Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • J&P Credit Solutions are specialists on debt recovery. Either way they seem to be swapping between the JandP and IDR whatever their exact definitions are.
    • Primary and secondary teachers are supporting pupils with their own money, buying food and warm clothing. Eight in 10 primary teachers in England spending own money to help pupils | Education | The Guardian WWW.THEGUARDIAN.COM Increasing numbers of children hungry and lack adequate clothing, with two-thirds of secondary teachers also supporting pupils  
    • I googled "prescribed disability" to see where it is defined for the purposes of S.92. I found HMRC's definition, which included deafness. I don't  think anyone is saying deaf people cant drive, though! digging deeper,  Is it that “prescribed disability” (for the purposes of S.88 and S.92) is defined at: The Motor Vehicles (Driving Licences) Regulations 1999 WWW.LEGISLATION.GOV.UK These Regulations consolidate with amendments the Motor Vehicles (Driving Licences) Regulations 1996...   ….. and sleep apnoea / increased daytime sleepiness is NOT included there directly as a condition but only becomes prescribed under “liability to sudden attacks of disabling giddiness or fainting” (but falling asleep isn't fainting!), so it isn’t defined there as a “prescribed disability”  Yet, under S.92(2)(b) RTA 1988 “ any other disability likely to cause the driving of a vehicle by him in pursuance of a licence to be a source of danger to the public" So (IMHO) sleep apnea / daytime sleepiness MIGHT be a prescribed disability, but only if it causes likelihood of "driving being a source of danger to the public" : which is where meeting / not meeting the medical standard of fitness to drive comes into play?  
    • You can counter a Judges's question on why you didn't respond by pointing out that any company that charges you with stopping at a zebra crossing is likely to be of a criminal mentality and so unlikely to cancel the PCN plus you didn't want to give away any knowledge you had at that time that could allow them to counteract your claim if it went to Court. There are many ways in which you can see off their stupid claim-you will see them in other threads  where our members have been caught by Met at other airports as well as Bristol.  Time and again they take motorists to Court for "NO Stopping" apparently completely forgetting that the have lost doing that because no stopping is prohibitory and cannot form a contract. Yet they keep on issuing PCNs because so many people just pay up . Crazy . You can see what chuckleheads they are when you read their Claim form which is pursuing you as the driver or the keeper. they don't seem to understand that on airport land because of the Bye laws, the keeper is never liable.   
    • The video-sharing app told the BBC that a "very limited" number of accounts had been compromised.View the full article
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Poll Tax 2 even bigger cuts to Council Tax benefit


osdset
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4117 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

if it comes to paying for food or council tax well sorry they can take me to court, cant pay if i have no money!

 

the problem is council tax is one bill cant get away with not paying, they are extremely agressive and have huge powers on non payment.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 114
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

I will be giving up this home im in, because i can not afford to keep it, i did not or a lot of us did not ask to be disabled. so im gearing myself up to go to prison atleast i will get my healthcare and my food and bed sorted its seems to me the only way, and a lot of us can go..

 

I can not believe that no one is kicking up a stink over any of these kick a cripple benifit changes:-(

 

because todays society is "Im alright jack"

 

the poll tax v1 I believe affected pretty much everyone paying tax who had more than 1 adult in their house.

 

this one is targeted at a small set of the population who traditionally arent very vocal and dont have a high influence on elections. In particular the media except the guardian are against us so are helping cover it up.

 

even members of my own family seem happy with it even tho they know my plight. Because their own tax isnt affected. Thats all they care about #1.

Link to post
Share on other sites

the problem is council tax is one bill cant get away with not paying, they are extremely agressive and have huge powers on non payment.

 

Well if I have £20 in my pocket and my food cupboard is bare and the CT needs paying which would you say I use the money for?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Well if I have £20 in my pocket and my food cupboard is bare and the CT needs paying which would you say I use the money for?

 

I dont know, but if you dont pay the CT I would hide anything worth money because they will come for it.

 

I would not pay water, gas, electric etc. all before not paying CT. Obviously harder to do if on prepay meter's tho.

 

In fact I went 3 years without paying anything to severn trent water.

Link to post
Share on other sites

announcement tonight that people in wales will not be subject to the ct tax as the welsh assembly have given the councils the money to fund it....good for us in wales, but not for the rest of the country...but the divide and rule goes on...

Link to post
Share on other sites

announcement tonight that people in wales will not be subject to the ct tax as the welsh assembly have given the councils the money to fund it....good for us in wales, but not for the rest of the country...but the divide and rule goes on...

 

yes wales and scotland ok, but those 2 regions arent affected by the demands of the south east and london.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

MY area still hasnt published what they doing, all they have done is published pol results which looks very bad for me because people support giving more help to those with children (this obviously going to hit hard on childless adults), dispite the fact those people get child benefit and child tax credits already.

 

Note also at the start of the document the claim they have been asked to cut 19% not 10%.

