Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Morning dx and thank you for your message.   With regards to your comment about them not needing to produce the deed, the additional directions ordered by the judge included 'a copy of any assignment o the debt or agreement relied upon'  so that is why I thought that point was relevant?
    • Sorry for the long post but I don't want to miss out any relevant information: My wife bought a car from Trade Centre UK and have been having nothing but trouble with it. Unfortunately we paid of the finance used to buy the car as we weren't expecting this much trouble with the car as we we though we would have protection as buying from a dealer. We are wondering if we can still reject the vehicle since the finance plan has been paid off. Timeline is as follows: 13/12/2023 -15/12/2023 Bought car from Trade Centre UK for £10548 £2000 deposit paid on credit card on 13/12/2023 £8548 on finance from Moneybarn (arranged through Trade Centre UK). picked up car on 15/12/2023 Also bought lifetime warranty for £50/month 25/12/2023 Engine Management Light comes on. The AA called out and diagnosed the following error codes: P0133 - Lambda sensor (bank 1, sensor 1) Oxygen Sensor. Error Message : Slow reaction. Error sporadic P0135 - Lambda sensor heat. circ.(bank1,sensor1) Oxygen Sensor. Error Message : Component defective Due to it being Christmas took a few days to get through to them but they booked me in for 28/12/2023 to run their own diagnostics. 28/12/2023 Took car in to Trade Centre so could check the car – They agreed it was the Oxygen Sensor and Booked me in for repair on 30/01/2024. I was told they had no earlier slots, and I would be fine to carry on driving car when I said I was afraid of problem worse. During diagnosing the problem, they reset the Engine Management Light. During drive home light comes back on. 29/12/2023 - 29/01/2024 I carry on driving the car but closer to the date, engine goes to reduced power every now and again – not being a mechanic I presumed that this was due to above fault. 20/01/2024 Not expecting any more problems paid off the finance on the car using personal loan from bank with lower interest rate. 30/01/2024 Trade Centre replace to O2 sensor (They also take it on a roughly 60mile road trip which seems a bit excessive to me – I can’t prove this as something prompted me take a picture of milage when I handed car in but I forgot take one on collection – only remembered next day.) 06/02/2024 Engine goes in reduced power mode again and engine management light comes on – Thinking the Trade centre’s 28 day warranty period was over I booked the car the into local garage for the next day to get problem fixed under the lifetime warranty package. Fault seems to clear after engine was switched off. 07/02/2024 In the Morning, I take it to local garage who say as the light gone off – the warranty company is unlikely to cover the cost of the repair or diagnostics and recommend I contact them when the light comes back on. In the evening the light comes back on and luckily I manage to get it back to the garage just before it shuts for the day. 08/02/2024 The Garage sends me a diagnostics video showing a lot error codes been picked up by their diagnostics machine including codes for Oxygen sensor and Nox Sensors, Accelerator pedal and several more. Video also shows EGR Hose not connected to the intake manifold properly, they believed this was confusing the onboard system as it is unlikely this many sensors would trigger at same the time but they couldn’t be certain until they repaired the hose. 13/02/2024 Finally get the car back as it took a while to get approval and payment for the repairs from the Warranty company. Garage told me to keep an eye the car as errors had cleared with the hose but couldn’t 100% certain that’s what caused the problem. 06/03/2024 Engine management light comes on again. Fed up I go into Trade Centre as I was just around the corner when it happened and asked them how to reject the car or have the problem fixed. They insist that as it’s over 28 days I need to get the car fixed under the warranty package I purchased and they could no longer fix the car as it was over 28 days. When I tried telling them it appeared to be the same or related problem they said they couldn’t help as I hadn’t contacted them earlier. I asked them if they were willing to connect the car to the diagnostics machine and tell me what the problem was, as a goodwill gesture, which he agreed to do and took the car to the back He came back around 30 minutes later and said they took a look at the sensor they replaced previously and there was nothing wrong with it and engine management light went off when they removed the sensor to check it. When I asked what the error code he couldn’t give me an exact fault but the said it one of the problems I told him earlier (Accelerator pedal). I have this visit audio recorded on my phone – I informed the reps I was recording several times. As the light wasn’t on, local garage couldn’t book me for a repair under warranty. 07/03/2024 Light came on so managed to book back into local garage for the 12/03/2024 Whilst waiting to take car into garage, I borrowed a OBD sensor and scanned for errors on the car. This showed the following errors: P11BE – Manufacturer specific code (Google showed this to be NOX sensor) P0133 - Oxygen (Lambda) Sensor B1 S1: Response too Slow 12/03/2024 Took car to local garage and the confirmed the above errors. This leads me to believe that either Trade Centre UK reps lied and just reset the light or just didn’t check properly (Obviously I am unable to prove this) 22/03/2024 Finally got the car back as according to garage, the warranty company took a long to time to pay for the repairs 28/04/2024 Engine management Light has come back on. Using the borrowed OBD scanner I am getting the following codes: P0133 - Oxygen (Lambda) Sensor B1 S1: Response too Slow P2138 - Accelerator Position Sensors (G79) / (G185): Implausible Correlation I have not yet booked into a garage as I wanted to see what my rights are in terms of rejecting the car as to me the faults seem related. I can’t keep using taxi or train to get to work every time the car goes into the garage as it is getting very expensive. Am I right in thinking that they have used up their chance to repair when they conducted the repair end of January or when they refused to repair it in February ? If I am still able to reject the vehicle could you point to any sample letters or emails I can use. Thankyou for your advice on my next steps.
    • Ok noted about the screenshot uploads. In terms of screwing up I had one previous ticket that defaulted and ended up in a CCJ from Southend airport because for some reason during COVID I didn't receive their claim form just a notice of default. This hospital ticket was the 2nd ticket that went to CCJ due to a lack of knowledge of the process. Maybe it's easier just to pay them in future I'm thinking though, I don't get them very often anyway
    • Car maker takes a hit from weakening demand and price war in the world's largest electric vehicle market.View the full article
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Sussex Security Solutions Ltd - T/A Parking Enforcement Co - Eastgate Wharf in Lewes.


