Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Northmonk forget what I said about your Notice to Hirer being the best I have seen . Though it  still may be  it is not good enough to comply with PoFA. Before looking at the NTH, we can look at the original Notice to Keeper. That is not compliant. First the period of parking as sated on their PCN is not actually the period of parking but a misstatement  since it is only the arrival and departure times of your vehicle. The parking period  is exactly that -ie the time youwere actually parked in a parking spot.  If you have to drive around to find a place to park the act of driving means that you couldn't have been parked at the same time. Likewise when you left the parking place and drove to the exit that could not be describes as parking either. So the first fail is  failing to specify the parking period. Section9 [2][a] In S9[2][f] the Act states  (ii)the creditor does not know both the name of the driver and a current address for service for the driver, the creditor will (if all the applicable conditions under this Schedule are met) have the right to recover from the keeper so much of that amount as remains unpaid; Your PCN fails to mention the words in parentheses despite Section 9 [2]starting by saying "The notice must—..." As the Notice to Keeper fails to comply with the Act,  it follows that the Notice to Hirer cannot be pursued as they couldn't get the NTH compliant. Even if the the NTH was adjudged  as not  being affected by the non compliance of the NTK, the Notice to Hirer is itself not compliant with the Act. Once again the PCN fails to get the parking period correct. That alone is enough to have the claim dismissed as the PCN fails to comply with PoFA. Second S14 [5] states " (5)The notice to Hirer must— (a)inform the hirer that by virtue of this paragraph any unpaid parking charges (being parking charges specified in the notice to keeper) may be recovered from the hirer; ON their NTH , NPE claim "The driver of the above vehicle is liable ........" when the driver is not liable at all, only the hirer is liable. The driver and the hirer may be different people, but with a NTH, only the hirer is liable so to demand the driver pay the charge  fails to comply with PoFA and so the NPE claim must fail. I seem to remember that you have confirmed you received a copy of the original PCN sent to  the Hire company plus copies of the contract you have with the Hire company and the agreement that you are responsible for breaches of the Law etc. If not then you can add those fails too.
    • Weaknesses in some banks' security measures for online and mobile banking could leave customers more exposed to scammers, new data from Which? reveals.View the full article
    • I understand what you mean. But consider that part of the problem, and the frustration of those trying to help, is the way that questions are asked without context and without straight facts. A lot of effort was wasted discussing as a consumer issue before it was mentioned that the property was BTL. I don't think we have your history with this property. Were you the freehold owner prior to this split? Did you buy the leasehold of one half? From a family member? How was that funded (earlier loan?). How long ago was it split? Have either of the leasehold halves changed hands since? I'm wondering if the split and the leashold/freehold arrangements were set up in a way that was OK when everyone was everyone was connected. But a way that makes the leasehold virtually unsaleable to an unrelated party.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

New Estate (2yrs) Road adoption issue


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 148 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

My partner and I moved into a new build house on a small development of 11 houses two years ago. The development is accessed by a lane maintained by the local council.

I asked the developer about the plans for the road servicing the houses prior to purchasing and was told the section covering the first seven houses, including our property, would be adopted by the council, with the remaining road maintained by the householders, as it was too narrow, and did not meet adoptable standards.

The developer said adoption would be under a Section 37 agreement, following one year of maintenance, as the bond required by the council for a Section 38 agreement was excessive. Our solicitor was particularly bad and failed to pick up a clause in the agreement relating to fees for the road, outbuildings, litter picking, fencing and green spaces until an hour before exchange, at which point our buyers removal van was outside. We managed to get some of the clauses removed after arguing that there were no outbuildings, fencing or green spaces on the site. It was an extremely stressful process from start to finish.

Last September we received a £300 maintenance bill from the developer. We paid this thinking it was for the first year of maintenance, prior to handover of the road to the council. We were speaking to one of our neighbours a few weeks ago and he told us the developers was now retaining ownership of the road. We have since received another bill for £360 this year. The developer has told all seven home owners that the road would be adopted. I’ve read that legally, verbal agreements are as binding as written agreements.

