Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • be very wary upon what you see being recently posted on here 😎 regarding KIH.... all is not what it seems...  
    • 1st - all my posts on CAG are made not only in reply to the specific issue the topic starter makes but also in a general matter to advise any future readers upon the related subject - here it is kings interhigh online school. KIH lets take this topic apart shall we so readers know the real situation and the real truth...and underline the correct way to deal with KIH. https://tinyurl.com/ycxb4fk7 Kings Interhigh Online School issues - Training and Apprenticeships - Consumer Action Group - but did not ever reply to the last post.  but the user then went around every existing topic here on CAG about KIH pointing to the above topic and the 'want' to make some form of group  promoting some  'class action' against KIH . then on the 2nd march this very topic this msg is in was created. all remarkably similar eh? all appear to be or state..they are in spain... ....as well as the earlier post flaunting their linkedin ID, (same profile picture) that might have slipped through via email before our admin killed it.., trying to give some kind of legitimacy to their 'credentials' of being 'an honest poster'....oh and some kind of 'zen' website using a .co.uk  address (when in spain- bit like the Chinese ebay sallers) they run ... and now we get the father of the bride ...no sorry...father of a child at the uk-based international school in question posting ...pretending to be not the 'other alf... do you really think people are that stupid..... ................... nope you never owed that in the 1st place... wake up you got had and grabbed the phone - oh no they are taking me to court under UK jurisdiction...and fell for every trick in the book that they would never ever put in writing that could be placed in front of a court operating under their stated uk jurisdiction wherever you live. T&C's are always challengeable under UK law this very site would not exist if it were not for the +£Bn's bank charges reclaiming from 2006> and latterly the +£Bn's of PPI reclaiming both directly stated in the banks' T&C's were they claimed they were legally enforceable ...not!! they lost big time... why? a waste of more money if you've not got a court claim....... why not use them for a good outcome...go reclaim that £1000 refundable deposit you got scammed out of . people please research very carefully ...you never know who any of these people are that are posting about kings interhigh and their 'stories' they could even be one of their online tutors or a shill . don't get taken in. dx      
    • @KingsParent thank you for sharing your experience.  I also tried contacting the CEO but didn’t get very far. Do you mind sharing his contact details?  kind regards   
    • Thank you Rocky for the clarifications though they did cause a problem at first since an original windsccreen ticket was  of a different breach some time before. The current windscreen ticket only states that you were parked there for 6 minutes which is just one minute over the minimum time allowed as the Consideration period. There is no further proof that you parked there for any longer than that is there? More photographs for example? Moving on to the Notice to Keeper-it does not comply with the Protection of Freedoms Act 2012 Schedule 4. First there is no parking period mentioned on it. there is the time 20.25 stated which coincides with the W/S ticket but a parking period must have a starting and finishing time-just one time is insufficient to qualify as a parking  period as required in Section 9 [2] [a] . Are there any different photos shown on the NTK comapared to the w/s PCN? Not that that would make a difference as far as PoFA goes since the times required by PoFA should be on the NTK but at the moment Met only appear to show that you stayed there for 6 minutes. Another failure to comply with PoFA is at S9([2][e] where their wording should be "the creditor will (if all the applicable conditions under this Schedule are met) have the right to recover from the keeper so much of that amount as remains unpaid; ". You can see on your NTK that they misssed off the words in brackets. Met cannot therefore transfer the charge from the driver to the keeper. Only the driver is now liable. Then their is the discrepancy with the post code on the NTK  HA4 0EY which differs from the post code on the contract and the Post Office Postcode Finder which both list it as HA4 0FY. As you were not parked in HA4 0EY the breach did not occur. In the same way as if you were caught speeding in the Mall in London, yet you were charged with speeding in Pall mall London [a street nearby] you would be found not guilty since though you were speeding you were not speeding in Pall Mall. I bow to Eric's brother on his reasoning on post 12 re the electric bay abuse  That wording is not listed on their signs nor is there any mention on the contract of any electric charging points at all let alone who can park there or use them. He is quite right too that the entrance sign is merely an invitaion to treat it cannot form a contrct with motorists. Also the contract looks extremely  short no doubt there will be more when we see the full Witness statement. As it stands there is no confirmation from Standard Life [or Lift !] on the contract that Savills are able to act on their behalf. Also most contracts are signed at the end of the contract to prevent either side adding extra points. So their percentage  chance of winning their case would be somewhere between 0.01 and 0.02.    
    • Owners of older vehicles tell the BBC of their anger that their cars' apps will stop working.View the full article
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 160 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Lowell/overdales claimform - old british gas acount ***Claim Discontinued***


Clam shell
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 160 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

please complete this:

 

 

dx

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I’m sorry I suffer with mental health and am finding it really difficult to understand

 

 

Which Court have you received the claim from ? Name County Court business centre, Northampton, NN1 2LH

 

 

Name of the Claimant ? Lowell portfolio 1 ltd. Ellington House, 9 Savannah Way, Leeds valley park, Leeds, ls10 1ab

 

Date of issue –  12 April 2023

 

Particulars of Claim

 

What is the claim for – the reason they have issued the claim? 

