Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Please see my comments on your post in red
    • Thanks for your reply, I have another 3 weeks before the notice ends. I'm also concerned because the property has detoriated since I've been here due to mould, damp and rusting (which I've never seen in a property before) rusty hinges and other damage to the front door caused by damp and mould, I'm concerned they could try and charge me for damages? As long as you've documented and reported this previously you'll have a right to challenge any costs. There was no inventory when I moved in, I also didn't have to pay a deposit. Do an inventory when you move out as proof of the property's condition as you leave it. I've also been told that if I leave before a possession order is given I would be deemed intentionally homeless, is this true? If you leave, yes. However, Your local council has a legal obligation to ensure you won't be left homeless as soon as you get the notice. As stated before, you don't have to leave when the notice expires if you haven't got somewhere else to go. Just keep paying your rent as normal. Your tenancy doesn't legally end until a possession warrant is executed against you or you leave and hand the keys back. My daughter doesn't live with me, I'd likely have medical priority as I have health issues and I'm on pip etc. Contact the council and make them aware then.      
    • extension? you mean enforcement. after 6yrs its very rare for a judge to allow enforcement. it wont have been sold on, just passed around the various differing trading names the claimant uses.    
    • You believe you have cast iron evidence. However, all they’d have to do to oppose a request for summary judgment is to say “we will be putting forward our own evidence and the evidence from both parties needs to be heard and assessed by a judge” : the bar for summary judgment is set quite high! You believe they don't have evidence but that on its own doesn't mean they wouldn't try! so, its a high risk strategy that leaves you on the hook for their costs if it doesn't work. Let the usual process play out.
    • Ok, I don't necessarily want to re-open my old thread but I've seen a number of such threads with regards to CCJ's and want to ask a fairly general consensus on the subject. My original CCJ is 7 years old now and has had 2/3 owners for the debt over the years since with varying level of contact.  Up to last summer they had attempted a charging order on a shared mortgage I'm named on which I defended that action and tried to negotiate with them to the point they withdrew the charging order application pending negotiations which we never came to an agreement over.  However, after a number of communication I heard nothing back since last Autumn barring an annual generic statement early this year despite multiple messages to them since at the time.  at a loss as to why the sudden loss of response from them. Then something came through from this site at random yesterday whilst out that I can't find now with regards to CCJ's to read over again.  Now here is the thing, I get how CCJ's don't expire as such, but I've been reading through threads and Google since this morning and a little confused.  CCJ's don't expire but can be effectively statute barred after 6 years (when in my case was just before I last heard of the creditor) if they are neither enforced in that time or they apply to the court within the 6 years of issue to extend the CCJ and that after 6 years they can't really without great difficulty or explanation apply for a CCJ extension after of the original CCJ?.  Is this actually correct as I've read various sources on Google and threads that suggest there is something to this?.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Is the bank taking your Benefits ?


MARTIN3030
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4086 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

We have requested on the 21st july by letter that Nationwide look at repaying our charges due to the financial hardship we are experiencing,they sent out inbcoming/outgoings form(even though we included that info by means our debt management plan from the CAB with the letter).We phoned Nationwide explaining that they already have the information but they wanted to know why and how long we have been experiencing hardship.

We provided the information and expected that,as they state in their letter,a full response by the 23rd of August.We sitll haven't received any response from Nationwide and was wondering if anyone from CAG could help draft a letter to get things moving again,any offers?

 

 

Ok something done for you.

Have a happy and prosperous 2013 by avoiiding Payday loans. If you are sent a private message directing you for advice or support with your issues to another website,this is your choice.Before you decide,consider the users here who have already offered help and support.

Advice offered by Martin3030 is not supported by any legal training or qualification.Members are advised to use the services of fully insured legal professionals when needed.

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...
  • Replies 1.2k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Hi, I have only just realised this great site and this helpful thread, I have skimmed through the best I can although there is a fair bit to take in. My situation is that I am on benefits and the only money that has entered my account in the last 4 months has been JSA yet I have been hit with so many charges which accounts for the majority of that money, I now understand how to stop the banks taking more but what I am not sure about is if I can claim the other charges back as afterall they have broken the law and taken my benefit payments regardless if it was last week or last year, right? I was previously unwell and these charges have caused me a lot of trouble with morgage payments and other outstanding bills, if I could claim my charges back for the last few months or even longer that would go someway to straightening up my finances though thankfully and coincidentally I have just landed a job with the DWP, thanks in advance for your help.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hello :-)

 

Just wanted to report on what happened at the bank when I took in the letter.

