Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • OK thank you very much. I will prepare my WS as you advise.  I will indeed be preparing the WS over the weekend. I will also post UKPC's on Wednesday by 2nd class mail. As they have until the 17th to pay the court fee, is it possible they might discontinue at that stage too? Also I wanted to ask, in what form should the site manager's statement come? And the site owner if i can contact them? I will get photos of the signage to share with you also. Thank you.
    • Theres speculation on whether the magazine was Womens Weekly or Boys own 😀   ... probably a classic first edition of boys own - based on it costing $130k :lol  
    • You have five days yet to respect the WS deadline which is next Wednesday.  As others have said,  you can e-mail the court their copy.  That gives you the whole weekend to get the WS prepared.  Personally I'd post UKPC's theirs by 2nd class post (all they are worth) on Wednesday too, the court won't look badly on a short delay from a Litigant-in-Person. Another point.  In your WS you say their signs are rubbish.  That's a great point if their signs really are rubbish.  It's a dreadful point if their signs are fine.  So have you got photos of their signs?
    • You need to start drafting your WS.  I would suggest as sections - Sequence of Events - a brief description of how you came to get the invoice. Permission from Landowner - self-explanatory.  You will have to include this as it is in your defence.  However, be aware that your argument is very weak and indeed harms your case.  A person with no connection to the car park said you could park there - that is no different from saying that someone you met in the local pub said you could park there.  Anyway, get the site manager's WS.  Obviously this weak point could morph into a winner if you could get a WS from the landowner. Prohibition - you have this virtually word for word in the other WS. No locus standi - UKPC are not the landlord, they only administer the car park, they have no right to sue you (however the fact you never asked by CPR to see their contract with the landowner makes this a very weak point too). Double Recovery - again in the other WS.
    • And don't be worrying too much about being a day or two late with your WS. As a litigant in person, you'll be given a little leeway. Take time to post up your WS here  for the team to take a look. It'll give time to get your site manager's statement as an exhibit. Also, I understand you haven't got their WS yet? It could give you time to see theirs first if they send it. Do they have your email address? If so they could play dirty and send it the night before the hearing!
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

just returned from spain after losing house with 2 children and not entitled to benefits


rosebudbon
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4258 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

other side of the coin here..you cant really expect to show up in the uk after living abroad for several years and expect the authorities to just sort you out,did you really think you would just get a council house straight away and plenty of benefits excetera when you just popped back?,theres loads of people already been in the system for years

 

 

 

Join the queue, we had to wait 7 years for accomodation, and there are Thousands ahead of you, you left for a better life, well if things do go wrong as happens a pity, but that is your situation, you left u.k. where Thousands are homeless so join the queue, sorry realility check here, children being used as a reason, sorry been there it does not work that way, get in line, no disrespect but reality, or buy your own house in the u.k. next time?

:mad2::-x:jaw::sad:
Link to post
Share on other sites

thankyou so much for those points. how long ago was that as they are saying that laws have changed. we are going to shelter tomorrow and they are hopefully going to help us with the habitual residence test. i will definately use those points though. things are getting so bad with 4 more people all squashed into a small 3 bed house with 9 people living there. we really feel like were putting on our friends.

thankyou again. will lwet you know the outcome of tomorrow. x

Link to post
Share on other sites

nystagmite,the op has had plenty of advice from various sources,online and goverment offices,she just needs to wait for it to be sorted,it will in the end,thats my advice,its not rude to point out the totally obvious,its not going to get sorted for her at the drop of a hat!

Link to post
Share on other sites

for those people who think we have just come back here to claim loads of benefits and get a council house - you are so far wrong about my family. we have always worked and owned a house when we were here before. we have just become another victim of the recession. we intend to work for a living here just as soon as we can. please dont insinuate that were back here just to get what we can. we are in a real dark place at the moment and just wished the system could find a way to find out who is genuine and who is not and help the people who really do need help.

Link to post
Share on other sites

thankyou so much for those points. how long ago was that as they are saying that laws have changed. we are going to shelter tomorrow and they are hopefully going to help us with the habitual residence test. i will definately use those points though. things are getting so bad with 4 more people all squashed into a small 3 bed house with 9 people living there. we really feel like were putting on our friends.

thankyou again. will lwet you know the outcome of tomorrow. x

 

That was in the early 1990s, we lived in a damp so called flat, ceilings fell down in bedroom luckily we were out, but only after landlord threateneing after years to throw us out then the council at the last minute stepped in after a fuss, the landlord was re-developing the house of bedsits etc, incidently I was already living here as well, fighting to get my family here for 3 years thru immigration court cases eventually won, all these agencies seemed to try to help but well sorry I did it all myself in the end.

 

I was not being rude but faceing the facts as I have had to try and adivise actual cases in the past, on similair cases, even putting up whole families in one room (13 people incl children on mattresses). for days on end.

 

So will monitor your case to see if any difference to the past experiances, I even helped people who lost their home/business due to earth quakes whereby British Embassy refused visas for them and the children, yet one parent was U.K. passport holder, they did pretty quick when I mentioned certain names in government will be informed. The people came to the u.k. for 2 years and picked up the pieces then went back and started to rebuild their old life there, whilst here they earned what they could and rented accomodation, no recourse to public funds.

Edited by Old Cogger
:mad2::-x:jaw::sad:
Link to post
Share on other sites

Just a quick note here, not directed at anyone in particular. I'd ask that we restrict ourselves to offering advice - if anyone has formed a judgement about the OP situation, could they please keep it to themselves.

 

Thanks all.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING. EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 

The idea that all politicians lie is music to the ears of the most egregious liars.

