Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Hi all, hope you can help. I've received a £4k repair estimate from the main dealer after my 2016 F30 330e developed the dreaded drivetrain error. The qoute is for a replacement cell module and associated labour and various bits and bobs to get it done. I initially had them investigate the issue when it first popped up a year ago. They replaced the auxillary battery which 'fixed' the issue for a few months before returning. Last Novemner the issue escalated to 'Battery not charging' which would clear after powering off the car , and disappear. Took it into the dealer and they diagnoised a faulty high voltage battery under the boot but could not do any work as they needed to schedule more cars for this 'specialist high voltage work'. So they said I could continue to drive the car until they got in touch when the car could be booked in for repairs. Roll on to April, the issue became severe (battery not charging error not going away, car in limp mode one morning) and car completly died at a traffic light same day (dashboard flashing all over the place), couldnt engage in 'Drive' and had to be recovered by AA to the dealer. Turns out car was now only running on the 12v battery in the boot and that had run flat as the hybrid function had stopped working altogether. My question is whether this is a reasonable estimate. Could this be done cheaper elsewhere? The dealer has servived this car from new hence took it them in the hope they'd not point fingers at any other party. Should I be paying for this at all since I raised the issue with them before it escalted and resulted in a now expensive fault? I also suspect the KLE may have gone too based on other posts, but the dealer hasnt qouted for that yet. I worry they'll' 'discover' that after I've already shelled out for a new cell module and end up lumbered with another bill to replace the KLE. Feels like I know about what they need to do than they do. The Service Advisor has been completely useless. Any advice would be greatly appreciated.
    • The Petrol Station is Shell Garage Wickham (Hampshire ) Another person obviously had the same issue as they had called the garage previously-
    • Thanks Dave, that all sounds clear to me. In terms of avoiding PCNs, I'm not sure if I can. I need to be able to park in that spot, especially as I've got kids to lug forth and back for the school run. Likewise it's not always possible to use the MA's permit system either, as I've not always got them to hand. So, if I'm actively avoiding PCNs, then it could mean I've given in to their idiotic rules. But, I do get what you're saying, as I imagine the risks go up if they claim there are multiple PCNs to be paid at court. Not sure what to do with this one.
    • Is it possible you could qualify for a DRO (Debt Relief Order) and ditch the IVA ? https://debtcamel.co.uk/end-iva-change-to-dro/  
    • My IVA which I began in 2021 has for around a year now been passed to credit expert - I find this company and it's staff obnoxious and insensitive money grabbing monsters.  What is my legal right can I have my IVA moved to another ip what happens if Hanover sell my file?  I am ina real bad situation where my kids are unwell and this crest expert supervisor is saying I should try more than what I agreed despite my situation being very bad and kids unwell.   I feel like they are bullying me and I duh I where to turn.  I keep getting emails saying we at credit expert are in charge of your iva now but still I got messages about my review annual from Hanover which I sent documents and now I got a response from credit expert saying they think I agreed to pay more - how ludicrous is that how can I keep these bullies at bay.   Who can I complain too without messing up my IVA.  I'm going to post below what they sent me please someone help me as they are making me suicidal now. These evil people g coincidently all Indians with weak English which is another issue as communication feels like a battle each time.    Good afternoon,   We hope you are keeping well.   In accordance with the terms of your voluntary arrangement you a required to comply with the following modification:   The debtor must seek to either obtain full time employment or improve self employed income to equivalent thereof as soon as possible and a full review of the debtor’s income and expenditure must be undertaken by the supervisor. The contributions shall increase after taking into account any increased costs in respect of travel and should commence in the month following the review. If any instances of co-habitation with the debtor by any person aged 18 or over occur during the term of this arrangement and where there is reasonable expectation that board and lodging should be paid, the contribution will be added into this arrangement in full. The debtor agrees to provide an income and expenditure review in the month following any loss of child related income. Any surplus identified is to be made available immediately for the benefit of unsecured creditors in the arrangement.    In order to ensure that the terms of the voluntary arrangement are adhered to, I require you to provide evidence that you complies with the above modification along with any supporting evidence.   Alternatively, if you believe you are no longer able to comply with the modification please do inform us.   I eagerly await your response to the points raised within 14 days of the date of this email.   If you have any further queries, please contact Customer Service on ‪0800 0431 431‬ or by email at [email protected].   Thank you for your comprehension.   Plese guys advice me what I can reply as I don't have any more money for these thieves and their annual review is an annual monster nightmare how can I tell them I'm not willing to be bullied and can't paid more    تھا ks   
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Zurich Life Ins - increased PCM £36 to £166!!


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 3315 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hello All

 

I just got my husbands yearly statement for his life insurance

 

UNBELIEVABLE !!!

 

Its an adaptable term plan and most its ever gone up is a couple of pound every year WE have had this policy for 20 years

 

This year they have uped payment from £36 pcm to :mad2: £166 how does that work?

 

Surely they cannot increase premium this much £214,000 cover (which I think is less than last years cover have to check) for £166 pcm

 

Gob Smacked ! and to make matters worse their letter dated 1st March was received today which now gives me 10 days to deal with this.

