Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Thanks for that. I will give them till Tuesday. Thanks for your help, very much appreciated. 
    • Ok thanks for that, well spotted and all duly noted. Yes they did eventually submit those docs to me after a second letter advising them I was contacting the ICO to make a formal complaint for failing to comply with an earlier SAR that they brushed off as an "administrative error" or something. When I sent the letter telling them I was in contact with the information commissioner to lodge the complaint, the original PCN etc quickly followed along with their excuse!
    • its not about the migrants .. Barrister Helena Kennedy warns that the Conservatives will use their victory over Rwanda to dismantle the law that protects our human rights here in the UK.   Angela Rayner made fun of Rishi Sunak’s height in a fiery exchange at Prime Minister’s Questions, which prompted Joe Murphy to ask: just how low will Labour go? .. well .. not as low as sunak 
    • From #38 where you wrote the following, all in the 3rd person so we don't know which party is you. When you sy it was your family home, was that before or after? " A FH split to create 2 Leasehold adjoining houses (terrace) FH remains under original ownership and 1 Leasehold house sold on 100y+ lease. . Freeholder resides in the other Leasehold house. The property was originally resided in as one house by Freeholder"
    • The property was our family home.  A fixed low rate btl/ development loan was given (last century!). It was derelict. Did it up/ was rented out for a while.  Then moved in/out over the years (mostly around school)  It was a mix of rental and family home. The ad-hoc rents covered the loan amply.  Nowadays  banks don't allow such a mix.  (I have written this before.) Problems started when the lease was extended and needed to re-mortgage to cover the expense.  Wanted another btl.  Got a tenant in situ. Was located elsewhere (work). A broker found a btl lender, they reneged.  Broker didn't find another btl loan.  The tenant was paying enough to cover the proposed annual btl mortgage in 4 months. The broker gave up trying to find another.  I ended up on a bridge and this disastrous path.  (I have raised previous issues about the broker) Not sure what you mean by 'split'.  The property was always leasehold with a separate freeholder  The freeholder eventually sold the fh to another entity by private agreement (the trust) but it's always been separate.  That's quite normal.  One can't merge titles - unless lease runs out/ is forfeited and new one is not created/ granted. The bridge lender had a special condition in loan offer - their own lawyer had to check title first.  Check that lease wasn't onerous and there was nothing that would affect good saleability.  The lawyer (that got sacked for dishonesty) signed off the loan on the basis the lease and title was good and clean.  The same law firm then tried to complain the lease clauses were onerous and the lease too short, even though the loan was to cover a 90y lease extension!! 
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

SIP Windscreen PCN - I parked on private land ADJACENT to Commercial st. Carpark, Manchester: Not on SIPS land.


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 199 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

1 The date of infringement? 9/10/23


2 Have you yet appealed to the parking company yet? [Y/N?] No


Has there been a response? (n/a yet)


Have you received a Notice To Keeper? (NTK) [must be received by you between 29-56 days] No


What date is on it? N/a


Did the NTK provide photographic evidence? N/a


3 Did the NTK mention Schedule 4 of the Protection of Freedoms Act 2012 (PoFA) [Y/N?] Unsure: dont think so

5 Who is the parking company? SIP parking Limited, Peter House, Oxford St, Manchester M15AN


6. Where exactly [Carpark name and town] did you park? Herein lies the issue: I parked on private land ADJACENT to Commercial st. Carpark, Manchester: Not on SIPS land.

My problem, in short is as described above.

The Commercial St carpark is a small roughly square piece of land, with an adjacent cobbled side/back street. 

The other side of the side street is an office building undergoing refurbishment, where I am working.

According to the buildings owners, the side/back street is owned by them i.e. NOT part of the SIPS car park.

I have been to this job several months ago, was informed by client to park in this area,  not blocking the entrance to the side street, as access to SIPS carpark was across the corner  there. 

At this time there was fencing around all of the car park, with SIPS signs on the inside of the fencing.

When I returned yesterday, SIPS had  removed some of the fencing, and were using the former access point as parking, had taken down some of the fencing on the side street to make new access , so that half of the side street was now unusable on that side .

They had taken down the signs attached to that fencing, and stuck them onto the clients building, 'claiming' parking rights over land not belonging to them.

In due course parking enforcer appears and issue PCN for several vehicles parked..not on their land.

 

PCN 9 10 23 edit.pdf

Link to post
Share on other sites

Obviously ignore their bilge and don't pay.

Wait for the NTK to arrive, which is highly likely to have a lot wrong legally with it.

Any photos you can get of where the car was really parked.

 

 

.

Edited by Andyorch
Potentially libelous
  • Like 1

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • dx100uk changed the title to SIP Windscreen PCN - I parked on private land ADJACENT to Commercial st. Carpark, Manchester: Not on SIPS land.

no private parking company owns any land they manage parking on.......

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Is this it?

https://www.google.com/maps/@53.4731147,-2.2503053,3a,90y,282.38h,81.09t/data=!3m6!1e1!3m4!1sMIe7AitbSFwCeoR6SwqKwg!2e0!7i16384!8i8192?entry=ttu

2 hours ago, myrdaal said:

According to the buildings owners, the side/back street is owned by them i.e. NOT part of the SIPS car park.

Any chance of getting this in writing?

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group The National Consumer Service

Link to post
Share on other sites

@Nicky Boy.

Yes, that is the park and road in question, and the refurb site entrance is where the chap in the fluorescent vest is entering, with the skip and parked vans responsible to the client @5 Jordan St.

The entrance to that park was mainly across the dropped kerb on the corner, and you can see the SIPS sign on the right there ( although most of the car park wasn't fenced at the time, you could just drive over the kerb onto the road: it is fenced now).

You can just about make out the wooden fence (side on) down the left side of the street, which is 2m high in places, and in others just has 2 planks across,  and the signs, also side on.  It appears the SIPS signs were up in the side street even back then, not moved later.

I doubt I can get anything in writing, although I shall attempt to.

.I am at the bottom of the foodchain and the client is a national land owning company with offices elsewhere:(

I realise SIPS only manage the land, not own it :)

Link to post
Share on other sites

await the notice to keeper 

then we will know exactly the address where they are claiming you were parked.

the windscreen ticket wont say that.

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...