 

The lady I spoke to was very nice and helpful, she took my phone number to call me with a decision. No one phoned though.

 

The charge came out of my account on the Wednesday so I thought the letter hadn't worked.

 

Then on Friday I got the charges back!

 

Thank you so much for your help.

 

I received a letter stating that as this was my first charge, they would waive the charge but future charges will remain. That's fine with me, it won't happen again and....I got my money back without too much of a fight....excellent! :-)

 

Thank you again :-)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Well I have just called the DWP and they are going to call me back more than likely to change the destination of the payment, not holding my breath on any help recovering recent charges though, the guy did say whoever calls me will know much more than him.

 

Then I called Natwest and the guy I spoke to said that it is not against the law for them to take charges from my benefits, he seemed so sure of that, I said so I can't stop you taking charges even if I send a letter, he said no the charges will stand unfortunately, he said it may be different if you claim hardship, to which I said well my mortgage payment is almost what I receive from the DWP wach month, he then mentioned that there was a couple of betting transactions on my account and said that it's difficult to prove hardship with these showing on my statement, is he right, I had one £10 football bet at the beggining of the season, and transferred £10 to my poker account about 4 months ago for my girlfried who is working and she uses my poker account now and then though we don't live together, he then asked when I would be back in work and that he'll get somebody to call me to help me with my account so we can try to avoid any charges up until I have a regular income. I know I can still send the letter (right of appropriation) at the front of this forum but I guess all of those charges on my benefits could be lost? I do have the standard charges claim in waiting for the courts decision though.

Edited by Grantyy
Link to post
Share on other sites

Well I have just called the DWP and they are going to call me back more than likely to change the destination of the payment, not holding my breath on any help recovering recent charges though, the guy did say whoever calls me will know much more than him.

 

Then I called Natwest and the guy I spoke to said that it is not against the law for them to take charges from my benefits, he seemed so sure of that, I said so I can't stop you taking charges even if I send a letter, he said no the charges will stand unfortunately, he said it may be different if you claim hardship, to which I said well my mortgage payment is almost what I receive from the DWP wach month, he then mentioned that there was a couple of betting transactions on my account and said that it's difficult to prove hardship with these showing on my statement, is he right, I had one £10 football bet at the beggining of the season, and transferred £10 to my poker account about 4 months ago for my girlfried who is working and she uses my poker account now and then though we don't live together, he then asked when I would be back in work and that he'll get somebody to call me to help me with my account so we can try to avoid any charges up until I have a regular income. I know I can still send the letter (right of appropriation) at the front of this forum but I guess all of those charges on my benefits could be lost? I do have the standard charges claim in waiting for the courts decision though.

 

He is right in so much as an excuse not to accept a hardship claim! They will look carefully at ALL expenditure in the previous 3 months. It should be noted that there is absolutely nothing to force them to pay you back any charges under a hardship claim. They might say they follow rules but in fact it's purely 'voluntary' and with the current 'stay' in place not much you can do if they refuse. Financial institutions are not bothered about bad publicity as long as it does not get reported on national television. They have enough complaints about themselves that any half decent company would have removed all of its directors for allowing themselves to be exposed to the such.

Try to avoid giving too many details on your calls. Just a tip because banks are cunning in extracting details about you. A simple 'work' number if they want to contact you can lead to (if something falters) a call making you feel uneasy taking it at a place of employment.

 

Michael

When I was young I thought that money was the most important thing in life; now that I am old I know that it is. (Oscar Wilde)

--I like to be helpful wherever possible however I'm not qualified in this field. I do consider carefully anything important (normally from personal experience) however please understand that any actions taken are at your own risk--

Link to post
Share on other sites

I have currently no monies going into my Lloyds account other than £136ish Child Benefit.

I had cancelled all DDs & SOs already.

However, the bank keeps charging me £156 per month for a DD they say I can't cancel - it's of course for their very own credit card.

So for months now that bank charge is eating up the benefits.

Lloyds have taken the CC account off my online banking - it's not there anymore, presumably because it's in default. I have started reclaimng my bank charges also under the hardship rule. I have also asked them not to keep charging me in the future. Both requests have been rejected, they say I'm not in hardship and they further say I agreed to the charges when I first signed up for the account. Standard initial response.

I'm just about to send off the second letter proving hardship (not least through their very own credit card & account).

