Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Small boat crossing numbers in last 7 days much more than the planned number to be sent to Rwanda. Small boat arrivals – last 7 days - GOV.UK WWW.GOV.UK These migrants obviously believe that being sent to Rwanda is not a consideration when they are aware of other migrants having died making the English channel crossing. If Rwanda was going to receive thousands of migrants, then it probably would be a deterrent to some. But the threat of sending 300 migrants to Rwanda is just not going to make any difference.
    • Last June, 3.4m members received a £100 payment from the building society. Now they will be wondering whether the offer will be replicated this year.View the full article
    • Write to the IPC complaining that UKPC have not observed the requirements of PoFA . IPC  Waterside House, Macclesfield SK10 9NR Dear IPC, I am writing to complain about a serious breach of the Protection of Freedoms Act 2012 by UKPCM. I feel that as it is more a breach of the Act rather than not just  complying with your Code of Practice which is why I am bypassing your operator. Should you decide to insist that I first complain to your operator, I will instead pass over my complaint to the ICO and the DVLA . My story starts with being issued a windscreen PCN on 8/3/24 which was almost immediately removed and a second  PCN was then  sent by post on 13/3/24  [deemed delivered 15/3/24] which I did not receive and had to send an sar to have that particular mess revealed later  but that is not the reason for my complaint. UKPC then sent a Keeper Liability Notice dated 12/4/24 warning me that as 28 days have now elapsed, I as keeper am now liable for the charge.  This is in direct contravention of PoFA since the keeper does not become liable to pay until the day after the original PCN is deemed to have been given which would have been 13/4/24 -a Saturday ]. Not only does it not comply with PoFA but it fails to adhere to your Code of Practice and is in breach of their agreement with the DVLA. You will be aware that this is not the first time that UKPC have fallen foul of the DVLA and presumably yourselves. I have included copies of both Notices for information. You will realise the seriousness of this situation if this is standard practice from the UKPC to all motorists or just those where windscreen tickets are involved since the Law regarding PoFA is being abused and is unfair to misguide motorists. I await your  response which I understand will usually be within a week. -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------I would think that should be sufficient for the IPC to cancel your PCN though  you should await comments from the Site team before sending your complaint. Don't forget to include both PCNs.  
    • Hi DX, Sorry, fell asleep as I was up all night last night writing that statement. Yes, I attached the rest of the witness statement on post 50, bottom of webpage 2. That's the important part.  It looks like the lawyer who wrote Erudio's Witness statement does not work for them any more. So, I'll have another lawyer representing instead. Not sure if I can use Andy's hearsay argument verbally if that happens.... I did not put it in writing. Apart from not sending deferral forms, my main argument is that in 2014 Erudio fixed some arrears mistake that SLC made and then in 2018 they did the same mistake, sent me confusing letters. What is the legal defence when they send you confusing material?
    • Chinese firm MineOne Partners has been ordered to sell land it owns near a US nuclear missile site.View the full article
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

My overall Benefits journey from 2013 to date - and on going still!!


Guest
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 383 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Well.....I am baffled......... as I posted last week, my daughter had emailed atos, asking for the appointment to be emailed etc, she attached scanned documents (which had been sent with esa50), which were the letters of diagnoses and the tribunal decision letter from before etc, requested that the write to GP etc etc, she stated we would need a taxi on the day due to my anxiety and repeated the request for recording etc, and the reply was that which I put on here in post 61.........she replied thanking them for being prepared to check for us every two weeks etc, and asked if they could confirm the attachments she sent had reached the appropriate person, they replied to say they had been forwarded to the assessment team, now whether they were not looked at with the esa50 or what I have no way of knowing.

 

So today I get a letter from atos saying that a health professional has looked at it again, in the light of "further evidence", and now decided that I no longer need to be assessed at this time and my file has been returned to the DWP..............? waiting now to see what happens next.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 697
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

:Hiya Ruby_Tuesday:

 

:thumb: This is good news for you. We can't know if it's the best news cos we don't know (and I'm defo not asking) whether Jobcentreplus will award the support component if you believe you're entitled to it. But it means Tatos have recommended at least limited capability for work cos you can't be found fit for work without a face to face Tatos trial.

 

The 'further evidence' is almost certainly the second copies of the medical evidence that your daughter sent to them. As to what they do with original copies sent with an ESA50:?::?: In your case it may even be that a second lot sent via electronic mail was harder to 'lose'. Shall add that tip to my mental list of tactics. Thanx and well done to :Ruby_Tuesday:'s daughter. :biggrin:

 

Suspect there's been lots of times during the last few months when you've wondered whether the pro-active approach is worth the effort. Seems a lot of faff and stress at the time, specially as it shouldn't be necessary. And we couldn't have predicted this somewhat sideways outcome. But I think we can predict that without the constant enquiries you'd have waited many months for a high chance of fit for work, for lack of medical evidence!

