Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • statute barring in Scotland is 5yrs from last payment/use date or date of default Notice + 14 days, whichever is the later. dont confuse that with the 6yrs debts show on credit files (DN's 6th bday regardless to payment or not). they'd never get a claim raised by august in 99% of cases . as long all these debts were taken out whilst resident in scotland and you have not moved since taking them out but failed to inform the original creditor before the debt sale....... then stay radio silent until sb date is reached. then if you wish send our scottish sb letter. just remember unlike E&W in scotland debts are extinguished, dead , gone , parrot. once SB'd dx  
    • Hi all, Love this site and it's no nonsense advice, have dipped in and out of the consumer forums over the years, mostly to assure myself that what I was doing was the right thing when dealing with various businesses (almost 100% success rate, thanks in part to reading and more reading here.). Anyway, the time is almost approaching where I might need to ask for some specific help and I have a couple of queries that I can't see definitively answered. Due to financial mismanagement and severe anxiety issues I stopped paying all unsecured debt in December 2018 (one slipped to the first week in Jan 2019 when the last payment was made having rechecked my bank statement from that period - all my unsecured debt direct debits were cancelled in early Jan 2019). This has left half a dozen debts;  a couple of credit cards, a bank loan, Shop Direct and some Hitachi Finance stuff having been sold on and passing the rounds through the usual suspects, Lowells, Link, PRA Group, others related to them, and then back to them again. I have somehow successfully managed to maintain radio silence and avoided anything more worrying than their begging letters.  I have blocked their phone calls and texts, bumped all emails to the spambox and had a chuckle at their desperate letters.  I've never had anybody at the door.  I have been at the same address since before I defaulted and all correspondence comes to my current home address.  I have NEVER contacted them or admitted any debt. In anticipation of them perhaps ramping up action at the last minute I've had a look at my credit report on Credit Karma (rec'd from this very place) and I see that the default dates on these range from May 2019 to November 2019. Also in preperation I've been reading, reading and reading lots here as advised. Obviously being in Scotland there are a lot fewer posts relating to these matters and it's always quite annoying when OP's do not follow up with any outcome on their cases - how rude! This has also left me a bit confused of when I am able to finally breathe easy (although cancelling all the direct debits in Jan 2019 was the biggest sigh of relief as I knew it was all going to be unmanageable and, well, default one, default all.). I've been reading that defaults should be filed 3-6 months after the missed payment but one of my larger debts was defaulted on 27th August 2019 when the last payment I made was 10th December 2018, meaning the first missed payment was 10th Jan 2019.   My query for now is - when should I infer that these debts are prescribed?  From when the payment was missed, or taking the default date plus 5 years from the credit report? The three I have with the May date are moot anyway as either way they are gone  - some letters from Lowell offering me 90% off to settle is what got me thinking these must have been near SB status, however I have one big 10k+ with a July date and another 10k+ at the end of August I am feeling a bit anxious again, even though I know there is nothing to worry about with the begging letters.  Reading the various forums I am not sure why the OC's didn't take action against me when I read time and again the surprise that other posters haven't already been taken to court for lesser amounts - I'm also surprised I've avoided any action this long as there are plenty in this forum and sub forum who are whisked off to the court by the beggers minions after only a year or so after defaulting.  There are no CCJ/decrees listed on my credit report and I have not received any such judgements against me.  I still just regularly receive the begging emails to the spambox, the blocked phone calls and the letters from the they. I'm also reading that there is no need in Scotland to send an LBC so what should I be looking out for to know that the time has come to engage with CCA requests etc? I'm afraid in a fit I threw a lot of the paperwork out but I have a box of stuff I'm going to go through which may have the original letters from the OC's. Thanks in advance for any advice.  
    • I'm at work now but promise to look in later. Can you confirm how you paid the first invoice?  It wasn't your fault if the signal was so poor and there was no alternative way to pay.  There must be a chance of reversing the charge with your bank.  There are no guarantees but Kev  https://find-and-update.company-information.service.gov.uk/company/09766749/officers  has never had the backbone to do court so far.  Not even in one case,  
    • OK  so you may not have outed yourself if you said "we". No matter either way you paid. Snotty letter I am surprised that they were so quick off the mark threatening Court. They usually take months to go that far. No doubt that as you paid the first one they decided to strike quickly and scare you into paying. Dear Chuckleheads  aka Alliance,  I am replying to your LOCs You may have caught me the first time but that is  the end. What a nasty organisation you are. You do realise that you now have now no reason to continue to pursue me after reading my appeal since you know that my car was not cloned. Any further pursuit will end up with a complaint to the ICO that you are breaching my GDPR.  Please confirm that you have removed my details from your records. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ I haven't gone for a snotty letter this time as they know that you paid for your car in another car park. So using a shot across their bows .  If it doesn't deter them and they send in the debt collectors or the Court you will then be able to get more money back from them for  breachi.ng your data protection than they will get should they win in Court-and they have no chance of that as you have paid. So go in with guns blazing and they might see sense.  Although never underestimate how stupid they are. Or greedy.
    • Thank you. Such a good point. They did issue all 3 before I paid though. I only paid one because I didn’t have proof of parking that time, only for two others.    Unfortunately no proof of my appeal as it was just submitted through a form on their website and no copy was sent to me. I only have the reply. I believe I just put something like “we made the honest mistake of using the incorrect parking area on the app” and that’s it. Thanks again for your help. 
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
        • Like
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

lowell/overdale claimform - old Shop Direct CAT debt - Now Wiped out by my Court Charges Reclaim **WON**


Ftgab19
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 2513 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi hillards,

 

I've been thinking whats the best way to do my claim, online or by post?

