Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Hi everyone, Thanks for the responses. Just a few follow up questions in light of what's been said:   If I dont appeal to PPM, who can I appeal to?   Why should the PCN been attached to the windscreen? Is this written in law?   I assumed the document I had received was the NTK, if this is not the case, what does a NTK look like?   Regarding the compliance with the Protection of Freedoms Act, could the "period" of parking not be argued either way? The legislation doesnt state it must have a start/end time of parking, which I assumed an ANPR camera would pick up if it had one. Is 4 minutes not technically enough to show the vehicle was parked?    Thanks !
    • I see jenrick has stuck his head up with them, and I'm sure this wont faze their nasty rhetoric one wit-less UK growth since 2010 has been lacklustre and largely driven by immigration, says report UK growth since 2010 has been lacklustre and largely driven by immigration, says report | Economic growth (GDP) | The Guardian WWW.THEGUARDIAN.COM Resolution Foundation report suggests parties are dodging the economic challenges facing the country   Net migration is more than two and a half times the 2010 figure despite a string of Tory pledges to reduce it Immigration: how 14 years of Tory rule have changed Britain – in charts | General election 2024 | The Guardian WWW.THEGUARDIAN.COM Net migration is more than two and a half times the 2010 figure despite a string of Tory pledges to reduce it    
    • Will get them done asap My job changes week to week so at the time I didn’t know. 
    • You will probably get a couple more reminders followed by further demands fro unregulated debt collectors with even increasing amounts to pay. They are all designed to scare you into paying.  Don't. It's a scam site and they do not know who was driving and they know the keeper is not liable to pay the PCN. Also the shop was closed so they have no legitimate interest in keeping the car park clear. So to charge £100 is a penalty as there is no legitimate interest which means that the case would be thrown out if it went to Court.  Keep your money in your wallet and be prepared to ignore all their letters and threats. Doubtful they would go to Court since a lot more people would not pay when they heard  MET lost in Court. However they may just send you a Letter of Claim to test your resolve.  If yoy get one of those, come back to us and we will advise a snotty letter to send them.  You probably already have, but take a look through some of our past Met PCNs to see how they are doing.
    • Hello, been a while since I posted on here, really hoping for the same support an advice I received last time :-) Long, long story for us, but basically through bad choices, bad luck and bad advice ended up in an IVA in 2016. The accounts involved all defaulted, to be expected. In 2018, I got contacted by an 'independent advisor' advising me that I shouldn't be in an IVA, that it wasn't the solution for our circumstances and that they would guide us through the process of leaving the IVA and finding a better solution. I feel very stupid for taking this persons advice, and feel they prey on vulnerable people for their own financial gain (it ended with us paying our IVA monthly contribution to them)-long and short of it our IVA failed in 2018. At the same time the IVA failed we also had our shared ownership property voluntarily repossessed (to say this was an incredibly stressful time would be an understatement!) When we moved to our new (rented) property in August 2018, I was aware that creditors would start contacting us from the IVA failure. I got advice from another help website and started sending off SARs and CCAs request letters. I was advised not to bury my head and update our address etc and tackle each company as they came along. Initially there was quite a lot of correspondence, and I still get a daily missed call from PRA group (and the occasional letter from them), but not much else. However, yesterday i had a letter through from Lowell (and one from Capital One) advising that they had bought my debt and would like to speak with me regarding the account. There will be several.of these through our door i suspect, as we did have several accounts with Capital One. Capital One have written to us with regular statements over the last 5 years, and my last communication with them was to advise of of our new address (June 2019), I also note that all of these accounts received a small payment in Jan2019 (i'm assuming the funds from the failed IVA pot). Really sorry for the long long post, but just thought id give (some of) the background for context.... I guess my question at the moment is.....how do I respond to Lowell...do I wait for the inevitable other letters to arrive then deal with them all together or individually...? Do I send them a CCA?  Many thanks
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Bus lane PCN - York Council/Lendal Bridge **Appeal Upheld**


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 3524 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi, I stumbled across this forum whilst researching ways to appeal the PCN I have just been served with.

 

As I understand, the Lendal Bridge bus lane fiasco is quite controversial (google brings up many irate articles).

 

I lived in York last year for a few months and throughout that time, the bridge was open to all vehicles.

 

On 9/9/13 however I was flat hunting in York as I'm planning to move back there and drove over the bridge unaware that

it is now a restricted route for buses/taxis only between 1030 and 1700.

