Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Thank you very much for your letter in regard to the above mentioned shipment.  Due to the high volume of parcels coursing through the courier network each day, undergoing continuous processing and handling, certain packages may experience delays or even can get lost in the course of this journey. Please note that due to the time that has passed, this shipment has been declared as lost.  I have today processed the claim and made offers to the value of £75 as a goodwill gesture without prejudice. I do acknowledge that you have mentioned in your letter that the value was higher, however, you did not take out any protection to that amount. The protection for this shipment was £20 and we will not be increasing our goodwill offer any further.    Please log into your account online in order to accept our offer. Once accepted, our accounts department will process the claim accordingly. The claim payment will be processed and received within 7 working days.                                  In addition, a refund of the carriage fee will be processed as a separate payment and will be received within 3 working days.  If I can further assist, please feel free to contact me.   I have also just noticed that yesterday afternoon they sent me an email stating that "after my request" they have refunded the cost of shipping. I did not request the refund so will mention that in my letter as well.
    • Hi I had to leave Dubai back in 2011, during the financial crisis. And only now have I received a letter from IDRWW. Is this anything to worry about about as I have 2 years left until it’s been 15 years(statute barred in Dubai). Worried as just got a mortgage 2 years ago. Could they force me in to bankruptcy? Red lots of different threads on here. And unsure what true and what isn’t. 
    • Not that TOR will see this now he's thrown in the hand grenade. Rayner has plenty of female supporters on X, for a start. As for the council and HMRC, fair enough and I thought Rayner was already in touch with them. That's where it should be dealt with, not the police force. @tobyjugg2 Daniel Finkelstein thinks the same as you about tax. The Fiver theory. How the Fiver Theory explains this election campaign ARCHIVE.PH archived 28 May 2024 17:36:51 UTC  
    • Often with the Likes of Lowells/ Overdales that 'proof' doesn't stand up to scrutiny.   Think about it like a game of poker, they want to intimidate you into folding and giving up as soon as possible, and just get you to pay up and roll over, that is their business model, make you think your cards are rubbish. What they don't expect, and their business isn't set up for it, is for a defendant to find this place and to learn that they have an amazing set of cards to play. Overdales don't have an infinite number of lawyers, paralegals etc, and the time / money to spend on expensive court cases, that they are highly likely to lose, hence how hard they will try to get you to roll over.  Even to the extent of faking documents, which they need to do because the debts that they purchased were so cheap, in the first place. Nevertheless it works in most cases, most people chicken out, when they are so close to winning, and a holding defence is like slowly showing Overdales your first card, and a marker of intention that this could get tricky for them. In fact it may be,  although by no means guaranteed that it won't even go any further than that.  Even if it does, what they send you back will almost certainly have more holes than Swiss Cheese, and if with the help you receive here, you can identify those weaknesses and get the whole thing tossed in the bin.
    • So Rayner who is don’t forget still being investigated by the local council and HMRC  is now begging to save her seat Not a WOMAN in sight in this video other than Rayner  Farage is utterly correct this country’s values are non existent in her seat   Rayner Pleads With Muslim Voters as Pressure From Galloway Grows – Guido Fawkes ORDER-ORDER.COM Guido has obtained a leaked tape from inside a meeting between Angela Rayner and Muslim voters in Ashton-under-Lyne...  
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4243 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Good day everyone,

 

long time reader, first time writer.

 

just thought I should share my experience, it might help some people.

 

 

Newlyn has been harassing for quite sometime now, probably up to a year now. It is regarding a parking ticket from Brent Council. I have received numerous text messages from Newlyn bailiffs such as "bailiffs are in your area and will remove your goods, go home quickly", "we are coming today to remove your goods, see you at 11.30am", some distressing text messages as well as letters.

 

Anyway, I kept ignoring them, but today (9 Oct 2012), I was paid a visit by a Newlyn bailiff, saying he is here to seize my vehicle unless I pay £431 immediately, I got my phone and started video recording, I first asked for his I.D., he showed it to me, I wanted to take a picture of it, but he refused. He said I dont need to record but I kept on recording, he said do I have the money, to which I replied no, but as I am not working, I am willing to make monthly payments, but he refused and demanded full payment.

 

I said, I cant give you what I dont have, he then parked his vehicle in my driveway, saying he's not going to leave until the tow truck gets here, I said fine, whatever makes you happy. I kept on video recording, I went up to his face while he was in his vehicle and kept on recording, he said why am I behaving like this, that I must be suffering from a disease, I said thanks for the insult and kept on recording, he was in his vehicle for about 20 mins, and then came out and said last chance, the tow truck is coming, I said I dont have any money but I'm willing to make monthly payments.

 

He then demanded I give him the keys to my car, to which I refused, he went back into his vehicle and I kept on recording, I then asked to see a documentation of how it mounted up to £431, and he refused saying that after I make payment, he will then give me the breakdown. I kept on recording, going round his car, recording everything. He then came out and said that he has to leave but he has called the tow truck and they can come anytime to collect the vehicle, then he left.

 

I just wanted to ask you guys for your opinion on the whole situation. Also, I am going to send the documents, emails and video to the OFT and file a complaint as well. These guys have been disturbing my life, the bailiff today he insulted me verbally and was quite rude.

