Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • I have looked at the car park and it is quite clearly marked that it is  pay to park  and advising that there are cameras installed so kind of difficult to dispute that. On the other hand it doesn't appear to state at the entrance what the charge is for breaching their rules. However they do have a load of writing in the two notices under the entrance sign which it would help if you could photograph legible copies of them. Also legible photos of the signs inside the car park as well as legible photos of the payment signs. I say legible because the wording of their signs is very important as to whether they have formed a contract with motorists. For example the entrance sign itself doe not offer a contract because it states the T&Cs are inside the car park. But the the two signs below may change that situation which is why we would like to see them. I have looked at their Notice to Keeper which is pretty close to what it should say apart from one item. Under the Protection of Freedoms Act 2012 Schedule 4 Section 9 [2]a] the PCN should specify the period of parking. It doesn't. It does show the ANPR times but that includes driving from the entrance to the parking spot and then from the parking place to the exit. I know that this is a small car park but the Act is quite clear that the parking period must be specified. That failure means that the keeper is no longer responsible for the charge, only the driver is now liable to pay. Should this ever go to Court , Judges do not accept that the driver and the keeper are the same person so ECP will have their work cut out deciding who was driving. As long as they do not know, it will be difficult for them to win in Court which is one reason why we advise not to appeal since the appeal can lead to them finding out at times that the driver  and the keeper were the same person. You will get loads of threats from ECP and their sixth rate debt collectors and solicitors. They will also keep quoting ever higher amounts owed. Do not worry, the maximum. they can charge is the amount on the sign. Anything over that is unlawful. You can safely ignore the drivel from the Drips but come back to us should you receive a Letter of Claim. That will be the Snotty letter time.
    • please stop using @username - sends unnecessary alerts to people. everyone that's posted on your thread inc you gets an automatic email alert when someone else posts.  
    • he Fraser group own Robin park in Wigan. The CEO's email  is  [email protected]
    • Yes, it was, but in practice we've found time after time that judges will not rule against PPCs solely on the lack of PP.  They should - but they don't.  We include illegal signage in WSs, but more as a tactic to show the PPC up as spvis rather than in the hope that the judge will act on that one point alone. But sue them for what?  They haven't really done much apart from sending you stupid letters. Breach of GDPR?  It could be argued they knew you had Supremacy of Contact but it's a a long shot. Trespass to your vehicle?  I know someone on the Parking Prankster blog did that but it's one case out of thousands. Surely best to defy them and put the onus on them to sue you.  Make them carry the risk.  And if they finally do - smash them. If you want, I suppose you could have a laugh at the MA's expense.  Tell them about the criminality they have endorsed and give them 24 hours to have your tickets cancelled and have the signs removed - otherwise you will contact the council to start enforcement for breach of planning permission.
    • Developing computer games can be wildly expensive so some hope that AI can cut the cost.View the full article
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
        • Thanks
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Council bill for repairs came after property passed by inspector.3 months have passed.


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 3066 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

For a couple of months my wife and i had to move into my father in laws council house to help care for him as he was in need of care.

His wife had died and he lived with his son.

The son took on the house tenancy jointly with his father along with my wife.

Anyway shortly afterwards more suitable house was found for them as accommodation was not suitable for his needs.

The house was examined room by room and passed by a inspector from the council.Who said only thing that needs to be done

is all carpets to be moved out of premises.

This was back in early July..And was carried out as said.

A new tenant had moved in a month later.

 

Moved out a couple of weeks later to new house and continued caring for a couple of months then he passed away.

The council were informed of this.

Now early in November a bill came for replacing kitchen sink unit and worktop costing 400 pounds.At the old property.

Which after 14 weeks after vacating a passed property came as a shock.

Also addressed to Passed away father in law and his son.

 

Then we got in touch with the council who said they will look into it ,

took our phone number and they would get back in touch.

Seemed quite concerned about this matter.

 

However this last week a letter came saying despite previous reminders the amount is still outstanding.

And must be made within 7 days otherwise your case will be referred to a DCA and also consider taking legal action which will incur substantial costs.

 

So once again phoned the council who this time said there was no one to deal with this and to email a complaint.Which i am going to do shortly.On their behalf.

But the seven days are up now and i suppose the debt will now be on its way to the DCA.

Personally i would rather go to court and tell the judge what i feel about this and fight it.But feel i am not being given much choice.

Feeling harassed and threatened really with a bad credit file.

 

Now personally i would pay if this was justified.But in my mind is clearly not.

I enjoy standing my ground when needed.And want to help.

What would you do.

Link to post
Share on other sites

stop phoning and start writing to them....start a formal complaint addressing your concerns and the facts as they are and detail what outcome you require...it would be helpful if you had any documentation from the inspector stating his acknowledgement of the condition of the property to show them too

Link to post
Share on other sites

Cheers neil6534-

Inspector had many papers at the time.

