Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • I see they're trying to round up asylum seekers and lock them up for about three months so they can be put on planes to Rwanda. I'm a bit surprised that this is legal.  
    • thought for the day "Prime ministers need a big strategy that tells you where you’re going, you need a bunch of tactics that get you there, and you need the ability to take everybody else with you."   Now I know you are all thinking 'why is the  UKs destination Rwanda ???
    • Asset Link filed for a default CCJ against me, in relation to an old Barclaycard debt which I apparently signed an agreement for back in 2000.   I did not own a Barclaycard in 2000 so I know this is not true.  The CCJ notice was sent to an old address so I did not receive it.  Years later when I found out about the CCJ when I applied for credit, I put an application in to have the CCJ set aside.   As part of the set aside case, I was asked by the judge to provide a draft defence, should the CCJ be set aside.   The defence I provided was that I did not admit to the debt as I had not been provided with any evidence of an original loan agreement.   I won the case and the CCJ was set aside.   Link then filed to court again to make me pay the debt.   We both filed directions questionnaires and the judge allocated the claim to the small claims track.   As part of the directions, additional directions given were as follows ' Additional Directions in a claim for an Assigned Debt - Because the claim is in respect of an assigned debt the Court makes the following directions for the management of claim.  The claim shall be automatically struck out at 4pm on 3 April 2024 unless, before that time, the Claimant delivers to the Court and to the Defendant the following documents'  It then listed various documents such as an original agreement, deed of assignment, notice of default, statement of account setting out how the alleged debt accrued under that agreement etc.     The Claimant failed to provide these documents within the deadline provided and instead I received a copy of a bundle of documents provided by them in preparation for the court date, this was received weeks after the deadline.    I have called the Court to ask if it has been automatically struck out and they advised that it is not automatic and that I should still send my witness statement by the deadline provided, which is Wednesday.  This does not give me much time to prepare my witness statement.   I have never done anything like this before and I am unclear what my witness statement should include.  My thoughts were that I should keep it simple and stick to the facts, like the fact thy have not provided evidence of the original agreement, or the deed of assignment of the debt.   They have provided a copy of a default notice from Baclaycard dated 2015, this states a figure of £550 but the debt they say I owe is £10k.   I am not sure what makes a valid default notice?   I have previously requested proof of the debt from Barclaycard directly and have evidence of emails between us where they have been unable to provide me with the agreement or any documents at all relating to the debt.   Should I include these as an appendix?  Are there any other documents I should include in my bundle?    I have also tried to mediate with the claimants, to save the court costs and time, on a without prejudice basis, but the claimants solicitors refused to mediate.   Should i state this in my witness statement too to show the judge that I have been reasonable and they haven't? Many thanks   Louise
    • Right that's exactly why so many drivers got caught, it had been that way for many years then suddenly changes with no warning
    • The hearing is 25th June, I have downloaded items to different organisations previously but they do it a simple way and I just cross out private things with a felt tip and sent to an email address.  I have looked at the instructions for CAG it seems extremely complicated especially this about having to use a system MSPAINT.EXE that removes your personal information. I am hoping one of my Grandchildren understands things to give me help, I have shown one of my daughters she said she does not understand the instructions. I have a PC and I mainly use a lap top, as previously advised I only understand the straightforward things, sending an email and using my scanner to send a document that I save in a file or send it to an email. I will try and find someone to help me, thanks for your help you have given me so far appreciate it        
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Welcome finance and Ind ltd - claimform received


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 3687 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Not that it has any relevance on the claim......

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...
  • Replies 75
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Good afternoon.

 

 

Received letter from Northampton bulk centre stating case has been transferred to my local court.

Prior to this they sent an allocation questionnaire to myself stating it must be returned no later than the

6th of December,which is was Iit stated that a copy must be sent to all parties concerned.which it was.

 

 

Howver unsure if welcome have to send me one if so I have not received it,can anybody shed any light on this please.

 

 

Thanks

WK

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

Good morning.

Update so far.

 

 

Have a court date of 24th March,i have also asked for the free mediation service which has not happened as of yet.

 

 

Welcome finance via the FSCS have awarded me my ppi claim against welcome this will come of the balance they are claiming at court.

Regarding the Gap insurance shortfall collision call emergency recovery and mechanicial breakdown insurance that was front loaded who do I complain to welcome finance or welcome via the FSCS.

 

 

Reason why I ask is I have spoken to the FSCS and they are saying two different things

I am on a list an when the system goes live ??? they will send me the claim form which I have been told is different to the ppi form.

 

 

Other story is should have received it by now.

