Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • S13 (2)The creditor may not exercise the right under paragraph 4 to recover from the keeper any unpaid parking charges specified in the notice to keeper if, within the period of 28 days beginning with the day after that on which that notice was given, the creditor is given— (a)a statement signed by or on behalf of the vehicle-hire firm to the effect that at the material time the vehicle was hired to a named person under a hire agreement; (b)a copy of the hire agreement; and (c)a copy of a statement of liability signed by the hirer under that hire agreement. As  Arval has complied with the above they cannot be pursued by EC----- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- S14 [1]   the creditor may recover those charges (so far as they remain unpaid) from the hirer. (2)The conditions are that— (a)the creditor has within the relevant period given the hirer a notice in accordance with sub-paragraph (5) (a “notice to hirer”), together with a copy of the documents mentioned in paragraph 13(2) and the notice to keeper; (b)a period of 21 days beginning with the day on which the notice to hirer was given has elapsed;  As ECP did not send copies of the documents to your company and they have given 28 days instead of 21 days they have failed to comply with  the Act so you and your Company are absolved from paying. That is not to say that they won't continue asking to be paid as they do not have the faintest idea how PoFA works. 
    • Euro have got a lot wrong and have failed to comply with the Protection of Freedoms Act 2012 Schedule 4.  According to Section 13 after ECP have written to Arval they should then send a NTH to the Hirer  which they have done.This eliminates Arval from any further pursuit by ECP. When they wrote to your company they should have sent copies of everything that they asked Arval for. This is to prove that your company agree what happened on the day of the breach. If ECP then comply with the Act they are allowed to pursue the hirer. If they fail, to comply they cannot make the hirer pay. They can pursue until they are blue in the face but the Hirer is not lawfully required to pay them and if it went to Court ECP would lose. Your company could say who was driving but the only person that can be pursued is the Hirer, there does not appear to be an extension for a driver to be pursued. Even if there was, because ECP have failed miserably to comply with the Act  they still have no chance of winning in Court. Here are the relevant Hire sections from the Act below.
    • Thank-you FTMDave for your feedback. May I take this opportunity to say that after reading numerous threads to which you are a contributor, I have great admiration for you. You really do go above and beyond in your efforts to help other people. The time you put in to help, in particular with witness statements is incredible. I am also impressed by the way in which you will defer to others with more experience should there be a particular point that you are not 100% clear on and return with answers or advice that you have sought. I wish I had the ability to help others as you do. There is another forum expert that I must also thank for his time and patience answering my questions and allowing me to come to a “penny drops” moment on one particular issue. I believe he has helped me immensely to understand and to strengthen my own case. I shall not mention who it is here at the moment just in case he would rather I didn't but I greatly appreciate the time he took working through that issue with me. I spent 20+ years of working in an industry that rules and regulations had to be strictly adhered to, indeed, exams had to be taken in order that one had to become qualified in those rules and regulations in order to carry out the duties of the post. In a way, such things as PoFA 2012 are rules and regulations that are not completely alien to me. It has been very enjoyable for me to learn these regulations and the law surrounding them. I wish I had found this forum years ago. I admit that perhaps I had been too keen to express my opinions given that I am still in the learning process. After a suitable period in this industry I became Qualified to teach the rules and regulations and I always said to those I taught that there is no such thing as a stupid question. If opinions, theories and observations are put forward, discussion can take place and as long as the result is that the student is able to clearly see where they went wrong and got to that moment where the penny drops then that is a valuable learning experience. No matter how experienced one is, there is always something to learn and if I did not know the answer to a question, I would say, I don't know the answer to that question but I will go and find out what the answer is. In any posts I have made, I have stated, “unless I am wrong” or “as far as I can see” awaiting a response telling me what I got wrong, if it was wrong. If I am wrong I am only too happy to admit it and take it as a valuable learning experience. I take the point that perhaps I should not post on other peoples threads and I shall refrain from doing so going forward. 🤐 As alluded to, circumstances can change, FTMDave made the following point that it had been boasted that no Caggers, over two years, who had sent a PPC the wrong registration snotty letter, had even been taken to court, let alone lost a court hearing .... but now they have. I too used the word "seemed" because it is true, we haven't had all the details. After perusing this forum I believe certain advice changed here after the Beavis case, I could be wrong but that is what I seem to remember reading. Could it be that after winning the above case in question, a claimant could refer back to this case and claim that a defendant had not made use of the appeal process, therefore allowing the claimant to win? Again, in this instance only, I do not know what is to be gained by not making an appeal or concealing the identity of the driver, especially if it is later admitted that the defendant was the driver and was the one to input the incorrect VRN in error. So far no one has educated me as to the reason why. But, of course, when making an appeal, it should be worded carefully so that an error in the appeal process cannot be referred back to. I thought long and hard about whether or not to post here but I wanted to bring up this point for discussion. Yes, I admit I have limited knowledge, but does that mean I should have kept silent? After I posted that I moved away from this forum slightly to find other avenues to increase my knowledge. I bought a law book and am now following certain lawyers on Youtube in the hope of arming myself with enough ammunition to use in my own case. In one video titled “7 Reasons You Will LOSE Your Court Case (and how to avoid them)” by Black Belt Barrister I believe he makes my point by saying the following, and I quote: “If you ignore the complaint in the first instance and it does eventually end up in court then it's going to look bad that you didn't co-operate in the first place. The court is not going to look kindly on you simply ignoring the company and not, let's say, availing yourself of any kind of appeal opportunities, particularly if we are talking about parking charge notices and things like that.” This point makes me think that, it is not such a bizarre judgement in the end. Only in the case of having proof of payment and inputting an incorrect VRN .... could it be worthwhile making a carefully worded appeal in the first instance? .... If the appeal fails, depending on the reason, surely this could only help if it went to court? As always, any feedback gratefully received.
    • To which official body does one make a formal complaint about a LPA fixed charge receiver? Does one make a complaint first to the company employing the appointed individuals?    Or can one complain immediately to an official body, such as nara?    I've tried researching but there doesn't seem a very clear route on how to legally hold them to account for wrongful behaviour.  It seems frustratingly complicated because they are considered to be officers of the court and held in high esteem - and the borrower is deemed liable for their actions.  Yet what does the borrower do when disclosure shows clear evidence of wrong-doing? Does anyone have any pointers please?
    • Steam is still needed in many industries, but much of it is still made with fossil fuels.View the full article
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