The signs are poor - from the direction I took, I did not notice any new signage and

 

my research showed that there in fact are NO new signs (apparently to avoid planning applications) and the sign that was in place is small and on the pavement next to a bus stop.

 

I've found a photo that shows a double decker stopped at this bus stop would shadow the sign completely from drivers. In addition I did not notice any new relevant road markings.

 

Whilst on this forum I also found something to do with the wording of the PCN

- use of 'will' as opposed to 'may' in the following sentence:

 

'This Notice will be taken to have been served on the second working day after the day of posting (as shown on the right) unless you can show that it was not'.

 

Have I a case to appeal?? Any advice welcome!!

 

Nicola

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 134
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

I am aware of this from the coach driver's forums. I understand it is being enforced by ANPR cameras.

 

Unfortunately its difficult to advise without seeing the signage. Just checked Google Street view and it's not up to date enough to show the changes which came in 27th August.

 

Can you provide any images?

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

This is one I found on the Facebook group 'say no to Lendal Bridge close' - as you can see the bus destructs vision quite a bit but it would be impossible to prove a bus might have been there!

 

I've also read that in order to serve a PCN the council must also provide evidence of me driving past this sign - is this true? I've only been provided with photos of my car on the actual bridge which must be about 100-200 metres from this sign.

 

Thanks

Nicola

Link to post
Share on other sites

536956_505225129554088_1205393030_n.jpg

 

 

1234084_382786075184086_2119845590_n.jpg

Any advice i give is my own and is based solely on personal experience. If in any doubt about a situation , please contact a certified legal representative or debt counsellor..

 

 

If my advice helps you, click the star icon at the bottom of my post and feel free to say thanks

:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

Much better.

 

My opinion is that the first sign is confusing and in fact, contradictory. It appears top indicate that traffic can only turn right but yet there is s 'no right turn' sign above it. The second sign is inadequate by itself and surely is non-compliant anyway. There should be a 'all motor vehicles prohibited' with the times that the restriction is in force. And if there are no advanced signs, which way are you supposed to go to avoid the restriction?

 

Number of grounds for appeal in my opinion.

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you renegadeimp for the photos!

 

Sailor sam, so the fact it says 'closed' as opposed to 'all motor vehicles prohibited' or buses only or whatever is something to use? Apparently there is a temporary sign on one road prior to this but I came from a different direction, I'm going to go check it out in the next couple of days just to clarify though. Thank you for your help so far!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you renegadeimp for the photos!

 

Sailor sam, so the fact it says 'closed' as opposed to 'all motor vehicles prohibited' or buses only or whatever is something to use? Apparently there is a temporary sign on one road prior to this but I came from a different direction, I'm going to go check it out in the next couple of days just to clarify though. Thank you for your help so far!

 

AFAIK the yellow part of the sign isn't mandatory (i.e. prohibitory), it's 'advising' you that the bridge is physically closed (kind of sign for road works) but it apparently isn't. The sign they should use to restrict vehicle access is the one underneath (all motor vehicles prohibited) with an exemption plate (if any) plus a time plate showing any period that the restriction is in force (unless it is a 24 hour, 7 day a week restriction).

 

In addition, there should be advance warning signs on each approach road leading up to the restriction advising drivers of the alternative route.

 

The sign in the first image provided by renegadeimp is totally confusing and makes no sense at all in my opinion. It's telling you that no motor vehicles can turn left underneath a 'no right turn' sign!

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

AFAIK the yellow part of the sign isn't mandatory (i.e. prohibitory), it's 'advising' you that the bridge is physically closed (kind of sign for road works) but it apparently isn't. The sign they should use to restrict vehicle access is the one underneath (all motor vehicles prohibited) with an exemption plate (if any) plus a time plate showing any period that the restriction is in force (unless it is a 24 hour, 7 day a week restriction).

 

In addition, there should be advance warning signs on each approach road leading up to the restriction advising drivers of the alternative route.

 

The sign in the first image provided by renegadeimp is totally confusing and makes no sense at all in my opinion. It's telling you that no motor vehicles can turn left underneath a 'no right turn' sign!

 

I do hope the OP comes back as the very same thing happened to us on Sept 8th. We are not from York. We were unaware that there was a change in the road structure.

 

We visit York every couple of months so the last visit will have been before the changes tooklace.

 

I don't feel like returning. York is an ancient place. It's very popular, there's people walking, all over over roads as well as footpaths so you really need to keep your eyes on jaywalking pedestrians.

 

I'm not even sure which one is lendal bridge but the time the offence happened was very busy and we were looking for a parking space as we had left my blue badge at home. I'm a permanent wheelchair user so have to try to be not too far away from main area .

