Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Ok thanks for that, well spotted and all duly noted. Yes they did eventually submit those docs to me after a second letter advising them I was contacting the ICO to make a formal complaint for failing to comply with an earlier SAR that they brushed off as an "administrative error" or something. When I sent the letter telling them I was in contact with the information commissioner to lodge the complaint, the original PCN etc quickly followed along with their excuse!
    • its not about the migrants .. Barrister Helena Kennedy warns that the Conservatives will use their victory over Rwanda to dismantle the law that protects our human rights here in the UK.   Angela Rayner made fun of Rishi Sunak’s height in a fiery exchange at Prime Minister’s Questions, which prompted Joe Murphy to ask: just how low will Labour go? .. well .. not as low as sunak 
    • From #38 where you wrote the following, all in the 3rd person so we don't know which party is you. When you sy it was your family home, was that before or after? " A FH split to create 2 Leasehold adjoining houses (terrace) FH remains under original ownership and 1 Leasehold house sold on 100y+ lease. . Freeholder resides in the other Leasehold house. The property was originally resided in as one house by Freeholder"
    • The property was our family home.  A fixed low rate btl/ development loan was given (last century!). It was derelict. Did it up/ was rented out for a while.  Then moved in/out over the years (mostly around school)  It was a mix of rental and family home. The ad-hoc rents covered the loan amply.  Nowadays  banks don't allow such a mix.  (I have written this before.) Problems started when the lease was extended and needed to re-mortgage to cover the expense.  Wanted another btl.  Got a tenant in situ. Was located elsewhere (work). A broker found a btl lender, they reneged.  Broker didn't find another btl loan.  The tenant was paying enough to cover the proposed annual btl mortgage in 4 months. The broker gave up trying to find another.  I ended up on a bridge and this disastrous path.  (I have raised previous issues about the broker) Not sure what you mean by 'split'.  The property was always leasehold with a separate freeholder  The freeholder eventually sold the fh to another entity by private agreement (the trust) but it's always been separate.  That's quite normal.  One can't merge titles - unless lease runs out/ is forfeited and new one is not created/ granted. The bridge lender had a special condition in loan offer - their own lawyer had to check title first.  Check that lease wasn't onerous and there was nothing that would affect good saleability.  The lawyer (that got sacked for dishonesty) signed off the loan on the basis the lease and title was good and clean.  The same law firm then tried to complain the lease clauses were onerous and the lease too short, even though the loan was to cover a 90y lease extension!! 
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

1st Credit angling for a CO on LLoyds Credit Card CCJ -


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 3282 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Received letter from 1st Credit whom I have been paying £30.00 per month for a CJJ from a debt originally Lloyds CC.

I have been paying the £30.00 per month since the CCJ was obtained April 14, I have not missed a payment since then.

 

I received this letter with their intention to review my account with a view to applying to the court to obtain a charging order to secure our interest against my property.

 

The letter also states that they want to know if my financial circumstances are likley to change in the forseeable future? I wish I knew.

 

At the end it also states

"It is not our intention to pressurise you into paying more than you can afford

and therefore we may ultimately decide that applying for a charging order is a reasonable and fair outcome."

 

Should you wish to avoid this action please contact us on 01737 237374 etc.

 

Can some one advise / help with what to do next ?

 

Thanks in advance

 

There is very little equity in the property if any at all!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Is the CCJ joint or in only one person's name.

 

Is the mortgage in joint or in only one person's name

 

It is my understanding that there is little you can do to prevent this happening. If the CCJ is in only one person's name, but the mortgage a joint one, then they can only obtain a restriction on the equity of the debtor.

 

You say you have not missed a payment since the Judgment was obtained in April 2014. I wonder if this not so subtle pressure for you to increase the monthly payment - they are not allowed to simply demand that you pay more without asking the court to amend the Judgment.

 

 

 

 

As this statement is being made by 1st credit, it is without doubt intended to pressure and intimidate. Especially if you have adhered to the terms of the Judgment!

 

"It is not our intention to pressurise you into paying more than you can afford and therefore we may ultimately decide that applying for a charging order is a reasonable and fair outcome."