swift claiming OH owed £650 council tax from 2009


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 2606 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 51
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

In the first instance, could you go backwards and let us know the starting figures for both accounts and what fees have been charged against each one.

 

Are both debts for council tax?

 

When payment arrangements were initially set up, whas this following initial Notices of Enforcement being received?

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

hi all , this enquiry is about http://www.swiftcredit.co.uk/ ,

 

This has been an ongoing saga , but its getting to a point where i want to put a nail in the coffin , so any help would be appreciated ,

 

I have 2 outstanding debts with them, that were originally from bridgend county council for council tax,

one was for my wife and the other was mine, i was paying £35 a month on the pair ,

 

 

last yr i was paying them every month as usual this went on for about 6 months or so , maybe longer ,

i missed a payment in december 2014 ,

 

 

all of a sudden in january 2015 a bailiff turned up at my door ,

i asked him why he was here and he told me , that i had not been paying 1 of the payments and not the other ,

even though every month when i was ringing up to make payment ,

i was clearly telling them to split the payments , which they were doing ,

told the bailiff this was incorrect and i suggest you go back to your office ,

 

 

i then contacted the office and asked them why they had sent a bailiff out ,

and they claimed it was due to the problem mentioned ,

 

 

they suddenly found out i was actually correct , and they said it would be sorted ,

 

 

a month or so later , i emailed them and asked them if they had sorted it out , so i could continue paying as normal ,

and they didn't get back to me ,

 

 

a month later i did the same again , and this time i got a response , telling me the bailiff fee wasn't getting removed ,

 