 

Is it worth appealing?

 

We are not even sure from the photograph where the offence was committed.

 

It's been a very expensive day out!

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

spey a nice weekend in york, then came back to a pcn notice from these gangsters. I had no idea there were any restrictions in place, my video shows cars both in front and behind me, so they must be making a fortune.

 

I intend to appeal. The location says i was caught on lendal bridge bus lane, when i google map lendal bridge it shows the bridge as having an IRON wall yet the image they've given me is of a bridge with a MASONARY wall so heaven knows where they caught me but it wasn't lendal bridge.

 

anyway thats the last york sees of me untill i calm down. i will post the outcome of my appeal in case it is successful so others can try and stop this robbery

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 4 weeks later...

Had our first appeal turned down. Now we have re appealed . The signs are a joke. The sign in st Leonard's place next to the theatre had a double decker tour bus at the side of it. The sign was totally obscured and anyone driving would not be able to see it. That's the last sign before the traffic lights /junction that leads to the bridge . There are no signs at the traffic lights.

 

Best to go to lendal bridge Facebook page. Lots on there.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Had our first appeal turned down. Now we have re appealed . The signs are a joke. The sign in st Leonard's place next to the theatre had a double decker tour bus at the side of it. The sign was totally obscured and anyone driving would not be able to see it. That's the last sign before the traffic lights /junction that leads to the bridge . There are no signs at the traffic lights.

 

Best to go to lendal bridge Facebook page. Lots on there.

 

I have just drafted this and also submitted a epetition for people to sign

 

I understand that the bus lane is not enforceable as it does not have adequate signage to Diagram 959 at the start, in accordance with the Traffic Signs Regulation and General Directions 2002. Bus lanes should be fully signed before and throughout their length. The misleading sign shown does not suggest that there is a bus lane. It is also placed in a position that can be obscured by an high sided vehicle, such as a BUS. The PCN I have received shows no markings on the road suggesting that it is anything but a road, THERE ARE NO BUS LANE MARKINGS. See the photo of the signage, there is NOTHING there, to suggest there is a bus lane.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes, I've fallen foul of the 10 posts rule. There was a petition that closed end of sept with only 1200 names on it but I don't lknow how long it was open and the full effect of the bridge closure hadnt hit home yet.

 

Anyway I have emailed a link to friends.

Link to post
Share on other sites

There are a number of complaints on various caravan forums about this closure to buses only. People are visiting as tourists and seem to be either missing or misunderstanding the signs. Those that visited York previously are the ones that appear to be caught out the most.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I am at my wits end with this. I have just returned from a short family holiday to York. Whilst there we visited the retail park and I used my sat nav to do this as I am not that familiar with York. The sat nav took me over lendal bridge on the way and also on the way back. I saw no signs whatsoever to say that we could not use this route as the traffic was back to back all the way there and all the way back. All i could see was the traffic ahead and I followed. My husband drove our car and my daughter followed behind in her car as she needed to do as she did not have the sat nav. She didnt see any signs to say we could not use the route.

Now we have returned home, my daughter and myself have both received not just one, but TWO notices of driving in a bus lane and have been fined £60 for each offence = £120. Thats one on the way and one on the way back.

What should have been a little get away for the family is now costing us a fortune, money that we have not got, especially my daughter who has two small children and is hard up.

I am hoping that someone can help me with this and please tell me that we dont have to pay this fine.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Sadly a lot of visitors are being caught out as you are too busy trying to find your way around that makes it easy to miss the signs. At the moment I don't think there is much you can do about. Try and appeal one of the tickets each so you only have to pay once. Sorry cannot be more helpful than that.,

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thankyou for your help. Its so annoying to be caught out like this. We never break the rules, we see many people who do, who seem to get away with it. But we don't and always do the right thing, it takes such a long time to earn that kind of money £240 which is what i will have to pay as my daughter doesnt have the money. I am so upset about this, especially with Chrismas coming.

Link to post
Share on other sites

If the signage is as what has been posted (obviously I can only go on that because I havn't seen the situ for myself), then in my opinion they are non-compliant. The signs that have been posted are miss-leading and un-clear.

 

It needs someone with the balls to take the case all the way to an adjudicator which is easy for me to say because it's not my money.

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Do you know the traffic was that bad I do not remember seeing any signs to say we could not go through. It took us almost an hour to get to the retail park which is 3.5 miles away from where i was staying. You would of thought that seeing as we were traveling at such a slow speed we would see some signs.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...