled, while the default continues, to enforce the agreement 10. By reasons of the facts and matters set out above, it is denied that the claimant is entitled to the relief claimed or any relief.     .
    • OK, well rereading the court orders from March, in the cold light of day rather than when knackered late at night, it is quite clear that on 25 June there will only be a preliminary hearing about Laura representing her son.  Nothing more. It's lazy DCBL who haven't read things properly and have stupidly sent their Witness Statement early. Laura & I had already been working on a WS, and here it is.  It needs tweaking now after reading the rubbish that DCBL sent and after all of LFI's comments.  But the "meat" is there. Defendant's WS - version 1.pdf
    • Morning, I purchased a car from Big Motoring World on 10th December 2023 for £14899.00. On the 15th December I had a problem with the auto start stop function of the car in which the car would stop in the middle of the road with a stop start error message. I called the big assist and the car was booked in for February. The BMW was with them for a week and it came back with the auto stop start feature all fine and all error codes cleared on the report from big motoring world. within 5 days I had the same issue. Warning light coming on and the car stopping. I called big assist again and the car was again booked in for an other repair in May. Car was taken back in may, they had the car for a week and returned with the report saying no issue with the auto stop start feature and blamed my driving. Within 5 days of having the car back it broke down again. This time undrivable. I had the rac pick my car up and take to Stephen James BMW for a full diagnostic. The diagnostic came back with the car needing a new fuel system as magnetic swarf was found.  I have sent big motoring world a letter stating all the issues and that under the consumer rights act 2015 I have asked for a replacement vehicle. all reports from Stephen James BMW have been sent over to big motoring world. Big motoring world have come back and said they will respond to my complaint within 14 days for the date of my complaint letter. I am not feeling confident on the response from them, what are my next steps?   Thanks in advance. 
    • That is really good is that a mistake last off "driver doesn't have a licence" I assume that should be keeper? The Court requested me to send the Court and applicant proof of my sons disability from their GP this clearly shows he has Severe Mental Impairement, he is also illiterate.  I naively assumed once the applicant received this that they would drop the claim.  It offends me that Bank has asked the Judge to throw the case out at the preliminary hearing and to make us pay up.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
        • Like
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
        • Like
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Highview Parking PCN - Albion Road Car Park, Bexleyheath


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 2917 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

My OH used local car-park on Sunday 22nd May to go shopping.

 

Entered car park.

 

No barriers or ticket collection on arrival.

 

Returned to car-park went to enter car details in first machine, in which shut-down.

 

Went to another machine entered details. Payment request advised in which she paid but this time did not take option to take receipt, in which she usually does. Therefore no way of not paying correct amount.

 

Left car park and again no barriers on exit.

 

Well today (2nd June 2016) she received the attached PCN (dated 31/5/16), details attached.

 

On googling certain car park it seems that she has not been the only one to encounter same issue.

 

Don't want to pay but I would appreciate if someone could kindly advise chances of appealing.

 

Thank-you

Link to post
Share on other sites

Have a read of the parking prankster http://parking-prankster.blogspot.co.uk/2014/01/highview-parking-admit-all-their.html

 

DO NOT contact them yet, let Ericsbrother advise you first.

 

Have you got receipts or proof of purchase from the sops you went into whilst being parked in this car park?

 

Who owns it?

Who ever heard of someone getting a job at the Jobcentre? The unemployed are sent there as penance for their sins, not to help them find work!

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hello there.

 

I think it would be a good idea to edit out your registration and repost that attachment, so you can't be indentified.

 

HB

 

Thanks honeybee, all sorted :wink:

Link to post
Share on other sites

Have a read of the parking prankster http://parking-prankster.blogspot.co.uk/2014/01/highview-parking-admit-all-their.html

 

DO NOT contact them yet, let Ericsbrother advise you first.

 

Have you got receipts or proof of purchase from the sops you went into whilst being parked in this car park?