 

Because if littlwoods mess up like they did in your case, I can call a judgement faster online.

 

Thanks

Andrew

We live in a world where seeing is not believing, where only a few know what really happened.

NatWest Problem *****Refunded*****

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 358
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

It's usually advised to claim by post as you cannot fit all the wording of the POC onto the online form.

 

To be fair, it wasn't Shop Direct who messed up, it was the court. Long story but something went wrong and SD eventually got a set aside, despite settling based on the default court order.

 

The limits are the same for online and postal claims, regardless of the method. You would still have to call the court to check before you could claim judgment by default, and I doubt the same circumstances would apply.

Be good to those who give you advice that helps - click the star to give them your thanks by way of a reputation credit.

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I've read you also can't get the fee waverd when you on benefits if you do it online. So I'll be doing it by post.

 

I'll get my N1 form done tonight and I'll upload just to make sure its all ok.

 

Thanks

Andrew

We live in a world where seeing is not believing, where only a few know what really happened.

NatWest Problem *****Refunded*****

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi hillards,

 

I've just got a few questions on filling in the N1 form.

 

 

In the "Claimant(s) name(s) and address(es) including postcode" do I just put my name & address then Shop Direct Ltd & the address i've got for them?

 

In the "Brief details of claim" do I just put something like, I am claiming back unlawful penalty charges plus restitutionary interest to Shop Direct?

 

Is the value what I'm claiming plus the interest on the day I post the N1 form?

 

Thanks

Andrew

We live in a world where seeing is not believing, where only a few know what really happened.

NatWest Problem *****Refunded*****

Link to post
Share on other sites

The CAB have a good guide at: http://www.adviceguide.org.uk/wales/consumer_w/consumer_taking_action_e/consumer_legal_actions_e/consumer_going_to_court_e/consumer_taking_court_action_e/step_three_filling_in_the_claim_form.htm

 

You are the claimant, just your details in that box.

 

They are the defendant, so their details in the next box. Make sure it is the head office (legal) address: Shop Direct Ltd, Skyways House, Speke Rd, Speke, Liverpool, Merseyside L70 1AB

 

I would not put 'unlawful charges'. I really don't want to word the claim for you but it should be something along the lines of 'the defendant applied charges to the account which I believe were unfair (because)... " and mention the 2006 statement by the OFT on what constituted fair charges. I've done several of these now and every one is different so I can't even suggest a basic template. I've also added "A letter before action was sent on Xxx 00 2015, the defendant failed to respond to this."" on a couple, where it applies

 

Value: Mine have been on the lines of "£000.00 of charges plus £000.00 interest in restitution at 00.0%, the rate they applied at the time these charges were made. (As at 00/00/15, increasing by 0.0000% per day until settled)." If you're not asking for a set interest rate in restitution then just put the value of the charges. Just how the 8% is worked out I do not know as I've not had a claim without a set rate.

Be good to those who give you advice that helps - click the star to give them your thanks by way of a reputation credit.

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

My credit card charges reclaims were worded as follows

 

"Money Claim for return of credit card account default charges and interest in restitution on those charges."

 

 

Simples. Any other detail is for your POC and witness statements

  • Haha 1

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

The SabreSheep, All information is offered on good faith and based on mine and others experiences. I am not a qualified legal professional and you should always seek legal advice if you are unsure of your position.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 5 months later...

Hi everyone,

 

Not been on here in awhile, had a lot going on. We had a death in the family and also moved address. I completely forgot about LittleWoods cliam until I had a look at a time when letter from Lowell.

 

They said they sent my debt to BW Legal, I also got a letter from BW Legal saying they will issue a claim. I'll upload it so everyone can see.

 

Would like some help on where to go from here.

 

Thanks

Andrew

We live in a world where seeing is not believing, where only a few know what really happened.

NatWest Problem *****Refunded*****

Link to post
Share on other sites

Well they say will

 

And as this is a post apr2007 (2010 online tickbox)

That CCA looks OK too

I take it your aborted claim is more than their claimed total?

 

Dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I was thinking of sending a CCA to gain some time?

 

Andrew

 

you already have done this no need to duplicate as you will show them that you are not confident Post 108 tells you it is o.k., a tick is all that is needed post 2006/7

:mad2::-x:jaw::sad:
Link to post
Share on other sites

no never do that...

 

 

 

you could send them a copy of your spread and basically say bugger off I will be counter claiming for the enclosed should you ever proceed to court.