 

In case you're wondering, your situation's different to mine. You know that some evidence was sent to Tatos and they've returned your file to Jobcentreplus. There wasn't any extra evidence or information when my file was recalled by an exasperated decision maker.

 

You should be able to :sleep: easier now.

 

Sincerely, Margaret.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thankyou Margaret....yes indeed thankyou to my daughter.

 

I admit I am just grateful this much has happened, my family and GP think the support group is where I should be but its obviously not their call. I have read about others experiences with WRAG, but am not going to assume the worst or best of it, whatever comes I will just have to handle the best I can, am so thankful I have my daughter who will come to any possible future appointments, I understand that as she is my carer she is allowed to, she would need to be there as my anxiety and fibro fog do seriously affect my understanding of whats being said and my ability to remember it correctly, although I would be able to re-read any written record I wouldn't recall if I actually agreed or suggested it, and in my vulnerable state can be swayed to agree or seem to agree with anything, my daughter is my rock with this.

 

All in all I am grateful not to be waiting for assessment and the jsa route which I was convinced was on the cards, I wouldn't have coped well with it all. If I get in WRAG I think I will just have to go with it as I don't think it would be good either to be waiting for reconsideration with no money, and the whole tribunal scenario. My hand would have been forced if it had gone down the jsa route, but now things have changed somewhat. Just going to relax and wait to see what happens.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Ohhh I don't know anything about ESA to be fair RMW and your probably right, my claim has been for incapacity benefit and this recent ESA50 millarkey is to do with the change from that benefit to ESA, I will take a look at the regs etc. Thankyou.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thankyou RAE.

 

Yes RMW you are right, its only those found fit for work that cannot claim any benefit whilst appealing, so if I get put in WRAG I can still claim while appealing for support group, the WFI would be very difficult and I don't see really how any of that would work. Just relieved for what I have now and taking a breath.

 

The letter from atos says that I do not need to be reassessed at this time.......so will see what dwp decide. No doubt I will hear from them soon.

Link to post
Share on other sites

So a week on and no word yet from DWP.....don't feel its good to contact them, maybe just wait? I expect that although atos said the file had been returned to DWP that this in itself will take a few weeks before they get round to deciding what to do with me?

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

I hadn't wanted to ring the dwp and wasn't sure what to do, daughter said to leave it another week or two then she would be with me to ring dwp so I could let them speak to her and explain what the current situation was etc.........but today thankfully my wait was over with a letter from dwp and they have placed me in the support group, it doesn't say how long for but at least its not wrag as having seen the changes made to that group I wouldn't cope with it, GP and family shook their heads at the mere suggestion of it so I am glad I don't have to appeal etc.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Well done.

 

You could also write and ask for a copy of the ESA85A (I think that's the right form number if there's not been a face to face assessment) as that will also say how long ATOS are recommending.

RMW

"If you want my parking space, please take my disability" Common car park sign in France.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

I haven't contacted them yet, but reading the letter I am on IR ESA Support group. My benefit rate has risen due to an extra payment called disability income guarantee that I wasn't getting on incapacity benefit, and the limited capability for work addition is £34.80 which is £4.80 more than the topup I had when on incapacity benefit.

 

Does this extra amount affect my housing benefit/council tax benefit at all?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Ok so I grabbed the bull by the horns so to speak and rang them just now. They are giving me 2yrs grace before the next esa form, their decision was backdated to the 9th January so they have said on 9th January 2016 is when I will be contacted again.

Link to post
Share on other sites

:Ruby_Tuesday:

 

:frown: That you've limited capability for work related activity but :thumb: that DWATO have recognised it and awarded you employment n support with the support component.

 

The £34.80 is the support component that's added to your personal allowance of £71.70. You won't have any 'top ups' as such cos your applicable amount (what Government says you need to live on) of employment n support is higher than your applicable amount of incapacity + income support.

 

'disability income guarantee' is a legacy generic term for supposedly ensuring a minimum income for disability. (And I wish Jobcentreplus would up date their letters.) You'll be more familiar with the term 'enhanced disability premium' for which the 'passport' is your support component.

 

The higher rates won't affect housing benefit/council tax reduction cos Government's decided you need more to live on.

 

It is an ESA85A and I'd suggest you write to your benefit delivery centre for a copy. Never know when it might come in useful. :-)

 

Think that's it, and I'm really pleased that you got the right result for you.

 

Margaret. :bounce:

Link to post
Share on other sites

:Ruby_Tuesday:

 

:frown: That you've limited capability for work related activity but :thumb: that DWATO have recognised it and awarded you employment n support with the support component.

 

The £34.80 is the support component that's added to your personal allowance of £71.70. You won't have any 'top ups' as such cos your applicable amount (what Government says you need to live on) of employment n support is higher than your applicable amount of incapacity + income support.

