Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Hi folks, The keeper received correspondence today from DCBL.  The keeper has received previous correspondence from (Possibly) Parking Eye and Debt Recovery Plus, all of which has been ignored with zero contact with either company. The keeper has moved house twice since the original PCN but has kept DVLA informed of every move and V5 updated accordingly. The driver recalls entering the car park but didn't see any signs indicating payment required. The drivers friend happened to be in the same car park a few days after original PCN was received. Friend is a truck driver and said there is a sign but at truck windscreen height. Driver was in a small vehicle and, due to being careful as to where they were driving, did not see the sign. Original paperwork has been lost while moving but keeper still has scans of paperwork from Debt Recovery Plus. Driver was on site for approximately one hour after a long drive and was resting. After having read previous cases on here, is it still safe to ignore? 1 Date of the infringement 15th September 2020   2 Date on the NTK [this must have been received within 14 days from the 'offence' date] Unsure    3 Date received A/A 4 Does the NTK mention schedule 4 of The Protections of Freedoms Act 2012? [Y/N?] A/A 5 Is there any photographic evidence of the event? Driver recalls there was a screenshot of the reg plate, but it wasn’t a very good one.  6 Have you appealed? [Y/N?] post up your appeal] No.   Have you had a response? [Y/N?] post it up A/A  7 Who is the parking company? Parking Eye?   8. Where exactly [carpark name and town] MFG ESSO Cobham Gravesend  DCBL 30:04:24 Redacted.pdf
    • Hi all, hope you can help. I've received a £4k repair estimate from the main dealer after my 2016 F30 330e developed the dreaded drivetrain error. The qoute is for a replacement cell module and associated labour and various bits and bobs to get it done. I initially had them investigate the issue when it first popped up a year ago. They replaced the auxillary battery which 'fixed' the issue for a few months before returning. Last Novemner the issue escalated to 'Battery not charging' which would clear after powering off the car , and disappear. Took it into the dealer and they diagnoised a faulty high voltage battery under the boot but could not do any work as they needed to schedule more cars for this 'specialist high voltage work'. So they said I could continue to drive the car until they got in touch when the car could be booked in for repairs. Roll on to April, the issue became severe (battery not charging error not going away, car in limp mode one morning) and car completly died at a traffic light same day (dashboard flashing all over the place), couldnt engage in 'Drive' and had to be recovered by AA to the dealer. Turns out car was now only running on the 12v battery in the boot and that had run flat as the hybrid function had stopped working altogether. My question is whether this is a reasonable estimate. Could this be done cheaper elsewhere? The dealer has servived this car from new hence took it them in the hope they'd not point fingers at any other party. Should I be paying for this at all since I raised the issue with them before it escalted and resulted in a now expensive fault? I also suspect the KLE may have gone too based on other posts, but the dealer hasnt qouted for that yet. I worry they'll' 'discover' that after I've already shelled out for a new cell module and end up lumbered with another bill to replace the KLE. Feels like I know about what they need to do than they do. The Service Advisor has been completely useless. Any advice would be greatly appreciated.
    • The Petrol Station is Shell Garage Wickham (Hampshire ) Another person obviously had the same issue as they had called the garage previously-
    • Thanks Dave, that all sounds clear to me. In terms of avoiding PCNs, I'm not sure if I can. I need to be able to park in that spot, especially as I've got kids to lug forth and back for the school run. Likewise it's not always possible to use the MA's permit system either, as I've not always got them to hand. So, if I'm actively avoiding PCNs, then it could mean I've given in to their idiotic rules. But, I do get what you're saying, as I imagine the risks go up if they claim there are multiple PCNs to be paid at court. Not sure what to do with this one.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Marlin


spamheed
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4039 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 69
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Yes good plan, just that, no further info for them at this stage. JMHO. Good Luck t.

 

I SAR'd Egg a few years back and got a complete print out of the Egg account history, in it, it clearly records my CCA request and states equally as clearly that they couldn't find one, this not only places the account in dispute prior to even the transfer to BC, let alone the latest assignment to Marlins

 

but it does show how far Marlins are going to get with this if even the OC Egg couldn't produce anything.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I have no intention of allowing these parasites to obtain judgement against me, however OFT are neither use nor ornament when it comes to Debt Collection.

 

At the moment they haven't actually done anything other than buy a load of accounts, as far as they are concerned they are acting in good faith.

 

Once they have been informed that they have bought a pup, depending on their actions from that point onwards, this will dictate my own actions

 

Yes, I agree hold fire. I am in the same situation. I plan to wait to see something more than computer generated standard letters. I dont want to open up any dialogue with these guys as I belive its all phishing at the moment to see who is going to reply to us so we can hassle them.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Also - a few years ago I had a situation with Halifax. Out of the blue H sent a N1CPC Claim form. I asked for help on here. Very simply, the letter sent to me should have had attached all the documents regarding the alleged card - in the Particulars of Claim Section - and it did not. I did not deny the debt, I just replied with special template letter - a CPR 31.14 letter. This legal letter asked them to provide every detail of the original cc. In this instance Halifax could not for some reason find all the relevent paperwork. And within 6 weeks they replied that they were not - after all - continuing with pursuing my alleged debt.