 

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

If you never sent the N1 form off, you could recommence your claim

 

Start with an updated LBA giving them 14 days to respond positively then put in your N1

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

The SabreSheep, All information is offered on good faith and based on mine and others experiences. I am not a qualified legal professional and you should always seek legal advice if you are unsure of your position.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Sorry for the late reply, been busy with moving. I'd like to start the claim again, I never sent the n1 off. So what should I change in my Lba?

 

Also what should I tell BW Legal?

 

Thanks

Andrew

We live in a world where seeing is not believing, where only a few know what really happened.

NatWest Problem *****Refunded*****

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

Hi everyone

 

I sent a letter to BW Legal to let them know I was planning to take littlewoods to court but they have gone ahead anyway.

 

I've only today found out that they have sent court papers to my old address.

 

The claim form says issue date 08/09/2015. I got a notice from BW Legal telling me what they've done dated the 09/09/2015.

 

It's been ages since I last looked at what I would need to do in court.

 

I want to get as much time as I can to research again.

 

I want to send the Acknowledgment of service off.

 

Should I put my new address on the AOS and send it with a letter explaining why there's a different address?

 

Also when sending the AOS do I cut the response pack bit off using the dotted line?

 

Would really like some help with this.

I want to see if I can get Legal aid on this case,

because I'm only on benefits and can't afford aid.

 

I will upload the claim form so you can see what they've said.

 

Many Thanks

Andrew

We live in a world where seeing is not believing, where only a few know what really happened.

NatWest Problem *****Refunded*****

Link to post
Share on other sites

can you fill this out

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/showthread.php?419198-You-have-received-a-Claim-What-you-need-to-do.-**UPDATED-December-2014**

 

and copy and paste the Q&A back here please

 

and you don't use the form

 

you use the MCOL website.

 

but lets have the info first please

 

then we'll advise

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Here is the Q&A, should I now login and complete the acknowledgement of service?

 

Name of the Claimant ? LOWELL PORTFOLIO 1 LTD

Date of issue 08 September 2015

 

Date of issue 08.09.2015 + 19 days ( 5 day for service + 14 days to acknowledge) = 27.09.2015 + 14 days to submit defence = 11.10.2015 (33 days in total)

****DATE FOR FILING DEF 4pm FRIDAY 9th October.****

 

What is the claim for –

 

1.The Claimant's Claim is for the sum of £292.95 being monies due from the Defendant to the Claimant

under a Home Shopping agreement regulated by the Consumer Credit Act 1974 between the Defendant

and Shop Direct Finance Company Limited under account reference 00000000

and assigned to the Claimant on 04/02/2015 notice of which has been given to the Defendant.

 

2.The Defendant failed to maintain the contractual payment under the terms of the agreement

and a default notice has been served and not complied with.

 

3.The claim also includes statutory interest pursuant to section 69 of the County Courts Act 1984

at the rate of 8.00% per annum (a daily rate of £0.06 from the date of assignment of the agreement

to 06/09/2015 being an amount of £12.90.

 

What is the value of the claim? £390.85

Is the claim for a current account (Overdraft) or credit/loan account or mobile phone account? catalogue

When did you enter into the original agreement before or after 2007? After 2007

 

Has the claim been issued by the original creditor

or was the account assigned and it is the Debt purchaser who has issued the claim. Debt purchaser

 

Were you aware the account had been assigned – did you receive a Notice of Assignment? I was aware and I did receive a Notice of Assignment

Did you receive a Default Notice from the original creditor? Yes

Have you been receiving statutory notices headed “Notice of Default sums” – at least once a year ? Yes

Why did you cease payments?

Couldn't afford to pay the payments at the time,

then later found out that I shouldn't of been charged that much to start with.

So I made a complaint and continued to cease payment.

What was the date of your last payment? 14.08.2014

Was there a dispute with the original creditor that remains unresolved? Yes

Did you communicate any financial problems to the original creditor

and make any attempt to enter into a debt management plan? I entered into a debt management plan

We live in a world where seeing is not believing, where only a few know what really happened.

NatWest Problem *****Refunded*****

Link to post
Share on other sites

note correct def filing date.

 

 

yes go ack the claim on MCOL website

defend all

leave juris unticked

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

right so back to post 107 onwards

 

did you try and frighten them away by sending a copy of your spread to frighten them away?

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I left sending it a bit late and couldn't find my spread in time, so I just sent the following.

 

Dear Sir/Madam

 

I am in receipt of your letter relating to the above account. I would like to make you aware that I am currently seeking legal advice from my local citizens advice bureau about taking Littlewood’s to small claims court over unfair fees that amount to over £400 with 8% interest.

 

I am also drafting my LBA letter for Littlewood’s and will be sending it in due time. I would suggest that you hold off on court proceedings until the outcome of my case with Littlewood’s.

 

I look forward to hearing from you.

 

I sent it second class recorded delivery on the 08.09.2015, they received it on the 09.09.2015.

 

 

Andrew

We live in a world where seeing is not believing, where only a few know what really happened.

NatWest Problem *****Refunded*****

Link to post
Share on other sites

Should I send a CPR31.14 request and ask for what was mentioned in the particulars of claim?

 

 

Thanks

Andrew

 

Wouldn't do any harm and you can refer to it within your defence.

 

Andy

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...