Link to post
Share on other sites

lets try and make sure we point things out to people and not just patronise them,thats not fair,the op needs to note that it will take months if not years to get sorted in the uk,you cant just expect to show up and expect the benefits agency etc to move heaven and earth for you cos ya just happen to have a british passport holder in the family,it is not gonna happen

Link to post
Share on other sites

lets try and make sure we point things out to people and not just patronise them,thats not fair,the op needs to note that it will take months if not years to get sorted in the uk,you cant just expect to show up and expect the benefits agency etc to move heaven and earth for you cos ya just happen to have a british passport holder in the family,it is not gonna happen

 

Yes, this is fair enough, which is why I was clear to state that I was not directing my remarks at anyone in particular. I wasn't so much expressing concern about what I read in this thread, but attempting to forestall future problems.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING. EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 

The idea that all politicians lie is music to the ears of the most egregious liars.

Link to post
Share on other sites

lets try and make sure we point things out to people and not just patronise them,thats not fair,the op needs to note that it will take months if not years to get sorted in the uk,you cant just expect to show up and expect the benefits agency etc to move heaven and earth for you cos ya just happen to have a british passport holder in the family,it is not gonna happen

 

Did you not see antone's post? I'm assuming you didn't as your post contains judgement and assumptions instead of constructive, helpful advice.

Link to post
Share on other sites

This is the sort of thing I was trying to avoid, and I suppose I inadvertently precipitated it. My bad.

 

If you want to say "These are the rules for returning citizens: x, y, z" then go for it. Just please, please, don't say "What makes you think you should be entitled to x, y, z?" Is that clear enough? Presenting information is great, that's what we're here for. I'm just asking that we all consider our phrasing with care, because squabbling helps no-one.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING. EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 

The idea that all politicians lie is music to the ears of the most egregious liars.

Link to post
Share on other sites

reality check..if you left uk years ago and come back,it takes a while getting sorted again,simple as that

 

And, given that our OP is in this situation, how would you suggest she best go about expediting the process? She already knows it's complex and takes time, that's why she posted in the first place.

 

Because it is certainly possible to be confused by the Byzantine complexity of the benefits system, and that confusion can lead to people missing out on things they're entitled to, to claims being delayed because the claimant doesn't know specifically what to request, and so on. That's one of the main reasons there are welfare rights advisers.

 

And this is the key point. Posts that amount to "Well, sucks to be you, heh!" aren't helpful and just start rows and flame wars. So, I ask everyone to refrain from making such posts. I'll enforce this if required, but I'd really rather it didn't come to that.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING. EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 

The idea that all politicians lie is music to the ears of the most egregious liars.

Link to post
Share on other sites

well,reading the ops post,she wasnt happy with the time it was taking,her first post stated she couldnt understand why it was taking so long for her to get sorted,feel free to scroll back,I pointed out to her it would take a while to get sorted and basically she would have to be patient,all you have done antone is castigate me for pointing out the patently obvious,I find it hard to understand where you are coming from??what you think you are contributing?..I dont get it? if anyone else wants to scoll back and make a constructive comment feel free?

Antone you think the benefits system should just fast track people through to whatever benefits they request with no checking up?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Antone you think the benefits system should just fast track people through to whatever benefits they request with no checking up?

 

I'm a former benefit processor, so no, I do not so believe.

 

To some extent you are correct, I am castigating you for pointing out the obvious, because OP already knows that it takes time to process such claims. She's asking if there's any way to make it take less time. But you're not the only person to do this on the the thread, which is why I was pretty careful to explain that I wasn't directing my initial comments at anyone in particular.

 

As to what I'm contributing, well, I'm trying to keep this thread on-topic and civil. That's one of my jobs as a member of the Site Team. Beyond that, I felt others had offered appropriate advice and didn't feel the need to add anything.

  • Haha 1

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING. EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 

The idea that all politicians lie is music to the ears of the most egregious liars.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Contribution from :antone: and site colleagues?

 

Invaluable. And all for free. To a (usually) non judgemental space where anyone trying to negotiate the complexities of benefit entitlement (or any other issue CAG deals with) can ask advice from others who've been there/done that. With the added extra of professional expertise, also for free.

 

:thumb: Margaret.

Edited by **Margaret**
  • Haha 2
Link to post
Share on other sites

The problem is the actual Habitual Residency Test has been decided and until the decision is either revised following reconsideration or subsequent appeal the decision stands and regardless of how many claims the OP submits to JSA the decision from the initial claim will stand.

 

One of the likely problems for the HRT from what I understand, is that there is still aproperty held in Spain which is pending reposession do you have any other links to Spain?

What steps did you take prior to arriving in the UK to secure accommodation and employment? When you left for Spain originally what ties did you keep with the UK, did you ever visit relatives etc?

  • Haha 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

The problem is the actual Habitual Residency Test has been decided and until the decision is either revised following reconsideration or subsequent appeal the decision stands and regardless of how many claims the OP submits to JSA the decision from the initial claim will stand.

 

Two days after i arrived back i telephoned the benefits office and they rang back saying it would be six months before i was considered resident.I found reference online to form HRT2 04/08 and asked them to send me one.On completion i immediately received JSA and got HB.

Link to post
Share on other sites

mekongmarcus your decision was based on the form HRT2 that you completed on making your application.

The benefits office don't make the decision themselves as all paperwork is sent off to a specialist team to consider all paperwork.

Your case I believe was also different in as much as you had maintained links with the UK whilst you were abroad and on your returm you severed all financial links etc from Singapore and most importanatly you had arranged accommodation for your return to the UK and as such the UK was considered your sole interest (registered with dentist, GP etc).

The situation for the OP is sligtly different as they still hold property in spain and had made no prior arrangements to secure accommodation prior to arriving.

As the decision has been made each susbesquent claim made will have no bearing as the original decision will stand regardless how many times they contact to reapply.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...