Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Not really. His claim will succeed simply because its a simple matter of a lost parcel and no insurance. Its not a complex case so I think he’ll be fine, especially as it is P2G who arent very good at defending claims but I ageee its not been handled at all well.   My only concern with withdrawing is that he loses £35 in the case of £240 but thats a matter for him   I dont think it has a reduced chance of success if OP actually replies and actions things but if not then ofcourse it will struggle.   My concern is if he starts again it’ll be just as sporadic.   Maybe close thread and let him make a new one if hes ready to engage?
    • Please will you start reading up on the stories on the some form especially the pinned post. I have to say that I'm concerned that you feel that a warning from P2G is going to affect your rights and is going to subvert statutory law. I think you've been here for a few months and I would have hoped that by now you would understand that terms and conditions must always be interpreted in the light of overriding statute. Also I suggested that once you have done the reading on the sub- forum then you would understand the information that we would need in order to give you the best help. The fact that you haven't told us what the item was suggested also that you haven't done the reading. Please give us full details including identity of the item, value, where these properly declared? Dates – blah blah blah. Not paying attention to P2G. Pay attention to us
    • P2G can make clear whatever they want frankly, the judge isnt going to sit there and go “they told you to buy their insurance and you didn’t” and then dismiss your claim.  I would say you should send a formal complaint then after 7 days sent a LOC. Day 21 from now submit your claim on OCMC.    
    • I thought i could just use ( copy and paste)  the terminology from my other post earlier in the year when i previously claimed against P2g .   The parcel hasnt been 'officially ' lost yet i have another 13 days before their 'investigation' ends and then theyll probably offer the postage back as i didnt take the 'insurance'   But to recap ,  The parcel was booked through P2g and sent with Evri. No Protective Insurance was taken out. The parcels value is only £48 plus postage of £3 and the value of the parcel was declared The parcels tracking says while it was in Evri's system it was sent to an 'incorrect' depot and tracking would be updated in 24 hrs which it didnt and the delivery date passed, i then had a live chat with P2g who opened an investigation and im waiting to hear what's happened. My only concern is,  last time i claimed P2g made it clear that in future i must take out their protective insurance which i gavent and im wondering whether this will ' complicate' things ...  
    • it is precisely for these reasons that the OP should withdraw the claim and begin again. Firstly, the case has been badly handled from the start. The OP hasn't come to us and stuck to it in a regular engaging way. Secondly, it seems that the OP is now being advised on the basis of it being a matter of principle rather than looking at a sensible and pragmatic outcome. We have a duty to the people who come to help us to try and get the best solution for them that we can. Secondary is that we want to notch up a further victory against the parcel delivery industry – and frankly it doesn't matter which company it is as long as we get a victory. If we simply urge someone to continue a case at their own expense in a claim which has a very reduced chance of success, simply because it gives us personal satisfaction, then this is really contrary to what we do and certainly contrary to the interests of the claimant. I'm now urging the OP (Original Poster) to withdraw and to start again and work with us very closely in order to get a much more certain victory. By continuing this claim, not only with the OP risk even more money, it will take more time in the sense of failure will be demoralising. Better to feel that one is in control by exercising one's own choices and taking the long view
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Help with a brighthouse issue please


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4110 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

I need some help and advice on an issue i am having with brighthouse please.

 

I am not sure if something similar has been posted and i am new here, so i apologise in advance.

 

I have been away for a few weeks due to a family emergency, and brighthouse, among other things, became less of a priority.

 

I have been a customer with them for over a year, and have always paid in full, on time, every week, and everything is on my name.

I fully intended to pay, but never gave it a second thought and went off to sit with my dying mother.

 

I came home this morning from my family, only to find one letter about late payment, which was dated the 5th of February,

and nothing else from them, except, my ex, who was house sitting for me, had let them in,

to recover a washing machine and a corner sofa and matching arm chair.

I have a television with them too, which was locked in my bedroom, and a mobile phone, which was with me.

 

My ex sighed a voluntary surrender form for the sofa and washer, not realising the tv was locked upstairs.

