Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • statute barring in Scotland is 5yrs from last payment/use date or date of default Notice + 14 days, whichever is the later. dont confuse that with the 6yrs debts show on credit files (DN's 6th bday regardless to payment or not). they'd never get a claim raised by august in 99% of cases . as long all these debts were taken out whilst resident in scotland and you have not moved since taking them out but failed to inform the original creditor before the debt sale....... then stay radio silent until sb date is reached. then if you wish send our scottish sb letter. just remember unlike E&W in scotland debts are extinguished, dead , gone , parrot. once SB'd dx  
    • Hi all, Love this site and it's no nonsense advice, have dipped in and out of the consumer forums over the years, mostly to assure myself that what I was doing was the right thing when dealing with various businesses (almost 100% success rate, thanks in part to reading and more reading here.). Anyway, the time is almost approaching where I might need to ask for some specific help and I have a couple of queries that I can't see definitively answered. Due to financial mismanagement and severe anxiety issues I stopped paying all unsecured debt in December 2018 (one slipped to the first week in Jan 2019 when the last payment was made having rechecked my bank statement from that period - all my unsecured debt direct debits were cancelled in early Jan 2019). This has left half a dozen debts;  a couple of credit cards, a bank loan, Shop Direct and some Hitachi Finance stuff having been sold on and passing the rounds through the usual suspects, Lowells, Link, PRA Group, others related to them, and then back to them again. I have somehow successfully managed to maintain radio silence and avoided anything more worrying than their begging letters.  I have blocked their phone calls and texts, bumped all emails to the spambox and had a chuckle at their desperate letters.  I've never had anybody at the door.  I have been at the same address since before I defaulted and all correspondence comes to my current home address.  I have NEVER contacted them or admitted any debt. In anticipation of them perhaps ramping up action at the last minute I've had a look at my credit report on Credit Karma (rec'd from this very place) and I see that the default dates on these range from May 2019 to November 2019. Also in preperation I've been reading, reading and reading lots here as advised. Obviously being in Scotland there are a lot fewer posts relating to these matters and it's always quite annoying when OP's do not follow up with any outcome on their cases - how rude! This has also left me a bit confused of when I am able to finally breathe easy (although cancelling all the direct debits in Jan 2019 was the biggest sigh of relief as I knew it was all going to be unmanageable and, well, default one, default all.). I've been reading that defaults should be filed 3-6 months after the missed payment but one of my larger debts was defaulted on 27th August 2019 when the last payment I made was 10th December 2018, meaning the first missed payment was 10th Jan 2019.   My query for now is - when should I infer that these debts are prescribed?  From when the payment was missed, or taking the default date plus 5 years from the credit report? The three I have with the May date are moot anyway as either way they are gone  - some letters from Lowell offering me 90% off to settle is what got me thinking these must have been near SB status, however I have one big 10k+ with a July date and another 10k+ at the end of August I am feeling a bit anxious again, even though I know there is nothing to worry about with the begging letters.  Reading the various forums I am not sure why the OC's didn't take action against me when I read time and again the surprise that other posters haven't already been taken to court for lesser amounts - I'm also surprised I've avoided any action this long as there are plenty in this forum and sub forum who are whisked off to the court by the beggers minions after only a year or so after defaulting.  There are no CCJ/decrees listed on my credit report and I have not received any such judgements against me.  I still just regularly receive the begging emails to the spambox, the blocked phone calls and the letters from the they. I'm also reading that there is no need in Scotland to send an LBC so what should I be looking out for to know that the time has come to engage with CCA requests etc? I'm afraid in a fit I threw a lot of the paperwork out but I have a box of stuff I'm going to go through which may have the original letters from the OC's. Thanks in advance for any advice.  
    • I'm at work now but promise to look in later. Can you confirm how you paid the first invoice?  It wasn't your fault if the signal was so poor and there was no alternative way to pay.  There must be a chance of reversing the charge with your bank.  There are no guarantees but Kev  https://find-and-update.company-information.service.gov.uk/company/09766749/officers  has never had the backbone to do court so far.  Not even in one case,  
    • OK  so you may not have outed yourself if you said "we". No matter either way you paid. Snotty letter I am surprised that they were so quick off the mark threatening Court. They usually take months to go that far. No doubt that as you paid the first one they decided to strike quickly and scare you into paying. Dear Chuckleheads  aka Alliance,  I am replying to your LOCs You may have caught me the first time but that is  the end. What a nasty organisation you are. You do realise that you now have now no reason to continue to pursue me after reading my appeal since you know that my car was not cloned. Any further pursuit will end up with a complaint to the ICO that you are breaching my GDPR.  Please confirm that you have removed my details from your records. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ I haven't gone for a snotty letter this time as they know that you paid for your car in another car park. So using a shot across their bows .  If it doesn't deter them and they send in the debt collectors or the Court you will then be able to get more money back from them for  breachi.ng your data protection than they will get should they win in Court-and they have no chance of that as you have paid. So go in with guns blazing and they might see sense.  Although never underestimate how stupid they are. Or greedy.
    • Thank you. Such a good point. They did issue all 3 before I paid though. I only paid one because I didn’t have proof of parking that time, only for two others.    Unfortunately no proof of my appeal as it was just submitted through a form on their website and no copy was sent to me. I only have the reply. I believe I just put something like “we made the honest mistake of using the incorrect parking area on the app” and that’s it. Thanks again for your help. 
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Erudio using state benefits, refuse deferement, i want to go to court over this