 

http://www.cabinet.leicester.gov.uk/documents/s52298/Final%20report%20of%20consultation%20responses.pdf

Link to post
Share on other sites

letter from my council telling me I will be paying at least £4.44 per week, but could be more as they haven't decided yet how much the council tax will be for this year. and with an assessment looming I expect to lose IB, end up on £71 jsa and being unfit will lose that too.... davidcameron-scrooge & co will finish me off.

Link to post
Share on other sites

they have to cut 10% over all, but pensioner claimants are protected from cuts

 

so therefore 19% sounds right for working age claimants

If you have found my post useful, please click on the star at the bottom of my post and add some reputation points.

Link to post
Share on other sites

 

it doesnt say anything. so those arent the details.

 

Also they dont say its 19% on working age claimants, they specifically state they have been asked to cut their budget by 19%, thats either a lie or the government are lieing.

Link to post
Share on other sites

letter from my council telling me I will be paying at least £4.44 per week, but could be more as they haven't decided yet how much the council tax will be for this year. and with an assessment looming I expect to lose IB, end up on £71 jsa and being unfit will lose that too.... davidcameron-scrooge & co will finish me off.

 

I have had no letter other than about 2 months ago telling me they starting a consultation.

 

But I was already paying £4 a week. I expect I will be paying approx £15-20 per week currently.

 

I have seen nothing published showing the results, that pdf posted here doesnt have the results.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I emailed my local council benefits office and got the letter about a week later, saying about the £4.44 thing etc and telling me there is drop in meeting locally on 25th to ask any questions....all I want to know is how much I have to pay. I daren't not pay it as they just take you to court and then its bailiffs at the door if you don't pay.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I emailed my local council benefits office and got the letter about a week later, saying about the £4.44 thing etc and telling me there is drop in meeting locally on 25th to ask any questions....all I want to know is how much I have to pay. I daren't not pay it as they just take you to court and then its bailiffs at the door if you don't pay.

 

Ok I will contact mine next week and ask.

 

I agree on the bailiffs. There is no doubt if I dont pay (or anyone for that matter) they will be very quick on legal ation which is court warrant and bailiff to collect belongings.

 

I will be very surprised if my weekly payments are below £8 a week.

Link to post
Share on other sites

it doesnt say anything. so those arent the details.

 

Also they dont say its 19% on working age claimants, they specifically state they have been asked to cut their budget by 19%, thats either a lie or the government are lieing.

 

 

the government have told them the new scheme must cost 10% less than old scheme - put pensioners have to be protected - this means that pensoioners share of the cut is applied to working age claimants

 

Example - if a Council curently spends £10m on CTB, they have to cut it by 10% to £9m

 

now out of that £10m: -

 

  • if half (£5m) is spent on pensioners who are protected, they still get £5m
  • the other half (£5m) is spent on working age, this will get reduced to £4m

 

so this means LA has to apply a 20% cut to working age claimants, to deliver an overall 10% cut for the government

If you have found my post useful, please click on the star at the bottom of my post and add some reputation points.

Link to post
Share on other sites

is expecting all kinds now after this mornings report about the UK credit rating dropped etc and the govt adamant to keep on their own dastardly path....CTB is just the start methinks...HB will be next.....and free dentist/prescriptions to follow.....that would be interesting if I couldn't afford my meds....my bipolar would take me up like a helium balloon

Link to post
Share on other sites

the government have told them the new scheme must cost 10% less than old scheme - put pensioners have to be protected - this means that pensoioners share of the cut is applied to working age claimants

 

Example - if a Council curently spends £10m on CTB, they have to cut it by 10% to £9m

 

now out of that £10m: -

 

  • if half (£5m) is spent on pensioners who are protected, they still get £5m
  • the other half (£5m) is spent on working age, this will get reduced to £4m

 

so this means LA has to apply a 20% cut to working age claimants, to deliver an overall 10% cut for the government

 

I will say it again, they dont say that.

 

They simply state they have had their funding cut by 19%.

 

Even if they mean what you say they have worded it wrong. Working age isnt mentioned in their statement, they simply state their 'entire' budget is cut by 19%. In the public consultation they did, the website said working age may have to pay 40%.

Link to post
Share on other sites

is expecting all kinds now after this mornings report about the UK credit rating dropped etc and the govt adamant to keep on their own dastardly path....CTB is just the start methinks...HB will be next.....and free dentist/prescriptions to follow.....that would be interesting if I couldn't afford my meds....my bipolar would take me up like a helium balloon

 

HB is already been cut.

 

You missed the?

 

bedroom tax

under 35s no longer allowed contained accomodation.

under 25s HB also cut.

LHA change from lower 50% to lower 30% and no longer based on local rent increases.

HB reduced when claimant exceed benefit cap.

 

Of course it could be cut more as these idiots wont stop at anything.

 

A change I predicted a while back is JSA under 25 rate increased to the under 35s, they will state it is to bring in line with HB changes.

Link to post
Share on other sites

worried33

 

the full rules can be found here

 

http://www.leicester.gov.uk/EasySiteWeb/GatewayLink.aspx?alId=120511

 

Wow, I haven't read anything in a while that appears so deliberately intended to be difficult to understand as this is.

We hang the petty thieves and appoint the great ones to public office ~ Aesop

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...