I suspect - that if any of us do get N1CPC court papers - and we do reply with the CPR template letter - that Marlin will respond in similar fashion as H did a few years ago.

It will be interesting to see how Marlin approach any future claims.....

Link to post
Share on other sites

I suspect that Marlin have all the personal details of cardholders who also banked with Barclays.

 

Of this, have no doubt, anyone who banks with Barclays and has a debt with Barclaycard would be wise to sort themselves a new account at their soonest opportunity, and the same with any other bank, as many others have found before, they will clear any balance to offset a defaulted balance without a moments second thought.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Also - a few years ago I had a situation with Halifax. Out of the blue H sent a N1CPC Claim form. I asked for help on here. Very simply, the letter sent to me should have had attached all the documents regarding the alleged card - in the Particulars of Claim Section - and it did not. I did not deny the debt, I just replied with special template letter - a CPR 31.14 letter. This legal letter asked them to provide every detail of the original cc. In this instance Halifax could not for some reason find all the relevent paperwork. And within 6 weeks they replied that they were not - after all - continuing with pursuing my alleged debt.

I suspect - that if any of us do get N1CPC court papers - and we do reply with the CPR template letter - that Marlin will respond in similar fashion as H did a few years ago.

It will be interesting to see how Marlin approach any future claims.....

 

Making them prove their case and provide a clear papertrail for the account is an absolute must - from the creation of the account (the agreement) to the moment the DCA sent the claim form, is imperative, if you want to stand a chance of winning in court, the CPR rules are an excellent tool in the forming of any defence

 

without this papertrail they are in deep doo doo

Edited by spamheed
Link to post
Share on other sites

I would send a prove it letter,i am betting the reference number is just marlins ref. If they have sold the account nothing can be offset now as Barclays have no interest in the account.

Any opinion I give is from personal experience .

Link to post
Share on other sites

I would send a prove it letter,i am betting the reference number is just marlins ref. If they have sold the account nothing can be offset now as Barclays have no interest in the account.
I don't bank with Barclays so nothing could ever have been offset. Edited by spamheed
Link to post
Share on other sites

The letter received today goes as follows:

 

Dear Sir/Madam So a std Template letter then, not even Dear Mr Spamheed

 

The debt has been passed to us to recover and we need to speak with you to arrange a suitable repayment plan.

 

Please contact us in the next 5 days to arrange a repayment plan to settle the outstanding debt. Please telephone us on 0333 123 9999.

Our office opening hours are Monday to Friday 8:00am to 8:00pm and Saturday 9:00am to 1:00pm.

 

Alternatively, please complete and return the statement of means form which can be found on the reverse of this letter,

detailing your income and expenditure along with your proposed offer of repayment.

 

Yours faithfully

Marlin Financial Services

 

I would say that it was just a tad on the optimistic side, bordering on presumptuous

Link to post
Share on other sites

I don't bank with Barclays so nothing could ever have been offset.

 

I was just confused by what someone else has said. Have you had the NOA,? told you i get confused.

 

I think a bugger off or prove it is in order. Then when they do prove it it would be a sorry but this account is in dispute since x did not reply to my cca request. That should kill at least a couple of months.

Any opinion I give is from personal experience .

Link to post
Share on other sites

I was just confused by what someone else has said. Have you had the NOA,? told you i get confused.

 

I think a bugger off or prove it is in order. Then when they do prove it it would be a sorry but this account is in dispute since x did not reply to my cca request. That should kill at least a couple of months.

 

Got a NOA from B/C to this shower, but since I've never had an agreement of any kind with B/C it really has little value, and since no transactions have been made against the non existent B/C account, how can they substantiate the balance from B/C???

 

and bugger me if I've had nothing from the OC since sending the CCA request 5+ years ago, certainly nothing to resolve the dispute

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...
I would send the prove it letter, as the account numbers are different and in my case, the only account i've ever had with Barclays has been written off as it is stat barred.

Don't ignore Marlin, that's what they want you to do, so they can issue a Claim, hoping you ignore that as well.

You must report Marlin to the OFT if they step out of line, the OFT were very interested in Marlin after the despatches documentary.

 

 

Link to prove it letter please?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi,I've started a thread in Egg very similar. I THINK my account is SB this month . had an EGG credit card years ago and had some problems and struggled to pay. Heard nothing from them for literally years. can't remember ever having a notice that my account was Aiken over by Barclays but can't be sure . Then out of nowhere I've had contact recently from Marlin and I'm not entirely sure what to do except that i can't ignore it .

I need a way of ensuring I don't risk a ccj while I bide enough time to obtain SAR and check when last payment was made and if. Paid PPI which I'm almost certain I did .

I remember asking them to pls stop taking it out as it was causing me to go over my limit and I couldn't afford it !

Will watch this thread with interest.