 

Who owns it?

 

Thanks bazooka Boo, I will have a look in a moment.

 

I have quickly read up on some other forums about this lot and just wondered about legitimacy of notice.

 

It's sods law as has receipts for same car park day before. Why would she not pay when there is no way of not doing it, as ANPR car-park. Her words to me today.

 

I will ask her about shopping receipts but she is kicking herself for not getting a car-park one on day in question.

 

I believe it is Bexley Council according to website details.

 

They probably just want her to pay it but told her not to if got a case to appeal.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks bazooka Boo, I will have a look in a moment.

 

I have quickly read up on some other forums about this lot and just wondered about legitimacy of notice.

 

It's sods law as has receipts for same car park day before. Why would she not pay when there is no way of not doing it, as ANPR car-park. Her words to me today.

 

I will ask her about shopping receipts but she is kicking herself for not getting a car-park one on day in question.

 

I believe it is Bexley Council according to website details.

 

They probably just want her to pay it but told her not to if got a case to appeal.

 

Further to the above Bazooka Boo

I have just contacted Bexley Council, who inform me that they own part of car-park and the Marriott hotel the rest ?

 

Just spoke to the Marriott and they have a separate area and entrance/ exit via front of hotel who use Parking Eye for PCN's .

 

My OH entered and exit via Bexley Council part of car park.

 

Now how do I obtain proof as where she was parked ?

Link to post
Share on other sites

AFAIK, it isn't for you to prove differently, it is for them to provide strict proof that the vehicle was parked on their 'clients' property.

 

Like I say, this isn't really my bag, Ericsbrother or others who have far more knowledge in this area will be able to advise, but I think that without them providing evidence/proof of who their client is exactly, then they are falling foul.?

Who ever heard of someone getting a job at the Jobcentre? The unemployed are sent there as penance for their sins, not to help them find work!

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks again and I will await further responses.

 

As you can see only photographic evidence is supposedly vehicle entering and leaving car-park.

 

Car-park ownership is divided. Cannot enter / exit hotel part (Parking Eye) from way my OH drove.

 

Bexley Council confirmed that they have no relationship with Highview Parking and have never heard of them. But then would they have anything to do with payment machines ?

 

OH attempted to pay at one machine in which did not work (after entering details) but then paid at another.

Link to post
Share on other sites

their NTK is not compliant with the PoFA

they cant add £40 debt collection fees and their waffle about Beavis is misleading.

 

 

In short, there is no keeper liability and their letter is worthy of sending to Trading Standards for attempted fraud.

 

You have a but of time to deal with this in other ways so write a stiff letter of complaint to owners of hotel

and tell the that you have not used their facilities,

have no contractual relationship with Highview

and their demands for payment fall short of the requirements for keeper liability under the PoFA

and that you consider them culpable for their agent's attempt to obtain money by deception

and what are they going to do about this mess that is of their creation

because they hired a bunch of incompetents to manage their parking spots?

 

When you get a response from the hotel chain post that up here

and we will suggest a form of words to send Highview as an appeal/cease and desist.

 

 

You may have to complain to the BPA about them as well (not that will make much difference

but then they cant claim not to know thei members are up to no good again)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi ericsbrother thanks for your reply.

 

After further discussion with OH when returning home from work, it now transpires that it was an adjacent car park in the same road. Address on PCN not very clear, same road but no specific mention of which one ?

 

The facilities are shared for residents of a Premier Inn / Brewers Fayre and local gym.

 

As only local I drove up to car-park in question to check signage and take photos etc. I went to reception of Premier Inn to explain circumstances. They kindly passed me parking details for residents in which states that the car park is operated by Skillcrown Homes Ltd (details attached). Would these be the owners now ?

 

They also confirmed that other residents had incurred same problems and complained. The machine in question is recorded by Premier Inns CCTV and also by Skillcrownhomes. Should I request footage of CCTV for day in question ?