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 2466 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

has 35 days passed since your email? If so then there is no keeper liability so your best move is to now ignore anything but a lba. Should you get one of those then respond saying that they have failed to follow the protocols of the PoFA andthere is no keeper liability and to cease their correspondence with you or risk civil action for harassment.

Essentially they will probably get Gladstones to send you a threatening letter but as they are acting as a dca it is meaningless.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 70
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

Hi

I appealed on the day of PCN issue which was 21 June 2015 and their NTK was dated 23 July 2015 so not quite 35 days. I never received a response to my email appeal. This is first correspondence I have had since the PCN.

Thanks for your help.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I have reverted to the old method of sticking something over the personal details - given up with ever being able to manage editing anything on a PC.

I will attach the new scanned ones and hopefully they will be OK.

Any help really is appreciated.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I have reverted to the old method of sticking something over the personal details - given up with ever being able to manage editing anything on a PC.

I will attach the new scanned ones and hopefully they will be OK.

Any help really is appreciated.

 

 

I hate to break it to you but there is still some data showing on photo2 1.pdf. Umpteenth time lucky :-)

If you are asked to deal with any matter via private message, PLEASE report it.

Everything I say is opinion only. If you are unsure on any comment made, you should see a qualified solicitor

Please help CAG. Order this ebook. Now available on Amazon. Please click HERE

Link to post
Share on other sites

Well done. I think you have it.

 

As it stands, it is my belief that they are in breach of PoFA in that they are only giving the driver the right to appeal. They are not giving the keeper any opportunity to appeal the charge.

 

If this went to court, you could show this piece of garbage to the judge and I suspect you would win. This is IPC misinformation at its best.

If you are asked to deal with any matter via private message, PLEASE report it.

Everything I say is opinion only. If you are unsure on any comment made, you should see a qualified solicitor

Please help CAG. Order this ebook. Now available on Amazon. Please click HERE

Link to post
Share on other sites

SSS/PE are a shambles with paperwork. They threatened and then got DR+ to write to one motorist three months AFTER the IPC adjudicated against the ticket being issued due to incorrect signage!

Any advice given is done so on the assumption that recipients will also take professional advice where appropriate.

 

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

DONATE HERE

 

If I have been helpful in any way - please feel free to click on the STAR to the left!

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for that. I'll hold on and see if anything else comes. Are you ok if I come back to you if something else comes through? All your advice has really helped me. Regards

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...
They would be unwise to go any further but yes, if you get anything else from the parking co post again so we can consider.

Hi, have received a letter today in connection with the PCN I received on 21 June 2015. It is from DRP (Debt Recovery Plus) and is demanding payment for £160, with a payment date of 15/09/15. Any advice what to do now would be appreciated - thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

Totally agree with HB. Debt collectors have as much power over you that I have. Erm? That'll be none then. DR+ are the parking industry's pet DCA who will send two or three letters before sending it back with 'a recommendation' that legal action be taken. This is more misinformation.

 

Ignore until you get something of substance (LBA?) If they are silly enough to try court action, help can be provided.

If you are asked to deal with any matter via private message, PLEASE report it.