 

i rang them up and had a heated discussion with them on the phone ,

about you admitted last time i spoke to you , that he was sent in error ,

 

 

then they put me onto a complaints department member ,

who then proceeded to tell me the bailiff had now been sent for that 1 payment i had missed in december ,

i had already told them he wasn't there for that , and she insisted he was ,the call ended ,

 

 

surely if i had missed a payment in december , then wouldn't they surely have sent me a latter

saying i was in default or i am late on a payment first ??? before they send out a bailiff ?? ,

 

 

i then emailed them back demanding i want a copy of all my payments and i want a copy of the sheet the bailiff ,

came round with back in december !!

 

 

now the email was sent at least 2 months ago , and i have had no emails back off them

and i have not had 1 bailiff at my door , in regards to the last 8 months of non payment ,

 

 

how do i put a nail in this coffin and end it ??

as this has gone on long enough !!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Sorry I am in the country and the internet connection is weak so I will have to be quick.

You missed payment so that brought out the bailiff. Forget he used the wrong reason for his visit. The missed payment means they do not have to write first and that you have incurred

a fee of £235.

If you have a car move it away from your property and please answer the questions from Bailiffadvice to help us give you the best help.

It is not good that you have paid nothing this year-have you saved the payments you should have made?

Link to post
Share on other sites

as it stands at this moment in time ,i dont have a car for him to take ,

and yes i do have the payments saved up ,

and im only £200 in arrears ,

 

 

the reason i mentioned him coming here for the wrong reason , was because i recently visited citizens advice

and they told me that , i should have received a letter from them b4 the bailiff turned up , to tell me i was in arrears ,

but they didnt send one ,

 

 

and they now seem to be stalling in the info i am requesting ..

Link to post
Share on other sites

I think it might be best to get every piece of info you can as well:

 

 

First of all establish from the Council how much was owing etc

.

You need to speak to someone at the Council and ask the following questions:

1 - how many Liability Orders they have against you

2 - the dates they were obtained

3 - the addresses they were for

4 - the period of time each covers

5 - how much each one was for

6 - how much is still outstanding

7 - the dates they were passed on for enforcement

8 - the dates & amounts of any payments

...........................

.

Next you need to send off for a breakdown of the charges the Bailiff applied.

.

Here's an example,

use and ADAPT at will and best sent initially by email backed up by a copy in the post.

.

"From:

My Name

My Address

.

To:

Acme Bailiff Co

Bailiff House

.

Ref: Account No: 123456

.

Dear Sir

.

With reference to the above account, Can you please provide me with a breakdown of the charges.

.

This includes:

a - the time & date of any Bailiff action that incurred a Fee.

b - the reason for the fee.

c - the name(s) of the Bailiff(s) that attended on each occasion a Fee was charged.

d - the name(s) of the Court(s) the Bailiff(s) was/were Certificated at.

e - the date of the Certification.

.

This is NOT a Subject Access Request

uest under the Data Protection Act S7 1998

so does not incur a fee of £10. You are obliged to provide this information.

.

I require this information within 14 days.

.

Yours faithfully

.

Ripped off customer"

.

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

hi dx , thankyou for the info , i have sent them an email , with the template above , and i will also send them in a letter as well with the same info on it , i will contact the council today , and ask for the info , but may i ask what exactly would it achieve , as the council seem to shrug off any enquiries once they have been sent over to the bailiffs :(

Link to post
Share on other sites

the council cannot ignore you.

neither can the bailiffs

 

 

the guys here will need those questions answered to properly advise you

as I can see this has been going on some years.

 

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

You admit yourself that you stopped paying and as a result they had every right to make a visit. Once a visit has been made the enforcement stage fee of £235 is due. It has already been to court and all that is left to be done is for you to pay your debt.

Link to post
Share on other sites

It has already been to court and all that is left to be done is for you to pay your debt.

 

Yeah! Spoken like a true DCA......:rant:

Who ever heard of someone getting a job at the Jobcentre? The unemployed are sent there as penance for their sins, not to help them find work!