 

 

Any advice much appreciated

 

 

WK

Link to post
Share on other sites

that's the 2nd or 3rd time I've heard that said

 

where they are bringing in a system to deal with all the other insurances

 

couple of years ago mind I think I first heard it.

 

i'm sure atleast 2 people have gotten them all back already.

 

it'll be a claim to welcome I think.

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

unsure i'll let the legal bods comment further

 

but surely if you could get 'welcome/FSCS[working on their behalf] to admit

that you were mis-sold all the other crap

then surely the whole court case falls apart...

 

if the balance was all PPI/GAP etc etc.

 

I would push the reclaim hard now you have till march?

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

yes ofcourse

sri I thought these had been posted

 

you can treat it the same way as ppi

 

look at no.1. link below my msg

 

the spreadsheet is right at the end

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

Morning Update on thread.

 

 

After sending letter of complaint to welcome finance ref additional insurance policies added to a car loan.

Received letter back from welcome stating welcome in default etc etc negotions on going with FSCS to allow customers to claim back these premiums in the near future.

 

 

Also received a witness statement from IND ltd from an external account manager with documents/evidence they intend to rely on in court.

something I have noticed on this gap insurance is listed on credit agreement however on the breakdown of charges for insurances it is listed as shortfall extra ??

 

 

I have received no such direction from the local court regarding a witness statement as was clearly advised to wait for court direction.

Many Thanks

 

 

WK

Link to post
Share on other sites

Update on post.

 

Evening.

 

Welcome finance via the FSCS have settled my claim for mii-sold ppi

it has been deducted from the balance they are claiming at court and have notified them.

 

However what they have not done is recalculated interest under section 69 of the county court act.

 

Surely they are obliged to to do this as they have admitted miss-selling.

 

Also the FSCS have sent me more paper work in order to claim all other rubbish stuck on account at conception

after I sent letter of complaint to welcome head office

Link to post
Share on other sites

how much does this leave owing now

you can workout the section 69 on the new figure yourself

 

using the statint sheet

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Quick update not sure if I have mentioned this although I have looked through thread.

 

 

When I received my SAR from welcome finance after checking countless times I came across some paper work they had enclosed.

 

This relates to Mechanical Breakdown Recovery

underneath this it states in bold type Not applicable

however I have been charged £503.00 incl of interest.

 

I have included this in my witness statement to the court and a copy to IND.

 

Is this likely to render the agreement unenforceable?.

 

Getting rather anxious as date is looming.

 

Many thanks

 

WK

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

I wouldn't think it would render the agreement un-en no.

 

but you could calc what mech is worth in terms of a reclaim surely.

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I agree totally, unenforceable charge for policy + interest reclaimable.

Any Letters I Draft are N0T approved by CAG and no personal liability is accepted.

Please Consider making a donation to keep this site running!

Nemo Mortalium Omnibus Horis Sapit: Animo et Fide:

Link to post
Share on other sites

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/showthread.php?330996-Latest-Spreadsheets-PPI-Claims-and-Charges-Claims-Dec-2011

 

statint sheet will calc the court int at 8%

 

same one for mech too

treat as ppi

 

link 1 below

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Good morning.

Well was in court yesterday with WFSL.

Judgement went in favour of the claimant.

The claimant set out there reasons for bringing the claim against me.

I was then allowed to speak I pointed out to the judge the paperwork in regards to the charge for Mech Breakdown insurance paperwork which,

clearly states NOT APPLICABLE he acknowledged that and asked WFSL to explain his eplanation was flimsy at best typing error /mistake etc etc.

Judge then looked at statement of price he commented that I had signed the agreement that clearly states I will pay x amount on x day this figure included the monthly charge for mech breakdown,

so he would not allow it despite evidence to the contray.

However S69 cc interest was deducted on price of ppi even though the judge was a bit baffled as to why this had been refunded by the FSCS an not the claimant.

Judge also not happy with WFSL adding the 8% court interest before judgement being given as commented on earlier in post by DX therefore he set this at the bank of England base rate of 0.05% from the default date on account till yesterday.

So there we go.

Not entirely sure what happens next ref payments etc

Many thanks

WK

Link to post
Share on other sites

not too bad then.

 

ok so we can now get on with reclaiming the mech?

 

so what did he judge on payments then?

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Many thanks for reply Dx

No mention on payments guess I will have to contact IND LTD an make some kind of monthly offer?

Waiting on response from Direct group ref other insurance;s added to account,then I will be able to forward these to FSCS.

 

 

Never dealt with IND ref payments are they flexible or quite stern.

 

 

Cheers

 

 

WK

Link to post
Share on other sites

Wait until you receive the General Order from court (N30) this will confirm if its Forthwith,,,you will then have to make application using the N245 to vary to monthly payment.

 

Regards

 

Andy

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...