Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • I have looked at the car park and it is quite clearly marked that it is  pay to park  and advising that there are cameras installed so kind of difficult to dispute that. On the other hand it doesn't appear to state at the entrance what the charge is for breaching their rules. However they do have a load of writing in the two notices under the entrance sign which it would help if you could photograph legible copies of them. Also legible photos of the signs inside the car park as well as legible photos of the payment signs. I say legible because the wording of their signs is very important as to whether they have formed a contract with motorists. For example the entrance sign itself doe not offer a contract because it states the T&Cs are inside the car park. But the the two signs below may change that situation which is why we would like to see them. I have looked at their Notice to Keeper which is pretty close to what it should say apart from one item. Under the Protection of Freedoms Act 2012 Schedule 4 Section 9 [2]a] the PCN should specify the period of parking. It doesn't. It does show the ANPR times but that includes driving from the entrance to the parking spot and then from the parking place to the exit. I know that this is a small car park but the Act is quite clear that the parking period must be specified. That failure means that the keeper is no longer responsible for the charge, only the driver is now liable to pay. Should this ever go to Court , Judges do not accept that the driver and the keeper are the same person so ECP will have their work cut out deciding who was driving. As long as they do not know, it will be difficult for them to win in Court which is one reason why we advise not to appeal since the appeal can lead to them finding out at times that the driver  and the keeper were the same person. You will get loads of threats from ECP and their sixth rate debt collectors and solicitors. They will also keep quoting ever higher amounts owed. Do not worry, the maximum. they can charge is the amount on the sign. Anything over that is unlawful. You can safely ignore the drivel from the Drips but come back to us should you receive a Letter of Claim. That will be the Snotty letter time.
    • please stop using @username - sends unnecessary alerts to people. everyone that's posted on your thread inc you gets an automatic email alert when someone else posts.  
    • he Fraser group own Robin park in Wigan. The CEO's email  is  [email protected]
    • Yes, it was, but in practice we've found time after time that judges will not rule against PPCs solely on the lack of PP.  They should - but they don't.  We include illegal signage in WSs, but more as a tactic to show the PPC up as spvis rather than in the hope that the judge will act on that one point alone. But sue them for what?  They haven't really done much apart from sending you stupid letters. Breach of GDPR?  It could be argued they knew you had Supremacy of Contact but it's a a long shot. Trespass to your vehicle?  I know someone on the Parking Prankster blog did that but it's one case out of thousands. Surely best to defy them and put the onus on them to sue you.  Make them carry the risk.  And if they finally do - smash them. If you want, I suppose you could have a laugh at the MA's expense.  Tell them about the criminality they have endorsed and give them 24 hours to have your tickets cancelled and have the signs removed - otherwise you will contact the council to start enforcement for breach of planning permission.
    • Developing computer games can be wildly expensive so some hope that AI can cut the cost.View the full article
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Dismissed on capability grounds after work accident...


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4099 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi Guys,

 

First time poster on here, but have been reading the boards for a while.

 

Wondering if anyone can advise which way to go with this:

 

*Employed more than 12yrs by current employer

 

*Had accident at work 13 months ago (employer admitted liability, PI claim in hand)

 

*Unable to work full time since

 

*Paid for all Injury Assessments myself (Employer refused)

 

*Harassed to see the reports (i was happy to if they covered the cost to me)

 

*Told in a meeting in Nov'12 I would be dismissed if I 'didn't get myself right' and would receive a letter the next day ( I had no idea what the meeting was to be about)

 

*Took 5 wks of me asking, to actually receive the letter (which was different to what was mentioned in meeting)

 

*Verbally dismissed 3rd wk in Dec (I asked for this to be confirmed in writing,still waiting!)

 

*Have started me training in another role,less money,to run concurrent with notice period, then 3 months in that position but only as sickness cover, then 'who knows'

 

I'm aware I may have one or two grounds for unfair dismissal. Would appreciate some advice from you guys. Also would a tribunal only hear one claim, or if there are several grounds would they be heard in the same case?

 

Cheers

Link to post
Share on other sites

Have you had any guidance that you have as disability as defined by the equality act? What adjustments would you need to do bathe old job full time?

Never assume anyone on the internet is who they say they are. Only rely on advice from insured professionals you have paid for!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi JuCo

 

You mention that you were verbally Dismissed which you asked to be confirmed in writing and to date you are still waiting on this letter.

 

When you were informed of the dismissal were you also informed of your Rights to Appeal as per the companies policies and procedures as you have a timelimit in place for appealing their decision?

