Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Hi With the Section 21 Notice I do hope the Landlord issued you with: Energy Performance Certificate (EPC) for the Property How to Rent Guide A current Gas Safety Certificate (if gas in the Property) If above have not been provided to the Tenant by the Landlord then they can't use a Section 21 Notice until the above have been provided (note you don't warn the Landlord of this until but put it in your defence) Have a good read of this link: Evicting tenants in England: Section 21 and Section 8 notices - GOV.UK WWW.GOV.UK Information for landlords in England on tenant eviction: assured shorthold tenancies, including eviction notices, Section 21, Section 8, accelerated possession, possession orders, bailiffs  
    • good idea take some pix and put them in a PDF read UPLOAD dx
    • thread title updated moved to overseas debt forum. sadly as they are outside any UK jurisdiction upon DCA rules which state in the UK they must not call employers, there not alot you can do to stop these scammers. make sure you totally make private ALL social media twitter/facebook/linked in etc etc as there no-way for them to findout where you work otherwise so you must have a leak somewhere. find it. your employer details arent even legally available to UK DCA's so how have they found it out to date???  simply write to the BANK informing them of your correct and current address ALWAYS!!. if you want to arrange payment or not TO THE BANK ONLY thats upto you. never ever ignore a Statutory Demand a Letter Of Claim a Court Claimform. if if if any of those ever happen. till then ignore and rewash. dx    
    • Date of issue –   13 may 2024 AOS date 31st may defence filing date 14th june plenty of lowell card claimform threads here use our enhanced google searchbox Lowell card claimform id be reading at least 5-10 threads a day. do NOT MISS your defence filing whatever happens.  
    • Hello All,  I’m hoping someone can help me urgently here. Firstly, I’d like to say I have read multiple other threads and have some what an idea of what I should be doing, however my case might be slightly different so coming with my own questions here.    my situation is I lived in Dubai and had a credit card and a loan, loan with HSBC and credit card with Emirates (or the other way round), I lost my job and was forced to leave the country as I was staying in the country on my companies visa.    since coming back, after a few years 2 different debt collections agencies have been approaching me (one being IDRW and the other J&P). I’ve never answered IDRWW and they constantly chase me by calling and messaging me and my employer. My current company is ok with this as I explained the situation but I’m soon to be joining a new company who definitely won’t be ok with being messaged and called. I’m afraid to continue to ignore them as they may message and calm the new employer as they have before and I’ll lose my job. However, it seems clear from these forums that dealing with the debt collection agencies is never a good idea. You shouldn’t agree to the amount or pay anything.    j&p caught me on my phone but I still haven't sent them any money or confirmed the amount they’re saying is owed, they keep pushing to pay off the “principal” amount by making monthly payments, from reading these forums it seems like if I make one of those payments (they have provided bank details for ENBD), then it’ll just be paying off interest and not actually clearing the principle debt and the bank won’t even approve receipt of payment or that it’s coming off principle.    this is my predicament as ignoring them might not be an option if they chase my new employer. Maybe there’s a way to ensure the debt collection agency don’t contact my new employer?? I don’t know? Massively appreciate peoples help here. Thanks, 
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

Lowells/carter claimform OH's old CAP1 Card 'debt' ***Claim Discontinued***


MadMat
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 3144 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 63
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Potential Issue - seems the CCA request+ postal order has got lost in the post :(

 

from royal mail track and trace -

 

Status: We have your item

Item BZ7xxxxxxxxGB was posted at Waitrose xxx xxx on 15/06/15 and is being progressed through our network for delivery.

 

give it a couple more days then send another one?

 

Mat

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

Returned home from a few days away to find a prezzie from Brian Carter waiting on the doorstep!

 

An allocation questionnaire - which I can deal with.

 

And the attached letter offering to negotiate a tomlin order - smacks a little of desperation to me, they've still not produced a single shred of paperwork to back up the claim. I'm inclined to send back the AQ agreeing to mediation and a hearing and ignore the letter at this stage. Would appreciate any thoughts as to why I should reply to the letter though!!

 

Mat

Edited by MadMat
typo
Link to post
Share on other sites

Why agree to mediation if they haven't sent any paperwork to show the debt is legit

Any advice i give is my own and is based solely on personal experience. If in any doubt about a situation , please contact a certified legal representative or debt counsellor..

 

 

If my advice helps you, click the star icon at the bottom of my post and feel free to say thanks

:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

Mainly to show any judge I may end up in front of that i'm willing to co-operate with the court, I have no intention of actually agreeing to pay them anything unless they do somehow find all the paperwork to give them a water tight case!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Your decision to accept or ignore their offer...its just his last role of the dice before deciding to pay the hearing fee.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Another letter from Brian Carter today

 

"Please find enclosed a copy of our DQ, And also please note our clients would like to settle out of court, please contact us"

 

DQ Shows that they do not plan to attend any hearing - shows 0 witnesses including yourself

 

Last begging letter before discontinuing ???