They told him that unless i surrendered the tv and phone by next friday, i would be arrested.

The tv never left the property, as stated in the agreement, and the phone, which is a mobile, is with me at all times.

 

No court order was obtained, and no final default notice has been sent to me.

Obviously being a sunday, i can't ring them until tomorrow, but surely without these, they should not have been allowed to take the items?

 

I had one letter stating that i was late paying, but nothing more.

I am still within the time frames from when they can take the goods, and have done nothing illegal,

as the goods, except the mobile phone, have ever left the property, so i did not breach my contract in that respect.

 

I have had the sofa and armchair since 22 February 2012, so i am not entirely sure if that is a third of the time, because of when i last made them a payment.

 

Can someone please help as to what else i can do?

I am sure i cannot get back the goods taken, but what are my rights to the goods i still have,

and any payments owed to me, if any, on the sofa and arm chair?

 

Thank you in advance.

Link to post
Share on other sites

urm..

 

this sounds dodgy too me

 

i cant see how your ex can sign for them as he is not the buyer.

 

as for the stuff they have not taken so far

 

they ARE NOT BAILIFFS and have no such LEGAL POWERS.

 

regardless to the fact you might not have paid 1/3rd.

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

ithink the fact they have not followed pre action protocol either

no default notice etc, stuffs then too.

 

you might well be entitled to the goods and all your payments back.

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

[quote=PennyMum ;4152683

They told him that unless i surrendered the tv and phone by next friday, i would be arrested.

:lol:

 

Bright house at there normal games again you have more chance of winning the lottery

If i have helped in any way hit my star.

any advice given is based on experience and learnt from this site :-)

Link to post
Share on other sites

They told him that unless i surrendered the tv and phone by next friday, i would be arrested.

 

I know, I laughed at that childish statement too! Not quite LOL but a chuckle, how fantastically inept? That joke should be on a stage, eejitt!

Who ever heard of someone getting a job at the Jobcentre? The unemployed are sent there as penance for their sins, not to help them find work!

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

So my ex had no right to voluntarily surrender goods in my name?

 

NONE if his sig is NOT on the org agreements

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

So I will not be arrested if they don't get the tv and phone back by next Friday?

 

I have done nothing illegal or wrong except miss a few payments?

 

Is it worth me seeing a solicitor and taking legal action against them?

 

Or should I just give back the stuff and end it there?

Link to post
Share on other sites

arrested my foot!

 

they have IMHO illegally repro'd your stuff

that voids the ALL agreements

 

if anyone could be arrested it will be THEM!

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

So I will not be arrested if they don't get the tv and phone back by next Friday?

 

I have done nothing illegal or wrong except miss a few payments?

 

Is it worth me seeing a solicitor and taking legal action against them?

 

Or should I just give back the stuff and end it there?

This will have to happen before any arrest:flypig::flypig::flypig::flypig::flypig:

 

If they do turn up at your home you can tell them where to go they have no right of entry not bailiffs and never will be

If i have helped in any way hit my star.

any advice given is based on experience and learnt from this site :-)

Link to post
Share on other sites

I read my agreement, and according to what it says, they did not issue a default notice so they could not have ended the agreement, and the goods were repossessed without my permission or a court order.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I am sure that when you sign a agreement with them you are giving them the right to forced entry. Look at your paperwork.

 

they are powerless debt collectors that if they turn up at any property can be told to play with the traffic

 

no forced entry

If i have helped in any way hit my star.

any advice given is based on experience and learnt from this site :-)

Link to post
Share on other sites

I am sure that when you sign a agreement with them you are giving them the right to forced entry. Look at your paperwork.

 

NOWAY EVER!!

 

NO CREDITOR has the right to forced entry!!

 

even if it wwent to court

 

NO BAILIFF can force entry either!!

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

If they do turn up on friday do not let them in , talk to them from an upstairs window for example, tell them to leave your property , if they do not leave you will call the police, and when they turn up use that mobile phone to video them and their threats.

If you have any dealings with them try to record it.

hello all:-)

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...