Everything I say is opinion only. If you are unsure on any comment made, you should see a qualified solicitor

Please help CAG. Order this ebook. Now available on Amazon. Please click HERE

Link to post
Share on other sites

just ask yourself why are DR+ asking for £160. Answer- if yoy are mug enough to believe that they have any clout then you are mug enough to pay a bit extra for your stupidity. If you looked them up to see if they are a licenced deposit taker you will see that they are not which means that if the debt was real and you paid them then the original debtor can still demand that you pay them as well as the payment to DR+ isnt protected. Shows you what a bunch of cowboys operate in this area.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Totally agree with HB. Debt collectors have as much power over you that I have. Erm? That'll be none then. DR+ are the parking industry's pet DCA who will send two or three letters before sending it back with 'a recommendation' that legal action be taken. This is more misinformation.

 

Ignore until you get something of substance (LBA?) If they are silly enough to try court action, help can be provided.

 

Thanks again for your help - will wait and see what comes next!

Link to post
Share on other sites

just ask yourself why are DR+ asking for £160. Answer- if yoy are mug enough to believe that they have any clout then you are mug enough to pay a bit extra for your stupidity. If you looked them up to see if they are a licenced deposit taker you will see that they are not which means that if the debt was real and you paid them then the original debtor can still demand that you pay them as well as the payment to DR+ isnt protected. Shows you what a bunch of cowboys operate in this area.

 

Thanks again for your advice - will see what comes next!

Link to post
Share on other sites

n1ch3s, have you viewed any threads about DR+ yet please? I'm not sure you have. There is a search facility on CAG that can bring up relevant threads.

 

If you do, you could find a lot of reassurance seeing that nothing has happened to other people when they've been threatened by DR+.

 

HB

Illegitimi non carborundum

 

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 6 months later...

Hello again

- as before everyone was so helpful before and I thought maybe that was the end of the fiasco

 

 

today have come home to a letter from Gladstones Solicitors with the paragraph that reads

 

 

'as all other attempts have failed, our client MAY now instruct us to take legal action against you in County Court' .

 

 

It then requests £160 within 14 days with payment to go to DRPL.

 

 

Can you please advise me what to do now and what the implications may be. Thank you all again

Link to post
Share on other sites

Well if that isn't a conflict of interest, I don't know what is. If Gladstones are going to try this on, I would welcome it as they are not very good at getting results for their clients.

 

The bosses behind Gladstones run the IPC and the IAS so it is in their interest to harass you a bit more.

 

As far as I can tell, this PPC took no one to court last year so whether they will this time, who knows?

If you are asked to deal with any matter via private message, PLEASE report it.

Everything I say is opinion only. If you are unsure on any comment made, you should see a qualified solicitor

Please help CAG. Order this ebook. Now available on Amazon. Please click HERE

Link to post
Share on other sites

Well if that isn't a conflict of interest, I don't know what is. If Gladstones are going to try this on, I would welcome it as they are not very good at getting results for their clients.

 

The bosses behind Gladstones run the IPC and the IAS so it is in their interest to harass you a bit more.

 

As far as I can tell, this PPC took no one to court last year so whether they will this time, who knows?

 

Thanks for reply. It's all so incestuous and a minefield. Do you think I should just ignore this letter?

Link to post
Share on other sites

I would but I'm not you! I would be willing to let them try it on with a judge should they try it on. As IPC members do not follow the PoFA 2012, they will have some difficulty trying to rely on it in a courtroom.

If you are asked to deal with any matter via private message, PLEASE report it.

Everything I say is opinion only. If you are unsure on any comment made, you should see a qualified solicitor

Please help CAG. Order this ebook. Now available on Amazon. Please click HERE

Link to post
Share on other sites

Gladstones are a company of solicitors whose 2 partners also own the IPC/IAS amongst others

including another of the parking industry dca's.

 

 

They are acting as a dca in this case and note the word MAY and the context of it.

They dont even have an instruction from Sussex Security to send out the letter they have let alone anything else.

 

 

they are telling you to pay another dca a sum that was never owed in the first place

even if there was a contractual debt.

 

Ignore them and come back again if they send you a letter headed letter befoe action or letter before claim

and we will advise you how to respond,

 

 

Again the Gladstones lbc fail to meet the requirements under civil procedure rules

so it is difficult to tell whether they are incompetent, lazy or attempting to deceive.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 months later...

http://www.moneysavingexpert.com/news/protect/2015/04/private-parking-fines-judges-rule-against-motorists

 

 

it is NOT A FINE

and they esp martin lewis should not be usin that word in relation to private parking INVOICES!

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...