 

Now my OH informed me that she followed procedure as stated, confirmed details and made payment by cash but then machine shutdown but kept funds.

 

With this further information, please can you kindly advise if I am still to proceed as previously mentioned and who to.

 

Is there a strongly worded template letter or if I draft something up could someone kindly look at it.

 

Finally do I need to contact Highview Parking as I have only until 14/6/16 to respond, if all legit.

 

Sorry for any inconvenience caused but now I have the true facts of the event in question.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just checked map details and entrance / exit is on Royal Oak Road off of Albion Road but not stated on notice ?

 

and sorry ericsbrother what does NTK mean ?

 

Thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

NTK = Notice to keeper.

 

As Eric says, there is no keeper liability as they have negated any PofFA.

 

So pretty much, they're stuffed!

Who ever heard of someone getting a job at the Jobcentre? The unemployed are sent there as penance for their sins, not to help them find work!

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

NTK = Notice to keeper.

 

As Eric says, there is no keeper liability as they have negated any PofFA.

 

So pretty much, they're stuffed!

 

Thanks again Bazooka

 

It's been confirmed by Premier Inn staff that location of entrance / exit is Royal Oak Road not Albion Road. Don't know if that will add to defence but I just wanted clarity.

 

I have contacted Skillcrownhomes regarding ownership of Car-Park and CCTV evidence of the payment machine in question.

 

They have replied that request has been passed to relevant person who will reply asap.

 

Also on checking signage yesterday, there is no mention of Skillcrownhomes, only that the car-park is enforced by Highview Parking.

 

Shall I just await response before submitting appeal details ?

 

Got until 14/6/16 to respond.

 

Or on what has been provided so far, will this be enough to contest charge now ?

 

Thanks again for help / advice.

Link to post
Share on other sites

It is clear that Highview dont know their arse from their elbow. Without digging into the directors of both companies it is safe to assume they are not related and therefore cannot assign any rights so that makes it nigh on impossible for them to offer a contract. Highview have a history of this, not knowing where their car parks are and I think it was them who claimed they managed a council car park next to one of theirs and the judge had to visit it himself to make sense of their claim (they lost).

 

So, what to say in your appeal? I would send them a statement saying that "it is denied that a contract has been formed between Highview parking and the driver or keeper of the vehicle reg XXX YYY on the grounds that Highview do not have any rights to form contracts on the land where it was parked and the CCTV was incorrectly monitoring land that is not under their control, which is also a breach of the DPA.

 

Also, the demand sent to the keeper on xx/xx/16 is anyway not compliant with the PoFA 2012 and thus no keeper liability could be created by any action of the driver of the vehicle at the time. Any further demands from Highview or any person acting on their instruction will be reported as attempted fraud and harassment"

 

Dont mention any other evidence you have as yet as you can use it to damage them if they dont agree to drop the matter.

Edited by honeybee13
Paras.
Link to post
Share on other sites

It is clear that Highview dont know their arse from their elbow. Without digging into the directors of both companies it is safe to assume they are not related and therefore cannot assign any rights so that makes it nigh on impossible for them to offer a contract. Highview have a history of this, not knowing where their car parks are and I think it was them who claimed they managed a council car park next to one of theirs and the judge had to visit it himself to make sense of their claim (they lost).

 

So, what to say in your appeal? I would send them a statement saying that "it is denied that a contract has been formed between Highview parking and the driver or keeper of the vehicle reg XXX YYY on the grounds that Highview do not have any rights to form contracts on the land where it was parked and the CCTV was incorrectly monitoring land that is not under their control, which is also a breach of the DPA.

 

Also, the demand sent to the keeper on xx/xx/16 is anyway not compliant with the PoFA 2012 and thus no keeper liability could be created by any action of the driver of the vehicle at the time. Any further demands from Highview or any person acting on their instruction will be reported as attempted fraud and harassment"

 

Dont mention any other evidence you have as yet as you can use it to damage them if they dont agree to drop the matter.