 

Thanks for reading, I really appreciate it, and I apologize for any typographical and grammatical errors.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Why are the pitbulls from newlyn on your case, were you aware of the PCN when they first called?

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

The bailiff: A 12th Century solution re-branded as Enforcement Agents for the 21st Century to seize and sell debtors goods as before Oh so Dickensian!

Link to post
Share on other sites

honestly, I dont recall any PCN from Brent Council.

 

I presume that you can ask the Brent Council parking enforcement people for evidence of the PCN.

 

That is what I suggest that you do. Contact the council and get them to furnish the proof.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

I presume that you can ask the Brent Council parking enforcement people for evidence of the PCN.

 

That is what I suggest that you do. Contact the council and get them to furnish the proof.

 

Thanks. will definitely do.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just a thought, did you own your car around the date of the alleged PCN, or have you bought it in the last 15 months or so? This could make a big difference, as then you wouldn't even be the debtor, and all that evidence and txts etc archived would be good in a complaint.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

The bailiff: A 12th Century solution re-branded as Enforcement Agents for the 21st Century to seize and sell debtors goods as before Oh so Dickensian!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Sounds like from your description that you acted in a childish manner in this situation,

Why couldnt you just be up front - look im not working heres my dole book this is how much ive got coming in each week/month etc rather than deliberetly trying to make a scene by putting your phone in his face

None of the beliefs held by "Freemen on the land" have ever been supported by any judgments or verdicts in any criminal or civil court cases.

Link to post
Share on other sites

The warrant of execution is valid for just 12 months. You had said that Newlyn have been in touch with you fo about a year. You should make enquiries about this.

 

If you had not received any statutory notices ( in particular the Notice to Owner) then you are legally able to file an Out of Time Witness Statement. All enforcement will then be on hold. The bailiff enforcement will then cease.

 

I would almost certainly suggest that you call Brent Council to make enquiries about this PCN.

Link to post
Share on other sites

how old is your car whats its value ?

 

 

Newlyn has been harassing for quite sometime now, probably up to a year now

 

do you know the date of the warrant

 

value of the car is probably around £600.

 

Sounds like from your description that you acted in a childish manner in this situation,

Why couldnt you just be up front - look im not working heres my dole book this is how much ive got coming in each week/month etc rather than deliberetly trying to make a scene by putting your phone in his face

 

Yes it was childish but it needed to be done, I have told him that I am not working, yet he insisted that I pay the full amount, I stressed it enough that I'm willing to make payments, but still demanded full amount.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Sounds like from your description that you acted in a childish manner in this situation,

Why couldnt you just be up front - look im not working heres my dole book this is how much ive got coming in each week/month etc rather than deliberetly trying to make a scene by putting your phone in his face

 

That was a totally unhelpful comment to make. Far from being childish, it was a brave action to take and it may help others who are scared of bailiff visits. Maybe the OP was lucky that the bailiff was not as aggressive as some though it could also be that by videoing him, it prevented him from actions he may have taken with some one less able to stand up for them selves.

Link to post
Share on other sites

That was a totally unhelpful comment to make. Far from being childish, it was a brave action to take and it may help others who are scared of bailiff visits. Maybe the OP was lucky that the bailiff was not as aggressive as some though it could also be that by videoing him, it prevented him from actions he may have taken with some one less able to stand up for them selves.

 

Rubbish. This is my opinion, an opinion and observation. Just because it isnt in line with yours and others narrow minded opinions about debt collection doesnt make it any less valid. Now we can only go off what the OP says, and the impression i get is that the OP had/has no intention on paying the parking fine and chose to attempt to antagonise the bailiff that came around, probably causing him to dig his heels in a bit instead of going away armed with the info regarding being unemployed which could of been easily passed over.

None of the beliefs held by "Freemen on the land" have ever been supported by any judgments or verdicts in any criminal or civil court cases.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Rubbish. This is my opinion, an opinion and observation. Just because it isnt in line with yours and others narrow minded opinions about debt collection doesnt make it any less valid. Now we can only go off what the OP says, and the impression i get is that the OP had/has no intention on paying the parking fine and chose to attempt to antagonise the bailiff that came around, probably causing him to dig his heels in a bit instead of going away armed with the info regarding being unemployed which could of been easily passed over.

 

No you are wrong, I want to pay the fine, but the bailiff wanted the full payment on the spot. Why wouldn't I want to pay what I am owing, all I asked was for documentation (breakdown) of the charges and a payment plan, but he refused and was quite rude. More so, I told him I was on job seekers, told him I can bring proof if he wants, but he was not interested, all he wanted was £431 right there and then.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Whatever the whys and wherefores, if OP had no knowledge of the PCN until newlyn turned up, then the OOT may be an option, As to filming a bailiff, well I would make a point of doing so, for the bailiffs protection as well as mine, I would film them as a favour if a bailiff called on any of my neighbours also.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

The bailiff: A 12th Century solution re-branded as Enforcement Agents for the 21st Century to seize and sell debtors goods as before Oh so Dickensian!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Rubbish. This is my opinion, an opinion and observation. Just because it isnt in line with yours and others narrow minded opinions about debt collection doesnt make it any less valid. Now we can only go off what the OP says, and the impression i get is that the OP had/has no intention on paying the parking fine and chose to attempt to antagonise the bailiff that came around, probably causing him to dig his heels in a bit instead of going away armed with the info regarding being unemployed which could of been easily passed over.