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

You admit yourself that you stopped paying and as a result they had every right to make a visit. Once a visit has been made the enforcement stage fee of £235 is due. It has already been to court and all that is left to be done is for you to pay your debt.

 

Whether anyone likes it or not, the above comment is correct.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 year later...

hi there , just a quick question ,

 

 

iswift credit ( www.swiftcredit.co.uk) at my door this morning ,

they are a debt collection company for the local council in regards to council tax ,

 

 

been paying them for over a year ,

and had paid one of the debts off ,

 

 

i got in abit of financial difficulty and had missed the last 2 months

( i usually pay £35 a month) , and due to my own fault ,

 

 

they then turned up at my door whilst i was out ,

i am still having some financial difficulties ,

 

 

when i got home , i rung the office up and offered to pay £20 a month which is better than nothing ,

they willingly took the first payment of £20 ,

then told me thanks but you still have to deal with the bailiff who came to the door ,

 

 

hes coming back on thursday expecting £100, or he will get a letter from the court to gain access to my house , to take items ,

 

 

i told him i had paid £20 to the office , and he didnt care

he told us he still wants £100 on thursday ( yet the debt i have built up with them so far is only £70 ) and he wants to set up a new plan for £100 a week ,

i told him he can get stuffed ,

 

 

where do i stand with this ??

as i offered an amount i can afford and they are saying no ??

yet they never sent no letter telling me i was in default , just sent a bailiff instead ...

Link to post
Share on other sites

they aren't a debt collection company

they are bailiffs BIG difference

but no he cant force entry nor would the courts ever [very very rare] grant forced entry.

 

 

so what letters have you had

notice of enforcement etc etc

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Keep it that way ( did not let them in )

 

It is unlikely he will be back on Thursday.

the fees seem to be correct

not many of the experts about at the moment so you will get more help later.

Link to post
Share on other sites

ty leakie , well the text message i sent him offering him £20 a week to which is more than i was paying before , has gone ignored , i think he will come back , just to push see if he can get that £100 , i will tell him go get a court letter because i am not refusing to pay :)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Can't read the notice as too dark, best convert to a pdf file.

 

If he has not had access to your home previously then he has no right of entry and it would be a seriously bad idea to let him in now. Has he seized anything outside at all - car, caravan, motor bike, BBQ etc?

Please consider making a small donation to help keep this site running

 

[sIGPIC][/sIGPIC]

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

The EA can not take you too court, only the council can for refusing to pay council Tax.

Are there any vulnerable people in your house, not a way to not pay but could possibly help.

And have you done an I &E to work out what you can pay?

 

You can not pay what you have not got,

Try to keep the conversation with the EA on text so you have a record, or record the calls if you can.

Link to post
Share on other sites

To be on the safe side your car should be parked on some private land - neighbours drive would be ideal. Whatever you do don't draw attention to it.

 

The only fees you are due to pay - if this is under the new rules , post April 2014 are:

Compliance Fee £75

Enforcement Visit Fee £235

Seeing as he not taken Control of any goods he has no chance of charging the Sale Fee.

 

You are in the driving seat here as he has no leverage but do agree providing I&E may help prove you can only afford small payments.

Please consider making a small donation to help keep this site running

 

[sIGPIC][/sIGPIC]

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

ok will try that , just going to see if he reacts to the text i sent him earlier , the company itself have all our incomes and expenditures from when i previously was paying them, but its weird how once a bailiff has been out the office want nothing to do with your account , and hand sole control of it over to the bailiff to deal with , i had just payed off a previous council tax bill of over £500 , and had this to pay , it seems they will try and get what they can without sending out a warning letter first or a phone call , just send a bailiff its an extra £300 + in their pockets ..

Link to post
Share on other sites

Unfortunately they do not have to send a letter to say they are coming. You said yourself you had broken the agreement you had by missing payments. It is good that you have been trying to play catchup although your efforts seem to be ignored.

 

Do you know how much you paid in fees with your other account?

Please consider making a small donation to help keep this site running

 

[sIGPIC][/sIGPIC]

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...