I'd do you a link to mine but don know how sorry .

Dec 2006 SARS request :p

 

5th Feb 2007 initial request inc list of charges totalling £1706.50 without 8% interest :o

 

15th Feb 2007"bog off " letter received.:(

 

19th Feb 2007 LBA sent with further copy of charges:|

 

4th April £750 goodwill gesture paid into bank

 

11th Aug 2007-another £704 charges since and lloyds served me with enforcement notoice

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi,I've started a thread in Egg very similar. I THINK my account is SB this month . had an EGG credit card years ago and had some problems and struggled to pay. Heard nothing from them for literally years. can't remember ever having a notice that my account was Aiken over by Barclays but can't be sure . Then out of nowhere I've had contact recently from Marlin and I'm not entirely sure what to do except that i can't ignore it .

I need a way of ensuring I don't risk a ccj while I bide enough time to obtain SAR and check when last payment was made and if. Paid PPI which I'm almost certain I did .

I remember asking them to pls stop taking it out as it was causing me to go over my limit and I couldn't afford it !

Will watch this thread with interest.

I'd do you a link to mine but don know how sorry .

 

I would send them some sort of prove it letter, since I assume Marlins are attempting to pursue a BarclayCard account, which you have allegedly never had,

Link to post
Share on other sites

They can sell an account at any time but often card providers will be rid of account where the min payment only is being made.

Any Letters I Draft are N0T approved by CAG and no personal liability is accepted.

Please Consider making a donation to keep this site running!

Nemo Mortalium Omnibus Horis Sapit: Animo et Fide:

Link to post
Share on other sites

Looks like I’m not alone. I’ve been helping a friend for a few years sort out their debts. One of the debts did the rounds with Egg and the account got passed to various other chancers then went quiet for a couple of years. Have now received a letter from Marlin saying that they’ve not received a reply to previous correspondence (Not received any previous correspondence from them). They quote a reference number that we don’t recognise and Barclays as the original creditor (Never had account with Barclays).

 

I was tempted to ignore but have read that Marlins do actively seek CCJ’s so thought I’d sent them an email just to get the ball rolling should they decide to try it on later down the line.

 

Have informed them of no knowledge of any outstanding debt to their company or the original creditor quoted in their letter – also their ref number bears no relation to any financial institute to which we have ever had dealings with, therefore will not be providing any personal information to an unknown party that could be used for fraudulent purposes.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Looks like I’m not alone. I’ve been helping a friend for a few years sort out their debts. One of the debts did the rounds with Egg and the account got passed to various other chancers then went quiet for a couple of years. Have now received a letter from Marlin saying that they’ve not received a reply to previous correspondence (Not received any previous correspondence from them). They quote a reference number that we don’t recognise and Barclays as the original creditor (Never had account with Barclays).

 

I was tempted to ignore but have read that Marlins do actively seek CCJ’s so thought I’d sent them an email just to get the ball rolling should they decide to try it on later down the line.

 

Have informed them of no knowledge of any outstanding debt to their company or the original creditor quoted in their letter – also their ref number bears no relation to any financial institute to which we have ever had dealings with, therefore will not be providing any personal information to an unknown party that could be used for fraudulent purposes.

 

 

 

Would you be so kind as to post a copy of your email for other people to peruse, maybe give ideas?

Link to post
Share on other sites

In my opinion, the first action in the case of an alleged account, whether under dispute/default or not, transferred through Barclaycard, then onto Marlins should always be a simple "Prove it" letter, the same as you would for any other unknown company suddenly making such a demand.

 

I can honestly say that I have never opened, owned, or used an account with Barclays or Barclaycard, they will not be able to produce anything signed by me to say that I have. Even if they do state it is linked to some long forgotten legitimate account, they would have to produce Notice of Assignments from the OC and Barclaycard, as well as the original signed agreement and a full range of statements, otherwise there is no way of verifying their claim of ownership and the amount they are claiming is owed.

 

The fact that Barclaycard or whoever and then Marlins have subsequently applied their own account details to the account will only muddy the waters further if and when it comes to court. especially if they bring the claim against one of these "made up" account numbers

Link to post
Share on other sites

Would you be so kind as to post a copy of your email for other people to peruse, maybe give ideas?

 

We sent something along the lines of:

------------------------------------

I am in receipt of your recent correspondence dated xxx and received by me xxx. Although your letter states “further to our previous correspondence…”, I can inform you that your letter dated xxx is the first and only communication that I have received from your company.

 

I further inform you that I have no such knowledge of any outstanding debt to you or the original creditor stated in your letter, also the reference number quoted bears no relation to any financial institute to which I have had dealings with, either past or present.

 

As such, I will not be providing any personal information to an unknown party that may be used for fraudulent purposes and trust this clarifies my position.

--------------------------------------------

 

I would also advise to keep an eye on your credit file as you’ll probably find that Barclays have marked the default as satisfied and closed the account but make sure that if Marlin add themselves as the new creditor that they don’t invent a new default date.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...