You obviously do have opinions but to suggest that I and others on this forum who think that bailiffs are an anachronism in the 21st century are narrow minded would perhaps

indicate that you are a bailiff or your sympathies rest with them rather than people who are in financial trouble.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Senusret it would seem strange that the bailiff would not have clamped or even levied on your car when he was there. perhaps the Warrant had expired and all he could do was to put the frighteners on you.

Do not lose the video it may become very helpful to you later.

Link to post
Share on other sites

It looks like the warrant has expired, in which case the bailiff has no lawful back up, and on another thread, I will find it later, apparently it cannot be renewed after the 12 months, so is on dodgy ground imho, as yes he would have most likely clamped the car by now otherwise.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

The bailiff: A 12th Century solution re-branded as Enforcement Agents for the 21st Century to seize and sell debtors goods as before Oh so Dickensian!

Link to post
Share on other sites

You say newlyn have been leaving letters and sending text messages for about a year and to quote your original post

"anyway, i kept ignoring them" doesnt sound like you want to tackle this really.

Also suggests this isnt the first the OP has heard about this.

And just because my answer to the original post isnt the same as every other thread and poster

-bailiffs in the wrong

-complain to company council and form 4

-must be fraud by false representation

-must be making the fees up

-remove the companies license

Does not mean i must be a bailiff

None of the beliefs held by "Freemen on the land" have ever been supported by any judgments or verdicts in any criminal or civil court cases.

Link to post
Share on other sites

You say newlyn have been leaving letters and sending text messages for about a year and to quote your original post

"anyway, i kept ignoring them" doesnt sound like you want to tackle this really.

Also suggests this isnt the first the OP has heard about this.

And just because my answer to the original post isnt the same as every other thread and poster

-bailiffs in the wrong

-complain to company council and form 4

-must be fraud by false representation

-must be making the fees up

-remove the companies license

Does not mean i must be a bailiff

 

Op needs to tell exactly when they first knew about this, were they the car owner at the time of issue of the PCN, did they buy it after the PCN, and the bailiff has data cleansed the warrant in some way, but whatever it is now likely out of time?

 

We cannot move forward with advice without more background information.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

The bailiff: A 12th Century solution re-branded as Enforcement Agents for the 21st Century to seize and sell debtors goods as before Oh so Dickensian!

Link to post
Share on other sites

You say newlyn have been leaving letters and sending text messages for about a year and to quote your original post

"anyway, i kept ignoring them" doesnt sound like you want to tackle this really.

Also suggests this isnt the first the OP has heard about this.

And just because my answer to the original post isnt the same as every other thread and poster

-bailiffs in the wrong

-complain to company council and form 4

-must be fraud by false representation

-must be making the fees up

-remove the companies license

Does not mean i must be a bailiff

 

yes, newlyn and their bailiffs have been in contact for a year and whenever I call them, asking and begging them to set up a payment plan, they both refused and threatened if I don't pay the full amount immediately they are coming to seize goods, I've called newlyn on several occasions and their reply was either you pay up now or we'll leave it to the bailiffs to seize your goods, I told them my circumstances and everything but they refused to negotiate and kept sending me threatening letters and text messages all the time. More so, I don't remember receiving any PCN from Brent council, they have not even told me the date the incident happened, at least I'll now if I was the owner at that time. All they want is £431, right now, they cant even give me a breakdown. Anyway, I've filed a complaint against them.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just concentrate on what you need to do.

 

Contact Brent for a copy of the PCN. ( There may still be a way of appealing this, depending on the details)

 

Once you have that, if it is all in order and there are no grounds for appeal, the see what you can do to settle the PCN based on your ability to pay and to only pay the bailiff fees that are legit.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yesterday I provided the follwoing advice. I am therefore at a losss to understand why you are saying that you want to pay. Why would you wnat to pay for something that you have no knowledge about??

 

The warrant of executionlink3.gif is valid for just 12 months. You had said that newlynlink3.gif have been in touch with you for about a year. You should make enquiries about this.

 

If you had not received any statutory notices ( in particular the Notice to Owner) then you are legally able to file an Out of Time Witness Statement. All enforcement will then be on hold. The bailifflink3.gif enforcement will then cease.

 

I would almost certainly suggest that you call Brent Council to make enquiries about this

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yesterday I provided the follwoing advice. I am therefore at a losss to understand why you are saying that you want to pay. Why would you wnat to pay for something that you have no knowledge about??

 

 

 

I would almost certainly suggest that you call Brent Council to make enquiries about this

 

 

will definitely do. Thanks.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Any statements made by certificated bailiffs and their employers that are not supported by hard evidence should ALWAYS be treated with suspicion and ALWAYS checked out with the relevant authority, etc.. NEVER take what a certificated bailiff says at face value.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...