Did not give a copy.

Just verbally told what needed doing.

And also said what condition some properties are in that they inspect.

Said it was in fine condition.

I will compose a complaint on their behalf now.

And keep this thread updated.

Anyone else have any experiences or advice please post.Thanks a lot.

Tawnyowl.

Link to post
Share on other sites

personally I would have thought it difficult for them to bring any charges against you being that someone else has since lived in the property...they need to prove the damage was there before you moved out....ask them for proof of what condition the worktop and sink were in, any charges they had to pay to get the work done - proof of work carried out - the date at which point they found the worktop and sink to be in such bad condition that they needed to replace them both

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks neil6534 for the advice.

On the day we moved i made a short video.

Kind of goodbye old house.And there is a short clip of the kitchen showing the sink and worktop.

I will hold back on this piece of possible evidence for now.See what they say.

So i will complain now and see what happens next.

Makes you wonder though what has happened to a sink and worktop only two years old.

I like how the council have spelt kitchen-kitcehn-just picking.

185 materials.Just noticed 2 worktops.

Sounds like something serious has happened somehow.

Since moving.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I had this

They tried for 18mts to spoof me into paying for all manner of things

Totalling £1800

 

I argued on every point

And the bill went down and down

As like you I had video and photographs that prove

Whatever they were charging me for

Was either inherited by me when they moved us there

Or

Was not caused by the time of moving out

 

Eventually it ended up at

 

Knew that was not my doing and ignored their silly court threats for summary damage

 

About 9mts later a letter from Phillips bailiff arrived

Claiming the sum

 

I happen to notice it said debt collection wing

So safe to ignore

 

I emailed the council

They sent photos from 7days after I left

Showing a whole heap of building rubble dumped in the drive

 

They tried to make me pay for someone that had fly tipped the front garden

 

Moral..question every sum they are after

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I see by reading your posts this could be happening to many people.

As councils become strapped for cash as many are they will obviously look for any way possible to raise some funds.Draw something back.

My town seems to be turning into a giant carpark but that is another story.

 

Multiplied by thousands of properties across Great Britain i understand this kind of thing could cost councils millions if houses are left with damage.

DX100uk clearly had one hell of a time but stood up to the demands.

But how many just accept these bills that seem to arrive weeks or many months later.

Moral is clearly when moving take photo and video on day of moving.Witnessed by someone if possible.

 

As there was also a council tax shortfall which i have sorted out because when i rang to ask telling them my father in law had passed away,they said well we then chase the other joint tenant for the shortfall.

Fair enough,so i presumed this would be the same.

 

They would chase his son now for the sink,worktop etc.

Things become so complicated some will probably just give in.

His son finds everything very difficult to deal with in many ways that is why i have become involved.

As ericsbrother says the letter is still being sent to both father and son despite his father passing away and the council being informed.

 

Thankyou for your posts.

Even now after many years on the forums it is nice that people care enough to offer advice and share their own experiences.

These kinds of things as you get older niggle at you,worry you, can i dare say keep you awake if you have limited funds.

Everybody in Great Britain or many i should say the money they have can only be spread so far.A unexpected bill can wreak havoc with planning.

Both by councils and individuals.

I believe in fair play but sometimes things are just plain wrong.And clear to see.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi

 

When they have the move out inspection by the council did they sign any paperwork?

 

Which Council Housing?

 

Make a Formal Complaint to the council housing and title the letter as that make sure and keep copies and get free proof of posting from the post office you want to keep a good paper trail.

 

Also ask for the following documents:

 

1. Customer Care/Service Standards.

2. Complaints Policy.

3. Compensation Policy.

4. Tenant Handbook

5. Allocations Policy.

6. Copy of the Move Out Inspection Report for date xx/xx/xxxxx

7. Copies of the dates when the previous sink and worktop were installed.

8. Copies of the lifecycle policy for sink and worktops once installed.

9. Complete breakdown of the bill for £XXXX

10. Cyclical Maintenance Policy

How to Upload Documents/Images on CAG - **INSTRUCTIONS CLICK HERE**

FORUM RULES - Please ensure to read these before posting **FORUM RULES CLICK HERE**

I cannot give any advice by PM - If you provide a link to your Thread then I will be happy to offer advice there.

I advise to the best of my ability, but I am not a qualified professional, benefits lawyer nor Welfare Rights Adviser.

Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Hi tawnyowl just thought I would pop in to see how this is progressing?

How to Upload Documents/Images on CAG - **INSTRUCTIONS CLICK HERE**

FORUM RULES - Please ensure to read these before posting **FORUM RULES CLICK HERE**

I cannot give any advice by PM - If you provide a link to your Thread then I will be happy to offer advice there.

I advise to the best of my ability, but I am not a qualified professional, benefits lawyer nor Welfare Rights Adviser.

Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...