Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Well, it's good that you have five days before you're supposed to go there, there is time enough to sort things out.  See if Booking.com rear their head tomorrow.
    • It is an interesting Final Notice. Firstly because there is usually a reminder Notice before the final Notice. Secondly because it contains some of the wording that should be in the original PCN [aka Notice to keeper]. It could be that the necessary wording in the NTK is missing so they put it in the Reminder Notice to cover their error. If they have it hasn't worked. But the only wat we will know if you post up the back page of the Notice to keeper along with the other details asked for on Post 8 .  If they have got it wrong it means that they are unable to transfer the liability to pay the PCN from the driver to the keeper . I take it that you are the keeper and not the hirer? And do you know how long you are supposed to stay in that car park? In the past I have found Sainsbury's pretty good at cancelling PCNs for their customers. Take both PCNs in to the store and point out if you are a regular customer and that the driver spent a lot of money in their store and see if they could please do something with the ticket for you. if the manager can't help, then come back and we will give you their Head office and write to them. It is the easiest and quickest way to get the ticket cancelled. No point in appealing since that would mean they lose the chance to make any money out of you which is their whole reason for running the car park. If you cannot get Sainsbury to cancel then we rely on ECP getting things wrong so that you don't have to pay  on a technicality or technicalities. For example if the PCN does not comply with the Act and the keeper is not then liable it makes it difficult for ECP to win should it go to court as so many people are legally able to drive your car and Courts do not accept that the driver and the keeper are the same person. Which is why we do need to see the questionnaire filled in and the rest of the NTK. Also it would be helpful to get photos of the signs in the car park. Ones that can be read by us, and the sign at the entrance as well as the inside ones especially those that are worded differently. Poor signage is another defence that works well and you will  need a good defence should they decide to go to Court.
    • Thanks for answer ref address/bank. Thought it wise to double-check.   When I reply to them as per post #5, what should my reason for dispute be?   " dispute this debt because..recommended reason as advised from your thread and add the debt purchaser has yet to provide any or all of the required documentation."
    • Alternative is to access the video yourself, upload to YouTube or similar and link back here.  Video will be accessible once you input your details into Wandsworth website: https://parking.wandsworth.gov.uk/pcn  
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

housing benefit - ** RESOLVED **


firstship
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 3845 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Applied for housing benefit to the local council,and now receive the same.

 

Brief circumstances.Live in private rented property, 2 bed house,the council will only pay benefit based on a 1 bedroom flat as there are just 2 adults and that would be the only property we would be entitled to live in for benefit purposes,based on their calculations.The rent they say for a 1 bed flat is £200 less approx than we pay in rent so the benefit although helpful,is much lower than their benefit online calculator indicates.

 

We also get 9pence per week benefit towards council tax

 

Is this the normal method of calculating housing benefit??

 

thankyou FS

Link to post
Share on other sites

if the 2 adults are a couple, hb will be awarded based upon the level for a 1 bedroom self contained property

If you have found my post useful, please click on the star at the bottom of my post and add some reputation points.

Link to post
Share on other sites

The online calculators are only a guide and don't always match the calculations that the housing benefit department make.

 

On the online calculator, did you enter your rent or the LHA (local housing allowance) rate?

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 7 months later...

We rent a 2 bed house from a Private Landlord and receive Housing Benefit ,the amount received is the difference between a 1 bed flat that is all we would be entitled to if we rented a Council property and the property we rent,however when I go onto the Council Website most 1 bed flats are at least a £100+ less than the LHA,ie LHA is £530 ,1 bed flats £380 to £420,am I using the wrong method of working out LHA or can the council just dream up a figure??

 

Many thanks FS

Edited by firstship
error
Link to post
Share on other sites

Rents for council houses and housing associations are less than the LHA, is that what you mean? LHA is worked out on the average rent of properties in the private sector and are not worked out on the rents in the non private sector.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for the reply yes that is what I meant,so council and housing association rent is lower than LHA and is based average private sector rents,I find that strange ,but was unsure of how it was arrived at

 

Thankyou FS

Link to post
Share on other sites

The Council has no control over the LHA rates.

 

They are calculated independently by the Valuation Office Agency and are based upon private rents in the rental market area. They do not take into account or affect council houses or housing association rents.

 

If you are renting a private property and claiming HB, the maximum HB is based upon the LHA rate for minimum property size to meet our household needs.

If you have found my post useful, please click on the star at the bottom of my post and add some reputation points.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 year later...

Rent Privately , Retired, receive housing benefit,discovered that the council did not take into account the income tax I pay,which is 50% of my occupational pension and I pay by direct debit a further amount each month direct to HMRC,I have made an appeal and have asked that the underpayment by the Council is backdated to January 2012.Further my rent has increased by £50 a month but the Council state the increase will have No bearing on the amount of benefit I receive.I find this strange,any idea's please on the rent increase and the benefit back dating

 

Regards FS

Link to post
Share on other sites

On the issue of the benefit backdating and the tax, I'm afraid I don't know for sure. I was under the impression that the council should consider your pension income net of tax for HB.

