Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • old and new threads merged for history. please dont go wasting your redundancy money on F&F's  its consumer debt only. is the secured debt joint? dx  
    • have you informed the bank ever by email/letter of your correct and current address? you can always ignore anyone else accept the bank,  Block and bounce back all emails. Block any text messages  Ignore any letters unless it's: - a Statutory Demand - a Letter Of Claim - a Court Claimform via Northants bulk.
    • a CCJ does not 'expire' thus does not need any application to a court to 'extend it'. if a CCJ has not been enforced within 6yrs, then it is very unlikely any court would grant such should the claimant return to court, of which the defendant would be advised -( unless they have moved and not informed the court & the claimant such) .  
    • I contacted them when it happened. The caretaker came over, looked at it, and walked off with the tree chunks of mortar. Next morning, they had a roofer come over and enter our garden to inspect it. Friday they were supposed to speak with a scaffolding company. I had to bring up liability and potentially calling the council to report 'an unsafe structure' before they even got moving. They know all about the wedding, the preparations, our patio contractors etc. but their attitude doesn't instill me with confidence. My fear is it will end up being a legal matter which is why I posted here to hopefully receive some advice. As far as I can see, the roof is in a state of disrepair, even if it's just the mortar breaking lose due to the size and weight of the chunks - and even from ground level it's visibly clear that multiple pieces have fallen over time (though never this size so we haven't been able to identify the issue till now - we thought it was rubble left in the garden by the previous owner). Currently, we can't use 25% of our garden due to the risk of more falling mortar which is more than just an inconvenience, we can't proceed with our contractors, and at worst, it will run up in several thousand of extra expenses for us, if we have to find a wedding venue. Even if they do have it fixed in time, and we have to settle for renting a marquee and floor for the marquee and furniture and whatnot it will be additional costs only due to the neighbour's roof.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Best Internet security software ?


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 3448 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

I am looking at changing internet security software and wonder whether anyone has any recommendations. A lot of people say that they use fee anti-virus software such as Avast or AVG, but in the past I have used paid for software believing it offers best protection. But given that the subscription renewal is more expensive than I can buy the product from elsewhere, I won't be doing it that way. It is F-secure which costs £25 to renew or I can buy it from Amazon as a download for £11.99.

 

Norton is one of the best for protection, but it does slow down your system and internet connections. That is what I am finding with a free trial version.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

norton is crap

Any advice i give is my own and is based solely on personal experience. If in any doubt about a situation , please contact a certified legal representative or debt counsellor..

 

 

If my advice helps you, click the star icon at the bottom of my post and feel free to say thanks

:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

norton is crap

 

It's no that good :)

Any advice I give is honest and in good faith.:)

If in doubt, you should seek the opinion of a Qualified Professional.

If you can, please donate to this site.

Help keep it up and active, helping people like you.

If you no longer require help, please do what you can to help others

RIP: Rooster-UK - MARTIN3030 - cerberusalert

Link to post
Share on other sites

Microsoft security essential

 

 

its free written by/for the windows os.

 

 

cant fault it.

 

 

put it on everything

no AV software is fool proof

esp if the person using the internet has admin rights

 

 

as 99% of users that get infected persist in using a windows log in that has admin right

rather than making a new user with LIMITTED RIGHTS.

 

 

that way 99% of the nasties

can never be installed blindly.

 

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Microsoft security essential

 

 

its free written by/for the windows os.

 

 

cant fault it.

 

 

put it on everything

no AV software is fool proof

esp if the person using the internet has admin rights

 

 

as 99% of users that get infected persist in using a windows log in that has admin right

rather than making a new user with LIMITTED RIGHTS.

 

 

that way 99% of the nasties

can never be installed blindly.

 

 

dx

 

That is useful to know. So you set up the main account you use to have no admin rights and then set up a secondary log on with admin rights ?

 

I have MS essentials already, but was not sure it has the full range of internet security features.

 

I might give Bitdefender a try, as they offer a 60 day free trial.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

no-one that browses the internet should have admin right

 

 

it just lets all the scripts and java code and stuff pass straight through

as 'windows' assumes as an administrator you know what you are doing!!

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

no-one that browses the internet should have admin right

 

 

it just lets all the scripts and java code and stuff pass straight through

as 'windows' assumes as an administrator you know what you are doing!!

 

I will look to change the way I use the internet in future. I just presumed that if anyone wanted to hack into my computer that they could access everything i.e all accounts.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

esp if you use cloud based systems.

 

 

it what get through blindly that catches people out.

 

 

that's why they are called Trojans.

 

 

one part gets on your machine through a fake picture, document, downloaded pirate video file or whatever.

 

 

it is activated by a program the hackers use to 'sniff' for pc's advertising it has this already installed.

 

 

the bob's your uncle they are in as an admin, because, well an admin let it be installed...and they have full access.

 

 

might sound dramatic, but in a nutshell

that's how they work.

 

 

along with never browsing the internet when using a windows admin log-in...

 

 

one of the other ways to alert you to nasties is to change windows to show extensions.