 

Thanks so much ericsbrother

 

I will draft something up tomorrow.

 

And will keep you posted.

 

:wink:

Link to post
Share on other sites

I have today received a response from SkillCrown Homes Limited confirming that they are the owners of the car-park and the entrance / exit is Royal Oak Road off of Albion Road.

 

Should I be asking about their relationship with Highview Parking ?

 

Or just get response of to Highview as previously advised.

 

Thanks for looking.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I have today received a response from SkillCrown Homes Limited confirming that they are the owners of the car-park and the entrance / exit is Royal Oak Road off of Albion Road.

 

Should I be asking about their relationship with Highview Parking ?

 

Or just get response of to Highview as previously advised.

 

Thanks for looking.

 

Further to the above, I have today received additional information from SkillCrown Homes Limited.

 

"That is the address of the car park, Royal Oak Road, Bexleyheath.

 

CCTV footage can be requested via your insurance company or the police due to data protection.

 

Kind Regards

 

Fiona".

 

ericsbrother shall I just send letter to Highview as previously advised ? Do I need to add anything to what you stated ?

 

Thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

I have today received a response from SkillCrown Homes Limited confirming that they are the owners of the car-park and the entrance / exit is Royal Oak Road off of Albion Road.

 

Should I be asking about their relationship with Highview Parking ?

 

Or just get response of to Highview as previously advised.

 

Thanks for looking.

 

And do I forward to Appeals address at Highview ?

Link to post
Share on other sites

It is for Highview to make their case, not you disprove it so I would keep to denying that there is a contractual obligation.

 

It could be that the landowner (Skillcrown) has a contract to let highview manage their car park but in this case I suspect that Highview have problems with their map!

 

As siad before, dony give Highview any information that you may wish to use at a later date, let them make the mistakes and thenbe damned for them later.

Edited by honeybee13
Paras.
Link to post
Share on other sites

It is for Highview to make their case, not you disprove it so I would keep to denying that there is a contractual obligation.

 

It could be that the landowner (Skillcrown) has a contract to let highview manage their car park but in this case I suspect that Highview have problems with their map!

 

As siad before, dony give Highview any information that you may wish to use at a later date, let them make the mistakes and thenbe damned for them later.

 

Many thanks again ericsbrother for your time and enlightenment.

 

I today received the following e-mail from the owners of the car-park, further to my enquiries regarding CCTV footage etc.

 

"Dear Mr XXXX

 

Further to your previous questions, please be advised that Highview parking are employed by us to deal with payments and PCN’s

 

I have checked our system and the parking in question was paid for and the PCN issued incorrectly, there must have been an issue with the payment software.

 

I will contact Highview to cancel the fine and issue an apology.

 

I am sorry that you have received this and could have dealt with this quicker if I had been given the full information.

 

Should you have any future queries at the car park please contact me directly as I am always happy to help.

 

Kind Regards

 

Fiona " End Quote

 

Now do I need to do anything regarding these cowboys - How many paid up regarding the same and similar circumstances when they shouldn't of have !

 

Or do I just await an apology from Highview ?

 

Many Thanks

 

Baz

 

:wink:

Link to post
Share on other sites

you wont get an apology, just a miserable "it wasnt our fault but as a gesture of goodwill we will let you off just this once".

As I said above, dont contact Highview.

 

Ok ericsbrother many thanks.

 

I had only requested CCTV info from owners and in which they wanted to know why I needed them. I told them about circumstances on day in question and requested contractual evidence between them and Highview.

 

So just do nothing for now ?

Link to post
Share on other sites

absolutely. the more you try and resolve this the more it becomes apparent that you are worried about it and the greater the liklihood they will carry on regardless of what their landlord says.

stop trying to dig a hole for yourself.

 

OK thanks again ericsbrother

 

Thanks for your time.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...