But my question in this forum is if the right of appropriation applies to the Child Benefit and, if yes, can I claim back some of that benefit also in retrospect?

Many thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

I have currently no monies going into my Lloyds account other than £136ish Child Benefit.

I had cancelled all DDs & SOs already.

However, the bank keeps charging me £156 per month for a DD they say I can't cancel - it's of course for their very own credit card.

So for months now that bank charge is eating up the benefits.

Lloyds have taken the CC account off my online banking - it's not there anymore, presumably because it's in default. I have started reclaimng my bank charges also under the hardship rule. I have also asked them not to keep charging me in the future. Both requests have been rejected, they say I'm not in hardship and they further say I agreed to the charges when I first signed up for the account. Standard initial response.

I'm just about to send off the second letter proving hardship (not least through their very own credit card & account).

But my question in this forum is if the right of appropriation applies to the Child Benefit and, if yes, can I claim back some of that benefit also in retrospect?

Many thanks

 

My apologies for my shouting - THEY CANNOT JUST REFUSE TO CANCEL THEIR OWN DIRECT DEBIT! Okay here goes (and a thank you again to 'citizenb' for the info I got). Under the direct debit guarantee they cannot refuse to remove their own and charge you for it in prference to others. In my personal case 'they' cancelled all but their own. Your defence to this is simply that you considered it wise to alleviate further charges by taking the action yourself (and that's a plus point LOL). I'm taking it that the £156 is the actual CC request rather that bank charges for not being able to take it? I'm also assuming when they cannot take it they are charging you fees for this?

 

Banking association link: BBA – British Bankers' Association - Direct Debit Guarantee

FOS Link: issue 27 - banking - direct debit guarantee

A very nice CAG link (here): http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/general-consumer-issues/119369-direct-debit-guarantee.html

...right that should now mean that if they attempted to extract funds (having refused to remove the D/D) then there's 99% chance of all the charges AFAIK on that part being refunded.

 

I personally would have a word with the DWP regarding benefits. I doubt the bank will treat them (but you never know as they believe they can ride roughshod over everyone) as they did you. I think my previous posts should cover the rest.

 

Hope this has been of some help.

Michael

  • Haha 1

When I was young I thought that money was the most important thing in life; now that I am old I know that it is. (Oscar Wilde)

--I like to be helpful wherever possible however I'm not qualified in this field. I do consider carefully anything important (normally from personal experience) however please understand that any actions taken are at your own risk--

Link to post
Share on other sites

LOL, heinov.. I saw this and raced over to tell you exactly what InformedSearcher has told you.

 

HSBC cannot refuse to cancel the Direct Debit Guarantee in favour of themselves.

 

You must write to them advising that not only do you want it cancelled as per the Direct Debit Guarantee scheme they have signed up to, but any charges applied to your account in respect of the abuse of this facility are to be reimbursed immediately along with any interest they have applied to those charges.

 

If they do not comply with this request within 14 days (if posted) or 7 days if taken into the branch then you will be reporting them to both the Financial Ombudsman and the Financial Services Authority.

 

I would also suggest you make arrangements for your benefits to go into another account with another bank.

 

HTH

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

Uploading documents to CAG ** Instructions **

Looking for a draft letter? Use the CAG Library

Dealing with Customer Service Departments? - read the CAG Guide first

1: Making a PPI claim ? - Q & A's and spreadsheets for single premium policy - HERE

2: Take back control of your finances - Debt Diaries

3: Feel Bullied by Creditors or Debt Collectors? Read Here

4: Staying Calm About Debt  Read Here

5: Forum rules - These have been updated - Please Read

BCOBS

1: How can BCOBS protect you from your Banks unfair treatment

2: Does your Bank play fair - You can force your Bank to play Fair with you

3: Banking Conduct of Business Regulations - The Hidden Rules

4: BCOBS and Unfair Treatment - Common Examples of Banks Behaving Badly

5: Fair Treatment for Credit Card Holders and Borrowers - COBS

Advice & opinions given by citizenb are personal, are not endorsed by Consumer Action Group or Bank Action Group, and are offered informally, without prejudice & without liability. Your decisions and actions are your own, and should you be in any doubt, you are advised to seek the opinion of a qualified professional.

PLEASE DO NOT ASK ME TO GIVE ADVICE BY PM - IF YOU PROVIDE A LINK TO YOUR THREAD THEN I WILL BE HAPPY TO OFFER ADVICE THERE:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for that - will look it up.