sabby1978
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 3263 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

again, I stress I would not be firing you bullets

just return the form.

 

whatever you/they said on the phone is inadmissible

you cant ack a debt on the phone so likewise

your regretful admittance to you having CB etc cant be used against you either.

 

the same as you cant prove what lies you are told on the phone either.

 

the trick that you'll read here on every DCA thread [regardless to it being this DCA and YOUR SLC debt]

 

is NEVER EVER talk on the phone to a DCA...there are no exceptions to this.

 

IF and when rodeo put in writing what they are saying about benefits

its then you quote the original T&C's & the consumer credit act to them

 

and also report them to the relevant authorities

for varying the original Creditors T&C without you signing a new agreement.

 

well done

 

think you've got it now good post sabby.

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 149
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

if you've not got a copy of YOUR SIGNED agreements

 

then send of 2 CCA requests to them as well.

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Sabby, I hate to say this and I hope you win the dispute but, on the scans of original loan agreements posted on the mumsnet thread - SLC define Gross income as: "income from all sources before deduction of tax but not including any disability related benefits"

 

As a layman, that means to me that housing, child benefit, income support etc - every single benefit under the sun EXCEPT disabilty and only except disabilty related benefits, is counted as part of your gross income. And if your gross income is over £2398 you're done for

 

I can only wish you luck with it - but I can't see a way out of that one

Link to post
Share on other sites

"income from all sources before deduction of tax but not including any disability related benefits"

 

 

Old person, benefits like housing benefit are not taxable, so that statement is saying all income on which you would pay tax, like from earnings, inheritance etc not welfare benefits but I needed that quote so fab :)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes all those benefits are part of your gross income but they only consider the gross income that is taxable - welfare benefits are not. Does that make things a little clearer.

 

 

And thanks DX once u get through the initial shock and worry, ur kind of left feeling a little P***ed that they do stuff like this, thank heavens for communities like this.

:)

Link to post
Share on other sites

:lol:

 

you're learning

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I see how you're reading that... interesting.

 

Personally, I suspect they meant "income from all sources" AND whether that income is taxable or not taxable - but before any tax has been deducted.

 

I hope you're right but why would they make a special point of saying "not including disabilty related benefits" which I presume are also untaxable, when by your argument, they should have said "not including any benefits" because your position is based on all benefits being treated as non-taxable income.