 

 

most pc's are set to not show extensions, by that we mean .jpg, .doc etc in file listings

on a hard drive

 

 

so most people when they list say their photos on a drive don't see photonumber.jpg

they only see photonumber

 

 

but if they do see .jpg they think its right.

 

 

but its not!

 

 

it will actually be photonumber.jpg.exe - a virus [a program hence the .exe bit]

 

 

but because extensions are turned off

you don't see the .exe, but just .jpg

 

 

this can be turned on under folder extensions of windows browser..

 

 

untick hide extensions of known file types under the view tab

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Good advice DX, BTW some techies regard Norton itself as a virus.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

The bailiff: A 12th Century solution re-branded as Enforcement Agents for the 21st Century to seize and sell debtors goods as before Oh so Dickensian!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Good advice DX, BTW some techies regard Norton itself as a virus.

 

Well, Norton does lock your computer down, take a ton of resources and pretty much does what it wants no matter what you tell it to do.

Any advice i give is my own and is based solely on personal experience. If in any doubt about a situation , please contact a certified legal representative or debt counsellor..

 

 

If my advice helps you, click the star icon at the bottom of my post and feel free to say thanks

:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

I've used Kaspersky for years and never had a problem.

It's free if you bank with Barclays, but I used to buy the license every year and I was happy to pay.

As others said, first of all you have to be a bit wise using your computer, the antivirus then can help you.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Well, Norton does lock your computer down, take a ton of resources and pretty much does what it wants no matter what you tell it to do.

 

Try uninstalling a Norton infestation reformat and reinstallation of Windows is only sure way of eradicating Norton.

 

As to freebies, Avast is quite good, but it seems to regard Google Chrome as a virus, AVG still OK, and Avira is a contender.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

The bailiff: A 12th Century solution re-branded as Enforcement Agents for the 21st Century to seize and sell debtors goods as before Oh so Dickensian!

Link to post
Share on other sites

best way is to not format

 

 

under te windows install

 

 

remove ALL partitions

then select all the unallocated space.

 

 

glary utils is a good tool for cleaning everything

 

 

and theres the Norton removal tool too.

 

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I've used Kaspersky for years and never had a problem.

It's free if you bank with Barclays, but I used to buy the license every year and I was happy to pay.

As others said, first of all you have to be a bit wise using your computer, the antivirus then can help you.

 

Do you honestly trust a piece of Russian software not to have spyware in it, I trust absolutely nothing that comes out of Russia.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Do you honestly trust a piece of Russian software not to have spyware in it, I trust absolutely nothing that comes out of Russia.

I didn't even know it was Russian.

Anyway, I have used it for years and never experienced a virus of any sort.

Barclays gives it out for free, so if they steal my bank details, Barclays will have no other option than refund.

Probably I've been lucky or maybe I never got a virus because I use only reputable programs and never visit dodgy websites or click on links I don't know about.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Very antiquated view:madgrin:

 

I think it is more relevant now than at any time since the cold war ended, (it did end didn't it).

 

You have more to fear from Barclays then Russia.:!:

 

Try telling that to Ukraine.

Link to post
Share on other sites

O.K. valid points on both counts, Russia messed up big time with Ukraine, it's all to do with Putin's ego. He want's to be a hero, immortalised in history. This is happening all because of one man, history shows that is very dangerous indeed.

 

You just need to watch the Youtube videos of Putin.

 

I think it is more relevant now than at any time since the cold war ended, (it did end didn't it).

 

 

 

Try telling that to Ukraine.

Link to post
Share on other sites

re free - avast is/was good re browsing protection eg if a website is infected and tries to run. it has picked up a few for me, including re known (supposedly safe) sites. :wink:

but, it has become a bit more bloated than it used to be.

 

what browser do you use?

Link to post
Share on other sites

re free - avast is/was good re browsing protection eg if a website is infected and tries to run. it has picked up a few for me, including re known sites. :wink:

but, it has become a bit more bloated than it used to be.

 

what browser do you use?

 

Firefox generally.

 

While I have been doing my research it amazes me the different prices that are quoted for the same product. Bitdefender total internet security £35 UK or available from US site for about £18. I am also offered a deal through Virgin Media for F-Secure for £25, when I can get F-Secure via Amazon for £12.

 

What I am going to do, is to try a few free ones and see how they compare. Also some free trials of paid for versions. If the paid for version free trials don't pick up a any addition security threats, then I might not bother to pay for one.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

re fox, there are the add ons eg 'no script'. but, that is not much good where a supposedly safe website is fully allowed but is infected.

there is also the fox in built site blocker re forgeries/attack sites. dont know how good that is.

 

one of the thngs to look out for re 'internet security' is re what the a/v does re browsing, as per mentioned if a website is infected and whether the a/v can detect and prevent anything dodgy in a website whilst browsing. rather than just other forms of infection which require manual opening of a file eg in an email attachment, file, etc those of which are scanned by pretty much every a/v upon exe. if that makes sense :)

 

and, re trying diff a/v's, ensure one is uninstalled fully prior to trying another.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 4 weeks later...
  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...