 

1. The claim is for the sum of £954.02 due by the defendant under a British Gas account with the account reference of ••••••••••••

 

2. the defendant failed to maintain contractual payments under the terms of the account agreement.

 

3.The debt was legally assigned to the claimant on 26.11.21, notice of which has been given to the defendant.

 

4.The claim includes statutory interest under s.69 of the county courts act 1984 at a rate of 8% per annum from the date of assignment to the date of issue of these proceedings in the sum of £76.52. The claimant claims the sum of £1030.34

 

What is the total value of the claim? £1190.34
 

Have you received prior notice of a claim being issued pursuant to paragraph 3 of the PAPDC (Pre Action Protocol) ? Give answer here
 

Have you changed your address since the time at which the debt referred to in the claim was allegedly incurred? no 
 

Did you inform the claimant of your change of address?  I have not changed address

Is the claim for - a Bank Account (Overdraft) or credit card or loan or catalogue or mobile phone account? British gas acount
 

When did you enter into the original agreement before or after April 2007 ? I moved in on 17 February 2019
 

Do you recall how you entered into the agreement...On line /In branch/By post ? They were the energy supplier when I moved in, - Didn’t enter agreement moved into property

 

Is the debt showing on your credit reference files (Experian/Equifax /Etc...) ?  Yes it is on Experian
 

Has the claim been issued by the original creditor or was the account assigned and it is the Debt purchaser who has issued the claim.  debt purchaser who is issuing claim
 

Were you aware the account had been assigned – did you receive a Notice of Assignment? No
 

Did you receive a Default Notice from the original creditor? No
 

Have you been receiving statutory notices headed “Notice of Sums in Arrears”  or " Notice of Arrears "– at least once a year ? No
 

Why did you cease payments? I did not make payments due to having no bills
 

What was the date of your last payment? See answer above
 

Was there a dispute with the original creditor that remains unresolved? Yes I opened a resolver case and this remains open
 

Did you communicate any financial problems to the original creditor and make any attempt to enter into a debt management plan? No I did not as I was disputing the fact that I had received no bills
 

Link to post
Share on other sites

pop up on the MCOL website detailed on the claimform.
[if mcol is not working return after the w/end or the next day if week time]
.
 register as an individual on the Gov't Gateway Site
Go to HMRC's login page.
Click the GREEN sign in button.
Click “Create sign in details”
Enter your email address where asked.
You will now be emailed a confirmation code. ...
You will now be issued with a User ID for your government gateway account.
 note down your details inc the long gateway number given, you might need it later.
 then log in to the MCOL Website
.
 select respond to a claim and select the start AOS box.
.
 then using the details required from the claimform
.
 defend all
 leave jurisdiction unticked
 you DO NOT file a defence at this time
[BUT you MUST file a defence regardless by day 33 ]
click thru to the end
confirm and exit MCOL.

.

get a CPR  31:14  request running to the solicitors [if one is not listed send to the claimant]LEGAL : CPR 31.14 Request - Request for information when a Claim has been issued . - Court Procedure and General Guidance (mainly England and Wales) - Consumer Action Group.

 

 

 type your name ONLY
Do Not sign anything
.do not ever use or give an email
.
you DO NOT await the return of ANY paperwork 
you MUST file a defence regardless by day 33 from the date on the claimform [1 in the count]

..............


 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • dx100uk changed the title to Lowell/overdales claimform - old british gas acount
  • 2 weeks later...

I have followed the guidance above.  I have been doing some reading and have had a go at writing the defence, I would be grateful if you could have a look through and tell me if this is appropriate, thanks.

 

Particulars of claim

 

1.The claim is for the sum of (£954.02) due by the Defendant under a British Gas account with an account reference of 01234567890

 

2.The Defendant failed to maintain contractual payments required under the terms of the account agreement.

 

3.The debt was legally assigned to the claimant on 26-11-21, notice of which has been given to the defendant.