 

So why didn't they state that?

 

Who knows?

 

That's just down to semantics and some you win/some you lose.

 

Good luck in any case. One for the people!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Old student its nothing to do with semantics,

 

im not a benefits expert and its prob not helpful to keep repeating the same thing,

 

tax credits and housing benefits are means tested benefits that are non taxable because they are given for a specific reason

rent , childcare - the recipient does not pay tax on it

 

however it is considered part of their gross income and on the original Student loan agreement

they only considered taxable earnings in their calculations

http://www.studentloanrepayment.co.uk/portal/page?_pageid=93,3867045&_dad=portal&_schema=PORTAL (please see the link).

 

DLA on the other hand is a non means tested benefit and you could get it if you were a millionaire

and it is to help people with covering the extra costs that may occur as a result of their disability

and to help them remain as independent as possible i.e. for a carer, getting cabs, therapeutic activities,

 

taking this money away from someone would be comparable to taking a guide dog away from a blind person

which is why they make a point of making reference to DLA,

 

they could also be accused of a number of other things if they tried to take someones disability money

i.e. breaching human rights etc.

 

Are things a little clearer?

Link to post
Share on other sites

now go put mumsnet right shabby

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I wish you the best of luck with your interpretation of the terms Sabby - although I've seen no evidence to support your view anywhere.

 

It seems clear to me that SLC use Gross income to mean ALL income, from all sources, whether that income is taxable or not, BUT (added together) before that tax has been deducted - whether the income is taxable or not.

 

That is quite simply not the same as saying they only base their calculation on 'taxable income'.

 

Perhaps they will be open to that reading of the meaning of the terms but personally, I wouldn't book my holidays on the strength of my case.

 

There's lots of 'warriors' who'll advise you to fight battles but you need to assess this one brutally honestly - it's your anxiety levels that will suffer.

 

Again - good luck - I hope you win it and let everyone know if you do and then they can use this argument.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Old student if that was the case why did the SLC accept my defermenta over the last 4 years, my circumstances have not changed and they didn't do it out of the goodness of their heart. And on the last link I posted it clearly stated taxable earnings, welfare benefits are not earnings. Contracts and their terms and conditions are not based on semantics that are open to interpretation.

 

This situation can no longer cause me any anxiety because my vibrational energy is high and even if I'm wrong (which I doubt very strongly) and I have to start paying, ill offer £5 or £10 which they will have no choice to accpet and if they attempt to corrupt my credit file I will report them to the OFT and the ombudsman for malicious activity and it will no doubt be removed and if its not ill add a not to my credot file explaining the situation so that other potential creditors have some context.

 

But yes I will keep you all updated, the account will now have to be put on hold as I've sent a cca request:)

Link to post
Share on other sites

You do appear to have a good grasp of the situation Sabby, fight your corner as they will bully you otherwise.

 

One other thing too, although it may be a few years away ... If you took out your loans before the age of 30, they will be written off in full when you reach the age of 50.

Link to post
Share on other sites

NOT 30

 

40

- if you took out the last of your loans before the age of 40,

they will be written off when you reach 50,

or after 25 years,

or if you were over 40 at last loan when you reach 60

- whichever is sooner.

 

Check legislation UK for full and accurate regulations on student loans

 

http://www.legislation.gov.uk/uksi/1997/1675/regulation/12/made#text%3Dstudent%20loans%20cancellation

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

oldstudent is correct,

most common state benefits were/are included in the gross income figure that the SLC (and now Erudio) worked to.

 

I have copies of the old SLC deferment forms, where it states this pretty clearly. I can post a copy if it would be useful?

 

I also disagree when people are saying that working/child tax credits shouldn't count.

The whole purpose of these benefits is to top up the income of low wage earners,

if you don't count them, you're at an advantage of people who actually earn all their income.

 

For example, if person A earns a salary of £30k/yr, and gets no tax credits they wouldn't be eligible to defer.