What’s the likelihood of successfully fighting this collectively on the basis we purchased the houses on the verbal agreement that the road would be adopted?

Thanks. 

 
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • dx100uk changed the title to New Estate (2yrs) Road adoption issue

Hi

My first suggestion on this would be to recommend that yourself and let the other homeowners know is to each send a Subject Access Request (SAR) to the Developer asking for 'ALL DATA' that simple phrase covers whatever format they hold that data in whether it be emails, recorded calls, written etc.

They then have 30 Calendar Days to respond and that time limit only starts once they acknowledge receipt of your SAR Request.

My second suggestion is for each homeowner affected (please let the other know) is to make a written Formal Complaint (ensure to title it Formal Complaint) to the Developer and wait for there response to see what excuse they come up with.

My third suggestion would be to write to the Councils Planning Department and ask them exactly what you were told by this Developer about them getting the Council to adopt that specific Road/Lane and if that Developer had actioned anything with them to Adopted said road/lane. Let the other homeowners know to do the exact same and write to the Council.

My fourth suggestion is to see if the Developer is a Member of any Registered Bodies (which they more than likely will be) and if they are look up those Registered Bodies and if they have a complaints process then again make a Formal Complaint to them of this Developers actions (again let the other affected by this know and for them to do the same.

Next I would suggest that all those homeowners affected that have been told the exact same about that road being adopted by the Council get together as a group to discuss this and a mutual way of going forward and please let them know of the above as you need that information from them and also to see what response they give to every homeowner affected that makes a Formal Complaint for your next steps.

What you all need to do is to start is gathering a good paper trail about all this that's why I am suggesting the above.

Who is the Developer???

 

  • Like 1

How to Upload Documents/Images on CAG - **INSTRUCTIONS CLICK HERE**

FORUM RULES - Please ensure to read these before posting **FORUM RULES CLICK HERE**

I cannot give any advice by PM - If you provide a link to your Thread then I will be happy to offer advice there.

I advise to the best of my ability, but I am not a qualified professional, benefits lawyer nor Welfare Rights Adviser.

Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi, 

Thank you for your reply.

The houses were built by a small, local developer. I’ve come to realise he’s not a particularly nice individual who’s driven by greed. 

I will make the Subject Access Request and ask my neighbours to do the same. My feeling is that he will fail to respond, or only pass on selected information. 

Thanks again.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Well, if he fails to respond, you all sue him and it would be a big hole in his wallet. How many live on the development?

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group The National Consumer Service

Link to post
Share on other sites

Agree with the above.

The Developer must comply with a Subject Access Request as it is a Legal Right in the UK and if they do not comply nor fail to acknowledge your Subject Access Request then you report them to the Information Commissioners Office (ICO) Failure to Comply with a Subject Access Request.

As also pointed out you could sue the Developer for there Failure to Comply with a Subject Access Request.

Please Name the Developer so we can research them???

How to Upload Documents/Images on CAG - **INSTRUCTIONS CLICK HERE**

FORUM RULES - Please ensure to read these before posting **FORUM RULES CLICK HERE**

I cannot give any advice by PM - If you provide a link to your Thread then I will be happy to offer advice there.

I advise to the best of my ability, but I am not a qualified professional, benefits lawyer nor Welfare Rights Adviser.

Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Hi

Any update on this at all???

How to Upload Documents/Images on CAG - **INSTRUCTIONS CLICK HERE**

FORUM RULES - Please ensure to read these before posting **FORUM RULES CLICK HERE**

I cannot give any advice by PM - If you provide a link to your Thread then I will be happy to offer advice there.

I advise to the best of my ability, but I am not a qualified professional, benefits lawyer nor Welfare Rights Adviser.

Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...