 

'disability income guarantee' is a legacy generic term for supposedly ensuring a minimum income for disability. (And I wish Jobcentreplus would up date their letters.) You'll be more familiar with the term 'enhanced disability premium' for which the 'passport' is your support component.

 

The higher rates won't affect housing benefit/council tax reduction cos Government's decided you need more to live on.

 

It is an ESA85A and I'd suggest you write to your benefit delivery centre for a copy. Never know when it might come in useful. :-)

 

Think that's it, and I'm really pleased that you got the right result for you.

 

Margaret. :bounce:

 

Is this premium excluded if you are DLA (lower rate) and ESA please?

 

I used to get it with JSA though?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Is this premium excluded if you are DLA (lower rate) and ESA please?

 

I used to get it with JSA though?

 

It's not excluded.

 

Ruby - you still need to inform housing benefit and council tax. Because your ESA (or part, rather) is income based, you'll get full housing and council tax support.

Link to post
Share on other sites

It's not excluded.

 

Ruby - you still need to inform housing benefit and council tax. Because your ESA (or part, rather) is income based, you'll get full housing and council tax support.

 

I have got two conflicting reports. I am not receiving this premium when I used to on JSA. Any references so I can take it up with the DWP please?

Link to post
Share on other sites

:Premiums:

 

The low and medium rate care components of disability living allowance neither confer nor exclude entitlement to an enhanced disability premium with either employment n support or jobseekers. A high rate care component 'passports' to the premium with an income flavoured award.

 

An enhanced disability premium may be payable with jobseekers allowance if the claimant's partner has limited capability work related activity as determined by a work capability assessment.

 

Margaret.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Perseus, I think you should start your own thread with your queries. As your question doesnt appear to relate to Ruby Tuesday's it might become confusing.

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

Uploading documents to CAG ** Instructions **

Looking for a draft letter? Use the CAG Library

Dealing with Customer Service Departments? - read the CAG Guide first

1: Making a PPI claim ? - Q & A's and spreadsheets for single premium policy - HERE

2: Take back control of your finances - Debt Diaries

3: Feel Bullied by Creditors or Debt Collectors? Read Here

4: Staying Calm About Debt  Read Here

5: Forum rules - These have been updated - Please Read

BCOBS

1: How can BCOBS protect you from your Banks unfair treatment

2: Does your Bank play fair - You can force your Bank to play Fair with you

3: Banking Conduct of Business Regulations - The Hidden Rules

4: BCOBS and Unfair Treatment - Common Examples of Banks Behaving Badly

5: Fair Treatment for Credit Card Holders and Borrowers - COBS

Advice & opinions given by citizenb are personal, are not endorsed by Consumer Action Group or Bank Action Group, and are offered informally, without prejudice & without liability. Your decisions and actions are your own, and should you be in any doubt, you are advised to seek the opinion of a qualified professional.

PLEASE DO NOT ASK ME TO GIVE ADVICE BY PM - IF YOU PROVIDE A LINK TO YOUR THREAD THEN I WILL BE HAPPY TO OFFER ADVICE THERE:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

the dwp baffle me, I am not alone on that I know lol..........so they give me extra to live on but the council tax I pay may go up? bit daft then saying I need more to live on when its not all mine....

 

when I rang dwp yesterday, I said that the letter states I will be transferred to esa from 8th February, but I now recall him saying its been backdated to 9th jan, presumably when atos sent the file back to dwp as atos wrote to me on 9th jan, the dwp wrote on 22nd to say esa from 8th February. so my next contact is due from 9th jan 201 to check if they still think I can have this benefit. I was paid as usual on 7th feb at old rate incapacity and understood that the new rate esa will be paid on due date 21st feb. will this include any extra from the 9th jan?

Link to post
Share on other sites

well I have emailed the councils benefit office and told them of the change of benefit and payment etc so will see what they say. am just grateful am in support group and not worse off.

Link to post
Share on other sites

:Ruby_Tuesday:

 

Under the rules for employment n support your applicable amount (what Government says you need to live on) is more than for incapacity/income support so the higher rate of employment n support won't reduce your entitlement to housing benefit/council tax reduction.

 

Both employment n support and incapacity are paid in arrears at the end of every two week period.

 

7 February - incapacity/income support for previous two weeks.

21 February - employment n support (starting 8 February) for previous two weeks.

 

Don't think you'll get any backdating to 9 January. Most decisions are effective from the date when the decision maker makes the decision, but the start dates for conversion decisions are usually aligned to payment cycles which depend on national insurance numbers.

 

Best wishes, Margaret.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thankyou Margaret I hadn't understood that. Am so grateful to be in this position. And thankyou as always for your input. At least I know I have informed them and what to expect. I have written for the esa85a, and now will enjoy the peace for a while lol x

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...