If person B earns £25k and gets £5k of tax credits (on which they don't pay income tax or NI, so they are actually better off than a £30k/yr salary),

why should they be eligible to defer on a gross income basis?

 

Same with housing benefit and council tax benefit

- it's purpose is to top up your income so it should be counted.

 

Saying that child tax credits are to go purely towards child costs might be correct,

but it's irrelevant - you still have all your other income that could be used to repay your student loan.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Having deferred for the last five years (and my circumstances have not changed)

 

I can assure you that neither housing benefit nor child tax credits were used in the SL calculation,

 

their calculations are based on gross taxable income not gross income (there is a difference),

 

my deferment was not a mistake on their part or out of the goodness of their heart.

 

I'm not sure there is much point in debating this point much further

 

but perhaps it would be useful if you posted the original loan agreement so the experts can have a look.

 

The original agreement needs to be pre 1997.

 

Just so you all know I sent a request for a copy of my original loan agreement,

10 days in no response or even acknowledgement of my request.

 

I will keep you updated.

:)

Link to post
Share on other sites

I doubt you'll get a responce, certainly not on time!

 

I think a statement on mumsnet was interesting and certainly applies to you Sabba

- the sale of loans should not be detrimental to the customer.

 

At least, words to that affect.

 

Seems to me if SLC weren't including the benefits, then they've set the bar. J

 

ust my uneducated opinion though.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I agree and based on the fact that DCA's cannot legally change the terms of the original agreement should be fine, if they don't comply with my request then the debt then becomes unenforceable in law, so here's hoping. This would not happened if they had not acted so unscrupulously and not tried to con money out of working low income families

Link to post
Share on other sites

I would be interested in billys T&C's and i will post a pdf of a clear copy that Link (DCA) sent me due to the originals being unreadable. We can then compare to see if there is any difference and the DCA's are indeed doctoring the t&c documents? This would then open up a whole new can of worms !?

Link to post
Share on other sites

sabby1978

 

hiya i posted on mumsnet about benefits being taken into account.

 

i have my local MP onto this and

 

i found one of the help sheets you used to get with the defferal forms.

 

it clearly states you must state what state benefits you receive but these are not counted in your gross income.

listed are Housing benefit,tax credits , child benefit and others.

 

will be a few weeks before hear anything back but im fighting this and glad others are too.

Link to post
Share on other sites

**you can post up images/letters by this method immediately..you don't need 10 posts**

.

set your default scan page size to A4 less than 300DPI [150 will do]

scan the required letters/agreements/sheets - as a picture[jpg] file

don't forget you can use a mobile phone or a digital camera too!!

'

BUT......

ENSURE: remove all pers info inc. barcodes etc

but leave all monetary figures and dates.

.

************************* ************************* *******

{DO NOT USE A BIRO OR PEN OR USE SEE THRU TAPE OR LABELS]

************************* ************************* ***********

.

DO IT IN MSPAINT.EXE or any photo editing program

goto one of the many free online pdf converter websites ...

http://freejpgtopdf.com/

http://www.convert-jpg-to-pdf.net/

..

if you have multiple scans/pics

put them in a word doc FIRST and convert that to PDF

or http://www.freepdfconvert.com/

or

use www.pdfmerge.com

 

convert existing PC files to PDF [office has an installable print to PDF option]

..

it would be better to upload a multipage pdf if

you have many images too rather than many single pdfs

.

or if you have PDF as an installed printer drive use that

or use word and save as pdf

try and logically name your file so people know what it is.

though dont use full bank names or CAG in the title

i'e Default notice DD-mm-yyyy TSB

.

open a new msg box here

hit go advanced below the msg box

hit manage attachments below that box

hit the add files button on the top right

hit select files, navigate to your file on your pc

hit upload files

...

YOU DONT have to put a link to the attachment in the msg box..just upload it ..job done

.

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...