 

With regards to the rent increase, the amount the council can pay in HB is not affected by an increase in your rent. The amount you are entitled to is based on your needs and the average rent for such a property in your local area. That average is determined by an independent Rent Valuation Agency, not the council. So the council is probably correct on this one.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING. EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 

The idea that all politicians lie is music to the ears of the most egregious liars.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Housing benefit should be based on income after tax & NI. And even part of any pension contributions.

 

I understood that OP was talking about payments from an Occ Pen rather than pension contributions. But yes, means tested benefits should be based on actual (not gross) income. What I'm not sure about is how late it is possible to appeal.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING. EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 

The idea that all politicians lie is music to the ears of the most egregious liars.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Had a reply, and the Council have only seen fit to acknowledge the tax I pay from my Occupational Pension,they have ignored the tax paid each month by Direct Debit to HMRC each month and they also have not seen fit to backdate anything and no explanation either,so naturally I have drawn their attention to their error, they are unsure why it has been missed,so I will have to wait another 14+ days while they sort this out again,

 

FS

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Further reply to my Appeal,it appears they refuse to answer the question of backdating the Housing Benefit against the tax I pay from my Occupational Pension even though the error was made by them ,and they require me to prove the tax I pay each month by Direct Debit comes out of my state pension,even though I have produced the HMRC letter and the reasons for the tax.They are also fully aware that my only source of income is State Pension and Occupational Pension,on top of this they have given me until July 14th to further appeal,as in their words after this date it will be to late.

Now at the Not Happy stage

 

FS

Link to post
Share on other sites

Made a visit today to Gateway,with all documents to further substantiate my Appeal,and was amazed to be told if the Local Council make a mistake with Housing Benefit and pay to much they can claim the amount back going back numerous years,but if they make a mistake with underpayment you will be lucky to get 1month up to 3 months. I have checked this out online with various councils and it appears to be the case.Not exactly T&Cs that are remotely fare.

 

FS

Link to post
Share on other sites

Rather than appeal, (which you are too late for anyway, for the Jan 2012 decision), you can request that your appeal request be treated as a request for an 'anytime revision due to official error'. As long as they had all the facts at the time the decision was made, then a decision in your favour should get you the arrears payment.

We hang the petty thieves and appoint the great ones to public office ~ Aesop

Link to post
Share on other sites

Made a visit today to Gateway,with all documents to further substantiate my Appeal,and was amazed to be told if the Local Council make a mistake with Housing Benefit and pay to much they can claim the amount back going back numerous years,but if they make a mistake with underpayment you will be lucky to get 1month up to 3 months. I have checked this out online with various councils and it appears to be the case.Not exactly T&Cs that are remotely fare.

 

FS

 

Yep, totally true, been there done it lol Althoooough, even though my council had over paid me for 2 years & wanted it back, when they worked out the total amount, they actually noticed some months that I hadn't earnt as much as they thought because I hadn't got sick pay. So they did actually still work out the times I had been under paid too. This had got to compliance stage by then though.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

The Council have backdated the much smaller amount to January 1st 2013,and paid the amount involved,however the much larger amount where they HMRC take 50% of my occupational pension in income tax,the Council are ducking and diving with excuses,such as it's not their fault that I did not declare that I have been paying Income Tax.I have asked them to produce documentation that states Income should be declared Net not Gross,they feel that is irrelevant,so my Further Claim "anytime revision due to official error",has met with, they will review the claim,however the error is entirely mine not theirs,I am now waiting once again .

 

FS

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Pleased to say my local council have agreed and complied by backdating the larger amount of Housing Benefit to January 2012,the "Anytime revision due to official error" really worked, MANY THANKS ESTELLYN.

 

Many thanks to all who supplied help

 

Regards

FS

Link to post
Share on other sites

Pleased to say my local council have agreed and complied by backdating the larger amount of Housing Benefit to January 2012,the "Anytime revision due to official error" really worked, MANY THANKS ESTELLYN.

 

Many thanks to all who supplied help

 

Regards

FS

 

Really pleased for you, glad you have it sorted.

  • Haha 1

We hang the petty thieves and appoint the great ones to public office ~ Aesop

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 months later...

Numerous Councils are altering the way they assess applications for the Housing Register in an attempt to reduce the number of people on the Housing Register and forcing people onto the Private Rental Market,which up to a point is fine but if you claim Housing Benefit you will still be judged by the Local Housing Applicable Rate,even though your Private Rent will be substantially higher,as I was told we the council are not interested in how much rent you pay in the Private Sector,you will only be assessed using the LHA rate.It appears that they cannot understand April 2014 Pension increase has already been taken by the Power Companies and Water Boards,so should my private housing rent increase next year I will not have sufficient money to pay it,and the Housing Benefit will not increase to cover the rent.The Councils appear to want it both ways.as usual

 

Any thoughts on this

 

Regards FS

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...