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

Uploading documents to CAG ** Instructions **

Looking for a draft letter? Use the CAG Library

Dealing with Customer Service Departments? - read the CAG Guide first

1: Making a PPI claim ? - Q & A's and spreadsheets for single premium policy - HERE

2: Take back control of your finances - Debt Diaries

3: Feel Bullied by Creditors or Debt Collectors? Read Here

4: Staying Calm About Debt  Read Here

5: Forum rules - These have been updated - Please Read

BCOBS

1: How can BCOBS protect you from your Banks unfair treatment

2: Does your Bank play fair - You can force your Bank to play Fair with you

3: Banking Conduct of Business Regulations - The Hidden Rules

4: BCOBS and Unfair Treatment - Common Examples of Banks Behaving Badly

5: Fair Treatment for Credit Card Holders and Borrowers - COBS

Advice & opinions given by citizenb are personal, are not endorsed by Consumer Action Group or Bank Action Group, and are offered informally, without prejudice & without liability. Your decisions and actions are your own, and should you be in any doubt, you are advised to seek the opinion of a qualified professional.

PLEASE DO NOT ASK ME TO GIVE ADVICE BY PM - IF YOU PROVIDE A LINK TO YOUR THREAD THEN I WILL BE HAPPY TO OFFER ADVICE THERE:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for reply,

 

CCJ is in my name only.

Mortgage in my name only.

I havent missed any payments but at the begining they thank me for my efforts to date to repay this debt?

I was under the impression when the CCJ was obtained that as long as I kept up with repayments this would be ok.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for reply,

 

CCJ is in my name only.

Mortgage in my name only.

I havent missed any payments but at the begining they thank me for my efforts to date to repay this debt?

I was under the impression when the CCJ was obtained that as long as I kept up with repayments this would be ok

.

 

A few years ago, this was pretty much a good argument to prevent a CO. However, once again, the rules were tinkered with and it is pretty much a done deal that where a person owns property and a CCJ has been awarded against them, a Charging order request will follow. It just seems very odd that they have waited a year suggesting they will be doing this, don't you think ? Which is why I am being quite suspicious about their timing.

 

Is it a large amount that you owe them ? If there were any default / penalty charges added to the account or Mis sold PPI, did you attempt to reclaim these ?

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

Uploading documents to CAG ** Instructions **

Looking for a draft letter? Use the CAG Library

Dealing with Customer Service Departments? - read the CAG Guide first

1: Making a PPI claim ? - Q & A's and spreadsheets for single premium policy - HERE

2: Take back control of your finances - Debt Diaries

3: Feel Bullied by Creditors or Debt Collectors? Read Here

4: Staying Calm About Debt  Read Here

5: Forum rules - These have been updated - Please Read

BCOBS

1: How can BCOBS protect you from your Banks unfair treatment

2: Does your Bank play fair - You can force your Bank to play Fair with you

3: Banking Conduct of Business Regulations - The Hidden Rules

4: BCOBS and Unfair Treatment - Common Examples of Banks Behaving Badly

5: Fair Treatment for Credit Card Holders and Borrowers - COBS

Advice & opinions given by citizenb are personal, are not endorsed by Consumer Action Group or Bank Action Group, and are offered informally, without prejudice & without liability. Your decisions and actions are your own, and should you be in any doubt, you are advised to seek the opinion of a qualified professional.

PLEASE DO NOT ASK ME TO GIVE ADVICE BY PM - IF YOU PROVIDE A LINK TO YOUR THREAD THEN I WILL BE HAPPY TO OFFER ADVICE THERE:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

I will flag your initial post for more advice from those on the site team.

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

Uploading documents to CAG ** Instructions **

Looking for a draft letter? Use the CAG Library

Dealing with Customer Service Departments? - read the CAG Guide first

1: Making a PPI claim ? - Q & A's and spreadsheets for single premium policy - HERE

2: Take back control of your finances - Debt Diaries

3: Feel Bullied by Creditors or Debt Collectors? Read Here

4: Staying Calm About Debt  Read Here

5: Forum rules - These have been updated - Please Read

BCOBS

1: How can BCOBS protect you from your Banks unfair treatment

2: Does your Bank play fair - You can force your Bank to play Fair with you

3: Banking Conduct of Business Regulations - The Hidden Rules

4: BCOBS and Unfair Treatment - Common Examples of Banks Behaving Badly

5: Fair Treatment for Credit Card Holders and Borrowers - COBS

Advice & opinions given by citizenb are personal, are not endorsed by Consumer Action Group or Bank Action Group, and are offered informally, without prejudice & without liability. Your decisions and actions are your own, and should you be in any doubt, you are advised to seek the opinion of a qualified professional.

PLEASE DO NOT ASK ME TO GIVE ADVICE BY PM - IF YOU PROVIDE A LINK TO YOUR THREAD THEN I WILL BE HAPPY TO OFFER ADVICE THERE:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

The amount owing is £6,300 approx . I never tried to reclaim anything back regards penalty charges PPI etc never only tried to do that once PPI on another Loan and got know where due to it being a broker who arranged Loan and then no longer trading and the company I took the loan out with said it was nothing to do with them ?