Just to clarify: the £156 is for unplanned overdraft, once they try to take the payment, and after they return it it's actually another £40 for Returned DD.

This is charges only - not CC interest and capital...

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just about a new account set up - like a basic (cash) account.

LloydsTSB and the Co-Op open accounts on the phone with a zero opening balance and it takes normally 5 - 10 minutes. The Co-Op will ask for your NI number too.

They will however in all probability disclose information to CRA's and that will mean that any beady eyed bank you've fallen out with will know where you've moved to if they check (and it'll show in the searches). I believe that the only reason even basic accounts are on CRA's is both to avoid fraud and ahem if you attempt to become overdrawn with them.

Michael

When I was young I thought that money was the most important thing in life; now that I am old I know that it is. (Oscar Wilde)

--I like to be helpful wherever possible however I'm not qualified in this field. I do consider carefully anything important (normally from personal experience) however please understand that any actions taken are at your own risk--

Link to post
Share on other sites

hmmmmmm i sent tis to halifax. They chargedme a month ago for there mistake They just keep repeating the impending high court case at me and refuse to accept they left me with nothing.I also spoke to the DWP who told me "theres nothing we can do" :mad:

 

....and I'm afraid that's the voluntary things as banks use and see them (to their advantage). The DWP could well have suggested something but as I've dealt with them, they have no interest and their interest does not surprise me.

However a visit to a branch and a face to face talk might be a good idea. If you find things not going your way and they will not budge then you can always resort to the 'raised voice' method when stating they have stolen your benefits. If there's one thing a bank dislikes it's that of others hearing how they treat people. You could of course refuse to leave the bank unless they refund your money as a last resort.

It's quite ironic that taxpayers money supported the bank only to find the same taxpayers money is charged in fees. Again it comes down to what's fair and what's not fair and who decides and in this case it's the bank themselves!

I can still remember a few years ago when a bank upset someone. They took legal action and the court was in their favour. As the respective bank did not conform the baliffs arrived and began removing items - they conformed within a few minutes after that. Wish I knew where the story was now.

Michael

(having flashbacks of his DWP under caution interview)

When I was young I thought that money was the most important thing in life; now that I am old I know that it is. (Oscar Wilde)

--I like to be helpful wherever possible however I'm not qualified in this field. I do consider carefully anything important (normally from personal experience) however please understand that any actions taken are at your own risk--

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi, I have only just realised this great site and this helpful thread, I have skimmed through the best I can although there is a fair bit to take in. My situation is that I am on benefits and the only money that has entered my account in the last 4 months has been JSA yet I have been hit with so many charges which accounts for the majority of that money, I now understand how to stop the banks taking more but what I am not sure about is if I can claim the other charges back as afterall they have broken the law and taken my benefit payments regardless if it was last week or last year, right? I was previously unwell and these charges have caused me a lot of trouble with morgage payments and other outstanding bills, if I could claim my charges back for the last few months or even longer that would go someway to straightening up my finances though thankfully and coincidentally I have just landed a job with the DWP, thanks in advance for your help.

 

 

Welcome to the site Grant.

You are certainly free to go for all charges-since you have now started work it may be difficult to file a complaint with the FOS for hardship.

You need to file a claim in Court ASAP.

If you already know the total charges and dates then you would just need to either send a prelim letter followed by a letter before action,or else just send a 28 day letter before action.

At least you will have a claim in the system while time allows.

If you have not got all your statements or figures with dates,then you will have to send a SAR.

 

Pity you didnt do this earlier as you would have been ok for fee remission.

Have a happy and prosperous 2013 by avoiiding Payday loans. If you are sent a private message directing you for advice or support with your issues to another website,this is your choice.Before you decide,consider the users here who have already offered help and support.

Advice offered by Martin3030 is not supported by any legal training or qualification.Members are advised to use the services of fully insured legal professionals when needed.

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hello :-)

 

Just wanted to report on what happened at the bank when I took in the letter.

 

The lady I spoke to was very nice and helpful, she took my phone number to call me with a decision. No one phoned though.

 

The charge came out of my account on the Wednesday so I thought the letter hadn't worked.

 

Then on Friday I got the charges back!

 

Thank you so much for your help.

 

I received a letter stating that as this was my first charge, they would waive the charge but future charges will remain. That's fine with me, it won't happen again and....I got my money back without too much of a fight....excellent! :-)

 

Thank you again :-)

 

Good to see that Kay.