 

4.The claim includes statutory interest under S.69 of the County Courts Act 1984 at a rate of 8% per annum from the date of assignment to the date of issue of these proceedings in the sum of (£76.32).

The Claimant claims the sum of (£1030.34)

  

 

Draft defence:

 

1. I the Defendant contends that the particulars of claim are generic in nature. The Defendant accordingly sets out its case below and relies on CPR 16.5 (3) in relation to any particular allegation to which a specific response has not been made.

 

2. Paragraph 1 is noted, i have in the past attempted to make a financial contract with British Gas, however I was informed incorrectly by them that my meter was unregistered and British Gas were unable to act. The claimant has to date failed to supply any bills or better details despite a CPR 31:14 sent to their solicitors on the 24th April 2023 by royal mail recorded delivery, the claimant has failed to respond to date.

 

3. There was and still remains an unresolved dispute with British Gas which was never resolved prior to the assignment of the alleged debt. Furthermore, the claimant has given no details as to the breakdown of their claim what dates it relates to, so I am unable to defend specifically until the claimant can particularise and quantify its pleadings.

 

4. Pursuant to OFGEM code of back billing rules the alleged charges are now over 12 months old and relate to charges which have not been billed correctly by British Gas and are therefore prevented from charging.

 

5. The claimant has thus far been unable to produce any evidence that the alleged debt has been legally assigned to them.


Pursuant to the civil procedure rules Practice Direction 16 (7.3) Where a claim is based upon a written agreement.

1) a copy of the contract or documents constituting the agreement should be available at the hearing.


With the court’s permission the Claimant is put to strict proof to: -


        a) show and disclose how the Defendant has entered into an agreement.
        b) show and disclose how the Claimant has reached the amount claimed.
        c) show how the Claimant has the legal right, either under statute or equity to issue a claim.

 

6. As per Civil Procedure Rule 16.5 (4) it is expected that the Claimant prove the allegation that the money is owed.

 

7. It is therefore denied that the defendant is indebted to the claimant as alleged or at all.

 

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

that looks fantastic..wish everyone took the time to source and create such a defence here.....

 

youve a few weeks (fri 12th may) to file that.

 

i'm sure the experts will pop in and give it the once over in good time to file

 

dx

 

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Have you received prior notice of a claim being issued pursuant to paragraph 3 of the PAPDC (Pre Action Protocol) ? Give answer here

 

:confused:

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

have you received a letter of claim with a reply pack wanting I&E details etc  before you got the claimform?..it would have come from overdales...they dont usually slip-up....

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Fine go with the above defence

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

I have received this via email from Overdales

 

Dear Ms xxxx

 

Our Client: Lowell Portfolio I

Reference Number:xxxxxxxx.    

Claim Number: xxxxxxx

Balance: £1,190.34

 

We write regarding the above matter and confirm receipt of your Defence.

 

As you are aware, the account we have been instructed on is regarding a former British Gas matter, where you entered into an agreement with British Gas on 18 February 2019. The acount was opened for the supply of electricity to your current address between the opening date and the end date on 14 March 2020.

 

British Gas have stated that they received no payments from you and meter readings were received from a Smart Meter, with the last reading received being 5343. We can confirm however, that the balance assigned to our client was £954.02, which, can be evidence via the attached Final Bill, in your name. Please be advised, as the Bill is dated 14 March 2020, it cannot be subject to backbilling, as these charges are from the start date in February 2019, to March 2020. 

 

Please note, as the account is in relation to a Service Agreement and not a Credit Agreement, it is not regulated by the Consumer Credit Act 1974. As such, British Gas are not obligated to retain a copy of the Agreement, therefore, we would be unable to request a copy of this document.

 

Regarding assignment of the debt, please find attached a copy of the Notice of Assignment sent to you, by our client. As such, assignment of the debt has been completed for the purposes of litigation. Even if you did not receive the notice of assignment nor the electronic copy, any number of the letters we sent to you would satisfy assignment of the debt as it clearly identifies what the debt is and who you must pay to discharge the balance.

 

We understand that within your Defence refer to a dispute still ongoing with British Gas, in order for this to be investigated further, please provide us with additional information by return. 

 

Settlement proposal

Nonetheless, our client is willing to attempt settlement and reach an amicable resolution with you.

An agreed settlement may avoid a hearing or judgment and also additional costs being incurred. Our client is prepared to accept a full and final settlement of:

-        A lump sum payment of £950.00

-        Or two payments of £500.00

-        Any reasonable settlement proposal you wish to make.