 

 

HELP HELP HELP :!:

Link to post
Share on other sites

Has your husband phoned them to ask whether they have made a mistake ? Perhaps the amount per month is wrong. Or there may be an explanation. Some companies are open on a Saturday, so it may be working calling them.

 

I thought that these were plans over say 25 years, with payments going up a bit each year and there would not be a sudden jump in premium when a certain age was reached.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

I wondered if it had something to do with age but 4.6 times increase because he's a year older???

 

Fact of the matter is if premium required is correct then no way can we continue with cover (how can this be legal)

 

Letter says something about administration charges but out so haven't hot the letter with me

 

I thought it was a 25 year term but we are talking about paperwork that's 20 years old I know I'm a hoarder of paperwork but wouldn't have the faintest idea where to find it

 

Can't phone today so have to do it Monday - surely it has to be wrong

 

Anyone else had such a jump on premium

Link to post
Share on other sites

this is a long shot... but if the increase is correct and there are guaranteed premiums offered in 2006, maybe it would be possible to claim back from 2006 as policy was mis-sold? a long shot i know, just suggesting incase it is possible

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hello there.

 

As well as the other comments on here, I think it would be worth checking the policy document. I hope it would explain the basis of how premiums might increase.

 

If you would like to post up what it says [minus personal details], we might be able to give more advice.

 

HB

Illegitimi non carborundum

 

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Reputable and Zurich, really.

 

They do this all the time, mine went up hundreds and I did a quick online comparison. What was funny was Zurich was lowest for new customers.

 

Phoned them up and questioned the increase. The advisor and I quote, told me to **** off and get it cheaper then. As you can imagine, I did :)

Link to post
Share on other sites

From what I can read, that's not a renewal, it's an illustration.

 

We need to see the whole letter and a lot clearer if poss.

 

The advice cost refers to what an IFA would be paid.

 

The only thing I would say is beware of cancelling it without getting more cover in force because if this was from 20 years ago, you won't get the same cover because of age or any possible health issues.

 

You could also speak to an Independent financial adviser, I'm sure you will find one that will give an initial free chat.

 

If I were you havinastella I would put a complaint in, because calls are usually recorded.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Dotty

 

Thats the document received only other page is acceptance form with questions does he smoke

 

What IFA would be paid ??? so the premium includes payment for IFA ?

 

No health issues

 

Filled online comparison with all details age smoking etc and cover for same amount over 25 years @ £50 ?

 

 

We have Zurich joint policy too god help me if they change that premium think we have spoken about this before Dotty ? Did ask them at that time for copy of original Docs but they never sent it really need to know if that covered critical illness !

 

Zurich has sent me 2/3 letters saying I hadn't paid monthly premium on this one and that they wouldn't cover me anymore however after sending them bank records of payment so they could access payment easily (my bankers gave me a code) they sent letter saying that cover still running - no apology though

Link to post
Share on other sites

The only way you will find out what is going on is to phone Zurich on Monday. These large Insurance companies are not very good at doing the admin on policies over a long period of time. They make mistakes and I think this may be the case here.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

If you look at the start date it says 1st April 15 so this doesn't relate to your existing plan.

 

I think it may have come to the end of the original term?

 

They are giving you options to retain cover, without underwriting or take out a new plan which would be subject to acceptance, hence the illustration and options.

 

The advice costs are also an example.

 

The last paragraph advises you to seek advice, yes gets idea's on comparison sites but they can vary so much in the cover provided, especially with critical illness being included.

 

Do you need that amount of cover now and another 24 year plan? Presumably it was to cover your mortgage, what sort of balance do you have now?

Link to post
Share on other sites

this is a long shot... but if the increase is correct and there are guaranteed premiums offered in 2006, maybe it would be possible to claim back from 2006 as policy was mis-sold? a long shot i know, just suggesting incase it is possible

 

How could it have been mis-sold?

 

The guaranteed premiums option wasn't available when the plan was taken out 10 approx years earlier

Link to post
Share on other sites

I see Dotty

 

 

I'll make sure he phones tomorrow to check all details but its strange I am almost sure we took policy out in 1997 so that would make a plan that lasted 18 years :| and I definitely didn't take it out in 1995.

 

 

On these figures yes I will definitely have to look for another policy - insurance taken out to give the kids something

 

Our other policy covers mortgage and this cover was for me to have a pot for kids and to keep us afloat funeral expenses etc...

 

Oh my sounds terrible when its written down

 

On price comparison sites like for like cover is as I said @ £50

 

Figures don't add up - term of policy doesn't seem right

 

There is no way they will take new premium by existing direct debit is there ? I best call the bank

Link to post
Share on other sites

I might have read some information related to a different product, but I think I read that this particular life product has a value at the end of the period you pay into it. i.e you pay in for 20 or 25 years, if you die during the period or suffer a terminal illness it pays out or if you survive for the whole period you get a cash payment at the end of it. There is discussion on forums about this Zurich product where people have been advised that surrendering the policy early, means that you get a small surrender value paid out and because it was so small, people have decided to continuing paying into it.

 

I have never dealt with life products, so you will have to speak to Zurich about this. There are few people on the Moneysavingexpert Insurance forum who are life Insurance specialists and there is some quite good info on that site.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...