Have a happy and prosperous 2013 by avoiiding Payday loans. If you are sent a private message directing you for advice or support with your issues to another website,this is your choice.Before you decide,consider the users here who have already offered help and support.

Advice offered by Martin3030 is not supported by any legal training or qualification.Members are advised to use the services of fully insured legal professionals when needed.

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

hi this happens to me all the time i am currently trying to claim back all chrges made to my account although its proving tough they are trying to put me in the long que waitng like evrybody else moneys tight any suggestions?

 

Well that'll be the big queue where nothing is guaranteed. If it's just recent they might relent and do a refund. A few more details might be helpful. There's of course the financial hardship route but alas not 100% guaranteed.

 

Michael

When I was young I thought that money was the most important thing in life; now that I am old I know that it is. (Oscar Wilde)

--I like to be helpful wherever possible however I'm not qualified in this field. I do consider carefully anything important (normally from personal experience) however please understand that any actions taken are at your own risk--

Link to post
Share on other sites

Heinov,

 

They absolutely cannot take your child benefit. Before any bank can get an offset (which they will say is in your t&cs) they have to prove it is "disposable income". My credit card company (same as bank) has tried to take money from my account three times this year. I have always called the Financial Ombudsman Service immediately and got it back on the same day.

 

The first time they actually took their payment on the same day as the child allowance came in and the FOS took an extremely dim view of this. :) (Appalled!!!)

 

Before they can offset against money in your account they must allow you to pay the mortgage or rent, council tax, tv licence and utility bills, and probably other things too - can't remember at the moment. Obviously though you must be allowed to eat!

 

You are under no obligation to pay for these outgoings by direct debit or standing order although they will argue that unless they can see these outgoings (council tax, gas, electricity, etc.) they can't know that you are making these payments. My argument (backed by FOS) is that I cannot have DDs or SOs because if the money isn't in the account they will bounce/refuse and charge me for doing so.

 

I really would call FOS. I know people say they aren't brilliant on a number of issues but I have called them five times this year - three times for the bank and twice for Cap One - and they have acted instantly.

 

DD

Link to post
Share on other sites

'Desperate Daniella' - You are dare I say it, lucky.

 

No, the banks do not need to see D/D's and S/O's going out but they will probably want to do an 'income and expenditure' both to see and update their records. I know Cap One and the bank (HSBC) did with me. In fact Capital One will allow a grace period of interest and will put a 'cunning' remark within the CRA files which anyone (financial) will comprehend as 'problem'. The simple argument is that as you are paying funds from your account these would be marked with their recipients accordingly. I can recall the funny incident with being questioned by an HSBC man in India who appeared not to know what rent, council tax and water rates were!

 

I would suggest in all such cases it's better to open a basic bank account where you cannot have an overdraft and it's up to you to ensure you have funds for whatever you pay out. I'm a little confused though as to why the bank is taking funds if you say you do not have any D/D's or S/O's marked to go out and therefore the account is maybe in credit?

 

Michael

When I was young I thought that money was the most important thing in life; now that I am old I know that it is. (Oscar Wilde)

--I like to be helpful wherever possible however I'm not qualified in this field. I do consider carefully anything important (normally from personal experience) however please understand that any actions taken are at your own risk--

Link to post
Share on other sites

I helped a neigbour to get a crisis loan following his bank taking most of his jobseekers allowance-DWP gave him a payment for gas electricity and food-I told him to send a copy of the crisis loan paperwork with his complaint to the FOS.

This came AFTER he had informed the bank of his financial position-clearly he has proof now that they ignored his plight.

Will keep this case updated as to the result.

Have a happy and prosperous 2013 by avoiiding Payday loans. If you are sent a private message directing you for advice or support with your issues to another website,this is your choice.Before you decide,consider the users here who have already offered help and support.

Advice offered by Martin3030 is not supported by any legal training or qualification.Members are advised to use the services of fully insured legal professionals when needed.

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

'Martin3030' - Yes I can believe that happening. To a bank it's considered that funds entering an account where there are payments due (and not agreed otherwise) are fair game. In my case I made it clear that the funds entering the account were for legitimate purposes as in goods and services which they knew about. They then never touched them again but alas due to my loan default advised me that the (joint) current account would be automatically closed. I had to smile as it's still active (less funds of course!).