 

Please contact our offices to your proposals for repayment and settlement offers within 7 days of the date of this email. Alternatively, please find our client’s details below:

Account Holder Name: Overdales Legal Ltd

Sort Code: 20 35 84

Account Number: 73467015

 

Please use your reference as the payment reference to ensure it is allocated to your account.

 

Please note that should you choose to accept the settlement sum which is lower than the outstanding balance of the claim and our client reports the matter to the relevant credit reference agencies, your credit file will be updated to reflect that you have partially satisfied the balance.

 

You may wish to seek independent legal advice from the Citizens Advice Bureau or a firm of solicitors of your choosing.

If we do not hear from you, we have been instructed by our client to proceed with the legal claim. This may incur further costs that our client will seek to recover from you. 

We trust further action will not be necessary and look forward to hearing from you.

Yours sincerely

 

Overdales Solicitors

Overdales Legal Ltd | PO Box 1399 | BD5 5GA |
Tel: 0333 111 0807 | Email: 
[email protected] | Web: www.overdales.com

 



This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the named recipient of this email. If you are not the named recipient you should not disseminate, distribute, copy or alter this email. If you have received this email in error, please notify the sender and delete the email from your records. Warning: although Overdales Legal Limited has taken reasonable precautions to ensure no viruses are present in this email, Overdales Legal Limited cannot accept responsibility for any loss or damage arising from the use of this email or attachments and it is recommended that you check all emails with an appropriate virus scanner.
 
Overdales Legal Limited of Ellington House, 9 Savannah Way, Leeds, LS10 1AB is a limited company registered in England and Wales under company number 07407310. ‘Overdales’ and ‘Overdales Solicitors’ are trading names of Overdales Legal Limited which is authorised and regulated by the Solicitors Regulation Authority under firm number 806769 and authorised and regulated by the Financial Conduct Authority in respect of consumer credit regulated accounts, Financial Services Register number 691793. Data Protection Registration number: Z2577941. Only persons designated as “solicitor” are qualified solicitors. We do not accept service of any documents by email or fax. 
 
Link to post
Share on other sites

how did they get your email? 

 

thats a std letter to intimidate and harass 

 

send them one email in reply stating email is not to be used for our mutual claim.

 

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Quote

I believe this occurred when I moved in to a new build and my meter was unregistered and I got no bills.

I moved in on 17 February 2019

did not make payments due to having no bills

 

Quote

British Gas have stated that they received no payments from you and meter readings were received from a Smart Meter, with the last reading received being 5343. We can confirm however, that the balance assigned to our client was £954.02, which, can be evidence via the attached Final Bill, in your name. Please be advised, as the Bill is dated 14 March 2020, it cannot be subject to backbilling, as these charges are from the start date in February 2019, to March 2020. 

 

But you used the electric ?

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

and

you are in the same property still?, who do you pay your electric too now?

 

dx

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

so when did you octopus AC start?

could this result from a period from move in date and that date?

and no those details on mcol are not passed nor are accessible to the claimant, i expect they've got this from details you'd given to BGAS? but...

 

you need to close email comms off by one reply stating NOT to use email for any comms relating to our mutual claim, else they'll be filing fake docs etc 1 min before any  court deadline removing your chance to counter them.

 

 

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Having checked back electric switched March 2020 and gas October 2020 (moved in Feb 2019)

BG told me the meter was unregistered and I got no bills from them, in actual fact the meter was registered but under the developer ( new build).

 

I have sent an email to Overdales asking them not to communicate via email. Funnily enough the email address they are using is not my main email address it is a gmail account I only use for certain things and not what I would have given to BG.

 

Attached to their email was a final bill and deed of assignment which I’ve attached.

 

NOA+Bill .pdf

Link to post
Share on other sites

ok ive sorted the PDF 

 

so no old bill for 18-02-19 - 14-03-2020 period showing how the balance occurred 

good luck with that lowell!!

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

just to complete the story the judge might ask,

what made you suddenly sign up with octopus in march 2020?

when you'd had free gas/elec  since moved in feb 19

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

But they are only charging £14 for March 2020 the balance is possibly from 2019 before the switch to Octopus.

 

 

 

.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

yea thats what im trying to work out.

what made the op suddenly signup to and pay a supplier after more than a year of free gas/electric....

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Well obviously it wasn't free hence the bill has caught up.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

I had to get my local community law team to sort it out for me because BG just kept saying, meter not registered nothing we can do.  

 

I never wanted to be a customer of British Gas I tried to switch as soon as I moved in but this is what I was told and the switch couldn’t go ahead.  

 

As they said the meter was not registered I have no way of knowing what I used or even what tariff I was on.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...