 

Now IMO I would not wait for their letter but would Appeal their decision to Dismiss you.

 

I would also request copies of the following documents:

 

Disciplinary Policy and Procedure.

Sickness Policy and Procedure

Health & Wellbeing Policy and Procedure

Health & Safety Policy and Procedure

 

Please have a look at this ACAS Website link good info their: www.acas.org.uk/

 

I would also have a look at this Health & Safety Executive (HSE) link: http://www.hse.gov.uk/riddor/reporting-change.htm

 

These PDFs may be of use:

Edited by stu007

How to Upload Documents/Images on CAG - **INSTRUCTIONS CLICK HERE**

FORUM RULES - Please ensure to read these before posting **FORUM RULES CLICK HERE**

I cannot give any advice by PM - If you provide a link to your Thread then I will be happy to offer advice there.

I advise to the best of my ability, but I am not a qualified professional, benefits lawyer nor Welfare Rights Adviser.

Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi stu007,

 

No, I was not informed of the right to appeal. I was worried about the timeline with having nothing concrete in writing!

 

Thank you for the ACAS links, I shall have a little look as soon as I get the chance :-)

 

Cheers

Link to post
Share on other sites

Well if you cannot do the job they are within their rights to dismiss and retraining is not a bad option. Lost income goes on the insurance claim.

Never assume anyone on the internet is who they say they are. Only rely on advice from insured professionals you have paid for!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes, the measure is "can you do the job with reasonable adjustments." Whether they dismissed fairly and with enough information may require more information and that is where stu's guides are really useful. Think of it as two events; one between you and insurers about lost income, and one between you and boss about can you do the job. Related but not totally intertwined.

Never assume anyone on the internet is who they say they are. Only rely on advice from insured professionals you have paid for!

Link to post
Share on other sites

I would appreciate further views and advice from other CAGGERS. No surprise that I'm fairly stressed with the situation. It seems like they are determined to let my notice run it course, maybe preventing me from going to an ET?

 

Cheers all

Link to post
Share on other sites

I would appreciate further views and advice from other CAGGERS. No surprise that I'm fairly stressed with the situation. It seems like they are determined to let my notice run it course, maybe preventing me from going to an ET?

 

Cheers all

 

Hello there.

 

Emmzzi's the expert, but I do know that if you're worried about your notice period messing up your ET1, then you should submit the form even if you're technically still employed.

 

My best, HB

Illegitimi non carborundum

 

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

As said, 2 things here, one is the PI, which insurers will deal with, the other is the dismissal on capability grounds. Employer has to jump through a lot of hoops before they do that and from what you say they have done none of them. Also, when you get all the paperwork suggested by stu007 get advice on doing a "Statutory Questionnaire" and submitting it to them under the EqA. That will most likely be dealt with at the same time as your tribunal claim for the wrongful dismissal (contractual part). There is are two good reasons for looking into this 1. burden of proof on employer and 2. damages claim can be unlimited wheras the wrongful or unfair dismissal has a compensation ceiling.

 

Yes, the measure is "can you do the job with reasonable adjustments." Whether they dismissed fairly and with enough information may require more information and that is where stu's guides are really useful. Think of it as two events; one between you and insurers about lost income, and one between you and boss about can you do the job. Related but not totally intertwined.
Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks ericsbrother :-) That about sums it up, a completely half baked attempt at dismissal, in my opinion. Do you see a case for wrongful, as well as, unfair dismissal? I shall have a look at the 'Statutory Questionnaire'

I've been told by ACAS that I could go to tribunal now, over failure to provide me with written notice of dismissal after I've requested it (now over 5 weeks). My main concern now is what actually is my dismissal date, did my 12 weeks notice start when I was verbally dismissed? I don't want to be missing that deadline!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

It would now appear that my employer has started a 'propaganda' campaign against me,telling anyone who will listen. Along the lines of 'We don't want her to leave, she is forcing us to dismiss her and give her the letter' I was verbally dismissed,all I want is the letter to see the grounds :x Stressed!!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

"Hi, I heard person X say this. Is that correct? That you do want to keep me and have a great role for me?"

Never assume anyone on the internet is who they say they are. Only rely on advice from insured professionals you have paid for!

Link to post
Share on other sites

This can still be completely true if you are unable to do the job, of course... you may be seeing conspiracies where there are none.

Never assume anyone on the internet is who they say they are. Only rely on advice from insured professionals you have paid for!

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...