 

Whilst I see the OFT as good people when needed they'll not contend with continious useage of them for the same thing. IMHO always best to tell the bank the position and with that knowledge it would be unacceptable for them to 'tamper' without good reason. The 'plus' point to this is that you have now put the emphasis in the banks court meaning they'll think twice about causing you genuine hardship - which they know they must not do.

 

I think there are many ways to resolve such issues. In my case I found 'fronting' the bank was wise in my set of particular citcumstances.

Michael

When I was young I thought that money was the most important thing in life; now that I am old I know that it is. (Oscar Wilde)

--I like to be helpful wherever possible however I'm not qualified in this field. I do consider carefully anything important (normally from personal experience) however please understand that any actions taken are at your own risk--

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Michael,

 

It is better to open a basic bank account, I agree, but as I have my company account with the same bank, I don't think they'd be too happy if I removed the personal account. It's the same card company as the bank and that's why they have tried to take the money as soon as anything gets into the personal account which it has to do to pay personal expenses. Obviously they know my income, but it's fee based, not a regular salary on a regular date, and consequently I can't have SOs or DDs because for the sake of literally one day I could end up incurring charges.

 

DD

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Michael,

 

It is better to open a basic bank account, I agree, but as I have my company account with the same bank, I don't think they'd be too happy if I removed the personal account. It's the same card company as the bank and that's why they have tried to take the money as soon as anything gets into the personal account which it has to do to pay personal expenses. Obviously they know my income, but it's fee based, not a regular salary on a regular date, and consequently I can't have SOs or DDs because for the sake of literally one day I could end up incurring charges.

 

DD

 

Nothing to stop you opening a basic account and have benefits paid into it though and always a good move as a fallback. You can open Co-Op and LloydsTSB accounts on the phone with a zero balance.

 

Michael

When I was young I thought that money was the most important thing in life; now that I am old I know that it is. (Oscar Wilde)

--I like to be helpful wherever possible however I'm not qualified in this field. I do consider carefully anything important (normally from personal experience) however please understand that any actions taken are at your own risk--

Link to post
Share on other sites

I helped a neigbour to get a crisis loan following his bank taking most of his jobseekers allowance-DWP gave him a payment for gas electricity and food-I told him to send a copy of the crisis loan paperwork with his complaint to the FOS.

This came AFTER he had informed the bank of his financial position-clearly he has proof now that they ignored his plight.

Will keep this case updated as to the result.

 

 

Martin.

 

How ar u managing to get ppl on benefits crisis loans when the bank has taken money for charges i dont know.

 

The whole of Norfolk, this is run by ONE DWP office, is being REFUSED crisis loans if the DWP even think it is due to bank charges or have the evidence. I can certainly say now ppl are being asked if they have had bank charges since being on benefits over here.

 

The DWP are refusing ALL crisis loans with or without evidence if they think bank charges telling us that under the law, quoting section 182 of the social securitys act thingy, that it is illegal for them to remove money for bank charges. They have wrote to all banks saying they are breaking the law and telling use verbally and in writing we are refused for either possibly bank charges or even defenate bank charges.

OFT debt collection guidance

 

Please remember the only stupid question is the one you dont ask so dont worry about asking the stupid questions.

 

Essex girl in pc world looking 4 curtains 4 her pc,the assistant says u dont need curtains 4 a computer!!Essex girl says,''HELLOOO!! i,ve got WINDOWS!!'.

Link to post
Share on other sites

GM quite simply because a Crisis loan is available to those whose health is at risk due to having no money.

My understanding is that the Social security act that you mention is not definitive-that is to say that it does not cover ALL benefits,and thiere is much confusion over this.

We have had some banks dismissing outright requests to give rights of appropriation citing the act,some have agreed whilst others have not.

 

The waiver agreement,coupled with the updated banking codes guidance in March 2008,are both in themselves adequate to be citing in requests to banks to leave benefit payments alone under a financial hardship request.

 

I have not heard of the initiative being taken by Norfolk.

 

I will contact them personally to see if I can find out how the banks have responded.

The info could prob be gained by a freedom of info request if they wont give it informally.

I would be very interested to know how the banks are responding.

Have a happy and prosperous 2013 by avoiiding Payday loans. If you are sent a private message directing you for advice or support with your issues to another website,this is your choice.Before you decide,consider the users here who have already offered help and support.

Advice offered by Martin3030 is not supported by any legal training or qualification.Members are advised to use the services of fully insured legal professionals when needed.

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...