 

Would it be easy to reclaim these back?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Paul,

 

You say the CCJ was for a Lloyds CC debt.

 

Have you reclaimed all penalty charges added to the a/c.

 

Was there any PPI on it.

 

These could be reclaimed and repaid to you direct or set against the balance owed.

We could do with some help from you

                                                                PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

                                            Have we helped you ...?  Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

Please give something if you can. We all give our time free of charge but the site has bills to pay.

 

Thanks !:-)

Link to post
Share on other sites

If you have all your statements for the a/c, you should list the PPI and the penalty charges separately.

 

If you don't have the data, get it from the bank with a SAR

 

:-)

We could do with some help from you

                                                                PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

                                            Have we helped you ...?  Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

Please give something if you can. We all give our time free of charge but the site has bills to pay.

 

Thanks !:-)

Link to post
Share on other sites

cant see a thread on the CCJ

 

did you not come here for help onit?

 

did you contest the CCJ and defend yourself?

 

when was the card taken out?

 

it might be you let them walk all over you

and they see you as an easy touch

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thans for replying,

 

I dont have any accounts for the Credit Card now ,

 

 

If I remember rightly the credit card limit was £5000.

 

 

so all the rest must be charges of some description,

 

 

when 1st Credit took me to court there was a fair amount in charges then?

 

How would I go about SAR Lloyds or 1st Credit?

 

sorry for not being bright regarding this?

Link to post
Share on other sites

I didnt defend CCJ at the time as I was recovering from Kidney Cancer it didnt seem impotant in the big picture then,

 

 

the card took out around 2000 but not sure exactly,

 

Maybe I was stupid then but as I said it was the least of my worries then.

 

Thats why I am after help advice now.

 

Thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

who set the £30PCM payment level, the judge or you afterwards talking to 1st credit?

 

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

That was what I offered to 1st credit which I sent back in the official paperwork which I received from Northampton

which I believe I sent back to 1st credit as it was a partial payment / offer?

 

 

And I eventually received the paper work back from the court saying it had been accepted.

 

thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just got the CCJ paperwork out and it states you made the claimant an offer which the claimant has accepted . £30.00 per month the first payment due on the 16/04/14 and on or before this date each month until the debt has been paid,

 

hope this helps answer your last question a bit clearer dx100uk

Link to post
Share on other sites

I would suggest that this CO letter is just a bluff to frighten you into contacting them.

and squeezing more out of you.

 

hopefully andyorch will pop in later

 

but in the meantime

I'd get an SAR off to Lloyds bank At

Registered Office:

25 Gresham Street,

London EC2V 7HN

I'd also try a CCA request to first credit too

now they could say we don't have to as we've a CCJ

but it might help decide which way we go from here

if they don't have the paperwork

my thoughts are

that if you were in hospital or whatever and couldn't really defend the claim

so thought better to admit it and that you find a lot of the debt is PPI/Penalties

both of these factor, and p'haps No CCA

might angle toward trying to set the CCJ aside

or

a redetermination on the payment levels

just my musings

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for your help dx110uk will get the SAR Lloyds done and sent off Monday and I will do a CAA to 1st credit as well. I will post any replies I get from either of these ASAP.

 

Will keep an eye on here as out for the rest of today I really appreciate everyones advice so far its great to know there are lots decent people out there able to help.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Paul,

 

Site Team Andyorch has said this about 1st Credits' actions :-

 

They are just after a review and possible increase - note the word " may ".

 

They can either apply for a re determination...doubtful. .. as they agreed the initial payment amount .........

 

......... or they can apply to secure the judgment vis a Charging Order...again doubtful ...further costs.

 

:-)

We could do with some help from you

                                                                PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

                                            Have we helped you ...?  Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

Please give something if you can. We all give our time free of charge but the site has bills to pay.

 

Thanks !:-)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Paul

Even if they get a co (as citb says now poss even if an inst order), there can be no order for sale so long as the payment order is adhered to.

Only the ct can change the instalment amount, upon application

Link to post
Share on other sites

well you most certainly never ever speak to a dca or alike on the phone.

 

writing only. put the phone down.

 

just remember, they are not bailiffs

and never can be.

they might have attained a ccj against you,

but that doesn't give them any other magical powers.

 

I rather suspect that had CAG been involved from before the CCJ

that things would not have gone their way

but hey ho, your health situation dictated otherwise

and you cant be blamed for what sadly happened

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Should I give them an up to date Financial statement or just tell them that I cant up the monthly payment as that is what the court and they agreed to ?

Thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

pers if you only had the one phishing letter

hoping you might contact them, which is all its about really..

 

 

I'd not instigate any letter tennis at this stage.

 

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...