 

Mat

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just had an email about mediation - extract below

 

Not sure I should agree to it as

 

a) still not had a single scrap of proof of the debt

b) We are not prepared to compromise until we do see some sort of proof!

 

Mat

 

 

Mediation Requirements

 

 

Please read the following statements:

 

 

I can confirm that I am willing to compromise on this matter

 

I can confirm that there has been no police involvement in this matter at any time

 

I can confirm that I have enough information about the claim to allow me to enter into negotiations and that I do not require any further evidence from the other party before the appointment

 

I can confirm that I can mediate on the date stated above.

 

(Mediation appointments are limited and can only be re-arranged under exceptional circumstances).

 

Mediation is only available to you if you can answer YES to all 4 statements above. If you answer NO to any of the statements, mediation is not suitable for your case and you should contact the Mediation Team to inform them (email is preferable).

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes agree you must

Unless you filed the SB defence

 

Mediation team will ring

Simply state no paperwork

They'll state no point then

 

Dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

Another letter from our new best mate Brian Carter today

- enclosing some paper work at last!

Also yet again offering to enter into Without Prejudice negotiations to settle via tomlin order.

 

he's sent us a copy of the

 

"original agreement" which a copy of the standard ultra short application form Cap1 used back then, along with several pages of boilerplate T&C (Capital One ConfidentialV9)

"agreement at time of default" Which is another set of T&C, blank and unsigned (V14)

"notice of assignment" A copy of a letter that claims to be a notice of assignment from Cap1 dated 1/08/14

- curiously printed on plain paper, not the usual capital one headed paper! and appears to be freshly printed, not a photocopy.

 

if any of this is any use I'll scan and PDF it

- but as it runs to over 20 pages of mainly standard boiler plate

I've seen posted here many times before I'm reluctant to waste the time ;)

 

FWIW We are due to have the mediation phone call on Thursday this week

 

Mat

Link to post
Share on other sites

would be nice to see it

including the edges

and the various number

pop every page into a word doc

then pdf that/

 

 

upload

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

OK did the best I could - they are pretty poor photocopies anyhow, and I don't have a scanner so it's been done with a camera in macro mode!

 

While going through them I noticed that her credit limit at time of default was £200 - so just how do they come up with a total outstanding of over £400? they must have been adding charges on like crazy!!!!

 

Mat

Link to post
Share on other sites

what date did she take this card out?

that's an application form not an agreement

 

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

yes I saw that but means nowt

 

 

don't think #V14 T&C match that date either

 

 

short form application is not a credit agreement.

and for £400 I wonder why farter is even bothering.

 

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I intend to use the mediation appointment tomorrow to point out to them that they really have nothing and invite them to discontinue in order to save on being awarded costs when they lose at a hearing

 

During mediation am I allowed to point out that as my wife is a working mother on a lower than average salary that even if they do win in court it's going to be a hollow victory as her Icomes/Expenditures sheet will show she can only afford to pay a nominal monthly sum anyhow.

 

Mat

Link to post
Share on other sites

During mediation am I allowed to point out that as my wife is a working mother on a lower than average salary that even if they do win in court it's going to be a hollow victory as her Incomes/Expenditures sheet will show she can only afford to pay a nominal monthly sum anyhow.

 

No I wouldn't be going into that kind of detail..let the mediator run the show...they will have set questions.

 

Andy

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

definitely allow mediator to run the show. just been through this whole process and won...... just listen to Andy and you will be fine, but be prepared to put in lots of effort to make sure you achieve all of the deadlines and look through as many threads as you can so that you can see what the next bit will be if it goes that far. mine went to court and i won.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Well had the mediation call.

 

Didn't go quite as I was expecting after reading other threads on here, Mediator was somewhat combative, made false statements that supported the claimant and threatened me that it wouldn't look good in court if I didn't make a good faith offer of settlement!

 

He told me that I'm definitely within the 6 years as it goes by the default date not last payment date

He also told me that the ultra short application form would be accepted as a credit agreement by the court.

 

When I said I was reluctant to pay them anything as I'd seen no paperwork at all that proved the debt I was accused of wasting his time and tax payers money.

 

So I made an offer of £50 in full and final settlement, which was rejected. Lowells came back with an offer of £450 which I rejected. Call then ended as I said I'd rather take my chances at a hearing than go higher then the £50

 

To be honest it felt more like I was talking to an employee of Brian Carter than an impartial mediator!

 

 

Mat

Link to post
Share on other sites

didn't think a mediator could make decisions on matters of law like defining sb date decisions?

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...